Re: Linked List Issue
From: Francis Glassborow (francis_at_robinton.demon.co.uk)
Date: 05/21/04
- Next message: Francis Glassborow: "Re: Book on C++"
- Previous message: Sumit Rajan: "Re: Book on C++"
- In reply to: Craig Bumpstead: "Re: Linked List Issue"
- Next in thread: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Coding guidelines, was re: Linked List Issue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:17:50 +0100
In message <40ad4bd8$1@post.usenet.com>, Craig Bumpstead
<cbumpste@yahoo.com.au> writes
>**** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
>
>Arthur & Leor,
>
>Thank you for you help.
>
>A question about notation. Which should I use? Hungarian or CamelCase?
>or nothing at all?
I would prefer nothing at all but that is a personal choice. However
Hungarian Notation is certainly inappropriate for C++ and other
languages with strong support for user defined types. It only really has
any place in untyped languages or weakly typed ones without adequate
tools.
>
>I used the Hungarian because with a glance I could tell what the type
>was without refering back to previous code.
>
>What are other people using as naming conventions??
-- Francis Glassborow ACCU Author of 'You Can Do It!' see http://www.spellen.org/youcandoit For project ideas and contributions: http://www.spellen.org/youcandoit/projects
- Next message: Francis Glassborow: "Re: Book on C++"
- Previous message: Sumit Rajan: "Re: Book on C++"
- In reply to: Craig Bumpstead: "Re: Linked List Issue"
- Next in thread: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Coding guidelines, was re: Linked List Issue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|