Re: Efficiency of math.h
From: Mike Wahler (mkwahler_at_mkwahler.net)
Date: 02/26/04
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number)"
- Previous message: Keith Thompson: "Re: String Functions"
- In reply to: E. Robert Tisdale: "Re: Efficiency of math.h"
- Next in thread: E. Robert Tisdale: "Re: Efficiency of math.h"
- Reply: E. Robert Tisdale: "Re: Efficiency of math.h"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 03:26:54 GMT
"E. Robert Tisdale" <E.Robert.Tisdale@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote in message
news:403D2216.1040808@jpl.nasa.gov...
> Christian Bau wrote:
>
> > Since I have actually not used the acos() function _once_
> > in over twenty years of C programming,
>
> So... you're a newbie eh?
I also have been using C for a long time (about 17 years).
I've never used *any* of the 'math.h' functions in my
production code (well, there might be one or two I've forgotten
about, but you get the idea). That's because my application
domains never needed them. So am I a 'newbie' too?
-Mike
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number)"
- Previous message: Keith Thompson: "Re: String Functions"
- In reply to: E. Robert Tisdale: "Re: Efficiency of math.h"
- Next in thread: E. Robert Tisdale: "Re: Efficiency of math.h"
- Reply: E. Robert Tisdale: "Re: Efficiency of math.h"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|