Re: [OT] Indian C programmers and "u"
From: Keith Thompson (kst-u_at_mib.org)
Date: 11/27/03
- Next message: Jeremy Yallop: "Re: [OT] Indian C programmers and "u""
- Previous message: Debashish Chakravarty: "Re: Style Question - Checking for Poor Parameters"
- In reply to: pandapower: "Re: [OT] Indian C programmers and "u""
- Next in thread: Sudheer Reddy Vakati: "Re: [OT] Indian C programmers and "u""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:15:16 GMT
pandapower@SoftHome.net (pandapower) writes:
[...]
> Its the westeners who have given us "u" , its not indians who have
> invented it.Indians have always given things which the world should be
> proud of.We have given you 0 which is the basis of all digital
> communications today(0's and 1's).
Well thanks for nothing! 8-)}
-- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst> San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://www.sdsc.edu/~kst> Schroedinger does Shakespeare: "To be *and* not to be" (Note new e-mail address)
- Next message: Jeremy Yallop: "Re: [OT] Indian C programmers and "u""
- Previous message: Debashish Chakravarty: "Re: Style Question - Checking for Poor Parameters"
- In reply to: pandapower: "Re: [OT] Indian C programmers and "u""
- Next in thread: Sudheer Reddy Vakati: "Re: [OT] Indian C programmers and "u""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]