Re: Rudimentary anomaly

From: nog (sodthis.nospam_at_gmx.net)
Date: 02/28/04


Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:08:30 -0000

In article <9wP%b.10844$yZ1.7731
@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>, mkwahler@mkwahler.net
says...
>
> "nog" <sodthis.nospam@gmx.net> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1aa9d355732374fc989bd9@News.individual.DE...
>
> > > > No, I already had the output formatted in that way - I've
> > > > since noticed that, curiously, other numbers are being
> > > > treated oddly - even though they are doubles they are being
> > > > output as if they are integers.
> > >
> > > Could your real number have a value that is very close
> > > to an integral value?
> >
> > No, the one I cited is 100.56 and the others are various.
>
> I think if we're to figure this out, we'll need to seem some
> real code. (try to make as small a program as possible that
> still reproduces the problem).

It's no longer happening.(!) If I should find out what was
the cause, I'll post a follow-up.
Thanks.