comp.lang.c
By Author

5384 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 09/29/03
Ending: 10/31/03

• D r . P r o z a c
  • Identify letter combinations where order is not important? (10/19/03)
• ={ Advocated }=
  • Looping this (10/25/03)
• A Causal
  • extract character strings from displayed web page. (10/15/03)
• A. Sinan Unur
  • Re: why still use C? (10/13/03)
• Aaron Hirshberg
  • Re: Fundamental Reason for High Achievements of Jews (10/10/03)
• Abby
  • Concatenate bits, then convert to HEX (10/29/03)
• Abhishek
  • Functioning In C (10/06/03)
  • Memory Managemant in C (10/01/03)
• Adam Ruth
  • Re: Named parameters (10/31/03)
  • Re: Named parameters (10/31/03)
  • Re: Named parameters (10/31/03)
  • Re: Named parameters (10/30/03)
  • Re: Named parameters (10/30/03)
  • Named parameters (10/30/03)
• Aggro
  • Re: integer to characters (10/22/03)
  • Re: Do your worst (10/12/03)
• Al Bowers
  • Re: A C-Program Question (10/31/03)
  • Re: work with dates (10/31/03)
  • Re: Function pointer Advantage (10/30/03)
  • Re: Dynamic arrays (10/29/03)
  • Re: is there an alternative to strstr (10/28/03)
  • Re: wait until \n appears in string (10/25/03)
  • Re: segfault on strtok (10/24/03)
  • Re: segfault on strtok (10/24/03)
  • Re: segfault on strtok (10/24/03)
  • Re: malloc problem (10/15/03)
  • Re: Char [] (10/14/03)
  • Re: about fwrite( ) (10/14/03)
  • Re: coding conventions: pointers, structures, and unions (10/13/03)
  • Re: variable length arrays (10/12/03)
  • Re: Formatting numbers (10/07/03)
  • Re: malloc (10/06/03)
  • Re: help request: clahe.c Graphics Gems (10/06/03)
  • Re: problems turning int into float (simple problem) (10/06/03)
  • Re: Newbie question on time() (10/04/03)
  • Re: Newbie question on time() (10/04/03)
  • Re: Linked list with void * (10/03/03)
  • Re: Linked list with void * (10/02/03)
  • Re: !!! linked list problem !!!! (10/01/03)
• Al Grant
  • Re: Line input and implementation-defined behaviour (10/02/03)
  • Re: Line input and implementation-defined behaviour (10/01/03)
  • Re: Line input and implementation-defined behaviour (10/01/03)
• Alan
  • [C] how to search a string ? (10/23/03)
  • [C] how to search a string ? (10/23/03)
  • Re: integer to characters (10/22/03)
  • Re: integer to characters (10/22/03)
  • how to convert double to short ? (10/18/03)
• Alan Balmer
  • Re: Interview question !!! (10/31/03)
  • Re: Interview question !!! (10/31/03)
  • Re: Interview question !!! (10/31/03)
  • Re: Barbecued Tri-Tip is better than C (10/27/03)
  • Re: crypt equivalent for Win32 platform? (10/21/03)
  • Re: Troll Alert: An Authors View on C (10/20/03)
  • Re: how to convert double to short ? (10/20/03)
  • Re: malloc/free weird behaviour (Win32 / MsVC7) (10/18/03)
  • Re: coding conventions: pointers, structures, and unions (10/16/03)
  • Re: [OT]Re: How can I open a file, skip first 2 lines and get the 50th character? (10/13/03)
  • Re: [OT]Re: How can I open a file, skip first 2 lines and get the 50th character? (10/13/03)
  • Re: [OT]Re: How can I open a file, skip first 2 lines and get the 50th character? (10/13/03)
  • Re: Science responsible for the genocides of the 20th century. (10/13/03)
  • Re: Fun and Mental; Raisin for High; Achievements of Shoes (10/13/03)
  • Re: scpp and expanding ifdef's (10/13/03)
  • Re: Will IM replace e-mail? (10/13/03)
  • Re: [OT] Re: 2 stupid array questions!! (10/10/03)
  • Re: Will IM replace e-mail? (10/10/03)
  • Re: restrict (10/03/03)
  • Re: restrict (10/03/03)
  • Re: [OT, spam] Backup your projects neatly (10/03/03)
  • Re: restrict (10/03/03)
  • Re: how to avoid loop overhead of for(), while() (10/02/03)
• Alan Connor
  • Re: Dynamic file names (10/24/03)
  • Re: Pascal is better than C (10/18/03)
  • Re: Will IM replace e-mail? (10/10/03)
  • Re: Why Use anything BUT C? (10/08/03)
  • Re: Why Use anything BUT C? (10/08/03)
  • Re: Why Use anything BUT C? (10/07/03)
  • Re: Racist Nonsense (10/07/03)
  • Re: Why Use anything BUT C? (10/07/03)
  • Re: Why Use anything BUT C? (10/07/03)
  • Re: Racist Nonsense (10/07/03)
  • Re: Why Use anything BUT C? (10/07/03)
  • Re: Why Use anything BUT C? (10/07/03)
  • Re: Why Use anything BUT C? (10/07/03)
  • Re: Why Use anything BUT C? (10/07/03)
  • Re: Why Use anything BUT C? (10/07/03)
  • Re: Why Use anything BUT C? (10/07/03)
  • Re: Why Use anything BUT C? (10/07/03)
  • Why Use anything BUT C? (10/07/03)
• Alan Coopersmith
  • Re: Porting from OpenBSD/Linux to Solaris : daemon(3) (10/28/03)
• Alan Kelon
  • Re: integer to characters (10/28/03)
• Aleksander Wodynski
  • Binding problem - address already in use (10/01/03)
• Alex
  • Re: Dynamic arrays (10/29/03)
  • Re: How to combine string (10/27/03)
  • Re: Order of function evaluation (10/25/03)
  • Re: free disk space (10/21/03)
  • Re: Char [] (10/14/03)
  • Re: using macros ... (10/14/03)
  • Re: Why is MAXINT doubly defined in system include files (10/13/03)
  • Re: release the memory help (10/07/03)
• Alex Vinokur
  • Re: warning - comparing a signed value to an unsinged value (10/20/03)
  • Re: How to find out the size of an array? (10/14/03)
  • Re: How to find out the size of an array? (10/13/03)
  • Re: How to find out the size of an array? (10/12/03)
  • Re: How to find out the size of an array? (10/12/03)
  • Re: How to find out the size of an array? (10/11/03)
  • Re: How to find out the size of an array? (10/10/03)
• Alexander Terekhov
  • Re: why still use C? (10/14/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/14/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/14/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/14/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/13/03)
• Alexei Cioina
  • Re: writing an interpreter for a simple language (10/29/03)
• Alf P. Steinbach
  • Re: C++ (10/09/03)
• Allan
  • Segmentation fault (10/07/03)
• Allan Bruce
  • Re: tech help required.. (10/17/03)
  • Re: seg fault and I don't know where (10/15/03)
  • Re: object oriented programming language (10/14/03)
  • Re: I can't find the error (10/13/03)
  • Re: How to handle pointers inside of a function ? (10/13/03)
  • Re: How to handle pointers inside of a function ? (10/13/03)
  • Re: Bit Manipulation (10/10/03)
  • Bit Manipulation (10/10/03)
  • Re: The strangest problem.... (10/09/03)
  • Re: code Critics please.. (10/03/03)
• Allin Cottrell
  • Re: malloc and free (10/31/03)
  • Re: segfault on strtok (10/26/03)
  • Re: array size (10/25/03)
  • Re: object oriented programming language (10/15/03)
  • Re: volatile? (10/14/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/14/03)
  • Re: anyone know about pthread_delay_np() function?? (10/14/03)
  • Re: question about memory shortage (10/14/03)
  • Re: Pointless [enough already] (10/11/03)
  • Re: dynamic declaration of struct array (10/11/03)
  • Re: Pointless [enough already] (10/10/03)
• amanayin
  • Re: recursion (10/31/03)
  • Re: should this work (10/21/03)
  • Re: should this work (10/20/03)
  • Re: should this work (10/20/03)
  • should this work (10/19/03)
• Amol
  • Re: Passing Arrays to Functions (10/12/03)
  • Exchanging large data between processes. (10/11/03)
• Andre Kelmanson
  • blocking i/o vs. non blocking i/o (performance) (10/10/03)
• Andreas
  • Re: #define problem (10/31/03)
  • #define problem (10/30/03)
  • Re: cast from sc_ufixed to int in systemC (10/13/03)
  • Re: cast from sc_ufixed to int in systemC (10/13/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/13/03)
  • cast from sc_ufixed to int in systemC (10/10/03)
• Andreas Kahari
  • Re: A C-Program Question (10/31/03)
  • Re: pass time(0) to srand() when generating random numbers. (10/31/03)
  • Re: list optimization (10/27/03)
  • Re: reset char array (10/24/03)
  • Re: segfault on strtok (10/24/03)
  • Re: segfault on strtok (10/24/03)
  • Re: reset char array (10/24/03)
  • Re: segfault on strtok (10/24/03)
  • Re: segfault on strtok (10/24/03)
  • [FAQ] Re: Using "return" with parantheses? (10/24/03)
  • Re: don't understand declaration "unsigned int ip_v:4" (10/24/03)
  • Re: segfault on strtok (10/24/03)
  • Re: segfault on strtok (10/24/03)
  • Re: segfault on strtok (10/24/03)
  • Re: segfault on strtok (10/24/03)
  • Re: Question About Strange 'C' Code Syntax ( Well strange to me anyway ) (10/23/03)
  • Re: adding chars to a string (10/23/03)
  • Re: adding chars to a string (10/23/03)
  • Re: adding chars to a string (10/23/03)
  • Re: segfault when strcmp (10/22/03)
  • Re: Is there a integer data type of one byte in gcc? (10/21/03)
  • Re: parenthesis (10/16/03)
  • Re: C99 question (10/16/03)
  • Re: VERY newbie pointer issue (10/16/03)
  • Re: VERY newbie pointer issue (10/16/03)
  • Re: Input without pressing enter? (10/16/03)
  • Re: Input without pressing enter? (10/16/03)
  • Re: parenthesis (10/16/03)
  • Re: Char [] (10/14/03)
  • Re: How do I overload functions in C? (10/13/03)
  • Re: Passing Arrays to Functions (10/12/03)
  • Re: Passing Arrays to Functions (10/11/03)
  • Re: C99 comparison macro's (10/11/03)
  • Re: Does standard C guarantee same memory content after realloc()? (10/10/03)
  • Re: 3 probs ...i m confused (10/10/03)
  • Re: 2 stupid array questions!! (10/10/03)
  • Re: Pointer to memory (10/10/03)
  • Re: how to use fopen()? (10/05/03)
  • Re: how to use fopen()? (10/05/03)
  • Re: how to use fopen()? (10/04/03)
  • Re: restrict (10/03/03)
  • Re: printing array elements (10/02/03)
  • Re: restrict (10/01/03)
  • Re: restrict (10/01/03)
  • Re: what is exactly "long long" (newbie) (10/01/03)
  • Re: what is exactly "long long" (newbie) (10/01/03)
• Andrew
  • stdin and stdout (10/28/03)
  • Re: Can the current file position indicator ever be greater the actual file size? (10/01/03)
• Andrey Tarasevich
  • Re: C or C++ first? (10/21/03)
• André Pönitz
  • Re: integer to characters (10/23/03)
  • Re: Returning values from a function (10/21/03)
  • Re: Returning values from a function (10/21/03)
  • Re: Returning values from a function (10/21/03)
• Andy Sinclair
  • Re: why still use C? (10/13/03)
• Andy Zhang
  • Re: doubt in USING POINTERS (10/04/03)
• Antonio
  • Re: memory allocation (10/13/03)
• Anupam
  • Re: The original subject seems to be quite descriptive (10/31/03)
  • Re: combinatorics question : A possible algorithm (10/30/03)
  • The original subject seems to be quite descriptive (10/30/03)
• ArmedCoder
  • Parsing error!? (10/03/03)
• Arnak
  • Re: Barbecued Tri-Tripe is better than C (10/25/03)
• Arthur J. O'Dwyer
  • Re: very basic C question--K&R on a Mac (10/31/03)
  • Re: Interview question !!! (10/31/03)
  • Re: malloc and free (10/29/03)
  • Re: malloc and free (10/29/03)
  • Re: malloc and free (10/29/03)
  • Re: Recursive Functions (10/29/03)
  • [troll] Re: Asking if elements in struct arre zero (10/29/03)
  • Re: Recursive Functions (10/29/03)
  • [OT] Re: Recursive Functions (10/28/03)
  • Re: Recursive Functions (10/28/03)
  • Re: Recursive Functions (10/28/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/27/03)
  • Re: New output model (10/25/03)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Is this the optimal FIR filter on all platforms? (10/25/03)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Is this the optimal FIR filter on all platforms? (10/25/03)
  • Re: Is this the optimal FIR filter on all platforms? (10/25/03)
  • Re: Portable Test for long long Support (10/24/03)
  • Re: Portable Test for long long Support (10/24/03)
  • Re: New output model (10/24/03)
  • Re: approx 100 assorted computer/ math/other books (10/23/03)
  • Re: int a=printf("%d\n",a); (10/23/03)
  • Re: Returning values from a function (10/21/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/21/03)
  • Re: An Authors View on C (10/20/03)
  • Re: An Authors View on C (10/20/03)
  • Re: An Authors View on C (10/20/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/20/03)
  • Re: freeing allocated memory (10/19/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/19/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from long? (10/19/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/18/03)
  • Re: Empty parentheses (10/17/03)
  • Re: Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition (10/17/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from long? (10/17/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from long? (10/17/03)
  • Re: parenthesis (10/17/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from long? (10/17/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from a long? (10/17/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from a long? (10/17/03)
  • Re: parenthesis (10/16/03)
  • Re: parenthesis (10/16/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/16/03)
  • Re: bugs in c (10/15/03)
  • Re: Newbie Turn off Echo in C (10/15/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/15/03)
  • Re: complex (10/15/03)
  • Re: [OT] graph isomorphism (10/14/03)
  • Re: Obfuscation devices (was Name Space Pollution: using macros ...) (10/14/03)
  • Re: Need graph isomorphism algorithm (10/14/03)
  • Re: How do I overload functions in C? (10/13/03)
  • Re: Why is MAXINT doubly defined in system include files (10/13/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/13/03)
  • Re: why does this work ? (10/12/03)
  • Re: why does this work ? (10/12/03)
  • Re: why does this work ? (10/12/03)
  • Re: How to enlarge a 2D polygon (conex, nonconvex) (10/11/03)
  • [OT] Re: Troll Alert: why not use C? (10/11/03)
  • Re: Source (10/11/03)
  • Re: comparing pointed-at value with another value (10/10/03)
  • Re: Pointless [enough already] (10/10/03)
  • Re: about Boolean (10/10/03)
  • Re: Source (10/09/03)
  • Re: Directory path (10/09/03)
  • Re: Directory path (10/09/03)
  • Code review request [savestruct] (10/09/03)
  • Re: Pre-offsetof() question (10/07/03)
  • Re: Parsing C declarations [savestruct] (10/07/03)
  • Re: Pre-offsetof() question (10/07/03)
  • Re: Pre-offsetof() question (10/06/03)
  • Re: arithmetic on pointer to an incomplete type (10/06/03)
  • Pre-offsetof() question (10/06/03)
  • Re: is this preprocessor using code compliant with Std (10/05/03)
  • Re: Parsing C declarations [savestruct] (10/04/03)
  • Re: What does f(x++) mean? (10/03/03)
  • Re: Did you know? (10/03/03)
  • Re: #if CONSTANT == 1 checking problem (10/03/03)
  • Re: Anyone mind reviewing my code? (10/03/03)
  • Re: Did you know? (10/03/03)
  • Re: Anyone mind reviewing my code? (10/02/03)
  • Re: Did you know? (10/02/03)
  • Re: Parsing C declarations [savestruct] (10/02/03)
  • Re: Parsing C declarations [savestruct] (10/02/03)
  • Re: Parsing C declarations [savestruct] (10/02/03)
  • Re: restrict (10/02/03)
  • Parsing C declarations [savestruct] (10/02/03)
  • Re: Understanding ++ (10/01/03)
  • Re: Compilation with preprocessor macros defined with no value (10/01/03)
  • Re: Bit shifting for log of 2 (10/01/03)
  • Re: 8.8 notation.... (10/01/03)
  • Re: 8.8 notation.... (10/01/03)
  • Re: for(;;) or while(1)? (10/01/03)
• Artie Gold
  • Re: casting (10/31/03)
  • Re: Pointers and Arrays in C?? (10/31/03)
  • Re: work with dates (10/30/03)
  • Re: work with dates (10/30/03)
  • [SPAM] Re: Check out this pendant! (10/30/03)
  • [OT] Re: stylistic prototype question (10/30/03)
  • Re: c# (10/29/03)
  • [OT] Re: orgin of semicolon usage (10/24/03)
  • Re: HELP, INFINIT LOOP... simple LINKED LIST (10/23/03)
  • Re: Always cast malloc (10/21/03)
  • Re: [OT] Re: doxygen does not document functions ? u know a solution? (10/21/03)
  • [OT] Re: doxygen does not document functions ? u know a solution? (10/20/03)
  • Re: Returning values from a function (10/20/03)
  • Re: seg fault and I don't know where (10/15/03)
  • Re: trapping library calls (10/08/03)
  • Re: Segmentation fault (10/07/03)
  • Re: Direct floppy disk access (10/07/03)
  • Re: static allocation question... (10/05/03)
  • Re: Read output from system( ). (10/05/03)
  • Re: Preprocessor directive (10/02/03)
• Arto Huusko
  • Offset/alignement of structure members (10/17/03)
• Arun
  • Re: Embedded Vs Java (10/15/03)
  • Embedded Vs Java (10/11/03)
• Ashish
  • Re: Pascal is better than C (10/21/03)
  • Re: Source (10/10/03)
  • Re: Source (10/09/03)
  • Re: Racist Nonsense (10/08/03)
  • Re: Pointless (10/08/03)
  • Re: Pointless (10/07/03)
  • Re: Pointless (10/07/03)
  • Re: Pointless (10/07/03)
  • Re: Fundamental Reason for High Achievements of Jews (10/06/03)
  • Re: how to use fopen()? (10/06/03)
  • Re: Did you know? (10/03/03)
• asm
  • Question on stack frame allocation space (10/04/03)
• Attila Feher
  • Re: How far is this true? (10/06/03)
• August Derleth
  • Re: casting (10/31/03)
  • Re: Question About Strange 'C' Code Syntax ( Well strange to me anyway ) (10/25/03)
  • Re: Barbecued Tri-Tip is better than C (10/25/03)
  • Re: Using "return" with parantheses? (10/25/03)
  • Re: OT Newsfeed test (10/21/03)
  • Re: Is there a integer data type of one byte in gcc? (10/21/03)
  • Re: bugs in c (10/16/03)
  • Re: !!!!! (void) question() !!!!!! [OT] (10/15/03)
  • Re: How do I overload functions in C? (10/14/03)
  • Re: volatile (10/13/03)
  • Re: function declaration nested? (10/12/03)
  • Re: Passing Arrays to Functions (10/12/03)
  • Re: 1254-002 Cannot find a rule to create target /u02/apps_r/dev/ben/lib/fcfz02.a from dependencies. (10/07/03)
  • Re: Functioning In C (10/06/03)
  • Is argv[0] guaranteed to be a valid pointer? (10/05/03)
  • Re: how to use fopen()? (10/04/03)
• Avinash
  • Re: doubt in USING POINTERS (10/03/03)
  • Re: Can the current file position indicator ever be greater the actual file size? (10/01/03)
• B. v Ingen Schenau
  • Re: integer to characters (10/24/03)
  • Re: integer to characters (10/22/03)
• B. Wood
  • Re: build error on Linux - initializer element is not computable at load time (10/17/03)
  • build error on Linux - initializer element is not computable at load time (10/16/03)
• Bamber
  • Re: why does this work ? (10/17/03)
  • why does this work ? (10/10/03)
• barefoot_XR6
  • I found the problem, thanks for the tips for my future postings. See inside if interested in problem. (10/05/03)
  • Re: A little bit of help regarding my linked list program required. READ THIS ONE FIRST (10/05/03)
  • Re: A little bit of help regarding my linked list program required. (No attachment this time) (10/04/03)
• Barry Schwarz
  • Re: Need Help speeding up mandelbrot algo (10/31/03)
  • Re: Looping this (10/25/03)
  • Re: reset char array (10/25/03)
  • Re: should this work (10/20/03)
  • Re: Increment file pointer (10/18/03)
  • Re: 4D array to malloc (10/16/03)
  • Re: volatile (10/16/03)
  • Re: volatile (10/15/03)
  • Re: volatile (10/14/03)
  • Re: volatile (10/14/03)
  • Re: representation of integers(again) very annoying.. (10/14/03)
  • Re: representation of integers(again) very annoying.. (10/13/03)
  • Re: volatile (10/13/03)
  • Re: Structure Creation (10/12/03)
  • Re: complex I/O (10/12/03)
  • Re: why does this work ? (10/11/03)
  • Re: Can array[]=malloc()ed? (10/11/03)
  • Re: piping/reading stdin quirks. (10/11/03)
  • Re: Can array[]=malloc()ed? (10/11/03)
  • Re: Any difference in creating array of strings (10/11/03)
  • Re: array decay (10/09/03)
  • Re: Any difference in creating array of strings (10/09/03)
  • Re: Your opinion (10/07/03)
  • Re: Help needed to count lines between preprocessor directives (10/07/03)
  • Re: Still having trouble with malloc (10/07/03)
  • Re: malloc (10/06/03)
  • Re: arithmetic on pointer to an incomplete type (10/06/03)
  • Re: recursively draw the line (10/05/03)
  • Re: pointers chainging in a function call? (10/05/03)
  • Re: freeing memory....partially (10/05/03)
  • Re: A little bit of help regarding my linked list program required. READ THIS ONE FIRST (10/05/03)
  • Re: static allocation question... (10/05/03)
  • Re: freeing memory....partially (10/05/03)
  • Re: array of pointers on functions (10/05/03)
  • Re: unions with long long ints and doubles? (10/02/03)
• bd
  • Re: reset char array (10/24/03)
  • Re: Increment file pointer (10/18/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from a long? (10/16/03)
  • Re: Increment file pointer (10/16/03)
  • Re: Having C code looking like C++ code (10/12/03)
  • Re: Let's write a c program, without knowing what it does... (10/10/03)
  • Re: linux kernel system call (10/06/03)
  • Re: Preprocessor directive (10/03/03)
  • Re: Stack & recursion Question (10/03/03)
• becte
  • Re: Storing 4 characters using 3 bytes (10/16/03)
  • Storing 4 characters using 3 bytes (10/15/03)
  • Re: Can array[]=malloc()ed? (10/11/03)
  • Re: What does f(x++) mean? (10/04/03)
  • Re: What does f(x++) mean? (10/03/03)
  • Re: What does f(x++) mean? (10/03/03)
  • What does f(x++) mean? (10/03/03)
• bellparis
  • Question About Example code, GlobalC (10/28/03)
• Ben Jacobs-Swearingen
  • Re: very basic C question--K&R on a Mac (10/31/03)
  • Re: very basic C question--K&R on a Mac (10/31/03)
  • very basic C question -- K & R on a Mac (10/31/03)
  • very basic C question--K&R on a Mac (10/31/03)
• Ben Pfaff
  • Re: Why are you still using C? (10/29/03)
  • Re: Using char (10/28/03)
  • Re: Obfuscation devices (was Name Space Pollution: using macros ...) (10/14/03)
  • Re: Name Space Pollution: using macros ... (10/14/03)
  • Re: Obfuscation devices (was Name Space Pollution: using macros ...) (10/14/03)
  • Re: functions with no side-effects (10/12/03)
  • Re: Having C code looking like C++ code (10/12/03)
  • Re: How can I compile a file with different constants? (10/12/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/11/03)
  • Re: Function Overloading (10/07/03)
  • Re: Function Overloading (10/06/03)
  • Re: problems turning int into float (simple problem) (10/05/03)
  • Re: recursively draw the line (10/05/03)
  • Re: Newbie question on time() (10/05/03)
  • Re: Function Overloading (10/04/03)
  • Re: Typedef - multiple declarations (10/04/03)
  • Re: Newbie question on time() (10/04/03)
  • Re: Today's Foxtrot comic strip (10/03/03)
  • Re: Parsing error!? (10/03/03)
  • Re: Function Overloading (10/03/03)
  • Re: Differences between 'const char' and 'char' (10/01/03)
  • Re: Differences between 'const char' and 'char' (10/01/03)
  • Re: Differences between 'const char' and 'char' (10/01/03)
  • Re: Differences between 'const char' and 'char' (10/01/03)
  • Re: Pointers in structures II (newbie question) (10/01/03)
  • Re: Differences between 'const char' and 'char' (10/01/03)
  • Re: Differences between 'const char' and 'char' (10/01/03)
• Bertrand Mollinier Toublet
  • Re: Printf, array of structures and pointers... (10/17/03)
  • Re: How can I set a integer array all bits to zero? (10/15/03)
  • Re: Passing Arrays to Functions (10/12/03)
  • Re: [MinGW] Stack limit (10/11/03)
  • Re: static allocation question... (10/05/03)
• Bigdakine
  • Re: Racist Nonsense (10/30/03)
  • Re: Fundamental Reason for High Achievements of Jews (10/28/03)
  • Re: Racist Nonsense (10/28/03)
  • Re: Fundamental Reason for High Achievements of Jews (10/27/03)
• Bill Cunningham
  • Re: structures compatibility (10/21/03)
  • Re: macros (10/17/03)
  • macros (10/16/03)
  • question (10/13/03)
  • Re: Source (10/11/03)
  • Re: Source (10/11/03)
  • Re: Source (10/11/03)
  • Re: Source (10/10/03)
  • Re: Source (10/09/03)
  • Re: Source (10/09/03)
  • Re: Source (10/09/03)
  • Source (10/09/03)
  • C Inlining (10/05/03)
  • Re: screwed up programmer (10/04/03)
  • screwed up programmer (10/04/03)
• Bill Godfrey
  • Re: Let's write a c program, without knowing what it does... (10/14/03)
  • Re: Let's write a c program, without knowing what it does... (10/10/03)
• Bin Lu
  • Re: malloc segfault-followup-HELP!! (10/23/03)
  • Re: malloc segfault-followup (10/23/03)
  • malloc segmentation fault (10/03/03)
• binaya
  • complete binary tree (10/22/03)
  • freeing allocated memory (10/19/03)
• Bjoern Pedersen
  • Re: adding chars to a string (10/23/03)
  • Re: why does this work ? (10/12/03)
  • Re: why does this work ? (10/12/03)
  • Re: why does this work ? (10/12/03)
• bob
  • Re: Fundamental Reason for High Achievements of Jews (10/28/03)
  • Re: Fundamental Reason for High Achievements of Jews (10/15/03)
  • Re: Racist Nonsense (10/14/03)
  • Re: Racist Nonsense (10/13/03)
  • Re: Fundamental Reason for High Achievements of Jews (10/13/03)
  • Re: Fundamental Reason for High Achievements of Jews (10/09/03)
• Bob Sull
  • Re: C or C++ first? (10/27/03)
• Bootstrap Bill
  • Re: C++ to C (10/29/03)
  • Re: C++ to C (10/29/03)
  • Re: C++ to C (10/29/03)
  • C++ to C (10/28/03)
  • Re: C for 6809? (10/27/03)
  • C for 6809? (10/27/03)
• brendon
  • Re: An Authors View on C (10/20/03)
• Brett
  • Re: program on Win98 DOS shell (10/22/03)
  • Re: C program verrrry slow on Win98 DOS shell (10/22/03)
  • C program verrrry slow on Win98 DOS shell (10/21/03)
• Brett Frankenberger
  • Re: Reversing the order of some loops. (10/22/03)
• Brian Quincy Hutchings
  • Re: Pointless (10/07/03)
• Brian Inglis
  • Re: Recording Process Startup (forks/exec etc) in Unix (10/28/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/27/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/19/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/19/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/16/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/16/03)
• Brian K. Michalk
  • Re: bulk assignment to structure (10/06/03)
  • bulk assignment to structure (10/02/03)
• brijwij_at_yahoo.co.in
  • how to make my password field INVISIBLE ? (10/21/03)
• Brooks1083
  • Programming error (10/22/03)
• Bruce Sinclair
  • Re: Fundamental Reason for High Achievements of Jews (10/30/03)
  • Re: Fundamental Reason for High Achievements of Jews (10/29/03)
  • Re: Fundamental Reason for High Achievements of Jews (10/28/03)
  • Re: Racist Nonsense (10/15/03)
  • Re: Racist Nonsense (10/14/03)
  • Re: Fundamental Reason for High Achievements of Jews (10/14/03)
  • Re: Fun and Mental; Raisin for High; Achievements of Shoes (10/13/03)
  • Re: Pointless (10/07/03)
  • Re: Fundamental Reason for High Achievements of Jews (10/07/03)
• BruceS
  • Re: [OT] Re: Troll Alert: why not use C? (10/11/03)
  • Re: Troll Alert: why not use C? (10/10/03)
  • Re: Troll Alert: why not use C? (10/10/03)
  • Re: Worm storms (10/02/03)
  • Re: Circular Queue data structure .. (10/02/03)
  • Re: prints out an unsigned long in decimal (10/02/03)
  • Re: Circular Queue data structure .. (10/02/03)
• Bruno Desthuilliers
  • Re: Too Big (10/06/03)
  • Re: Too Big [OT] (10/06/03)
• Bryan Bullard
  • how to align static struct to a 4kb boundry (10/15/03)
• Buck Rogers
  • a question about arrays and strings (10/22/03)
• C. Sengstock
  • Re: direct access with fpos_t doesn´t work (10/09/03)
  • Re: direct access with fpos_t doesn´t work (10/08/03)
  • Re: direct access with fpos_t doesn´t work (10/08/03)
  • direct access with fpos_t doesn´t work (10/08/03)
• Camil Demetrescu
  • [ANNOUNCE] The Leonardo C Library (LL-Win32-1.0-beta) (10/06/03)
• Capstar
  • Re: Structs refering to each other (10/28/03)
• carl mcguire
  • Re: String Permutation function in C (10/29/03)
  • Re: USB Programming (10/22/03)
  • Re: question (10/17/03)
  • Re: question [OT] (10/14/03)
• Carnosaur
  • Re: combinatorics question (10/31/03)
  • Re: combinatorics question (10/30/03)
  • Re: combinatorics question-answered (10/30/03)
  • Re: combinatorics question (10/28/03)
  • combinatorics question (10/28/03)
• CBFalconer
  • Re: Order of function evaluation (10/27/03)
  • Re: Is this the optimal FIR filter on all platforms? (10/27/03)
  • Re: Is this the optimal FIR filter on all platforms? (10/25/03)
  • Re: Using "return" with parantheses? (10/25/03)
  • Re: void pointers and more (10/25/03)
  • Re: Dynamic file names (10/25/03)
  • Re: New output model (10/25/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/25/03)
  • Re: adding chars to a string (10/24/03)
  • Re: integer to characters (10/24/03)
  • Re: approx 100 assorted computer/ math/other books (10/24/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/24/03)
  • Re: [C] how to search a string ? (10/23/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/23/03)
  • Re: enum (10/23/03)
  • Re: Using __LINE__ as a string (10/22/03)
  • Re: Returning values from a function (10/22/03)
  • Re: Best method to sort a linked list (in my case)? (10/22/03)
  • Re: approx 100 assorted computer/ math/other books (10/22/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/22/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/22/03)
  • Re: OT Newsfeed test (10/22/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/22/03)
  • Re: Is there a integer data type of one byte in gcc? (10/21/03)
  • Re: Always cast malloc (10/21/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/21/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/21/03)
  • Re: warning - comparing a signed value to an unsinged value (10/21/03)
  • Re: warning - comparing a signed value to an unsinged value (10/21/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from long? (10/21/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/21/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from long? (10/21/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/21/03)
  • Re: Link Lists (10/21/03)
  • Re: Syntax error? (10/21/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/21/03)
  • Re: warning - comparing a signed value to an unsinged value (10/21/03)
  • Re: warning - comparing a signed value to an unsinged value (10/20/03)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Pascal is better than C (10/20/03)
  • Re: sscanf return value with "%n" directive (10/20/03)
  • Re: line of array from stdin (10/20/03)
  • Re: segmentation fault with gets() (10/20/03)
  • Re: extracting integer from array of char (10/19/03)
  • Re: how to write binary data to stdout? (10/19/03)
  • Re: Style and Decompostion (was Re: help needed with filnames as command line arguments) (10/19/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/18/03)
  • Style and Decompostion (was Re: help needed with filnames as command line arguments) (10/18/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/18/03)
  • Re: Initializer element not computable at load time (10/18/03)
  • Re: tech help required.. (10/17/03)
  • Re: Offset/alignement of structure members (10/17/03)
  • Re: parenthesis (10/17/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from long? (10/17/03)
  • Re: [OT] Home computer wars (10/16/03)
  • Re: functions returning *char (10/16/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from a long? (10/16/03)
  • Re: Storing 4 characters using 3 bytes (10/16/03)
  • Re: 4D array to malloc (10/16/03)
  • Re: Storing 4 characters using 3 bytes (10/16/03)
  • Re: malloc problem (10/16/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from long? (10/16/03)
  • Re: bugs in c (10/16/03)
  • Re: Simple Question (10/15/03)
  • Re: String parsing question (10/15/03)
  • Re: functions with no side-effects (10/14/03)
  • Re: control reaches end of non-void function (10/13/03)
  • Re: Name Space Pollution: using macros ... (10/13/03)
  • Re: using macros ... (10/13/03)
  • Re: functions with no side-effects (10/13/03)
  • Re: Sig-block Netiquette (was Re: ignore a line) (10/13/03)
  • Re: How to call appropriate functions? (10/13/03)
  • Re: Sig-block Netiquette (was Re: ignore a line) (10/13/03)
  • Re: why does this work ? (10/13/03)
  • Do your worst (10/12/03)
  • Re: why does this work ? (10/12/03)
  • Re: How to find out the size of an array? (10/12/03)
  • Re: How to find out the size of an array? (10/12/03)
  • Re: why does this work ? (10/12/03)
  • Re: The strangest problem.... (10/11/03)
  • Re: ignore a line (10/11/03)
  • Re: The strangest problem.... (10/10/03)
  • Re: anyone know about pthread_delay_np() function?? (10/09/03)
  • Re: How to keep the address of one array in my case? (10/09/03)
  • Re: direct access with fpos_t doesn´t work (10/09/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/08/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/08/03)
  • Re: trapping library calls (10/08/03)
  • Re: direct access with fpos_t doesn´t work (10/08/03)
  • Re: Trapping Ctrl-C, how? (10/08/03)
  • Re: How to keep the address of one array in my case? (10/08/03)
  • Re: use of long double (10/08/03)
  • Re: [OT] Compile C Code With A CPP Compiler? (10/08/03)
  • Re: Segmentation fault (10/08/03)
  • Re: Trapping Ctrl-C, how? (10/08/03)
  • Re: Pointless (10/07/03)
  • Re: Formatting numbers (10/07/03)
  • Re: [OT] Compile C Code With A CPP Compiler? (10/07/03)
  • Re: int (*daytab)[13] vs int *daytab[13] (10/06/03)
  • Re: [OT] Compile C Code With A CPP Compiler? (10/06/03)
  • Re: for(;;) or while(1)? (10/06/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/06/03)
  • Re: sign magnitude, ones complement, two's complement (10/06/03)
  • Re: problems turning int into float (simple problem) (10/06/03)
  • Re: pointers chainging in a function call? (10/05/03)
  • Re: Read output from system( ). (10/05/03)
  • Re: Too Big (10/05/03)
  • Re: [OT] Cygwin Re: newlines in text files (10/05/03)
  • Re: Read output from system( ). (10/05/03)
  • Re: casting pointers (10/05/03)
  • Re: A little bit of help regarding my linked list program required. READ THIS ONE FIRST (10/05/03)
  • Re: [OT] Compile C Code With A CPP Compiler? (10/05/03)
  • Re: Typedef - multiple declarations (10/04/03)
  • Re: Too Big (10/04/03)
  • Re: [welcome msg, FAQ] Newbie question on time() (10/04/03)
  • Re: Difference between char**a and char *a[] (10/04/03)
  • Re: newlines in text files (10/04/03)
  • Re: hmmm, no C99 [OT] (10/04/03)
  • Re: [welcome msg, FAQ] Newbie question on time() (10/04/03)
  • Re: pointers chainging in a function call? (10/04/03)
  • Re: A little bit of help regarding my linked list program required. (No attachment this time) (10/04/03)
  • Re: A little bit of help regarding my linked list program required. - "words.c" - "words.c" (10/04/03)
  • Re: Question on stack frame allocation space (10/04/03)
  • Re: [OT, spam] Backup your projects neatly (10/04/03)
  • Re: const type question (10/04/03)
  • Re: Did you know? (10/04/03)
  • Re: code Critics please.. (10/03/03)
  • Re: const type question (10/03/03)
  • Re: [OT, spam] Backup your projects neatly (10/03/03)
  • Re: for(;;) or while(1)? (10/03/03)
  • Re: for(;;) or while(1)? (10/03/03)
  • Re: Backup your projects neatly (10/02/03)
  • Re: logical OR obfuscation (10/02/03)
  • Re: doubt in USING POINTERS (10/02/03)
  • Re: for(;;) or while(1)? (10/01/03)
  • Re: what's the best way to time your code? (10/01/03)
  • Re: function explanation (10/01/03)
  • Re: doubt in USING POINTERS (10/01/03)
• Cedric LEMAIRE
  • Re: Small Parser / processor (10/16/03)
• chad kline
  • Re: piping/reading stdin quirks. (10/11/03)
  • Re: piping/reading stdin quirks. (10/11/03)
  • Re: piping/reading stdin quirks. (10/11/03)
  • piping/reading stdin quirks. (10/10/03)
• Chang Byun
  • Re: question about structure array as a argument to a function (10/20/03)
  • question about structure array as a argument to a function (10/20/03)
  • problem solved (10/14/03)
  • question about memory shortage (10/14/03)
• Charles Erwin
  • fscanf or fgets still misses last line unless there is a newline (10/06/03)
• Charles Harrison Caudill
  • Re: malloc and free (10/29/03)
  • Re: Using char (10/28/03)
  • Re: Somple Recursion Question (10/27/03)
  • Re: malloc (10/06/03)
  • Re: passing ptr to function to another function (10/04/03)
  • Re: Preprocessor directive (10/02/03)
  • Re: programming style: which is clearer? (iteration vs. recursion) (10/02/03)
• Charles Richmond
  • Re: Carriage Returns (10/09/03)
  • Re: Carriage Returns (10/09/03)
• Chiron Paixos
  • Re: how to parse INI files ? (10/26/03)
  • Re: C-loops explain plz (10/19/03)
• Chris
  • Need Help speeding up mandelbrot algo (10/30/03)
  • Re: Newbie Turn off Echo in C (10/16/03)
  • Re: Newbie Turn off Echo in C (10/15/03)
  • Re: Newbie Turn off Echo in C (10/14/03)
  • Newbie Turn off Echo in C (10/13/03)
• Chris Dams
  • Re: Fourier transforms (coefficient calculation)... (10/03/03)
• Chris Dollin
  • Re: How to extract bytes from a long? (10/15/03)
  • Re: object oriented programming language (10/14/03)
  • Re: Structure Creation (10/13/03)
  • Re: Some Exercises (10/13/03)
  • Re: How to access the global (10/07/03)
  • Re: for(;;) or while(1)? (10/02/03)
  • Re: Differences between 'const char' and 'char' (10/02/03)
  • Re: Did you know? (10/02/03)
  • Re: for(;;) or while(1)? (10/01/03)
  • Re: diff between memmove & memecpy (10/01/03)
  • Re: Did you know? (10/01/03)
  • Re: level of questions for experts only (09/29/03)
• Chris Hills
  • Re: why still use C? (10/19/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/15/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/13/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/13/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/13/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/08/03)
• Chris Ling
  • Re: Embedded Vs Java (10/12/03)
• Chris Priede
  • Re: programming style: which is clearer? (iteration vs. recursion) (10/02/03)
• Chris Torek
  • Re: Interview question !!! (10/31/03)
  • Re: Using stdarg with unknown types (10/29/03)
  • Re: help needed with filnames as command line arguments (10/27/03)
  • Re: Using stdarg with unknown types (10/27/03)
  • Re: alternative to nested procedures (10/27/03)
  • Re: WINDOWS (10/27/03)
  • Re: Asking if elements in struct arre zero (10/27/03)
  • Re: Order of function evaluation (10/27/03)
  • Re: `void **' revisited: void *pop(void **root) (10/25/03)
  • Re: Order of function evaluation (10/25/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/24/03)
  • Re: Portable Test for long long Support (10/24/03)
  • Re: warning - comparing a signed value to an unsinged value (10/21/03)
  • Re: segmentation fault with gets() (10/20/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from long? (10/17/03)
  • Re: Storing 4 characters using 3 bytes (10/17/03)
  • Re: Storing 4 characters using 3 bytes (10/16/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/16/03)
  • Re: Storing 4 characters using 3 bytes (10/15/03)
  • Re: memory allocation (10/14/03)
  • Re: restrict (10/12/03)
  • Re: why does this work ? (10/12/03)
  • Re: The '_' char in variable names (10/11/03)
  • Re: why does this work ? (10/11/03)
  • Re: Pointers to Arrays (10/10/03)
  • Re: direct access with fpos_t doesn[microsoft-crud]t work (10/10/03)
  • Re: To coerce or not...? struct sockaddr vs struct sockaddr_in (10/08/03)
  • Re: freeing memory....partially (10/05/03)
  • Re: static allocation question... (10/05/03)
  • Re: IAR, __ASM(), and *.s33 to *.C files (10/05/03)
  • Re: what'd the difference between STDIN and Keyboard buffer ? (10/04/03)
  • Re: Array at specific address (10/04/03)
  • Re: IAR, __ASM(), and *.s33 to *.C files (10/04/03)
  • Re: Preprocessor directive (10/04/03)
  • Re: restrict (10/03/03)
  • Re: [OT] Compile C Code With A CPP Compiler? (10/02/03)
• Christian Bau
  • Re: Interview question !!! (10/31/03)
  • Re: casting (10/31/03)
  • Re: [Newbie] What is sizeof() ? (10/31/03)
  • Re: Pointers and Arrays in C?? (10/31/03)
  • Re: Recursive Functions (10/29/03)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Recursive Functions (10/29/03)
  • Re: C99: variable declarations inside switch statements (10/29/03)
  • Re: Recursive Functions (10/28/03)
  • Re: C99: variable declarations inside switch statements (10/27/03)
  • Re: Order of function evaluation (10/27/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/24/03)
  • Re: Simple Memory Allocator Challenge (10/24/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/24/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/23/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/23/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/23/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/23/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/23/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/23/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/23/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/22/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/22/03)
  • Re: Best method to sort a linked list (in my case)? (10/22/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/21/03)
  • Re: warning - comparing a signed value to an unsinged value (10/21/03)
  • Re: warning - comparing a signed value to an unsinged value (10/21/03)
  • Re: warning - comparing a signed value to an unsinged value (10/21/03)
  • Re: NULL in C (10/19/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/18/03)
  • Re: Union, ternary operator, Macro, printf don't cooperate for me. Help? (10/17/03)
  • Re: undefined behavior? (10/16/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from a long? (10/16/03)
  • Re: How can I set a integer array all bits to zero? (10/16/03)
  • Re: Code causes segfault on exit (10/16/03)
  • Re: Increment file pointer (10/15/03)
  • Re: Increment file pointer (10/15/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/15/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/15/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/15/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/14/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/14/03)
  • Re: representation of integers(again) very annoying.. (10/13/03)
  • Re: why does this work ? (10/11/03)
  • Re: Counter Intuitive Results: Optimising an FFT routine for Speed (10/10/03)
  • Re: unicode (10/10/03)
  • Re: restrict (10/03/03)
  • Re: Monty Hall simulator: is there a better way to do this? (10/01/03)
  • Re: Bit shifting for log of 2 (10/01/03)
• Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: Pointers and Arrays in C?? (10/31/03)
  • Re: recursion (10/31/03)
  • Re: [SPAM] Re: Check out this pendant! (10/30/03)
  • Re: Why are you still using C? (10/30/03)
  • Re: malloc and free (10/30/03)
  • Re: malloc and free (10/30/03)
  • Re: malloc and free (10/29/03)
  • Re: malloc and free (10/29/03)
  • Re: recv not completely overwriting last string (10/27/03)
  • Re: atoi question (10/27/03)
  • Re: sprintf segfaults (10/25/03)
  • Re: Barbecued Tri-Tip is better than C (10/24/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/24/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/23/03)
  • Re: adding chars to a string (10/23/03)
  • Re: enum (10/23/03)
  • Re: enum (10/22/03)
  • enum (10/22/03)
  • Re: approx 100 assorted computer/ math/other books (10/22/03)
  • Re: random number generator (10/22/03)
  • Re: how to call unix shell scripts from with in 'C' code? (10/22/03)
  • Re: a question about arrays and strings (10/22/03)
  • Re: OT Newsfeed test (10/21/03)
  • [OT] suggestion (10/21/03)
  • [OT] du/df (10/21/03)
  • Re: free disk space (10/21/03)
  • Re: An Authors View on C (10/21/03)
  • Re: Returning values from a function (10/20/03)
  • Re: An Authors View on C (10/20/03)
  • Re: malloc/free weird behaviour (Win32 / MsVC7) (10/20/03)
  • Re: [OT] Language bashing troll #1834697: Pascal is better than BASIC was: Re: Pascal is better than C (10/20/03)
  • Re: Boolean Values (10/17/03)
  • Re: inverse of a matrix for nxm (10/17/03)
  • Re: string routines go to never never land on unix (10/17/03)
  • Re: functions returning *char (10/17/03)
  • Re: string routines go to never never land on unix (10/17/03)
  • Re: Empty parentheses (10/17/03)
  • Empty parentheses (10/17/03)
  • Re: Problem: scanf used for double (10/17/03)
  • Re: Problem: scanf used for double (10/17/03)
  • Re: Problem: scanf used for double (10/16/03)
  • Re: Problem: scanf used for double (10/16/03)
  • Re: bugs in c (10/16/03)
  • Re: [OT] Home computer wars (10/16/03)
  • Re: extract character strings from displayed web page. (10/16/03)
  • Re: bugs in c (10/16/03)
  • Re: macros (10/16/03)
  • Re: Storing 4 characters using 3 bytes (10/15/03)
  • Re: Storing 4 characters using 3 bytes (10/15/03)
  • Re: extract character strings from displayed web page. (10/15/03)
  • Re: bugs in c (10/15/03)
  • Re: Newbie Turn off Echo in C (10/15/03)
  • Re: malloc problem (10/15/03)
  • Re: Newbie Turn off Echo in C (10/15/03)
  • [OT] graph isomorphism (10/14/03)
  • Re: String parsing question (10/14/03)
  • Re: Embedded Vs Java (10/14/03)
  • Re: Name Space Pollution: using macros ... (10/14/03)
  • Re: Simple Question (10/14/03)
  • Re: Simple Question (10/14/03)
  • Re: String parsing question (10/14/03)
  • Re: Name Space Pollution: using macros ... (10/14/03)
  • Re: String parsing question (10/14/03)
  • Re: String parsing question (10/14/03)
  • Re: String parsing question (10/14/03)
  • Re: String parsing question (10/14/03)
  • String parsing question (10/14/03)
  • Re: Small Parser / processor (10/14/03)
  • Re: How to find out the size of an array? (10/10/03)
  • Re: anyone know about pthread_delay_np() function?? (10/09/03)
  • Re: Understanding ++ (10/02/03)
  • Re: Understanding ++ (10/01/03)
  • Re: Understanding ++ (10/01/03)
  • Re: 8.8 notation.... (10/01/03)
  • Re: 8.8 notation.... (10/01/03)
• Christopher Robin
  • Formatting numbers (10/07/03)
• chrstian brensteiner
  • Re: [OT] Re: doxygen does not document functions ? u know a solution? (10/20/03)
  • doxygen does not document functions ? u know a solution? (10/20/03)
• cjw
  • Bit and Byte problem (10/17/03)
  • Re: Directory path (10/13/03)
  • Directory path (10/09/03)
• Clint Olsen
  • Re: Copying struct and unsigned char buffer (10/27/03)
  • Re: Using stdarg with unknown types (10/27/03)
  • Using stdarg with unknown types (10/27/03)
  • Initializer element not computable at load time (10/17/03)
  • Re: hmmm, no C99 [OT] (10/01/03)
• Clinton C Zimmerman
  • Re: Fun and Mental; Raisin for High; Achievements of Shoes (10/13/03)
  • Re: Fun and Mental; Raisin for High; Achievements of Shoes (10/13/03)
• Clive D. W. Feather
  • Re: Differences between 'const char' and 'char' (10/03/03)
• cody
  • Re: How can I set a integer array all bits to zero? (10/19/03)
  • Re: How can I set a integer array all bits to zero? (10/18/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from a long? (10/18/03)
  • Re: malloc/free weird behaviour (Win32 / MsVC7) (10/18/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from a long? (10/17/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from a long? (10/17/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from long? (10/17/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from a long? (10/17/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from a long? (10/17/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/17/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/17/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/16/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from a long? (10/16/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from a long? (10/16/03)
  • Re: Storing 4 characters using 3 bytes (10/16/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/16/03)
  • Re: undefined behavior? (10/16/03)
  • Re: Storing 4 characters using 3 bytes (10/16/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from a long? (10/16/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from a long? (10/16/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from a long? (10/16/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from a long? (10/16/03)
  • Re: How can I set a integer array all bits to zero? (10/16/03)
  • Re: 4D array to malloc (10/16/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/15/03)
  • Re: Storing 4 characters using 3 bytes (10/15/03)
  • Re: How to extract bytes from a long? (10/15/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/15/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/15/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/15/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/15/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/14/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/14/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/14/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/14/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/13/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/13/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/13/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/13/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/13/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/13/03)
  • Re: functions with no side-effects (10/13/03)
  • Re: Does standard C guarantee same memory content after realloc()? (10/13/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/13/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/12/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/11/03)
  • Re: The '_' char in variable names (10/11/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/11/03)
  • Re: Does standard C guarantee same memory content after realloc()? (10/11/03)
  • Re: static allocation question... (10/11/03)
  • Re: static allocation question... (10/10/03)
  • Re: Does standard C guarantee same memory content after realloc()? (10/10/03)
  • Re: malloc (10/10/03)
  • Re: Does standard C guarantee same memory content after realloc()? (10/10/03)
  • Re: Why C doen't allow if member of the structure is static? (10/10/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/10/03)
  • Re: compiling (10/10/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/10/03)
  • Re: malloc (10/10/03)
  • Re: Functioning In C (10/10/03)
  • Re: unicode (10/10/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/08/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/08/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/08/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/08/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/08/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/08/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/08/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/08/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/08/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/06/03)
  • why still use C? (10/05/03)
• Colin Newell
  • Re: delete comments in .c file (10/31/03)
  • Re: btree (10/26/03)
• Conan1st
  • Using char (10/28/03)
• Coreleus Corneleus
  • Re: Science responsible for the genocides of the 20th century. (10/17/03)
  • Re: Science responsible for the genocides of the 20th century. (10/12/03)
• Craig David
  • C++ (10/09/03)
• Craigb
  • Re: help needed with filnames as command line arguments (10/20/03)
  • Re: help needed with filnames as command line arguments (10/18/03)
  • Re: help needed with filnames as command line arguments (10/17/03)
• crazy
  • Re: pointers chainging in a function call? (10/04/03)
  • Re: pointers chainging in a function call? (10/04/03)
  • Re: printing array elements (10/02/03)
• CRM
  • Will IM replace e-mail? (10/10/03)
• cstudent79
  • powerpoint text extractor... Help! (10/13/03)
• Curt Geske
  • How to extract bytes from a long? (10/15/03)
• dam_fool_2003_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: Structure Creation (10/13/03)
  • Re: Structure Creation (10/13/03)
  • Re: Can array[]=malloc()ed? (10/11/03)
  • Can array[]=malloc()ed? (10/10/03)
  • A doubt about C's tree data struct (10/05/03)
  • Re: const type question (10/05/03)
  • Re: const type question (10/04/03)
  • Re: Linked list with void * (10/04/03)
  • Re: Preprocessor directive (10/03/03)
  • Re: Linked list with void * (10/03/03)
  • Linked list with void * (10/02/03)
  • Re: struct declaration and using free() (10/02/03)
  • Re: Variable length array confusion (10/01/03)
  • Re: zero-based array, in function confucsion (10/01/03)
• Dan
  • Re: Is this a valid data structure?? (10/07/03)
  • Is this a valid data structure?? (10/07/03)
• Dan Jacobson
  • do the equivalent of unix date(1) in C (10/31/03)
• Dan McLeran
  • Re: C or C++ first? (10/27/03)
• Dan Pop
  • Re: Help (10/30/03)
  • Re: incorrect printf o/p for doubles (10/30/03)
  • Re: calloc(1,1) vs. *malloc(1)=0 (10/30/03)
  • Re: Using char (10/30/03)
  • Re: What comes between learning the language and coding for real projects? (10/30/03)
  • Re: calloc(1,1) vs. *malloc(1)=0 (10/30/03)
  • Re: What comes between learning the language and coding for real projects? (10/30/03)
  • Re: Volatile (10/30/03)
  • Re: Recursive Functions (10/30/03)
  • Re: Named parameters (10/30/03)
  • Re: malloc and free (10/30/03)
  • Re: malloc and free (10/30/03)
  • Re: calloc(1,1) vs. *malloc(1)=0 (10/30/03)
  • Re: malloc and free (10/29/03)
  • Re: arrow operator (10/29/03)
  • Re: how to initialize a structure (10/29/03)
  • Re: Using char (10/29/03)
  • Re: Dynamic arrays (10/29/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/29/03)
  • Re: why still use C? (10/29/03)
  • Re: stdin and stdout (10/29/03)
  • Re: Using char (10/29/03)
  • Re: Is a "cast" ever necessary in "return"? (10/29/03)
  • Re: is there an alternative to strstr (10/28/03)
  • Re: C++ to C (10/28/03)
  • Re: Using char (10/28/03)
  • Re: Using char (10/28/03)
  • Re: Using char (10/28/03)
  • Re: Not reading data (10/28/03)
  • Re: Not reading data (10/28/03)
  • Re: timer in milliseconds (10/28/03)
  • Re: Not reading data (10/28/03)
  • Re: Not reading data (10/28/03)
  • Re: C++ to C (10/28/03)
  • Re: [FAQ] Re: Using "return" with parantheses? (10/28/03)
  • Re: Using "return" with parantheses? (10/28/03)
  • Re: Using char (10/28/03)
  • Re: Using "return" with parantheses? (10/28/03)
  • Re: Using char (10/28/03)
  • Re: timer in milliseconds (10/28/03)
  • Re: is there an alternative to strstr (10/27/03)
  • Re: timer in milliseconds (10/27/03)
  • Re: Using stdarg with unknown types (10/27/03)
  • Re: is there an alternative to strstr (10/27/03)
  • Re: is there an alternative to strstr (10/27/03)
  • Re: is there an alternative to strstr (10/27/03)
  • Re: atoi question (10/27/03)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Using "return" with parantheses? (10/27/03)
  • Re: [FAQ] Re: Using "return" with parantheses? (10/27/03)
  • Re: [FAQ] Re: Using "return" with parantheses? (10/27/03)
  • Re: wait until \n appears in string (10/27/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/27/03)
  • Re: Order of function evaluation (10/27/03)
  • Re: Using "return" with parantheses? (10/27/03)
  • Re: slightly OT: error handling conventions (10/24/03)
  • Re: segfault on strtok (10/24/03)
  • Re: segfault on strtok (10/24/03)
  • Re: why still use C?