Re: Rudimentary anomaly
From: nog (sodthis.nospam_at_gmx.net)
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:08:30 -0000
In article <9wP%b.10844$yZ1.7731
> "nog" <email@example.com> wrote in message
> > > > No, I already had the output formatted in that way - I've
> > > > since noticed that, curiously, other numbers are being
> > > > treated oddly - even though they are doubles they are being
> > > > output as if they are integers.
> > >
> > > Could your real number have a value that is very close
> > > to an integral value?
> > No, the one I cited is 100.56 and the others are various.
> I think if we're to figure this out, we'll need to seem some
> real code. (try to make as small a program as possible that
> still reproduces the problem).
It's no longer happening.(!) If I should find out what was
the cause, I'll post a follow-up.