Re: Why Use anything BUT C?
From: Alan Connor (zzzzzz_at_xxx.yyy)
Date: 10/08/03
- Next message: Alan Connor: "Re: Why Use anything BUT C?"
- Previous message: Glen Herrmannsfeldt: "Re: sign magnitude, ones complement, two's complement"
- In reply to: SKH: "Re: Why Use anything BUT C?"
- Next in thread: Todd Stephens: "Re: Why Use anything BUT C?"
- Reply: Todd Stephens: "Re: Why Use anything BUT C?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:39:19 GMT
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 22:37:28 GMT, SKH <skh@yoyodyne.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:35:00 +0000, Todd Stephens wrote:
>
>> Perl is just like shell on steroids anyway.
>
> And a cryptic one, at that. I can't wait for it to fade a way, replaced
> by more sensible tools.
>
>
Or at least offer itself as a complete *substitute* for the shell.
-- Later, Alan C You can find my email address at the website: contact.html take control of your mailbox ----- elrav1 ----- http://tinyurl.com/l55a
- Next message: Alan Connor: "Re: Why Use anything BUT C?"
- Previous message: Glen Herrmannsfeldt: "Re: sign magnitude, ones complement, two's complement"
- In reply to: SKH: "Re: Why Use anything BUT C?"
- Next in thread: Todd Stephens: "Re: Why Use anything BUT C?"
- Reply: Todd Stephens: "Re: Why Use anything BUT C?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
