Re: <ctype.h> toLower()
From: ellie fant (pcrcutitout1000011_at_uko2.co.uk)
Date: 11/28/03
- Next message: Karl Heinz Buchegger: "Re: <ctype.h> toLower()"
- Previous message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: <ctype.h> toLower()"
- In reply to: Richard Heathfield: "Re: <ctype.h> toLower()"
- Next in thread: Irrwahn Grausewitz: "Re: <ctype.h> toLower()"
- Reply: Irrwahn Grausewitz: "Re: <ctype.h> toLower()"
- Reply: Richard Heathfield: "Re: <ctype.h> toLower()"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 08:29:32 -0000
"Richard Heathfield" <invalid@address.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
news:3fc6e53e@news2.power.net.uk...
> ellie fant wrote:
>
> > The reason you gave (" the code is non-portable") is not a good reason
for
> > stating the code was incorrect or flawed. Code is only incorrect if it
not
> > suitable for the purpose it was intended or if it is does not comply
with
> > the languages standards.
>
> Your code was not a suitable general solution for the problem of
converting
> of characters to lower case, because it did not comply with the language
> standard but instead relied on a trick that doesn't work on all platforms.
Are you saying my code did not comply to the standards now?
My code wasn't intended to be a general solution for converting characters
to lowercase.
And my code contained no tricks it simply OR'ed a lowercase ASCII character
with 32 to get the uppercase equivelent.
>
> And, in case you've forgotten, the original question was to do with
> tolower(): "How do I apply [tolower()] to an array of characters?"
The topic of this discussion is <ctype.h> tolower() . The original question
had been answered numerous times and my post was not trying to re-answer the
original question my post was expanding the discussion. If your idea of a
discussion is simply asking a question or answering one then you are
obviously of very low intelligence.
>
> So that was the intended purpose, and that was the purpose your code
utterly
> failed to achieve. And therefore your code was incorrect.
<spits out coffeee and splutters>
lol
...thanks for telling me the intent of my post you obviously know better
than me.
lol
You are getting desperate now you idiot.
- Next message: Karl Heinz Buchegger: "Re: <ctype.h> toLower()"
- Previous message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: <ctype.h> toLower()"
- In reply to: Richard Heathfield: "Re: <ctype.h> toLower()"
- Next in thread: Irrwahn Grausewitz: "Re: <ctype.h> toLower()"
- Reply: Irrwahn Grausewitz: "Re: <ctype.h> toLower()"
- Reply: Richard Heathfield: "Re: <ctype.h> toLower()"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|