anything wrong with this?
From: atv (atv-nospam_at_xs4all.nl)
Date: 12/13/03
- Next message: glen herrmannsfeldt: "Re: Compiler Warnings"
- Previous message: Chris Torek: "Re: dynamic allocation of structs (struct members dissapear)"
- Next in thread: A. Sinan Unur: "Re: anything wrong with this?"
- Reply: A. Sinan Unur: "Re: anything wrong with this?"
- Reply: Richard Heathfield: "Re: anything wrong with this?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 21:46:38 +0100
Hi,
is there something wrong with this code? It seems that it crashes
at the else { clause, when allocating a second record. Excuse for
the indentation, the g_warnings are from gtk.
Also, i'm using 2 pointers in the struct, which consists of 3 ints,
and 2 pointers, which i give 256 bytes each. Much to much ofcourse,
but it's just testcode.
The code doesn't even reach the g_warning in the { code.
Any help most appreciated.
atv
if(tail==NULL) {
g_warning("First record in schedule allocated");
tail=(schedule *)malloc(256);
tail->string=malloc(256);
tail->timestamp=malloc(256);
strcpy(tail->string,string);
strcpy(tail->timestamp,asctime(tstruct));
tail->year=tstruct->tm_year;
tail->month=tstruct->tm_mon;
tail->day=tstruct->tm_mday;
tail->next=NULL;
head=tail;
} else {
g_warning("New record in schedule allocated");
/* First check if a day is already booked */
while(tmp!=NULL) {
g_warning("Checking for double appointment");
if(!strcmp(tmp->timestamp,asctime(tstruct))) {
gtk_widget_hide(window1);
return -1;}
tmp=tmp->next;
}
tail->next=(schedule *)malloc(256);
tail=tail->next;
tail->string=malloc(256);
tail->timestamp=malloc(256);
strcpy(tail->string,string);
strcpy(tail->timestamp,asctime(tstruct));
tail->year=tstruct->tm_year;
tail->month=tstruct->tm_mon;
tail->day=tstruct->tm_mday;
tail->next=NULL;
- Next message: glen herrmannsfeldt: "Re: Compiler Warnings"
- Previous message: Chris Torek: "Re: dynamic allocation of structs (struct members dissapear)"
- Next in thread: A. Sinan Unur: "Re: anything wrong with this?"
- Reply: A. Sinan Unur: "Re: anything wrong with this?"
- Reply: Richard Heathfield: "Re: anything wrong with this?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|