Re: precedence
From: Karl Heinz Buchegger (kbuchegg_at_gascad.at)
Date: 09/15/04
- Next message: Karl Heinz Buchegger: "Re: precedence"
- Previous message: bla abla: "Re: dont understand looping problem"
- In reply to: Christian McGuire: "Re: precedence"
- Next in thread: B. v Ingen Schenau: "Re: precedence"
- Reply: B. v Ingen Schenau: "Re: precedence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:57:34 +0200
Christian McGuire wrote:
>
> >
> > Ooops. You cought me here, I took your word for it but after rethinking
> > I looked it up and [ has same precedence as .
> > So the whole thing simply groups left to right
>
> I just looked it up on MSDN and it shows them as being the same, but the dox
> that came with VC++ which, at least how I interperet it, shows as the
> indexing operator higher than the dot. Each operator occupies it's own line
> in a top down list. What does all that mean to you?
That the Microsoft docu isn't trustworthy (does that wonder anybody?) (I used
the only MSDN version too)
I only have the C++ standard available, and I know that C++ took this part
from C, so the C++ standard doesn't contain anything about that but 'refers'
to the corresponding section in the C standard. Could anybody be so kind
to look it up?
-- Karl Heinz Buchegger kbuchegg@gascad.at
- Next message: Karl Heinz Buchegger: "Re: precedence"
- Previous message: bla abla: "Re: dont understand looping problem"
- In reply to: Christian McGuire: "Re: precedence"
- Next in thread: B. v Ingen Schenau: "Re: precedence"
- Reply: B. v Ingen Schenau: "Re: precedence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|