Re: why still use C?
From: Jeremy Yallop (jeremy_at_jdyallop.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 10/22/03
- Next message: David White: "Re: Troll alert: C or C++ first?"
- Previous message: Default User: "Re: OT Newsfeed test"
- In reply to: Default User: "Re: why still use C?"
- Next in thread: Default User: "Re: why still use C?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 21 Oct 2003 22:34:48 GMT
Default User wrote:
> "E. Robert Tisdale" wrote:
>
>> My GNU C compiler easily detects the missing declaration for malloc
>> with or without the cast.
>
> There's no requirement for an implementation to do the above.
There is such a requirement in C99, where calling an undeclared
function is an error (a syntax error, if footnotes are to be
believed).
Jeremy.
- Next message: David White: "Re: Troll alert: C or C++ first?"
- Previous message: Default User: "Re: OT Newsfeed test"
- In reply to: Default User: "Re: why still use C?"
- Next in thread: Default User: "Re: why still use C?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
