Re: Newbie OOP question
From: David White (no_at_email.provided)
Date: 05/02/04
- Next message: Andreas Karlberger: "calculation time"
- Previous message: David White: "Re: Newbie OOP question"
- Maybe in reply to: David White: "Re: Newbie OOP question"
- Next in thread: Gary Labowitz: "Re: Newbie OOP question"
- Reply: Gary Labowitz: "Re: Newbie OOP question"
- Reply: Jerry Coffin: "Re: Newbie OOP question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 08:34:40 +1000
"Jerry Coffin" <jcoffin@taeus.com> wrote in message
news:b2e4b04.0404300644.559f70e7@posting.google.com...
> "David White" <no@email.provided> wrote in message
news:<U2okc.11208$KS1.307586@nasal.pacific.net.au>...
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > BTW, although MS and Borland are hardly anyone's idea of OOP authorities
(I
> > once came across a class BookArray, derived from both Book and Array, as
an
> > example of multiple inheritance in an MS tutorial),
>
> This is an example, not of incompetence, but of a mixin. I'm not
> particularly an advocate of mixins myself, but I don't think it's at
> all reasonable to dismiss them as simple incompetence.
I doubt this. My recollection is that the tutorial was a sort of beginners'
guide, and it gave a simple hierarchy diagram with no details to illustrate
multiple inheritance. As defined, an instance of BookArray would be both a
Book and an Array. It wouldn't be an array of books, as the name implies.
DW
- Next message: Andreas Karlberger: "calculation time"
- Previous message: David White: "Re: Newbie OOP question"
- Maybe in reply to: David White: "Re: Newbie OOP question"
- Next in thread: Gary Labowitz: "Re: Newbie OOP question"
- Reply: Gary Labowitz: "Re: Newbie OOP question"
- Reply: Jerry Coffin: "Re: Newbie OOP question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|