Re: This I simply can't swallow
From: Alwyn (alwyn_at_blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: 02/17/05
- Previous message: niklasb_at_microsoft.com: "Re: This I simply can't swallow"
- In reply to: Francis Glassborow: "Re: This I simply can't swallow"
- Next in thread: Gary Labowitz: "Re: This I simply can't swallow"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:32:55 +0000
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:43:19 +0000, Francis Glassborow wrote:
> In article <pan.2005.02.17.16.23.33.969450@blueyonder.co.uk>, Alwyn
> <alwyn@blueyonder.co.uk> writes
>>A concrete type is a type the representation of whose values is visible to
>>the user. C nuilt-in types and most user-defined types are generally
>>regarded in this light.
>
> And there-in lies a common misconception. In C and C++ most of the
> fundamental types are abstract in the sense that neither languages
> specifies how the values shall be represented. About the only exception
> are the unsigned types which have to be a binary representation of the
> values (note that the signed types allow several distinct
> representations even though the behaviour is specified)
I would agree that efforts towards abstraction has been made in the
standards, but it is also quite easy to determine properties of the
representation of types on any implementation by means provided by the C
or C++ languages; very often you do need this information in order to
write programs that will work on multiple platforms.
Alwyn
- Previous message: niklasb_at_microsoft.com: "Re: This I simply can't swallow"
- In reply to: Francis Glassborow: "Re: This I simply can't swallow"
- Next in thread: Gary Labowitz: "Re: This I simply can't swallow"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|