Re: Pass by ref vs. value
From: Wolfie (bgbdwolf_at_gte.net)
Date: 05/18/04
- Next message: Francis Glassborow: "Re: C++ books"
- Previous message: Robert W Hand: "Re: problem with composite class and templates"
- In reply to: Francis Glassborow: "Re: Pass by ref vs. value"
- Next in thread: Francis Glassborow: "Re: Pass by ref vs. value"
- Reply: Francis Glassborow: "Re: Pass by ref vs. value"
- Reply: Greg Comeau: "Re: Pass by ref vs. value"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 21:07:29 GMT
Francis Glassborow wrote:
> But unlike C, the novice does not have to learn all those tricky bits
> of C++. String handling is the classic example but there are many
> others.
No, but they've got to learn a bunch of other stuff instead -- objects,
etc.
C's a very small language; it's not at all difficult to learn the
*language*
itself. Learning what to *do* with the language and learning the common
pitfalls -- in short, mastering the language -- can take quite a while
longer
and is orders of magnitude more difficult.
- Next message: Francis Glassborow: "Re: C++ books"
- Previous message: Robert W Hand: "Re: problem with composite class and templates"
- In reply to: Francis Glassborow: "Re: Pass by ref vs. value"
- Next in thread: Francis Glassborow: "Re: Pass by ref vs. value"
- Reply: Francis Glassborow: "Re: Pass by ref vs. value"
- Reply: Greg Comeau: "Re: Pass by ref vs. value"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|