Re: C++ books
From: Patrick de Ridder (wantnospam_at_all.here)
Date: 05/17/04
- Next message: jeffc: "Re: Pass by ref vs. value"
- Previous message: jeffc: "Re: Function prototype vs implementation mismatch in C++"
- In reply to: Ben Measures: "Re: C++ books"
- Next in thread: Frank Looper: "Re: C++ books"
- Reply: Frank Looper: "Re: C++ books"
- Reply: Francis Glassborow: "Re: C++ books"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 23:30:32 +0200
The meaning of the words "theory", "model" and "paradigm" in the context of
any theoretical domain is arbitrary, except when you say "theory", "model"
and "paradigm" , as defined by so and so. Bjarne Stroustrup (The Creator of
C++) said, "Except for minor details, C++ is a superset of the C programming
language". Now if you can prove to me that he didn't say so, you will have
made a point. However that would be a bit difficult, because I would fax you
the page on which he said it.
I have moved on to C# and no longer want my C++ books because I feel that C#
is a much more mature and better supported language reference-wise. So I
offered most of my C++ books to anyone interested in the neighbourhood. In
spite of these good intentions, I seem to have pressed a hot button.
Bye,
Patrick.
- Next message: jeffc: "Re: Pass by ref vs. value"
- Previous message: jeffc: "Re: Function prototype vs implementation mismatch in C++"
- In reply to: Ben Measures: "Re: C++ books"
- Next in thread: Frank Looper: "Re: C++ books"
- Reply: Frank Looper: "Re: C++ books"
- Reply: Francis Glassborow: "Re: C++ books"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|