s: AT&T C++ string class std::string compatible
From: Mai Kee (maik_NOSPAM_reiss_at_yahoo.de)
Date: 10/30/04
- Previous message: Jerry Coffin: "Re: help"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 16:54:23 +0200
Hi friends,
I am on the lookout for a string class. Since I use sometimes the pretty
old BC++ 3.1 (not ansi c++, but AT&T C++), I would like to have somewhat
that can be linked and/or compiled with that old compiler.
Even, because I write most of my programs with eVC4, Coldfire GCC and
BC++ 5 (not BCB5!) it should be less or more compatible to the methods
of the std::string. So I could reuse code between different projects.
Of course I did some google'ing and found some stuff. But my next idea
was to hear some "live response" from this board.
Some answers like "I use XYZ with BC++3.1 because ... " and "Do not use
ABC, its not worth the time installing it, because ..." would be welcome
to me.
I am short on money and I write my stuff mostly for free use, so some
"least cost" or some types of free licence would be very welcome ;-)
- 1st I tried out the built in "class String" of BC, it is not much more
than a helper class for containers.
- 2nd I tried the "class str" of david nugent (3:632/348@fidonet). Seems
to work fine, but nearly no methods are equal to std::string.
- 3rd I took a look on "String++ Version 3.1" from Carl Moreland
(compuserve:72137,2657). Same result.
- 4th I tried on a very sdt::string - like class from a guy calling
himself "robertnz". But this baby needs some love first before willingly
to compile under BC31.
Waht would you suggest me to use?
-- Mai Kee
- Previous message: Jerry Coffin: "Re: help"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|