Re: Mystery: static variables & performance
From: pete (pfiland_at_mindspring.com)
Date: 02/08/04
- Next message: Simon Wright: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Previous message: pete: "Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question"
- In reply to: Mark Shelor: "Re: Mystery: static variables & performance"
- Next in thread: Mark Shelor: "Re: Mystery: static variables & performance"
- Reply: Mark Shelor: "Re: Mystery: static variables & performance"
- Reply: Rich Dawes: "Re: Mystery: static variables & performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 12:15:12 GMT
Mark Shelor wrote:
> Despite the shrill squeaks from the peanut gallery,
> posting my query to
> this newsgroup had very positive results. I've received several
> enlightened suggestions through responses and private emails.
"lurkers support me in email" is an old USENET joke.
Searched the web for "lurkers support me in email".
Results 1 - 10 of about 108. Search took 0.32 seconds.
http://www.bluejo.demon.co.uk/poetry/interstichia/lurkers.htm
-- pete
- Next message: Simon Wright: "Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language)"
- Previous message: pete: "Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question"
- In reply to: Mark Shelor: "Re: Mystery: static variables & performance"
- Next in thread: Mark Shelor: "Re: Mystery: static variables & performance"
- Reply: Mark Shelor: "Re: Mystery: static variables & performance"
- Reply: Rich Dawes: "Re: Mystery: static variables & performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|