Re: C++ books

From: Patrick de Ridder (wantnospam_at_all.here)
Date: 05/16/04 

Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 17:26:25 +0200

"Francis Glassborow" <francis@robinton.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:PDfsugH370pAFwT8@robinton.demon.co.uk...
> I do not think that paradigm in either its classic meaning or in the
> sense in which it is currently used in the software industry means
> anything like the distorted view you seem to have. BTW C++ is not and
> never has been a superset of C. And I cannot imagine exactly how you
> think C# reestablishes any sort of theoretical consistency. It is a
> newer language so its inconsistencies are less well documented.
>
> --
> Francis Glassborow ACCU
> Author of 'You Can Do It!' see http://www.spellen.org/youcandoit
> For project ideas and contributions:
http://www.spellen.org/youcandoit/projects

May I quote Stroustrup? "Except for minor details, C++ is a superset of the
C programming language." It's ok to be subjective, but not when you respond
qualitate qua as Mr. ACCU.

Patrick