Re: unsigned long long
From: Tom St Denis (tomstdenis_at_iahu.ca)
Date: 11/11/03
- Next message: Joona I Palaste: "Re: unsigned long long"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Portable int?"
- In reply to: Joona I Palaste: "Re: unsigned long long"
- Next in thread: Joona I Palaste: "Re: unsigned long long"
- Reply: Joona I Palaste: "Re: unsigned long long"
- Reply: P.J. Plauger: "Re: unsigned long long"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:04:31 GMT
"Joona I Palaste" <palaste@cc.helsinki.fi> wrote in message
news:bormbg$lut$1@oravannahka.helsinki.fi...
> > ANSI is old. I for one welcome our new ISO overlords.
>
> I would think that the difference between the ANSI and ISO versions of
> the C standard is entirely bureaucratic and has no effect on the
> technical content.
Be that as it may "unsigned long long" is part of ISOC AFAIK.
Tom
- Next message: Joona I Palaste: "Re: unsigned long long"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Portable int?"
- In reply to: Joona I Palaste: "Re: unsigned long long"
- Next in thread: Joona I Palaste: "Re: unsigned long long"
- Reply: Joona I Palaste: "Re: unsigned long long"
- Reply: P.J. Plauger: "Re: unsigned long long"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|