Re: [OT] Indian C programmers and "u"
From: Thomas Stegen (tstegen_at_cis.strath.ac.uk)
Date: 11/26/03
- Next message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: [OT] Indian C programmers and "u""
- Previous message: Dan Pop: "Re: [OT] Indian C programmers and "u""
- In reply to: Floyd Davidson: "Re: [OT] Indian C programmers and "u""
- Next in thread: Jeremy Yallop: "Re: [OT] Indian C programmers and "u""
- Reply: Jeremy Yallop: "Re: [OT] Indian C programmers and "u""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:40:54 +0000
Floyd Davidson wrote:
> The connotation of each is different, but that subtlety might
> well be lost on anyone who speaks English as a second language.
It is not subtle. The two are not interchangeable.
People who have english as their second language often have
a better grasp of grammar and semantics of words than native
speakers (if they have been learning the language for some
time). The reason is that native speakers generally know
very little outside colloquial meanings of words unless these
words happens to have formal meanings in some area the person
has some expertise in.
-- Thomas.
- Next message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: [OT] Indian C programmers and "u""
- Previous message: Dan Pop: "Re: [OT] Indian C programmers and "u""
- In reply to: Floyd Davidson: "Re: [OT] Indian C programmers and "u""
- Next in thread: Jeremy Yallop: "Re: [OT] Indian C programmers and "u""
- Reply: Jeremy Yallop: "Re: [OT] Indian C programmers and "u""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|