Re: Order of evaluation and better declaration of functions
From: Christopher Benson-Manica (ataru_at_nospam.cyberspace.org)
Date: 01/20/04
- Next message: Dan Pop: "Re: Comments please"
- Previous message: James Kuyper: "Re: Extent of the "as-if" rule"
- In reply to: Peter Nilsson: "Re: Order of evaluation and better declaration of functions"
- Next in thread: August Derleth: "Re: Order of evaluation and better declaration of functions"
- Reply: August Derleth: "Re: Order of evaluation and better declaration of functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:11:10 +0000 (UTC)
Peter Nilsson <airia@acay.com.au> spoke thus:
>> j=++i+++i;
> That expression does require a diagnostic. ;)
foo.c:4: error: you are dumb
;)
-- Christopher Benson-Manica | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I ataru(at)cyberspace.org | don't, I need to know. Flames welcome.
- Next message: Dan Pop: "Re: Comments please"
- Previous message: James Kuyper: "Re: Extent of the "as-if" rule"
- In reply to: Peter Nilsson: "Re: Order of evaluation and better declaration of functions"
- Next in thread: August Derleth: "Re: Order of evaluation and better declaration of functions"
- Reply: August Derleth: "Re: Order of evaluation and better declaration of functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|