Re: why still use C?
From: A. Sinan Unur (asu1_at_c-o-r-n-e-l-l.edu)
Date: 10/13/03
- Next message: Andreas: "Re: why still use C?"
- Previous message: Serve La: "Re: why still use C?"
- In reply to: cody: "Re: why still use C?"
- Next in thread: Jerry Feldman: "Re: why still use C?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 12 Oct 2003 22:49:34 GMT
"cody" <dont.spam.me.deutronium@gmx.de> wrote in news:clcm-20031008-0005
@plethora.net:
>
> is "const float PI=3.14" possible in plain C?
>
You just confirmed Jack Klein's assesment of your knowledge of C.
-- A. Sinan Unur asu1@c-o-r-n-e-l-l.edu Remove dashes for address Spam bait: mailto:uce@ftc.gov -- comp.lang.c.moderated - moderation address: clcm@plethora.net
- Next message: Andreas: "Re: why still use C?"
- Previous message: Serve La: "Re: why still use C?"
- In reply to: cody: "Re: why still use C?"
- Next in thread: Jerry Feldman: "Re: why still use C?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
