Re: online C programming test
From: Richard Heathfield (dontmail_at_address.co.uk.invalid)
Date: 02/04/04
- Next message: Peter Pichler: "Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ?"
- Previous message: E. Robert Tisdale: "Re: online C programming test"
- In reply to: Peter Pichler: "Re: online C programming test"
- Next in thread: CBFalconer: "Re: online C programming test"
- Reply: CBFalconer: "Re: online C programming test"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 23:55:04 +0000 (UTC)
Peter Pichler wrote:
<snip>
> I must regretfully say that most GPL code I
> have seen looks worse. Moreover it is usually highly non-portable. Is
> there a clause in GPL that I missed that says that the source must be
> unreadable?
No, but there does seem to be some kind of underlying ethos of "I'm doing
this for free, so I don't have to be legible", which I find appalling. I go
to a lot of trouble to make my own code readable. Whether I succeed is for
others to judge for themselves, but at least I try. I wish this were more
common.
-- Richard Heathfield : binary@eton.powernet.co.uk "Usenet is a strange place." - Dennis M Ritchie, 29 July 1999. C FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html K&R answers, C books, etc: http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton
- Next message: Peter Pichler: "Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ?"
- Previous message: E. Robert Tisdale: "Re: online C programming test"
- In reply to: Peter Pichler: "Re: online C programming test"
- Next in thread: CBFalconer: "Re: online C programming test"
- Reply: CBFalconer: "Re: online C programming test"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|