Logic in equality and assignment

From: Peter Johnsson (pej_at_comhem.se)
Date: 03/31/04 

Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:12:09 GMT

Maybe this is considered a "strange" question but anyway...

Wouldn't it be more logic to do "!==" instead of "!=" for "not equal to"
considering the implication of assignment in the second case?, the same goes
for the other operators.. Or am I missing something here ?

Regards

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Logic in equality and assignment
    ... | Maybe this is considered a "strange" question but anyway... ... | considering the implication of assignment in the second case?, ... the C++ standard does offer some alternative operator ...
    (alt.comp.lang.learn.c-cpp)
  • Re: enrgie
    ... This assignment will result in a loss of precision, ... implicit none,which I recommend, the compiler would probably have given ... it is a bit "strange" to assign it a value like 61.39. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Newbie logic questions
    ... it seems very strange ... If you water my plants while I'm gone, ... you to dinner when I get back. ... there are much stronger notions of implication than the truth ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: enrgie
    ... This assignment will result in a loss of precision, ... implicit none,which I recommend, the compiler would probably have given ... it is a bit "strange" to assign it a value like 61.39. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: House of M #7, loved it... (Spoilers, of course!) --
    ... :> Another important point of the change was the implication that Strange ... :> had retrieved the items from his sanctum, which meant reaching back to ...
    (rec.arts.comics.marvel.universe)