Re: A problem about "vector" for c++ beginner
From: Larky Mi (LarkyMi_at_discussions.squaresoft.com)
Date: 10/22/04
- Next message: È«±æµ¿: "Re: Static nested class"
- Previous message: Jack Klein: "Re: A loop with C struct"
- In reply to: Chris \( Val \): "Re: A problem about "vector" for c++ beginner"
- Next in thread: Jerry Coffin: "Re: A problem about "vector" for c++ beginner"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:03:58 +0800
sorry , my used "news.yaako.com" is bad for this group.
I didn't receive other messages until today. And today I change the
"freenews.netfront.net" which is good for receiving this group,but can't
send
messages.From now on I must use both servers for this group.-_-
Thank you for everyone.
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:34:17 +1000, in article <<Re: A problem about
"vector" for c++ beginner>>, "Chris \( Val \)" <chrisval@bigpond.com.au>
wrote:
-- > >"Tabrez Iqbal" <iqbaltabrez@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:4e1c1048.0410130902.3638b1c5@posting.google.com... >| "Chris \( Val \)" <chrisval@bigpond.com.au> wrote in message >news:<2t4chmF1qkrmuU1@uni-berlin.de>... >| [snip] >| > std::vector<int>::size_type ix( 0 ); >| > for( ix; ix < ivec.size(); ++ix ) >| > // ... >| [snip] >| >| why put lone ix there? why not >| 'for( ; ix < ivec.size(); ++ix)' ? readability?? > >Yes, imo I think it offers better readability.
- Next message: È«±æµ¿: "Re: Static nested class"
- Previous message: Jack Klein: "Re: A loop with C struct"
- In reply to: Chris \( Val \): "Re: A problem about "vector" for c++ beginner"
- Next in thread: Jerry Coffin: "Re: A problem about "vector" for c++ beginner"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|