Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance)

From: Erik (et57)
Date: 02/11/04


Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 23:51:51 +0100

On 11 Feb 2004 18:52:15 GMT, the right honourable Dan.Pop@cern.ch (Dan
Pop) wrote:

>In <k2li20p7br382mmmdvng0lvk5sq1vmd884@4ax.com> Erik <et57 at correos calor dot com> writes:
>
>>And there is no charter. So who determins which questions are
>>off-topic ? the "regulars" you say.
>
>What would be a technical newsgroup without its regulars? A next to
>useless place, because you'd never have any a priori indication about
>the quality of one answer or another. Since they are the most valuable
>resource of a newsgroup, they also have the privilege to decide the
>"moderation policy".
>
>>A problem with the internet is one of identity. We do not know the
>>regulars, never seen them, never heard them, never met them.
>>I have great difficulty in trusting unseen people on the net.
>
>When choosing technical books, do you select *only* the ones whose
>authors you know personally (have met, seen, spoken to)? Why would be
>the Internet any different?
>

Publishing books is an entirely different process than posting on
Usenet. There are collegues of the writer, review people , publishers
etc.etc. It's not easy to publish a book.
and there is no peer review for a usenet posting. Only after the fact.

>>Especially trusting them with any power to decide...etc.
>
>You don't have to trust them with that power, it is a power they
>acquired themselves, based on their own merits. If you don't like the
>job they do, find another newsgroup or create one of your own.

But I do like the job they do, most of the time. But trust is a
different thing.

>
>>(for that, there are the moderated groups. One can ban all one likes
>>in a mod. group. No problem with that)
>>No white-robed high-priests for me, thank you.
>
>They exist and exert their power, whether you like it or not.

hm, I am a fan of Immanuel Kant in this: I use my own brain.

>
>>My rule of thumb is: only trust if you have to. Or, As Ronnie Reagan
>>once said about the russians: trust but verify.
>>And I cannot verify on the net.
>
>That's your problem. On the net, the credentials of each individual

yes indeed it is my problem. But I solved it :-)

>are his posts and they are available to anyone interested.
>
>>There is no charter. So don't bark at people who decide by the name of
>>the news group: comp.lang.c: the C computer language. full stop.
>
>OK, so you're now trying to act as a super-high-priest, imposing to the
>high-priests what (not) to do. Why would they bother to listen to you?

so I am right ?
They listen, apparently...judging from the length of this thread...

>
>The Usenet rules have been cast in concrete long ago: the newcomer *must*
>lurk for a while, in order to figure out what the newsgroup is about,
>rather than act based on *assumptions* derived from the newsgroup's name.
>In the process, he'll also figure out who are the newsgroup's regulars
>that are worth paying attention to and who is/are the village idiot(s).

There is no concrete on the net.
And it's only worth making rules, if they can be enforced. Ask any
cop.

>
>You have as many chances to change the Usenet rules as you have to impose
>your will to the newsgroup's regulars. In other words, you're wasting
>your time.

but i don't want to change rules. I want to point out uncivilised
behaviour. (if only I could change it too !)

>
>Dan



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Quest for the CFers
    ... since many of your newsgroup ... I think the regulars there might provide some interesting ... of posters actually feel that way, ... No, I don't feel guilt. ...
    (sci.econ)
  • How to bounce a post [Was: How to debug a program only having .exe file]
    ... A seasonal feature on behalf of the bouncier regulars here. ... their posts would fill this newsgroup and starve the more deserving ... If you can't, don't bounce. ... MS newsgroup, and a Borland library were better, wouldn't you feel ...
    (comp.lang.cpp)
  • Re: Black Balling Practices in this Group?
    ... I've found over the years that every newsgroup has it's own 'personality'. ... You rarely see more than one or two responses to a problem ... which I think is due to the "he's got it" syndrome with the regulars. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance)
    ... What would be a technical newsgroup without its regulars? ... >regulars, never seen them, never heard them, never met them. ... You don't have to trust them with that power, ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance)
    ... >>resource of a newsgroup, they also have the privilege to decide the ... there is no shortage of BAD C books on the market. ... >>You don't have to trust them with that power, ... is moderated by its regulars. ...
    (comp.lang.c)