Re: the trouble with mex c
From: Richard Heathfield (dontmail_at_address.co.uk.invalid)
Date: 02/01/04
- Next message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: difference"
- Previous message: E. Robert Tisdale: "Re: difference"
- Maybe in reply to: Martin Ambuhl: "Re: the trouble with mex c"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 06:16:56 +0000 (UTC)
Martijn van den Branden wrote:
> I've included the full code below, but at places i've deleted declarations
> of variables
> where they are obvious replaced by ...
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Martijn
>
>
>
>
> #include "mex.h"
gcc -g -W -Wall -ansi -pedantic -o foo foo.c -lm
foo.c:1: mex.h: No such file or directory
That's going to be a problem for anyone trying to help you.
<snip>
-- Richard Heathfield : binary@eton.powernet.co.uk "Usenet is a strange place." - Dennis M Ritchie, 29 July 1999. C FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html K&R answers, C books, etc: http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton
- Next message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: difference"
- Previous message: E. Robert Tisdale: "Re: difference"
- Maybe in reply to: Martin Ambuhl: "Re: the trouble with mex c"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]