Re: (OT?) Re: Stack overflow in function ...
From: CBFalconer (cbfalconer_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/15/04
- Next message: CBFalconer: "Re: Slow performance with new 3GHz Machine using FlushFileBuffers"
- Previous message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: question about cast"
- In reply to: Jim Lambert: "Re: (OT?) Re: Stack overflow in function ..."
- Next in thread: pete: "Re: (OT?) Re: Stack overflow in function ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:28:34 GMT
Jim Lambert wrote:
>
... snip ...
>
> I had a problem and after trying to resolve it and searching
> google, I decided to post on the one newsgroup that I thought
> would be most helpful in solving the problem. Heck it IS a C
> program I am having problems with.
I mistakenly and absent mindedly made a suggestion earlier, which
I now regret in the light of your excessive protests against being
redirected. Had you taken the trouble to lurk, read the welcome
message and the faq, you would have found a suitable elsewhere
with zero traffic.
-- Chuck F (cbfalconer@yahoo.com) (cbfalconer@worldnet.att.net) Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems. <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net> USE worldnet address!
- Next message: CBFalconer: "Re: Slow performance with new 3GHz Machine using FlushFileBuffers"
- Previous message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: question about cast"
- In reply to: Jim Lambert: "Re: (OT?) Re: Stack overflow in function ..."
- Next in thread: pete: "Re: (OT?) Re: Stack overflow in function ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|