comp.lang.c
By Author

5138 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 01/31/04
Ending: 02/29/04

• Aad Rijnberg
  • Qualifier not checked (02/18/04)
• Aaron Couts
  • Re: 51MB size limit with fopen in append mode (02/25/04)
  • 51MB size limit with fopen in append mode (02/25/04)
• Aaron Walker
  • zeroing structure of char pointers (02/29/04)
• Adam Barr
  • Re: Comments requested: brief summary of C (02/24/04)
  • Comments requested: brief summary of C (02/24/04)
• Adi
  • segmentation fault with printf (02/27/04)
• AirPete
  • Re: C Linked List - (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
• AJ Mohan Rao
  • Re: Problem with prints twice instead of once. (02/06/04)
  • Re: Problem with prints twice instead of once. (02/06/04)
  • Re: Sufficient error checking of strtol()? (02/03/04)
• Akyl Tulegenov
  • dynamic memory for large arrays (02/23/04)
• Al Bowers
  • Re: is this correct (02/29/04)
  • Re: 0a appending w/strcpy (02/29/04)
  • Re: 0a appending w/strcpy (02/28/04)
  • Re: pointers and array (02/27/04)
  • Re: Linked list or realloc()? (02/25/04)
  • Re: problem parsing strings (02/24/04)
  • Re: printf with run-time format strings (02/10/04)
  • Re: Problem with structs and strings in C (02/09/04)
  • Re: Append to char * (02/09/04)
  • Re: How to calculate size of an array of dynaically malloc'd structs? (02/06/04)
  • Re: Struggling with bsearch - on a struct! (02/06/04)
  • Re: How would I use qsort to sort a struct with a char* member and a long member - I want to sort in order of the long member (02/05/04)
  • Re: beginer C question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Problems when reading from a file with fscanf (02/04/04)
  • Re: Segmentation fault (02/03/04)
  • Re: string copy (02/01/04)
• Alan
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/06/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
• Alan Balmer
  • Re: [OT] Switch question (02/23/04)
  • Re: Empty statement (02/20/04)
  • Re: Regarding Switch statement (02/20/04)
  • Re: Memory Allocation for Dynamic Alloccation (02/19/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/17/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] - propagation of incorrect information (02/16/04)
  • Re: Acessing registers with C (02/14/04)
  • Re: Acessing registers with C (02/14/04)
  • Re: macros and functions (02/13/04)
  • Re: Acessing registers with C (02/13/04)
  • Re: Acessing registers with C (02/13/04)
  • Re: Yet another nitpicky style question (02/13/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: [OT, was Topic Nazis] Etymology (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/11/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/11/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/10/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/09/04)
  • Re: calculations in C, userinterface in PHP (02/09/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/09/04)
  • Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/06/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/06/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/06/04)
  • Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/04/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/04/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/03/04)
  • Re: malloc and calloc (02/02/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/02/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/02/04)
  • Re: the trouble with mex c (02/02/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: Christian Bau (02/02/04)
  • Re: the story of a socket connect and a char array :-) (02/02/04)
• Alan Connor
  • Re: vi rules (02/16/04)
  • Re: vi rules (02/12/04)
  • Re: vi rules (02/11/04)
  • Re: help with sorting (02/11/04)
• Albert van der Horst
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/04/04)
• Aleks
  • Re: Error in typedef (02/18/04)
• Alex
  • Re: Is that a constant expression? (02/27/04)
  • Re: How to create a simple configurationfile parser? (02/26/04)
  • Re: procedure parameter struct order (02/23/04)
  • Re: procedure parameter struct order (02/23/04)
• Alex Monjushko
  • Re: execlp() - mystery arg (02/16/04)
  • Re: Security (02/16/04)
  • Re: char * vs. const char * (02/16/04)
  • Re: Need help: Pointer to String (02/10/04)
  • Re: const array declaration (02/10/04)
  • Re: const array declaration (02/09/04)
• Alex Pankratov
  • Re: How to check if child is done executing ... (02/02/04)
• Alexander Bartolich
  • Re: Condensing nested switch statements (02/03/04)
• Alexander Malkis
  • Is that a constant expression? (02/26/04)
• Allan Bruce
  • Re: Trouble calculating 5th root of a given number using C (02/02/04)
  • Re: Trouble calculating 5th root of a given number using C (02/02/04)
• Allin Cottrell
  • Re: writing a plugin for ethereal ... where to start (02/20/04)
  • Re: writing program from a book (02/20/04)
  • Re: Converting ASM to C (02/11/04)
  • Re: How to find a string in a stream of binary data? (02/11/04)
  • Re: How to find a string in a stream of binary data? (02/11/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • question on pointer notation (02/07/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/07/04)
• Amir Yantimirov
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/09/04)
• Amos Leffler
  • Re: Review: 3D-Array (02/01/04)
• Andras Tantos
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/03/04)
• Andreas Røsdal
  • monitors in C? (02/06/04)
• Andrew Clark
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
• Angus Comber
  • How to find a string in a stream of binary data? (02/11/04)
  • Usoing fopen etc is there a way to find file size (02/09/04)
  • How to calculate size of an array of dynaically malloc'd structs? (02/06/04)
  • Struggling with bsearch - on a struct! (02/05/04)
  • Re: How would I use qsort to sort a struct with a char* member and a long member - I want to sort in order of the long member (02/05/04)
  • Re: How would I use qsort to sort a struct with a char* member and a long member - I want to sort in order of the long member (02/05/04)
  • How would I use qsort to sort a struct with a char* member and a long member - I want to sort in order of the long member (02/05/04)
  • Re: What's the best way to create an associative array in C? (02/04/04)
  • What's the best way to create an associative array in C? (02/03/04)
• ankursinha
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/20/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/20/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/20/04)
  • "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/19/04)
• Annit Bhattacharya
  • Re: linked list (02/12/04)
• anony*mouse
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/12/04)
• anonymous_at_coolgroups.com
  • Book Opinion-Expert C programming (02/05/04)
• Anthony Moss
  • pointers and array (02/27/04)
• Anthony Yio
  • Groupware - Opengroupware server codes in C/ C++? (02/04/04)
• Anupam
  • Re: Weird problem: sscanf (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: volatile ptr question (02/11/04)
  • Re: Just want to know why (02/11/04)
  • Identifier collisions between global level and static identifiers (02/06/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: MSG (02/06/04)
• apropo
  • Re: pointers to pointers (02/18/04)
  • pointers to pointers (02/18/04)
  • Re: array end issue (02/16/04)
  • array end issue (02/16/04)
  • Re: pointers switch function (02/13/04)
  • Re: pointers switch function (02/13/04)
  • pointers switch function (02/13/04)
• Arjan Kenter
  • Re: [OT] Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/10/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/06/04)
  • Re: number of 1's in an integer (02/06/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/05/04)
  • Re: array to pointer decay question !! (02/02/04)
• Arthur J. O'Dwyer
  • [FAQ] Re: zeroing structure of char pointers (02/29/04)
  • Re: which is the better way to declare dynamic single dimension array inside struct (02/27/04)
  • Re: help with type-punned warning please (02/26/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/23/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/23/04)
  • Re: Problems dereferensing my C structures (custom types) (02/22/04)
  • Re: why doesn't it print 1.0? (02/22/04)
  • Re: Problems dereferensing my C structures (custom types) (02/22/04)
  • Re: linked lists (02/22/04)
  • Re: Motion Detection in JPeg frames (02/21/04)
  • Re: linked lists (02/21/04)
  • Re: linked lists (02/21/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/21/04)
  • Re: Style - imbedding data files (02/19/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/19/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/19/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: char * vs. const char * (02/17/04)
  • [OT] Re: bit operation (02/17/04)
  • Re: char * vs. const char * (02/16/04)
  • Re: If a cast from void* to a struct type pointer fails (02/14/04)
  • Re: Acessing registers with C (02/14/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/14/04)
  • Re: Acessing registers with C (02/14/04)
  • Re: Pointer Qs (02/12/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/12/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/12/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/12/04)
  • [OT] Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/11/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/09/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/09/04)
  • [OT] Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/09/04)
  • Re: Review: My C FAQ Page (02/08/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/08/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/06/04)
  • [OT] Re: A C tutorial (02/05/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/05/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/05/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/05/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Need help with c macro. (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • [ERT] Re: online C programming test (02/03/04)
  • Re: What's the best way to create an associative array in C? (02/03/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/03/04)
  • Re: Review: 3D-Array (02/03/04)
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/01/04)
• Artie Gold
  • Re: type mismatch (02/28/04)
  • Re: getc() only returns 1500 chars on a 5 Meg file (02/23/04)
  • Re: getc() only returns 1500 chars on a 5 Meg file (02/23/04)
  • Re: getc() only returns 1500 chars on a 5 Meg file (02/22/04)
  • Re: [ansi 89] inline (02/16/04)
  • Re: Losing a variable (02/16/04)
  • Re: If a cast from void* to a struct type pointer fails (02/14/04)
  • Re: If a cast from void* to a struct type pointer fails (02/14/04)
  • Re: [OT] Sig query (02/13/04)
  • Re: macros and functions (02/13/04)
  • Re: macros and functions (02/13/04)
  • Re: extend/shrink heap ? (02/11/04)
  • Re: extend/shrink heap ? (02/11/04)
  • Re: extend/shrink heap ? (02/10/04)
  • Re: errno 13 (02/09/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/05/04)
  • Re: A few things remain unclear... (02/02/04)
  • Re: running c program (02/02/04)
  • Re: string copy (02/01/04)
• Ashish
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Wanting to Learn (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
• Attila Feher
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/03/04)
• August Derleth
  • Re: getc() only returns 1500 chars on a 5 Meg file (02/25/04)
  • Re: What can C do and Basic V2 not? (02/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Switch question (02/21/04)
  • Re: OT: Boxline in curses ( Linux ) (02/21/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] array end issue (02/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] array end issue (02/18/04)
  • Re: Long long int (02/16/04)
  • Re: Long long int (02/16/04)
  • Re: [OT] - propagation of incorrect information (02/14/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/11/04)
  • Re: how to run the index with 1, 2, 2,3,4,5..... in an array from a do loop (02/08/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: A C tutorial (02/06/04)
  • Re: <time .h> in the standard,Why? (02/05/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/05/04)
  • Re: [OT] Shooting yourself in the foot (02/02/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/02/04)
  • Re: [OT] Shooting yourself in the foot (02/01/04)
• Avinash
  • Re: Just want to know why (02/11/04)
• Axel Vogt
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/25/04)
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/16/04)
• B. v Ingen Schenau
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
• Barry Margolin
  • Re: bit operation (02/19/04)
  • Re: bit operation (02/17/04)
• Barry Schwarz
  • Re: hello world (02/29/04)
  • Re: Search a binary file for a string... again! (its to slow) (02/29/04)
  • Re: MultiDim Array Challenge (02/28/04)
  • Re: bitfield and enum, is this legal? (02/27/04)
  • Re: String Functions (02/23/04)
  • Re: reading macro (02/23/04)
  • Re: error when passing value to function (02/23/04)
  • Re: API function won't compile using CYGWIN g++; Interpreting error message (01/31/04)
• bartek
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/07/04)
• Beardy
  • Re: writing program from a book (02/20/04)
• beliavsky_at_aol.com
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/01/04)
• ben
  • Re: how to simplify/shorten this loop of bit shifting code? (02/17/04)
  • Re: how to simplify/shorten this loop of bit shifting code? (02/17/04)
  • Re: how to simplify/shorten this loop of bit shifting code? (02/16/04)
  • Re: how to simplify/shorten this loop of bit shifting code? (02/16/04)
  • how to simplify/shorten this loop of bit shifting code? (02/16/04)
• Ben Peddell
  • Re: First argument lost when doing exec (02/10/04)
• Ben Pfaff
  • Re: A NULL pointer changed after returned? (02/29/04)
  • Re: A NULL pointer changed after returned? (02/29/04)
  • Re: Why (long)NULL ? (02/29/04)
  • Re: hello world (02/28/04)
  • Re: which is the better way to declare dynamic single dimension array inside struct (02/27/04)
  • Re: Linked list or realloc()? (02/25/04)
  • Re: mmap vs read/write (02/25/04)
  • Re: gethostbyaddr returning null for CNAME records (02/25/04)
  • Re: Difference? (02/25/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/25/04)
  • Re: struct stat *stbuf seg fault (02/25/04)
  • Re: Difference? (02/24/04)
  • Re: bitfield and enum, is this legal? (02/24/04)
  • Re: bitfield and enum, is this legal? (02/24/04)
  • Re: reading a file using fread() (02/23/04)
  • Re: limits.h and int len (02/23/04)
  • Re: value of ((int)0.7) and ((int)-0.7) (02/23/04)
  • Re: bitfield and enum, is this legal? (02/23/04)
  • Re: Creating an argument list for sprintf (02/23/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/23/04)
  • Re: limits.h and int len (02/21/04)
  • Re: complexity of an algorithm (02/20/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/16/04)
  • Re: is casting a variadic function to a non-variadic one legal? (02/13/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/13/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/11/04)
  • Re: utf-8 string functions in c (02/11/04)
  • Re: utf-8 string functions in c (02/10/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: writing a shell in c (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/04/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/03/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/03/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/03/04)
  • Re: stringise DBL_DIG (02/01/04)
  • Re: [OT] The Deathstation (01/31/04)
• Benedicte
  • Problems when reading from a file with fscanf (02/04/04)
• Benjamin Rutt
  • Re: finding redundant #includes to shorten compile time (02/05/04)
  • finding redundant #includes to shorten compile time (02/05/04)
• berthelot samuel
  • pow problem (02/10/04)
• Bertrand Mollinier Toublet
  • [OT] Re: what "google" do to search a pattern (02/13/04)
• Bestel
  • send data to log with xinetd (02/25/04)
• Bill
  • Re: Read a binary file until "\name\" is encountered... (02/26/04)
• Bill Cunningham
  • Re: Standard question (02/29/04)
  • Standard question (02/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/25/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/24/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/17/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/19/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/17/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/17/04)
  • C dangerous? (02/17/04)
  • Re: Main [was File IO] (02/11/04)
  • Re: Main [was File IO] (02/10/04)
  • Main [was File IO] (02/09/04)
  • standard change (02/01/04)
• Bill Daly
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/24/04)
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/18/04)
• Bill Hanna
  • Re: 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/22/04)
• Bjarne Stroustrup
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/09/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/07/04)
• Bleakcabal
  • Problem with structs and strings in C (02/09/04)
• Bliss
  • Re: string copy (02/02/04)
• bml
  • Re: Questions, please (02/02/04)
  • Questions, please (02/02/04)
  • string copy (02/01/04)
• bob
  • Need help with c macro. (02/03/04)
• Bob Crowley
  • Re: problem related to printf!! why is it so??? (02/01/04)
• Bob Sheff
  • Re: Converting ASM to C (02/16/04)
• Booser
  • Iterative Merge Sort Using Circular Linked List (02/09/04)
• Brian Gough
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/02/04)
• Brian MacBride
  • Re: linked list (02/13/04)
• brianj
  • How to get make to work under Cygwin bash shell (02/10/04)
• Bruno Desthuilliers
  • Re: What can C do and Basic V2 not? (02/22/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/17/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/10/04)
  • Re: [OT] Strong typing ? [was : Wanting to Learn] (02/06/04)
  • Re: [OT] Wanting to Learn (02/06/04)
  • Re: [OT] Wanting to Learn (02/06/04)
  • Re:[OT] Wanting to Learn (02/05/04)
  • Re: Wanting to Learn (02/04/04)
  • Re: [OT ?] Newbie with ANSI C (02/02/04)
  • Re: test (02/01/04)
• Bruno Rosenau
  • Einsendeaufgabe (02/17/04)
• Buck Rogers
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/16/04)
  • Re: c/c++ compiler on windows (02/01/04)
  • Re: Allocating space for char*? (02/01/04)
• Buffy The Cache Coder
  • [OT] Outsourcing your C-progammer (02/24/04)
• bv
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/21/04)
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/17/04)
• c99
  • Test msg. (02/28/04)
• Capri
  • Building an application.. (02/14/04)
• Capstar
  • Re: code review (02/09/04)
  • Re: struct hack question (02/03/04)
  • struct hack question (02/03/04)
  • Re: longjmp vs goto (02/03/04)
  • Re: longjmp vs goto (02/02/04)
• caroundw5h
  • Re: limits.h and int len (02/18/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/03/04)
• Carsten Hansen
  • Re: Volatile variables (02/28/04)
  • Re: Volatile variables (02/27/04)
• Casper H.S. Dik
  • Re: string concatenation (02/14/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (02/14/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (02/14/04)
• CBFalconer
  • Re: Search a binary file for a string... again! (its to slow) (02/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Efficiency of Tisdale? (was: Efficiency of math.h) (02/27/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: problem with char array (02/26/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
  • Re: Binary constant macros (02/26/04)
  • Re: Read a binary file until "\name\" is encountered... (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: 51MB size limit with fopen in append mode (02/25/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/25/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/25/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/25/04)
  • Re: Read a binary file until "\name\" is encountered... (02/25/04)
  • Re: Linked list or realloc()? (02/25/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/25/04)
  • Re: C Programming Assignment: (02/24/04)
  • Re: problem parsing strings (02/24/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/24/04)
  • Re: Comments requested: brief summary of C (02/24/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/24/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/24/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (02/24/04)
  • Re: Fibonacci number (02/23/04)
  • Re: Difference? (02/23/04)
  • Re: Loops, switches, embedded returns (02/23/04)
  • Re: tmpnam question (02/23/04)
  • Re: Fibonacci number (02/23/04)
  • Re: struct stat *stbuf seg fault (02/23/04)
  • Re: getc() only returns 1500 chars on a 5 Meg file (02/23/04)
  • Re: Input file donkey work. (02/22/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/22/04)
  • Re: linked lists (02/21/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/21/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (02/21/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/21/04)
  • Re: Regarding Switch statement (02/21/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/21/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/21/04)
  • Re: Loops, switches, embedded returns (02/20/04)
  • Re: Issues with input (02/20/04)
  • Re: Spelling (02/20/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/20/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/20/04)
  • Re: Regarding Switch statement (02/20/04)
  • Re: bit operation (02/17/04)
  • Re: 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/17/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/17/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/20/04)
  • Re: How do i found out the number of lines in a file (02/20/04)
  • Re: Regarding Switch statement (02/20/04)
  • Re: useless warnings (02/20/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/20/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/20/04)
  • Re: writing a plugin for ethereal ... where to start (02/20/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/20/04)
  • Re: bit operation (02/20/04)
  • Re: Style - imbedding data files (02/19/04)
  • Re: Copying structures of different type (02/19/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/19/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/19/04)
  • Re: bit operation (02/19/04)
  • Re: struct problem (02/19/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/19/04)
  • Re: about hash table (02/18/04)
  • Re: edit list (02/18/04)
  • Re: Problem with pointer to array of structures (02/18/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/18/04)
  • Re: RPC question (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/18/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/18/04)
  • Re: Programming / malloc Q (02/18/04)
  • Re: 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/17/04)
  • Re: 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/17/04)
  • Re: Problems dereferensing my C structures (custom types) (02/17/04)
  • Re: About bitfields (02/17/04)
  • Re: need help regarding Natural language parsing!! (02/17/04)
  • Re: bit operation (02/17/04)
  • Re: Losing a variable (02/17/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/17/04)
  • Re: Volatile variables in C!! (02/17/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/17/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] array end issue (02/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] - propagation of incorrect information (02/17/04)
  • Re: Why the zero case in fabs()? (02/17/04)
  • Re: Programming / malloc Q (02/17/04)
  • Re: execlp() - mystery arg (02/17/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/17/04)
  • Re: Segmentation fault need help (02/16/04)
  • Re: redefinition (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/16/04)
  • Re: About bitfields (02/16/04)
  • Re: Volatile variables in C!! (02/16/04)
  • Re: Building an application.. (02/16/04)
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/16/04)
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/16/04)
  • Re: > (02/16/04)
  • Re: extend/shrink heap ? (02/16/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/16/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/16/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/16/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/16/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/16/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/10/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/10/04)
  • Re: Need help: Pointer to String (02/10/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (02/10/04)
  • Re: A more efficient way (02/10/04)
  • Re: const array declaration (02/10/04)
  • Re: Iterative Merge Sort Using Circular Linked List (02/09/04)
  • Re: Problem with structs and strings in C (02/09/04)
  • Re: FSM (Finite State Machine) Generator - Open Source (02/09/04)
  • Re: accessing array element as pointer (02/09/04)
  • Re: File access permission (02/09/04)
  • Re: File I/O (02/09/04)
  • Re: File I/O (02/09/04)
  • Re: File access permission (02/09/04)
  • Re: File access permission (02/09/04)
  • Re: File I/O (02/09/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/09/04)
  • Re: Check if a directory is empty and empty it (02/09/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/08/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/08/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/08/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/08/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/08/04)
  • Re: how to run the index with 1, 2, 2,3,4,5..... in an array from a do loop (02/08/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/08/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/08/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/07/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/07/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/07/04)
  • Re: Spirit rover OS problems (02/07/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • Re: How to pass by reference a dinamic array to a C routine (02/07/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/07/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/07/04)
  • Re: code review (02/07/04)
  • Re: code review (02/07/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/07/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/07/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/07/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/07/04)
  • Re: How to pass by reference a dinamic array to a C routine (02/07/04)
  • Re: calculations in C, userinterface in PHP (02/07/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/07/04)
  • Re: finding redundant #includes to shorten compile time (02/07/04)
  • Re: Identifier collisions between global level and static identifiers (02/06/04)
  • Re: number of 1's in an integer (02/06/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/06/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/06/04)
  • Re: Style question (02/06/04)
  • Re: memory oraganisation?? (02/06/04)
  • Re: generating waves (02/06/04)
  • Re: Newbie question (02/06/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/06/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/06/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/06/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/06/04)
  • Re: Style question (02/06/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/06/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/06/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/06/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/06/04)
  • Re: How would I use qsort to sort a struct with a char* member and a long member - I want to sort in order of the long member (02/05/04)
  • Re: Style question (02/05/04)
  • Re: output to *.xls (02/05/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/05/04)
  • Re: Too obfuscated? (02/05/04)
  • Re: C to Pro COBOL Problem - Bytes Shifted by 4 (02/05/04)
  • Re: Style question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/05/04)
  • Re: Will reading from stdin() flush output to stdout()? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Wanting to Learn (02/05/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/05/04)
  • Re: A more efficient way (02/05/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Style question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/05/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/05/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/04/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/04/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/04/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/04/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/04/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/04/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/04/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/04/04)
  • Re: Condensing nested switch statements (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Condensing nested switch statements (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: A situation (02/03/04)
  • Re: Segmentation fault (02/03/04)
  • Re: [ERT] Re: online C programming test (02/03/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/03/04)
  • Re: A few things remain unclear... (02/03/04)
  • Re: Newbie with ANSI C (02/03/04)
  • Re: malloc and calloc (02/02/04)
  • Re: using typedef for structures in C (02/02/04)
  • Re: Newbie with ANSI C (02/02/04)
  • Re: Initialization of global variables (02/02/04)
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/02/04)
  • OT: Re: standard change (02/02/04)
  • Re: running c program (02/01/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/01/04)
  • Re: problem related to printf!! why is it so??? (02/01/04)
  • OT: C perfomance (02/01/04)
  • Re: API function won't compile using CYGWIN g++; Interpreting error message (02/01/04)
  • Re: the trouble with mex c (02/01/04)
  • Re: Efficient Text File Copy (02/01/04)
  • Re: why is casting malloc a bad thing? (02/01/04)
  • Re: Disadvantages of malloc() (02/01/04)
• celsius
  • need help new to C programming (02/28/04)
• Chad Paquette
  • getenv and carriage returns (02/04/04)
• Charles Harrison Caudill
  • Re: struct stat *stbuf seg fault (02/23/04)
  • Re: struct stat *stbuf seg fault (02/23/04)
  • Re: [ansi 89] inline (02/17/04)
  • Re: JPEG/TIFF routines? (02/16/04)
  • Re: JPEG/TIFF routines? (02/16/04)
  • [ansi 89] inline (02/16/04)
  • Re: Learning c, need a little help with compiling. (02/16/04)
  • Re: Yet another nitpicky style question (02/13/04)
• Charles Sullivan
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/25/04)
• Chris
  • Re: VSIPL (02/10/04)
  • VSIPL (02/09/04)
• Chris F.A. Johnson
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/14/04)
• Chris Mantoulidis
  • Re: Just want to know why (02/12/04)
  • Re: Just want to know why (02/11/04)
  • Re: const array declaration (02/10/04)
  • Re: c/c++ compiler on windows (02/01/04)
• Chris McDonald
  • Re: Help for students, provided by a Scientists Group (02/02/04)
• Chris Saunders
  • Re: Interpreting some C code (02/06/04)
  • Interpreting some C code (02/06/04)
• Chris Torek
  • Re: 0a appending w/strcpy (02/28/04)
  • Re: help with type-punned warning please (02/28/04)
  • Re: 0a appending w/strcpy (02/28/04)
  • Re: Volatile variables (02/28/04)
  • Re: pointers and array (02/28/04)
  • Re: Volatile variables (02/28/04)
  • Re: Volatile variables (02/27/04)
  • Re: help with type-punned warning please (02/26/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/25/04)
  • Re: 51MB size limit with fopen in append mode (02/25/04)
  • Re: tmpnam question (02/25/04)
  • Re: procedure parameter struct order (02/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Switch question (02/23/04)
  • Re: Loops, switches, embedded returns (02/23/04)
  • Re: global scope on paramaters (02/19/04)
  • Re: Statements and expressions. (02/17/04)
  • Re: how to simplify/shorten this loop of bit shifting code? (02/17/04)
  • Re: how to simplify/shorten this loop of bit shifting code? (02/16/04)
  • Re: [OT, probably] stpcpy (02/16/04)
  • Re: Portable assignment (02/16/04)
  • Re: binary output to stdout in Windows (02/15/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/15/04)
  • Re: is casting a variadic function to a non-variadic one legal? (02/13/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/13/04)
  • Re: printf with run-time format strings (02/13/04)
  • Re: Acessing registers with C (02/13/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/13/04)
  • Re: Tricky Code (02/12/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/11/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/11/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/11/04)
  • Re: Can anyone improve this any further...... (02/11/04)
  • Re: const array declaration (02/10/04)
  • Re: accessing array element as pointer (02/09/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/09/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/09/04)
  • Re: register caching of static variables (02/08/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/06/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Stripping multiline C comments without using Lex (02/05/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/05/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/05/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/03/04)
  • Re: ANSI C - Filsize ? (02/02/04)
  • Re: why is casting malloc a bad thing? (02/02/04)
  • Re: C perfomance (02/01/04)
  • Re: Efficient Text File Copy (01/31/04)
  • Re: Disadvantages of malloc() (01/31/04)
• ChrisD
  • Re: network byte order (02/27/04)
• Christian Bau
  • Re: Troll Alert: [OT] Efficiency of math.h (02/29/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/25/04)
  • Re: Endianness, was: Most negative double value (02/25/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (02/23/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/23/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/23/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/23/04)
  • Re: why doesn't it print 1.0? (02/22/04)
  • Re: perils of memset (02/22/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/22/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/22/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/20/04)
  • Re: Why the zero case in fabs()? (02/17/04)
  • Re: complexity of an algorithm (02/20/04)
  • Re: useless warnings (02/20/04)
  • Re: Troll: bit operation (02/20/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/20/04)
  • Re: Why the zero case in fabs()? (02/17/04)
  • Re: how to simplify/shorten this loop of bit shifting code? (02/16/04)
  • Re: Portable assignment (02/16/04)
  • Re: Why the zero case in fabs()? (02/16/04)
  • Re: Tricky Code (02/13/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/12/04)
  • Re: Globals vs passing in by reference (02/11/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/11/04)
  • Re: why shoule write code like these? (02/11/04)
  • Re: why shoule write code like these? (02/11/04)
  • Re: Tricky Code (02/11/04)
  • Re: struct's first member and the NULL pointer (02/11/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/10/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/10/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/09/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/08/04)
  • Re: register caching of static variables (02/08/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: Memory allocation questions (02/08/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/07/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/07/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/07/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/07/04)
  • Re: code review (02/07/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/07/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/07/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/06/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/06/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/05/04)
  • Re: Style question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/05/04)
  • Re: A more efficient way (02/05/04)
  • Re: Style question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: malloc and calloc (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: malloc and calloc (02/04/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/04/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/03/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/03/04)
  • Re: longjmp vs goto (02/03/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/03/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: Christian Bau (02/02/04)
  • Re: C perfomance (02/02/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: Christian Bau (02/01/04)
  • Re: why is casting malloc a bad thing? (02/01/04)
  • Re: C perfomance (02/01/04)
• Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: 51MB size limit with fopen in append mode (02/26/04)
  • Re: send data to log with xinetd (02/25/04)
  • Re: ssl-connect over tcp (02/24/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (02/23/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (02/20/04)
  • Re: New Webmaster Forum (02/20/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/19/04)
  • Re: Crosscompile host linux target mac os x (02/19/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/19/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/19/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/19/04)
  • Re: malloc Q (02/19/04)
  • Re: malloc Q (02/19/04)
  • Re: Statements and expressions. (02/19/04)
  • Re: edit list (02/19/04)
  • Referencing/forward declarations (02/19/04)
  • Re: How do i found out the number of lines in a file (02/19/04)
  • Re: If a cast from void* to a struct type pointer fails (02/17/04)
  • Re: How to read/write raw bytes from a flash card in C++? (02/17/04)
  • Re: [OT, probably] stpcpy (02/16/04)
  • Re: Security (02/16/04)
  • Re: Learning c, need a little help with compiling. (02/16/04)
  • Re: Yet another nitpicky style question (02/13/04)
  • Yet another nitpicky style question (02/13/04)
  • Re: initialize serial port (02/13/04)
  • Re: signed and unsigned char (02/13/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/13/04)
  • Re: what "google" do to search a pattern (02/13/04)
  • Re: signed and unsigned char (02/12/04)
  • signed and unsigned char (02/12/04)
  • Re: quickest way to determine character sizes (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: [OT, was Topic Nazis] Etymology (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • [OT, was Topic Nazis] Etymology (02/11/04)
  • Re: [OT] Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: [OT] - propagation of incorrect information (02/11/04)
  • Re: why shoule write code like these? (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/10/04)
  • Re: [OT, probably] stpcpy (02/09/04)
  • Re: [OT, probably] stpcpy (02/09/04)
  • [OT, probably] stpcpy (02/09/04)
  • Re: pointers and files (02/09/04)
  • Re: javadoc like (02/09/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/09/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/08/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/07/04)
  • Re: generating waves (02/06/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/06/04)
  • Re: random numbers (02/06/04)
  • Re: Purify problem or compiler problem? (02/06/04)
  • Re: Book Opinion-Expert C programming (02/06/04)
  • Re: WASHINGTON POST = HOG-WASH POST (02/06/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/06/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/06/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/05/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/05/04)
  • A quick question (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/05/04)
  • Re: Book Opinion-Expert C programming (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Too obfuscated? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Too obfuscated? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Style question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/05/04)
  • Re: REQ:Pascal to C converter for WinXp please (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: C to Pro COBOL Problem - Bytes Shifted by 4 (02/05/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Style question (02/04/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/04/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/04/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/04/04)
  • Another style question (02/04/04)
  • Style question (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Question re. integral promotion, signed->unsigned (02/04/04)
  • Re: WASHINGTON POST = HOG-WASH POST (02/04/04)
  • Re: System programming - creating a shell (02/04/04)
  • Re: Groupware - Opengroupware server codes in C/ C++? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Condensing nested switch statements (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: writing a shell in c (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Condensing nested switch statements (02/03/04)
  • Re: Condensing nested switch statements (02/03/04)
  • Re: Condensing nested switch statements (02/03/04)
  • Re: ***what is the reason for this strange problem?*** (02/03/04)
  • Condensing nested switch statements (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Is it really necessary? (02/03/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/02/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/02/04)
  • Re: Trouble calculating 5th root of a given number using C (02/02/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/02/04)
  • Too obfuscated? (02/02/04)
  • Re: getting resource information: battery level and more (02/02/04)
  • Re: test (02/01/04)
• Christopher Dyken
  • [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/17/04)
  • Re: 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/17/04)
  • 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/17/04)
  • Re: 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/17/04)
  • [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/17/04)
  • Re: 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/17/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/17/04)
  • Re: 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/17/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/17/04)
  • Re: 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/17/04)
  • Re: 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/17/04)
  • 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/17/04)
• Clark Cox
  • Re: [OT] Re: procedure parameter struct order (02/23/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/23/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/23/04)
  • Re: bit operation (02/19/04)
  • Re: struct problem (02/19/04)
  • Re: bit operation (02/17/04)
  • Re: max value in an array (02/13/04)
• Clint Olsen
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • Re: Why runtime alignment could be useful (02/06/04)
  • Why runtime alignment could be useful (02/05/04)
• Colin Walters
  • is casting a variadic function to a non-variadic one legal? (02/13/04)
• CountScubula
  • Re: calculations in C, userinterface in PHP (02/06/04)
• cr88192
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/11/04)
• Cris Ding
  • Re: How to handle this problem in MS VC++ (02/18/04)
  • How to handle this problem in MS VC++ (02/17/04)
  • Re: How to call an external command? (02/16/04)
  • How to call an external command? (02/15/04)
• curious_one
  • Re: Casting (signed long)(unsigned long) (02/12/04)
• CViniciusM
  • Re: Function definition into main() function. (02/28/04)
  • Function definition into main() function. (02/27/04)
  • Function definition into main() function. (02/27/04)
• D
  • Re: comma in string (02/15/04)
  • comma in string (02/15/04)
• Dan Henry
  • Re: how to run the index with 1, 2, 2,3,4,5..... in an array from a do loop (02/08/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: FSM (Finite State Machine) Generator - Open Source (02/08/04)
• Dan Pop
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/27/04)
  • Re: pointers and array (02/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/27/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/27/04)
  • Re: Volatile variables (02/27/04)
  • Re: unsigned short; (02/27/04)
  • Re: unsigned short; (02/27/04)
  • Re: unsigned short; (02/27/04)
  • Re: unsigned short; (02/27/04)
  • Re: unsigned short; (02/27/04)
  • Re: is this valid c or a compiler bug? (02/27/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/27/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/27/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/26/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/26/04)
  • Re: weird 'C' warning - can you solve this? (02/26/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
  • Re: help with type-punned warning please (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/25/04)
  • Re: weird 'C' warning - can you solve this? (02/25/04)
  • Re: Please help........... (02/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/25/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/25/04)
  • Re: weird 'C' warning - can you solve this? (02/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/24/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/24/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/24/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/24/04)
  • Re: What can C do and Basic V2 not? (02/24/04)
  • Re: Style - imbedding data files (02/24/04)
  • Re: Style - imbedding data files (02/24/04)
  • Re: Style - imbedding data files (02/24/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/24/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/20/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/20/04)
  • Re: writing program from a book (02/20/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/20/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/20/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/20/04)
  • Re: useless warnings (02/20/04)
  • Re: Style - imbedding data files (02/20/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/20/04)
  • Re: limits.h and int len (02/20/04)
  • Re: How do i found out the number of lines in a file (02/20/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/20/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/20/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/20/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/20/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/20/04)
  • Re: About bitfields (02/17/04)
  • Re: [ansi 89] inline (02/17/04)
  • Re: Why the zero case in fabs()? (02/17/04)
  • Re: [ansi 89] inline (02/17/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/17/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/17/04)
  • Re: Style - imbedding data files (02/19/04)
  • Re: Just want to know why (02/19/04)
  • Re: How do i found out the number of lines in a file (02/19/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/19/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/19/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/19/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/19/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/19/04)
  • Re: Style - imbedding data files (02/19/04)
  • Re: How to define a define that defines some defines ? (02/19/04)
  • Re: How do i found out the number of lines in a file (02/19/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/19/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/19/04)
  • Re: Just want to know why (02/19/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/19/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/19/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/19/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: limits.h and int len (02/18/04)
  • Re: a shorter strchr (02/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: [ansi 89] inline (02/18/04)
  • Re: limits.h and int len (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: limits.h and int len (02/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: [ansi 89] inline (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: a shorter strchr (02/18/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/18/04)
  • Re: The behaviour of getchar() (02/17/04)
  • Re: About bitfields (02/17/04)
  • Re: Statements and expressions. (02/17/04)
  • Re: How to read/write raw bytes from a flash card in C++? (02/17/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] - propagation of incorrect information (02/17/04)
  • Re: [ansi 89] inline (02/17/04)
  • Re: [ansi 89] inline (02/17/04)
  • Re: Why the zero case in fabs()? (02/17/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/17/04)
  • Re: The behaviour of getchar() (02/17/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/17/04)
  • Re: Reading from array is faster than writing ??? (02/17/04)
  • Re: char * vs. const char * (02/17/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/17/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/17/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/17/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/17/04)
  • Re: About bitfields (02/17/04)
  • Re: Why the zero case in fabs()? (02/16/04)
  • Re: The behaviour of getchar() (02/16/04)
  • Re: redefinition (02/16/04)
  • Re: redefinition (02/16/04)
  • Re: itoa in pure C (02/16/04)
  • Re: binary output to stdout in Windows (02/16/04)
  • Re: binary output to stdout in Windows (02/16/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/16/04)
  • Re: [OT] Origins of a.out (02/16/04)
  • Re: [OT] - propagation of incorrect information (02/16/04)
  • Re: [OT] Origins of a.out (02/16/04)
  • Re: Use of const in parameter specification (02/16/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/16/04)
  • Re: The behaviour of getchar() (02/16/04)
  • Re: Reading from array is faster than writing ??? (02/16/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/16/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/16/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/16/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/16/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/16/04)
  • Re: About bitfields (02/16/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/14/04)
  • Re: Reading from array is faster than writing ??? (02/13/04)
  • Re: signed and unsigned char (02/13/04)
  • Re: Yet another nitpicky style question (02/13/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/13/04)
  • Re: Reading from array is faster than writing ??? (02/13/04)
  • Re: initialize serial port (02/13/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/13/04)
  • Re: what "google" do to search a pattern (02/13/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/13/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/13/04)
  • Re: signed and unsigned char (02/13/04)
  • Re: Converting ASM to C (02/13/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/13/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/13/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/13/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/13/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/13/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (02/13/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/12/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/12/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: strtol question (02/12/04)
  • Re: quickest way to determine character sizes (02/12/04)
  • Re: problem in K&R answer book (02/12/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/12/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/12/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/12/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/12/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Converting ASM to C (02/11/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/11/04)
  • Re: [OT] - propagation of incorrect information (02/11/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/11/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/11/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/11/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/11/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/11/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/11/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/11/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/11/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/11/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/11/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/11/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/11/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/11/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/10/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/10/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/10/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/10/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/10/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/10/04)
  • Re: utf-8 string functions in c (02/10/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/10/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/10/04)
  • Re: Probably a stupid newbie question. (02/10/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/10/04)
  • Re: Off Topic: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/10/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/10/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/10/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/10/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/10/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/10/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/10/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/10/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/10/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/10/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/10/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/10/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/10/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/10/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/10/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/06/04)
  • Re: itoa in pure C (02/06/04)
  • Re: finding redundant #includes to shorten compile time (02/06/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/06/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/06/04)
  • Re: Book Opinion-Expert C programming (02/06/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/06/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/06/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/06/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/06/04)
  • Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/06/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/06/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/06/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/06/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/05/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/05/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/05/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/05/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/05/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: <time .h> in the standard,Why? (02/04/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/04/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/04/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/04/04)
  • Re: malloc and calloc (02/04/04)
  • Re: Collating multi-byte strings (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/03/04)
  • Re: A few things remain unclear... (02/03/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/03/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/03/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/03/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/03/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: malloc and calloc (02/03/04)
  • Re: longjmp vs goto (02/03/04)
  • Re: Error in Preprocessing (02/03/04)
  • Re: Question re. integral promotion, signed->unsigned (02/02/04)
  • Re: longjmp vs goto (02/02/04)
  • Re: Is getopt() standard C? etc. (02/02/04)
  • Re: Initialization of global variables (02/02/04)
• Daniel Haude
  • Re: String Functions (02/23/04)
• Darklight
  • Re: is this correct (02/29/04)
  • is this correct (02/29/04)
  • Re: problem with char array (02/27/04)
  • Re: Please help........... (02/25/04)
  • which is the better path (02/17/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • which is the better path (02/17/04)
• Darrell Grainger
  • Re: What is the single most helpfull guide/reference one could go to!? (02/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Switch question (02/21/04)
  • Re: linked lists (02/21/04)
  • Re: linked lists (02/21/04)
  • Re: Spelling (02/20/04)
  • Re: Spelling (02/20/04)
  • Re: Find Greater or Equal (02/20/04)
  • Re: malloc Q (02/19/04)
  • Re: pointers to pointers (02/18/04)
  • Re: limits.h and int len (02/18/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: About bitfields (02/14/04)
  • Re: strtol question (02/12/04)
  • Re: searching a substring (02/12/04)
  • Re: Converting ASM to C (02/11/04)
  • Re: javadoc like (02/10/04)
  • Re: How to pass by reference a dinamic array to a C routine (02/06/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/06/04)
  • Re: Review: My C FAQ Page (02/06/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/05/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/05/04)
  • Re: <time .h> in the standard,Why? (02/04/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/03/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/02/04)
• Darron Jeans
  • Re: Newbie question (02/06/04)
  • Newbie question (02/05/04)
• Dave Allison
  • Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/05/04)
• Dave Hansen
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
• Dave Harris
  • Re: Memory question (02/10/04)
• Dave Rudolf
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Efficiency of math.h (02/25/04)
• Dave Thompson
  • Re: Question on Pointer Indirections (02/23/04)
  • Re: Requirements of floating point comparisons (02/23/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/23/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/23/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Origins of a.out (02/23/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/23/04)
  • Re: Vigenere Cipher (02/23/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/23/04)
  • Re: Vigenere Cipher (02/14/04)
  • Re: Check if a directory is empty and empty it (02/14/04)
  • Re: Can anyone improve this any further...... (02/14/04)
  • Re: itoa in pure C (02/14/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/14/04)
  • Re: struct hack question (02/09/04)
  • Re: using typedef for structures in C (02/09/04)
  • Re: [crosspost] Perl -> C (02/09/04)
  • Re: Question re. integral promotion, signed->unsigned (02/09/04)
  • Re: Review: 3D-Array (02/09/04)
  • Re: writing program from a book (02/05/04)
  • Re: itoa in pure C (02/05/04)
  • Re: Newbie: How to input a string? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Multiple returns (02/05/04)
  • Re: why is casting malloc a bad thing? (02/05/04)
  • Re: multidimensional arrays and cute tricks (02/02/04)
  • Re: Help with a progam (02/02/04)
  • Re: program (02/02/04)
• David Allison
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/06/04)
• David Combs
  • Re: writing program from a book (02/19/04)
• David Farning
  • Re: struct stat *stbuf seg fault (02/23/04)
  • Re: struct stat *stbuf seg fault (02/23/04)
  • struct stat *stbuf seg fault (02/23/04)
• David Ford
  • Re: help with type-punned warning please (02/26/04)
  • Re: help with type-punned warning please (02/26/04)
  • Re: help with type-punned warning please (02/26/04)
  • Re: help with type-punned warning please (02/26/04)
  • Re: help with type-punned warning please (02/26/04)
  • help with type-punned warning please (02/26/04)
• David García
  • Re: javadoc like (02/09/04)
• David Harmon
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/08/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/07/04)
• David Rasmussen
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/10/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/07/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/07/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/04/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/02/04)
• David Resnick
  • Re: algorithm to split number into two pieces (02/24/04)
  • Re: linked lists (02/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/12/04)
  • Re: How to find a string in a stream of binary data? (02/11/04)
  • Re: Condensing nested switch statements (02/04/04)
• David Rubin
  • Re: pointers and array (02/27/04)
  • Re: Check if value is defined in enum (02/27/04)
  • Re: tricky do-while (02/27/04)
  • Re: pointers and array (02/27/04)
  • Re: Exist a function for path management? (02/27/04)
  • Re: algorithm to split number into two pieces (02/24/04)
  • Re: What is the single most helpfull guide/reference one could go to!? (02/22/04)
  • Re: string assign to multi-dimension array w/o using pointer. (02/22/04)
  • Re: linked lists (02/22/04)
  • Re: allocating for an array of pointers (02/21/04)
  • Re: linked lists (02/21/04)
  • Re: linked lists (02/21/04)
  • Re: Find Greater or Equal (02/20/04)
  • [OT] Re: Spelling (02/20/04)
  • Re: Empty statement (02/20/04)
  • Re: a shorter strchr (02/17/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/17/04)
  • Re: edit list (02/19/04)
  • Re: pointers to pointers (02/18/04)
  • Re: pointers to pointers (02/18/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/18/04)
  • Re: a shorter strchr (02/18/04)
  • Re: a shorter strchr (02/17/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/17/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/17/04)
  • Re: edit list (02/17/04)
  • Re: execlp() - mystery arg (02/16/04)
  • Re: C function Parser (02/16/04)
  • Re: macros and functions (02/13/04)
• David Starner
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping (02/18/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/08/04)
• Deane Yang
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/25/04)
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/22/04)
• Default User
  • Re: [OT] Re: Efficiency of Tisdale? (was: Efficiency of math.h) (02/27/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: [OT] Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: C String/int question + Win/Unix Compile (02/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/25/04)
  • Re: problem parsing strings (02/24/04)
  • Re: How do i found out the number of lines in a file (02/19/04)
  • Re: malloc Q (02/19/04)
  • Re: question on fread() (02/17/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/13/04)
  • Re: pointers switch function (02/13/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/13/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/13/04)
  • Re: Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/12/04)
  • Re: Split C soup (was: [OT, was Topic Nazis] Etymology) (02/12/04)
  • Re: How to get make to work under Cygwin bash shell (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Usoing fopen etc is there a way to find file size (02/09/04)
  • Re: calculations in C, userinterface in PHP (02/09/04)
  • Re: monitors in C? (02/07/04)
  • Re: How to pass by reference a dinamic array to a C routine (02/06/04)
  • Re: calculations in C, userinterface in PHP (02/06/04)
  • Re: finding redundant #includes to shorten compile time (02/06/04)
  • Re: Newbie question (02/06/04)
  • Re: Book Opinion-Expert C programming (02/05/04)
  • Re: C Linked List - (02/05/04)
  • Re: output to *.xls (02/05/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/04/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/03/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/03/04)
• Denis Pithon
  • Re: javadoc like (02/09/04)
  • Re: Union type variable assignation --- in expression, in function argues (02/05/04)
  • Re: Union type variable assignation --- in expression, in function argues (02/05/04)
  • Union type variable assignation --- in expression, in function argues (02/05/04)
• Denise Mills
  • C program works on W98 but not new WXP machine (02/03/04)
• Dennis M. Hammes
  • Re: Is it really necessary? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Is it really necessary? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Is it really necessary? (02/03/04)
• Dennis Ritchie
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/27/04)
• Derk Gwen
  • Re: A NULL pointer changed after returned? (02/29/04)
  • Re: mmap vs read/write (02/25/04)
  • Re: OT: Boxline in curses ( Linux ) (02/22/04)
  • Re: Boxline in curses ( Linux ) (02/21/04)
  • Re: Empty statement (02/21/04)
  • Re: complexity of an algorithm (02/20/04)
  • Re: How do i found out the number of lines in a file (02/19/04)
  • Re: forward declaration for typedef of unnamed structs (02/18/04)
  • Re: array end issue (02/16/04)
  • Re: How to call an external command? (02/15/04)
  • Re: redefinition (02/15/04)
  • Re: Cannot create file for write (02/09/04)
  • Re: Append to char * (02/08/04)
  • Re: Check if a directory is empty and empty it (02/08/04)
  • Re: First argument lost when doing exec (02/08/04)
  • Re: register caching of static variables (02/08/04)
  • Re: returning array size (02/07/04)
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/07/04)
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/05/04)
  • Re: beginer C question (02/05/04)
  • Re: system shell command (02/05/04)
  • Re: A more efficient way (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: system shell command (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: longjmp vs goto (02/03/04)
• dickyho_at_cuhk.edu.hk
  • Palm programming (displaying different char-set) (02/28/04)
• Dietmar Kuehl
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/09/04)
• Dietmar Schindler
  • Re: system shell command (02/06/04)
• Dik T. Winter
  • Re: why doesn't it print 1.0? (02/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/28/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Statements and expressions. (02/24/04)
  • Re: Fibonacci number (02/23/04)
  • Re: Statements and expressions. (02/20/04)
  • Re: Requirements of floating point comparisons (02/16/04)
  • Re: Requirements of floating point comparisons (02/16/04)
  • Re: Tricky Code (02/13/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/11/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/11/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/11/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/09/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/08/04)
  • Re: [OT] Wanting to Learn (02/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] Wanting to Learn (02/06/04)
  • Re: [OT] Wanting to Learn (02/06/04)
  • Re: [OT] Wanting to Learn (02/06/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/05/04)
  • Re: problem with using Fortran routine in C. (02/03/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: Christian Bau (02/02/04)
  • Re: floating point precision problem (02/01/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: Christian Bau (02/01/04)
• DJTB
  • Re: Check if value is defined in enum (02/28/04)
  • Check if value is defined in enum (02/27/04)
• Dmitry A. Kazakov
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/11/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/10/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/10/04)
• donLouis
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/07/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/06/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: ANSI C - Filsize ? (01/31/04)
  • Re: ANSI C - Filsize ? (01/31/04)
• Douglas A. Gwyn
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/25/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/24/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/15/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (02/15/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (02/13/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (02/11/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/10/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/07/04)
• Dr. Flonkenstein
  • Re: Is it really necessary? (02/09/04)
  • Re: Is it really necessary? (02/06/04)
  • Re: Is it really necessary? (02/06/04)
  • Re: Is it really necessary? (02/04/04)
• Duff
  • Re: Append to char * (02/08/04)
  • Re: how to manage temporary files in C ? (02/08/04)
  • Re: how to manage temporary files in C ? (02/07/04)
  • how to manage temporary files in C ? (02/07/04)
• Dylan Nicholson
  • Re: Memory question (02/08/04)
• E. Robert Tisdale
  • Troll Alert: Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Troll Alert: [OT] Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: [OT] Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Troll Alert: Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Re: Problems dereferensing my C structures (custom types) (02/27/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Troll Alert: [OT] Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: help with type-punned warning please (02/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/25/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/25/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/25/04)
  • Re: tmpnam question (02/24/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (02/20/04)
  • Re: Referencing/forward declarations (02/20/04)
  • Troll: bit operation (02/20/04)
  • Re: Crosscompile host linux target mac os x (02/19/04)
  • Re: Question on Pointer Indirections (02/19/04)
  • Re: struct problem (02/19/04)
  • Re: Statements and expressions. (02/18/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/17/04)
  • Off Topic: Question about pipes (02/14/04)
  • Re: malloc - to cast or not to cast, that is the question... (02/14/04)
  • Re: malloc - to cast or not to cast, that is the question... (02/14/04)
  • Re: Globals vs passing in by reference (02/12/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/11/04)
  • Re: Converting ASM to C (02/11/04)
  • Re: struct's first member and the NULL pointer (02/11/04)
  • Re: Converting ASM to C (02/11/04)
  • Re: How to find a string in a stream of binary data? (02/11/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/11/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
  • Re: extend/shrink heap ? (02/10/04)
  • Re: VSIPL (02/10/04)
  • Off Topic: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/10/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/10/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/10/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/10/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: Append to char * (02/09/04)
  • Re: const array declaration (02/09/04)
  • Re: VSIPL (02/09/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: return all non-blank lines in a file(linux) (02/09/04)
  • Re: File I/O (02/09/04)
  • Re: File access permission (02/09/04)
  • Re: File access permission (02/09/04)
  • Re: Cannot create file for write (02/09/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/08/04)
  • Re: convert a single to multiuser.. in sock.c program (02/08/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Troll Alert (02/08/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/08/04)
  • Re: code review (02/08/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/08/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/08/04)
  • Re: Spirit rover OS problems (02/08/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/07/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • code review (02/06/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/06/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/06/04)
  • Re: finding redundant #includes to shorten compile time (02/06/04)
  • Re: big to little endian (02/06/04)
  • FAQ: How to use a function with variable number of arguments (02/06/04)
  • Troll Alert: WASHINGTON POST = HOG-WASH POST (02/06/04)
  • Re: finding redundant #includes to shorten compile time (02/06/04)
  • Troll Alert: MSG (02/05/04)
  • Re: REQ:Pascal to C converter for WinXp please (02/05/04)
  • Troll Alert: A C tutorial (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: C to Pro COBOL Problem - Bytes Shifted by 4 (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: why does my code stop responding...? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/05/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/05/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/04/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Style question (02/04/04)
  • Troll Alert: C routines for Special Functions (02/04/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/03/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/03/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/03/04)
  • online C programming test (02/03/04)
  • Re: difference (02/01/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: Christian Bau (02/01/04)
  • Re: why is casting malloc a bad thing? (02/01/04)
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/01/04)
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/01/04)
  • Re: why is casting malloc a bad thing? (01/31/04)
• Earth
  • sprintf function (02/08/04)
• Ed Davis
  • Re: Loops, switches, embedded returns (02/23/04)
  • Error handling - how to get rid of multiple flags? (02/20/04)
  • Loops, switches, embedded returns (02/20/04)
• Ed Falis
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/10/04)
• Ed Morton
  • Re: C function Parser (02/16/04)
  • Re: FSM (Finite State Machine) Generator - Open Source (02/09/04)
  • Re: How to use a function with variable number of arguments (02/06/04)
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/05/04)
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/05/04)
  • Re: A more efficient way (02/04/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/04/04)
  • Re: A more efficient way (02/04/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/04/04)
  • Re: OT: FSM (Finite State Machine) Generator - Open Source (02/04/04)
  • Re: OT: FSM (Finite State Machine) Generator - Open Source (02/04/04)
  • Re: OT: FSM (Finite State Machine) Generator - Open Source (02/03/04)
• Ed Vogel
  • Re: useless warnings (02/20/04)
• Eirik WS
  • Memory allocation questions (02/07/04)
  • Re: Coding style survey (02/06/04)
  • A more efficient way (02/04/04)
  • Re: A few things remain unclear... (02/02/04)
  • Re: A few things remain unclear... (02/02/04)
  • A few things remain unclear... (02/02/04)
• electric sheep
  • const char *const (02/21/04)
• Elliot Marks
  • Re: [OT] - propagation of incorrect information (02/15/04)
• Emmanuel Delahaye
  • Re: A NULL pointer changed after returned? (02/29/04)
  • Re: zeroing structure of char pointers (02/29/04)
  • Re: Standard question (02/29/04)
  • Re: A NULL pointer changed after returned? (02/29/04)
  • Re: String Functions (02/22/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/16/04)
  • Re: The behaviour of getchar() (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/15/04)
  • The behaviour of getchar() (02/14/04)
  • Re: Listing préprocesseur (02/09/04)
  • Re: Listing préprocesseur (02/09/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/07/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/02/04)
  • Re: A few things remain unclear... (02/02/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/02/04)
  • Re: running c program (02/02/04)
  • Re: string copy (02/02/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/02/04)
  • Re: string copy (02/01/04)
• erebus-
  • Re: What is the single most helpfull guide/reference one could go to!? (02/23/04)
  • What is the single most helpfull guide/reference one could go to!? (02/22/04)
• Eric Amick
  • Re: sprintf function (02/08/04)
• Eric Sosman
  • Re: segmentation fault with printf (02/27/04)
  • Re: struct problem (02/27/04)
  • Re: C String/int question + Win/Unix Compile (02/26/04)
  • Re: 51MB size limit with fopen in append mode (02/26/04)
  • Re: 51MB size limit with fopen in append mode (02/25/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/25/04)
  • Re: Linked list or realloc()? (02/25/04)
  • Re: Comments requested: brief summary of C (02/24/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/23/04)
  • Re: Fibonacci number (02/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Switch question (02/23/04)
  • Re: Empty statement (02/20/04)
  • Re: Style - imbedding data files (02/20/04)
  • Re: Style - imbedding data files (02/19/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/19/04)
  • Re: limits.h and int len (02/19/04)
  • Re: Copying structures of different type (02/18/04)
  • Re: The behaviour of getchar() (02/17/04)
  • Re: macros and functions (02/13/04)
  • Re: signed and unsigned char (02/13/04)
  • Re: Pointer Qs (02/12/04)
  • Re: signed and unsigned char (02/12/04)
  • Re: Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/12/04)
  • Re: quickest way to determine character sizes (02/12/04)
  • Re: quickest way to determine character sizes (02/11/04)
  • Re: why shoule write code like these? (02/11/04)
  • Re: why shoule write code like these? (02/11/04)
  • Re: pow problem (02/10/04)
  • Re: How to detail a struct content (almost) just like adebugger does ? (02/10/04)
  • Re: Usoing fopen etc is there a way to find file size (02/09/04)
  • Re: Is this code a portable? (02/09/04)
  • Re: const array declaration (02/09/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/06/04)
  • Re: code review (02/06/04)
  • Re: Why runtime alignment could be useful (02/06/04)
  • Re: random numbers (02/06/04)
  • Re: Why runtime alignment could be useful (02/06/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/05/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/05/04)
  • Re: A more efficient way (02/05/04)
  • Re: Will reading from stdin() flush output to stdout()? (02/05/04)
  • Re: A more efficient way (02/04/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/04/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/04/04)
  • Re: increment doubt (02/04/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/04/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: Condensing nested switch statements (02/03/04)
  • Re: Need help with c macro. (02/03/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: longjmp vs goto (02/03/04)
  • Re: Sufficient error checking of strtol()? (02/03/04)
  • Re: longjmp vs goto (02/02/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/02/04)
  • Re: longjmp vs goto (02/02/04)
  • Re: ANSI C - Filsize ? (02/02/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/02/04)
• EricLin
  • How to use a function with variable number of arguments (02/06/04)
• Erik
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/14/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/13/04)
  • Re: Topic ***** (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/13/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/13/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/12/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/11/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/10/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/10/04)
  • Re: calculations in C, userinterface in PHP (02/10/04)
  • Re: calculations in C, userinterface in PHP (02/10/04)
  • Re: calculations in C, userinterface in PHP (02/08/04)
  • Re: calculations in C, userinterface in PHP (02/07/04)
  • calculations in C, userinterface in PHP (02/06/04)
• Erik Cato
  • bitfield and enum, is this legal? (02/23/04)
• Erik S. Bartul
  • Re: allocating for an array of pointers (02/21/04)
  • allocating for an array of pointers (02/21/04)
  • execlp() - mystery arg (02/16/04)
• Evangelista Sami
  • macros and functions (02/13/04)
• EvilRix
  • malloc - to cast or not to cast, that is the question... (02/13/04)
  • Re: Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/13/04)
  • Re: Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/13/04)
  • Re: Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/13/04)
  • Re: Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/13/04)
  • Re: Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/13/04)
• Excluded_Middle
  • System programming - creating a shell (02/04/04)
• Fabien LE LEZ
  • Re: Listing préprocesseur (02/09/04)
• Fao, Sean
  • Re: Globals vs passing in by reference (02/12/04)
• fdunne2
  • A Vector (02/17/04)
  • max value in an array (02/13/04)
  • writting / reading signal points to a file in c (02/10/04)
• Fergus Henderson
  • Re: Memory question (02/13/04)
• Fernando Arbeiza
  • Re: Will reading from stdin() flush output to stdout()? (02/05/04)
  • Will reading from stdin() flush output to stdout()? (02/04/04)
• Fernando Gont
  • Re: Help with Select (02/14/04)
• fishfry
  • Re: WASHINGTON POST = HOG-WASH POST (02/06/04)
• fix
  • Re: A NULL pointer changed after returned? (02/29/04)
  • Re: A NULL pointer changed after returned? (02/29/04)
  • Re: A NULL pointer changed after returned? (02/29/04)
  • A NULL pointer changed after returned? (02/29/04)
• Flash Gordon
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/23/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/17/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/17/04)
  • Re: How do i found out the number of lines in a file (02/19/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/19/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/18/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/17/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/17/04)
• Francois Grieu
  • Re: value of ((int)0.7) and ((int)-0.7) (02/23/04)
  • value of ((int)0.7) and ((int)-0.7) (02/23/04)
  • Re: Volatile variables in C!! (02/17/04)
  • Re: Is this code a portable? (02/11/04)
  • Re: Is this code a portable? (02/10/04)
  • Re: Can anyone improve this any further...... (02/10/04)
  • Re: Can anyone improve this any further...... (02/07/04)
  • Re: floor(-0.5) (02/07/04)
  • Re: Can anyone improve this any further...... (02/06/04)
  • floor(-0.5) (02/06/04)
  • Re: number of 1's in an integer (02/06/04)
  • floor(-0.5) (02/06/04)
  • Re: C code for pure float PRNG (02/05/04)
• Frank J. Lhota
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/06/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/06/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/06/04)
• Franz
  • Problems dereferensing my C structures (custom types) (02/17/04)
• Fred Ma
  • Re: Question re. integral promotion, signed->unsigned (02/04/04)
• gabriel
  • Re: Empty statement (02/20/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/17/04)
  • Re: finding redundant #includes to shorten compile time (02/06/04)
  • Re: finding redundant #includes to shorten compile time (02/06/04)
  • Re: finding redundant #includes to shorten compile time (02/05/04)
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/05/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Wanting to Learn (02/04/04)
  • Re: C program works on W98 but not new WXP machine (02/04/04)
  • Re: OT: FSM (Finite State Machine) Generator - Open Source (02/03/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/03/04)
• Gareth McCaughan
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/02/04)
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/02/04)
• Gary
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
• Geetesh
  • which is the better way to declare dynamic single dimension array inside struct (02/27/04)
• Georg Bauhaus
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/06/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/06/04)
• George Marsaglia
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/25/04)
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/23/04)
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/17/04)
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/16/04)
• George Russell
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/18/04)
• Gianni Mariani
  • Re: Looking for a C/C++ programmer in Houston (02/23/04)
  • Re: Just want to know why (02/11/04)
  • Re: Is this code a portable? (02/09/04)
• Gino
  • C function Parser (02/16/04)
• giorgix
  • Re: [OT, welcome msg, link] Combobox on gtk+ 2 (02/27/04)
  • Re: Combobox on gtk+ 2 (02/26/04)
  • Combobox on gtk+ 2 (02/26/04)
• Gledgard
  • I'm sorry about the extra posts (02/11/04)
  • Re: help with sorting (02/11/04)
  • Re: help with sorting (02/11/04)
  • Re: help with sorting (02/11/04)
  • Re: help with sorting (02/11/04)
• glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/24/04)
  • Re: 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/24/04)
  • Re: How to find a string in a stream of binary data? (02/13/04)
  • Re: Converting ASM to C (02/13/04)
  • Re: Converting ASM to C (02/13/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/11/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/11/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/11/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
  • Re: newbie question (02/02/04)
• Glen Richards
  • Converting ASM to C (02/11/04)
• glueless
  • big to little endian (02/05/04)
• gnat
  • Re: Spelling (02/20/04)
  • Re: Spelling (02/20/04)
  • Spelling (02/20/04)
• Goh, Yong Kwang
  • Linked list or realloc()? (02/25/04)
  • First argument lost when doing exec (02/08/04)
• goose
  • Re: [OT] Re: Efficiency of Tisdale? (was: Efficiency of math.h) (02/27/04)
  • Re: Problems dereferensing my C structures (custom types) (02/27/04)
• gops
  • Get the difference between two dates in terms of days (02/10/04)
• Goran Larsson
  • Re: Tricky Code (02/11/04)
• Gordon Burditt
  • Re: struct stat *stbuf seg fault (02/23/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: Memory Allocation for Dynamic Alloccation (02/19/04)
  • Re: [ansi 89] inline (02/18/04)
  • Re: How to read/write raw bytes from a flash card in C++? (02/18/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: [ansi 89] inline (02/17/04)
  • Re: Why the zero case in fabs()? (02/16/04)
  • Re: array end issue (02/16/04)
  • Re: Acessing registers with C (02/14/04)
  • Re: File I/O (02/09/04)
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/09/04)
  • Re: First argument lost when doing exec (02/09/04)
  • Re: random numbers (02/07/04)
  • Re: Why runtime alignment could be useful (02/06/04)
  • Re: random numbers (02/06/04)
  • Re: memory oraganisation?? (02/06/04)
  • Re: running c program (02/02/04)
• Grant Austin
  • Re: 0a appending w/strcpy (02/29/04)
  • Re: 0a appending w/strcpy (02/29/04)
  • Re: 0a appending w/strcpy (02/28/04)
  • Re: 0a appending w/strcpy (02/28/04)
  • Re: 0a appending w/strcpy (02/28/04)
  • Re: 0a appending w/strcpy (02/28/04)
  • 0a appending w/strcpy (02/28/04)
• Greg Barron
  • Re: Why (long)NULL ? (02/29/04)
• Greg Comeau
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/23/04)
• Greg Lindahl
  • Re: Ada performance (was No call for Ada ) (02/13/04)
• Greg Roberts
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/02/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/02/04)
  • Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/01/04)
• grobbeltje
  • Re: pow problem (02/10/04)
• Grumble
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Re: C Programming Assignment: (02/24/04)
  • Re: Creating an argument list for sprintf (02/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: printf with run-time format strings (02/13/04)
  • Re: Tricky Code (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: printf with run-time format strings (02/11/04)
  • Re: Tricky Code (02/11/04)
  • Re: printf with run-time format strings (02/10/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
  • printf with run-time format strings (02/10/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/09/04)
  • Re: [OT, probably] stpcpy (02/09/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/09/04)
  • Re: number of 1's in an integer (02/06/04)
  • Re: number of 1's in an integer (02/06/04)
  • Re: What's the best way to create an associative array in C? (02/05/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/04/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/04/04)
  • Re: What's the best way to create an associative array in C? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Trouble calculating 5th root of a given number using C (02/03/04)
• gswork
  • Re: output to *.xls (02/06/04)
• Guillaume
  • Re: pointers and array (02/27/04)
  • Re: problem with char array (02/26/04)
  • Re: problem with char array (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/25/04)
  • Re: dynamic memory for large arrays (02/23/04)
  • Re: procedure parameter struct order (02/23/04)
  • Re: Spelling (02/20/04)
  • Re: Empty statement (02/20/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/19/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/19/04)
• GVK
  • Re: C Programming Assignment: (02/24/04)
• Harald Korneliussen
  • Re: online C programming test (02/06/04)
• Harry Phillips
  • Re: Is it really necessary? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Is it really necessary? (02/03/04)
• hasho
  • call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
• hello smith
  • quickest way to determine character sizes (02/11/04)
  • Globals vs passing in by reference (02/11/04)
• Helmut Michels
  • [ANN] Data Plotting Library DISLIN 8.2 (02/16/04)
• herbertF
  • Re: const array declaration (02/10/04)
  • Re: const array declaration (02/10/04)
  • const array declaration (02/09/04)
• Herrcho
  • K&R chapter 6.3 Question 'how to calculate the number of array elements' (02/10/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/08/04)
  • #define Question (02/05/04)
  • K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/04/04)
• Horst Kraemer
  • Re: Typecasting (02/15/04)
  • Re: Condensing nested switch statements (02/03/04)
  • Re: Problems with getvect/setvect under Borland C 3.1 (02/02/04)
  • Re: array to pointer decay question !! (02/02/04)
  • Re: using typedef for structures in C (02/02/04)
• http://sterlingdeepwaterbay.ath.cx
  • Security (02/16/04)
• huhu
  • Who can explain the sentence for me? (02/29/04)
• Hyman Rosen
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping (02/26/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping (02/25/04)
• Ian Peattie
  • Re: sprintf function (02/08/04)
• Ian Woods
  • Re: register caching of static variables (02/08/04)
• Irrwahn Grausewitz
  • Re: binary output to stdout in Windows (02/16/04)
  • Re: Just want to know why (02/11/04)
  • Re: Is this code a portable? (02/10/04)
  • Re: Cannot create file for write (02/10/04)
  • Re: Cannot create file for write (02/09/04)
  • Re: Append to char * (02/09/04)
  • Re: pointers and files (02/09/04)
  • Re: sprintf function (02/09/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/09/04)
  • Re: code review (02/08/04)
  • Re: Review: My C FAQ Page (02/08/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/08/04)
  • Re: code review (02/07/04)
  • Re: Review: My C FAQ Page (02/07/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/07/04)
  • Re: ANSI C - Filsize ? (02/04/04)
• italo
  • const array declaration (02/09/04)
• Ivan Leo Murray-Smith
  • Crosscompile host linux target mac os x (02/19/04)
• j
  • Re: problem parsing strings (02/24/04)
  • Re: Comments requested: brief summary of C (02/24/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
  • Re: #define Question (02/05/04)
• J Baskin
  • Re: pointers switch function (02/13/04)
  • Re: pointers switch function (02/13/04)
• J. J. Farrell
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/10/04)
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/04/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
• j0mbolar
  • type promotions (02/29/04)
• Jack Klein
  • Re: fork() problems (02/29/04)
  • Re: fork() problems (02/29/04)
  • Re: Volatile variables (02/28/04)
  • Re: which is the better way to declare dynamic single dimension array inside struct (02/28/04)
  • Re: which is the better way to declare dynamic single dimension array inside struct (02/28/04)
  • Re: which is the better way to declare dynamic single dimension array inside struct (02/27/04)
  • Re: which is the better way to declare dynamic single dimension array inside struct (02/27/04)
  • Re: mmap vs read/write (02/25/04)
  • Re: gethostbyaddr returning null for CNAME records (02/25/04)
  • Re: value of ((int)0.7) and ((int)-0.7) (02/25/04)
  • Re: ssl-connect over tcp (02/25/04)
  • Re: Lint doesn't catch signed => unsigned arg passing (02/24/04)
  • Re: value of ((int)0.7) and ((int)-0.7) (02/24/04)
  • Re: bitfield and enum, is this legal? (02/24/04)
  • Re: bitfield and enum, is this legal? (02/24/04)
  • Re: procedure parameter struct order (02/24/04)
  • Re: procedure parameter struct order (02/24/04)
  • Re: tmpnam question (02/24/04)
  • Re: tmpnam question (02/24/04)
  • Re: struct stat *stbuf seg fault (02/23/04)
  • Re: getc() only returns 1500 chars on a 5 Meg file (02/23/04)
  • Re: perils of memset (02/22/04)
  • Re: Boxline in curses ( Linux ) (02/21/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (02/21/04)
  • Re: RPC question (02/18/04)
  • Re: Referencing/forward declarations (02/20/04)
  • Re: Regarding Switch statement (02/19/04)
  • Re: Question on Pointer Indirections (02/19/04)
  • Re: struct problem (02/19/04)
  • Re: Copying structures of different type (02/19/04)
  • Re: RPC question (02/18/04)
  • Re: Statements and expressions. (02/18/04)
  • Re: Whats wrong with this crc32 code? (02/17/04)
  • Re: execlp() - mystery arg (02/17/04)
  • Re: Requirements of floating point comparisons (02/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] Origins of a.out (02/16/04)
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/15/04)
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/15/04)
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/14/04)
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/14/04)
  • Re: Just want to know why (02/12/04)
  • Re: struct's first member and the NULL pointer (02/11/04)
  • Re: volatile ptr question (02/11/04)
  • Re: printf with run-time format strings (02/11/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/11/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Software Quality & Fault Measurement (02/11/04)
  • Re: const array declaration (02/10/04)
  • Re: const array declaration (02/10/04)
  • Re: File access permission (02/10/04)
  • Re: return all non-blank lines in a file(linux) (02/09/04)
  • Re: File access permission (02/09/04)
  • Re: File access permission (02/09/04)
  • Re: Cannot create file for write (02/09/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/09/04)
  • Re: sprintf function (02/09/04)
  • Re: sprintf function (02/08/04)
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/07/04)
  • Re: placement of volatile in typedef of struct (02/07/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/07/04)
  • Re: placement of volatile in typedef of struct (02/07/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/07/04)
  • Re: lvalues -> incomplete types (02/07/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/06/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/06/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/06/04)
  • Re: finding redundant #includes to shorten compile time (02/06/04)
  • Re: Book Opinion-Expert C programming (02/06/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/06/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/06/04)
  • Re: why does my code stop responding...? (02/05/04)
  • Re: A more efficient way (02/05/04)
  • Re: <time .h> in the standard,Why? (02/04/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/04/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/04/04)
  • Re: What's the best way to create an associative array in C? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: struct hack question (02/04/04)
  • Re: struct hack question (02/04/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/04/04)
  • Re: Segmentation fault (02/04/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: What's the best way to create an associative array in C? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Help for students, provided by a Scientists Group (02/03/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/03/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/03/04)
  • Re: variable length record using struct/union - help (02/03/04)
  • Re: problem with using Fortran routine in C. (02/03/04)
  • Re: Polymorphism in C (02/01/04)
  • Re: How to check if child is done executing ... (01/31/04)
  • Re: ANSI C - Filsize ? (01/31/04)
  • Re: Allocating space for char*? (01/31/04)
• jacob navia
  • Re: Who can explain the sentence for me? (02/29/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/15/04)
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/14/04)
  • Bounds checked string library (02/14/04)
  • Bounds checked arrays (02/14/04)
  • Re: [OT] - propagation of incorrect information (02/12/04)
  • Re: How to find a string in a stream of binary data? (02/11/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/08/04)
  • Re: register caching of static variables (02/08/04)
  • register caching of static variables (02/08/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/07/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/07/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/06/04)
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/06/04)
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/05/04)
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/05/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/05/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/05/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/05/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/05/04)
  • A C tutorial (02/05/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/01/04)
• James Antill
  • Re: string concatenation (02/14/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (02/14/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (02/14/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (02/14/04)
• James Beck
  • Re: A situation (02/03/04)
• James Carlson
  • Re: Help with Select (02/20/04)
• James Dow Allen
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/20/04)
  • Re: Style - imbedding data files (02/20/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/20/04)
  • Re: Regarding Switch statement (02/20/04)
• James Harlacher
  • 'erf' function in C (02/15/04)
• James Hu
  • Re: Read a binary file until "\name\" is encountered... (02/25/04)
  • Re: Read a binary file until "\name\" is encountered... (02/25/04)
  • Welcome to comp.lang.c! (02/22/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/20/04)
  • Welcome to comp.lang.c! (02/08/04)
  • Re: Variable Length Packet (02/08/04)
• James Kuyper
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (02/16/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/14/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (02/13/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/11/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/10/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/07/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/07/04)
• James Rogers
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/20/04)
  • Re: Ada performance (was No call for Ada ) (02/13/04)
  • Re: Ada performance (was No call for Ada ) (02/13/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/11/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/10/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/09/04)
• Jan C. Vorbrüggen
  • Re: Ada performance (was No call for Ada ) (02/19/04)
  • Re: Ada performance (was No call for Ada ) (02/13/04)
• Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: 51MB size limit with fopen in append mode (02/25/04)
  • Re: reading macro (02/22/04)
  • Re: Main [was File IO] (02/09/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/06/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/06/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/06/04)
  • Re: memory oraganisation?? (02/06/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/06/04)
  • Re: A more efficient way (02/04/04)
  • Re: FAR * in 64-bit machines (02/04/04)
  • Re: ANSI C - Filsize ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: ANSI C - Filsize ? (02/02/04)
  • Re: ANSI C - Filsize ? (02/01/04)
  • Re: ANSI C - Filsize ? (01/31/04)
• janconway
  • C Programming Assignment: (02/24/04)
• Jared Dykstra
  • Re: A more efficient way (02/05/04)
• Jarno A Wuolijoki
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/12/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/10/04)
  • Re: #define Question (02/05/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/05/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Too obfuscated? (02/02/04)
  • Re: malloc and calloc (02/02/04)
  • Re: Polymorphism in C (02/01/04)
  • Re: string copy (02/01/04)
• Jasim
  • Re: Buffered _read and _write... how to get more buffer memory? (02/24/04)
  • Buffered _read and _write... how to get more buffer memory? (02/20/04)
• Jason
  • Re: utf-8 string functions in c (02/10/04)
  • Re: Wanting to Learn (02/06/04)
• javuchi
  • Re: vi rules (02/16/04)
  • Re: vi rules (02/16/04)
• Jay
  • Re: algorithm to split number into two pieces (02/24/04)
  • algorithm to split number into two pieces (02/23/04)
• Jean-Pierre Rosen
  • Re: Software Quality & Fault Measurement (02/10/04)
• jeff
  • Re: Acessing registers with C (02/14/04)
  • Re: Acessing registers with C (02/13/04)
  • Acessing registers with C (02/13/04)
• Jeff Schwab
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/06/04)
• Jens Schweikhardt
  • Re: Stripping multiline C comments without using Lex (02/05/04)
• Jens.Toerring_at_physik.fu-berlin.de
  • Re: segmentation fault with printf (02/27/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/25/04)
  • Re: dictionary + binary search = counting words (02/22/04)
  • Re: problems with copying/editing strings (02/18/04)
  • Re: problems with copying/editing strings (02/18/04)
  • Re: Using Select() (02/18/04)
  • Re: Problems dereferensing my C structures (custom types) (02/17/04)
  • Re: Programming / malloc Q (02/16/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Fibonacci series and the exact longitude and latitude (02/07/04)
  • [OT] Re: Fibonacci series and the exact longitude and latitude (02/07/04)
  • Re: PCI-1751 DI/DO control in comedi (02/05/04)
• Jeremy Yallop
  • Re: Re-using a 'va_list' (02/27/04)
  • Re: Comments requested: brief summary of C (02/24/04)
  • Re: Comments requested: brief summary of C (02/24/04)
  • Re: Comments requested: brief summary of C (02/24/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/21/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/20/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/19/04)
  • Re: char * vs. const char * (02/16/04)
  • Re: max value in an array (02/13/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/12/04)
  • Re: signed and unsigned char (02/12/04)
  • Re: Typecasting (02/12/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/12/04)
  • Re: Tricky Code (02/11/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/11/04)
  • Re: why shoule write code like these? (02/11/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/11/04)
  • Re: pointers and files (02/09/04)
  • Re: Append to char * (02/09/04)
  • Re: Append to char * (02/09/04)
  • Re: Review: My C FAQ Page (02/09/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/09/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/09/04)
  • Re: return all non-blank lines in a file(linux) (02/09/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/06/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/06/04)
  • Re: How to calculate size of an array of dynaically malloc'd structs? (02/06/04)
  • Re: [OT] Wanting to Learn (02/06/04)
  • Re: lvalues -> incomplete types (02/06/04)
  • Re: Problem with prints twice instead of once. (02/06/04)
  • Re: [OT] Wanting to Learn (02/06/04)
  • Re: Review: My C FAQ Page (02/06/04)
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/05/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/04/04)
  • Re: writing a shell in c (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/03/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/03/04)
• Jerry Coffin
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping (02/17/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/14/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/07/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/07/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/06/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/06/04)
• Jerry W. Lewis
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/21/04)
• Jesper Lund
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/27/04)
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/26/04)
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/24/04)
• Jesper N?hr
  • How to create a simple configurationfile parser? (02/26/04)
• jesse
  • struct problem (02/18/04)
• Jesse Engle
  • socket wrapper (02/28/04)
  • network byte order (02/27/04)
• jester.dev
  • Re: Learning c, need a little help with compiling. (02/16/04)
  • Learning c, need a little help with compiling. (02/16/04)
• Joachim Schmitz
  • Re: char * vs. const char * (02/16/04)
  • Re: char * vs. const char * (02/16/04)
  • Re: char * vs. const char * (02/16/04)
  • char * vs. const char * (02/16/04)
• Joe
  • Re: ANSI C - Filsize ? (02/01/04)
• Joe Blow
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/02/04)
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/02/04)
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/02/04)
  • C routines for Special Functions (01/31/04)
• Joe Pizzi
  • placement of volatile in typedef of struct (02/07/04)
• Joe Wright
  • Re: problem with char array (02/28/04)
  • Re: How do i found out the number of lines in a file (02/25/04)
  • Re: value of ((int)0.7) and ((int)-0.7) (02/25/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/22/04)
  • Re: struct problem (02/22/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/21/04)
  • Re: Keyboard = Stop (02/21/04)
  • Re: Question on Pointer Indirections (02/19/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/18/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/17/04)
  • Re: redefinition (02/17/04)
  • Re: redefinition (02/16/04)
  • Re: max value in an array (02/14/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/14/04)
  • Re: pointers switch function (02/13/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/13/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/12/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/11/04)
  • Re: problem in K&R answer book (02/11/04)
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/10/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/08/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/08/04)
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/08/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/07/04)
  • Re: getdents (02/07/04)
  • Re: lvalues -> incomplete types (02/07/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/07/04)
  • Re: How to read data columnwise (02/07/04)
  • Re: lvalues -> incomplete types (02/07/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/06/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/06/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/06/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/06/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/06/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/06/04)
  • Re: difference (02/01/04)
  • Re: difference (02/01/04)
• Joerg Schoen
  • Re: Search a binary file for a string... again! (its to slow) (02/28/04)
  • Re: need help new to C programming (02/28/04)
  • Re-using a 'va_list' (02/27/04)
• Jogo
  • getdents (02/07/04)
• Johan Lindh
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/09/04)
  • Re: Append to char * (02/08/04)
  • Re: Memory allocation questions (02/07/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • OT: Re: Purify problem or compiler problem? (02/07/04)
  • Re: Purify problem or compiler problem? (02/07/04)
  • Re: Purify problem or compiler problem? (02/07/04)
  • Re: Can anyone improve this any further...... (02/07/04)
  • Re: random numbers (02/06/04)
• Johannes Veerkamp
  • Re: random numbers (02/06/04)
  • random numbers (02/06/04)
• John Bode
  • Re: Comments requested: brief summary of C (02/25/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/19/04)
  • Re: increment doubt (02/04/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: Christian Bau (02/03/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: Christian Bau (02/02/04)
  • Re: longjmp vs goto (02/02/04)
• john chung
  • test (02/01/04)
• John Fly
  • General Info wanted: IBM Z/os C/C++ compilers (02/25/04)
• John Forkosh
  • Re: binary output to stdout in Windows (02/16/04)
  • Re: binary output to stdout in Windows (02/16/04)
  • binary output to stdout in Windows (02/15/04)
• john hrdo
  • redefinition (02/15/04)
• John L
  • Re: Comments requested: brief summary of C (02/24/04)
  • Re: need help regarding Natural language parsing!! (02/17/04)
• John Potter
  • Re: Memory question (02/10/04)
• Johnny B
  • writing a plugin for ethereal ... where to start (02/20/04)
• Jon Bell
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/07/04)
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/07/04)
• Jonathan Turkanis
  • Re: forward declaration for typedef of unnamed structs (02/18/04)
  • Re: forward declaration for typedef of unnamed structs (02/18/04)
• Joona I Palaste
  • Re: Press enter to continue (02/29/04)
  • Re: 0a appending w/strcpy (02/28/04)
  • Re: Press enter to continue (02/28/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: [OT] Efficiency of math.h (02/28/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/28/04)
  • Re: Function definition into main() function. (02/28/04)
  • Re: Function definition into main() function. (02/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Efficiency of Tisdale? (02/27/04)
  • Re: help with type-punned warning please (02/27/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: [OT] Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Re: unsigned short; (02/27/04)
  • Re: Exist a function for path management? (02/27/04)
  • Re: Combobox on gtk+ 2 (02/26/04)
  • Re: is this valid c or a compiler bug? (02/26/04)
  • Re: C String/int question + Win/Unix Compile (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/25/04)
  • Re: pstack help (02/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] Outsourcing your C-progammer (02/24/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/23/04)
  • Re: struct stat *stbuf seg fault (02/23/04)
  • Re: String Functions (02/22/04)
  • Re: Issues with input (02/21/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/20/04)
  • Re: Keyboard = Stop (02/20/04)
  • Re: How to handle this problem in MS VC++ (02/17/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/17/04)
  • Re: complexity of an algorithm (02/20/04)
  • Re: problems with copying/editing strings (02/19/04)
  • Re: writing program from a book (02/19/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/19/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/19/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/19/04)
  • Re: How to define a define that defines some defines ? (02/19/04)
  • Re: Memory Allocation for Dynamic Alloccation (02/19/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/19/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: question on fread() (02/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: How to handle this problem in MS VC++ (02/17/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/17/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/17/04)
  • Re: 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/17/04)
  • Re: question on fread() (02/17/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/17/04)
  • Re: Statements and expressions. (02/17/04)
  • Re: Error in typedef (02/17/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/16/04)
  • Re: JPEG/TIFF routines? (02/16/04)
  • Re: The behaviour of getchar() (02/16/04)
  • Re: vi rules (02/16/04)
  • Re: Losing a variable (02/16/04)
  • Re: Why is sizeof(arrayname)=4 and not 67 in function? (02/16/04)
  • Re: execlp() - mystery arg (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/16/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/16/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/15/04)
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/15/04)
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/15/04)
  • Re: Ada performance (was No call for Ada ) (02/15/04)
  • Re: How to call an external command? (02/15/04)
  • Re: comma in string (02/15/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/15/04)
  • Re: code review (02/14/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/14/04)
  • Re: The behaviour of getchar() (02/14/04)
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/14/04)
  • Re: Building an application.. (02/14/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: ed rules (was vi rules) (02/13/04)
  • Re: Acessing registers with C (02/13/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/13/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: ed rules (was vi rules) (02/12/04)
  • Re: quickest way to determine character sizes (02/11/04)
  • [OT] Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/10/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/10/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/10/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/10/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
  • Re: Append to char * (02/10/04)
  • Re: reading decimal data.... (02/09/04)
  • Re: gtk+-2.0, right align the cursor in a GtkEntry (02/09/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/09/04)
  • Re: How can i read a directory listing into an array (02/09/04)
  • Re: VSIPL (02/09/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/09/04)
  • Re: File access permission (02/09/04)
  • Re: accessing array element as pointer (02/09/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/08/04)
  • Re: Cannot create file for write (02/08/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/08/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/08/04)
  • Re: Check if a directory is empty and empty it (02/08/04)
  • Re: system shell command (02/07/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/07/04)
  • Re: returning array size (02/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/07/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/07/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/06/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/06/04)
  • Re: memory oraganisation?? (02/06/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/06/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: MSG (02/06/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/05/04)
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/05/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/05/04)
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/05/04)
  • Re: PCI-1751 DI/DO control in comedi (02/05/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/05/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/05/04)
  • Re: #define Question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/04/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/04/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/04/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/04/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: why is casting malloc a bad thing? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/03/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/03/04)
  • Re: [ERT] Re: online C programming test (02/03/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/03/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: Christian Bau (02/02/04)
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/02/04)
  • Re: determine offset point (02/02/04)
  • Re: array to pointer decay question !! (02/02/04)
  • Re: running c program (02/01/04)
• Jordan
  • Operating System (02/26/04)
• Jordi Vilar
  • forward declaration for typedef of unnamed structs (02/18/04)
• Josh Sebastian
  • Re: sprintf function (02/09/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/08/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/08/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/08/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/08/04)
  • Re: Again on passing arrays as arguments (02/08/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
• José de Paula
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: calculations in C, userinterface in PHP (02/08/04)
  • Re: Review: My C FAQ Page (02/06/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
• juergen perlinger
  • semantics of loating point exception handling (02/26/04)
• jugaaru
  • Re: Fibonacci number (02/23/04)
  • Fibonacci number (02/22/04)
• Julian V. Noble
  • Re: Fibonacci number (02/22/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/17/04)
  • Re: A Vector (02/17/04)
  • Re: redefinition (02/15/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/03/04)
• Jumbo
  • Re: Again on passing arrays as arguments (02/08/04)
• junk mail
  • Press enter to continue (02/28/04)
• junky_fellow
  • mmap vs read/write (02/25/04)
  • complexity of an algorithm (02/20/04)
  • what "google" do to search a pattern (02/13/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/13/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/12/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/12/04)
  • searching a substring (02/12/04)
  • linked list (02/12/04)
  • Re: number of 1's in an integer (02/09/04)
  • accessing array element as pointer (02/09/04)
  • newbie question (02/06/04)
  • number of 1's in an integer (02/06/04)
• JV
  • Re: static variables & their initializations (02/09/04)
• jwala
  • why doesn't it print 1.0? (02/22/04)
• Jérôme de Lagausie
  • Re: How to detail a struct content (almost) just like adebugger does ? (02/10/04)
  • How to detail a struct content (almost) just like adebugger does ? (02/10/04)
• Jürgen Voss
  • Re: Problem with prints twice instead of once. (02/06/04)
  • Re: Problem with prints twice instead of once. (02/06/04)
• Kalpesh Parikh
  • C to Pro COBOL Problem - Bytes Shifted by 4 (02/05/04)
• Kamus of Kadizhar
  • malloc and free (02/20/04)
  • Re: malloc Q (02/19/04)
  • Re: malloc Q (02/19/04)
  • malloc Q (02/19/04)
  • Re: Programming / malloc Q (02/17/04)
  • Programming / malloc Q (02/16/04)
  • Pointer Qs (02/12/04)
  • Re: utf-8 string functions in c (02/10/04)
  • Re: utf-8 string functions in c (02/10/04)
  • utf-8 string functions in c (02/10/04)
  • i18n charset question (02/10/04)
• kanze_at_gabi-soft.fr
  • Re: Memory question (02/10/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/10/04)
• Karl Heinz Buchegger
  • Re: system shell command (02/04/04)
• Kaush
  • how can i make functions which behaves like printf (02/01/04)
• Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/05/04)
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/03/04)
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/01/04)
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/01/04)
• Keith Bostic
  • Re: Efficient Text File Copy (02/03/04)
• Keith Thompson
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
  • Re: String Functions (02/26/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/25/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/24/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Switch question (02/22/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/21/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/21/04)
  • Re: Regarding Switch statement (02/21/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/21/04)
  • Re: writing program from a book (02/20/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/20/04)
  • Re: Regarding Switch statement (02/19/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/19/04)
  • Re: Statements and expressions. (02/18/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/17/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/17/04)
  • Re: Why is sizeof(arrayname)=4 and not 67 in function? (02/17/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/16/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/15/04)
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/14/04)
  • Re: [OT] - propagation of incorrect information (02/14/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/14/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/14/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/13/04)
  • Re: signed and unsigned char (02/13/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/11/04)
  • Re: Just want to know why (02/11/04)
  • Re: Just want to know why (02/11/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/11/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/10/04)
  • Re: Cannot create file for write (02/10/04)
  • Re: Append to char * (02/10/04)
  • Re: Append to char * (02/10/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/09/04)
  • Re: File access permission (02/09/04)
  • Re: Append to char * (02/08/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/08/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/08/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/08/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/08/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/07/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • Re: #define Question (02/07/04)
  • Re: floor(-0.5) (02/07/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/07/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/06/04)
  • Re: finding redundant #includes to shorten compile time (02/06/04)
  • Re: big to little endian (02/06/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/06/04)
  • Re: #define Question (02/06/04)
  • Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/06/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/06/04)
  • Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/05/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/05/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/05/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/05/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/05/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: malloc and calloc (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/03/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/03/04)
  • Re: longjmp vs goto (02/02/04)
  • Re: Help for students, provided by a Scientists Group (02/02/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/02/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/02/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/02/04)
  • Re: nomenclature issue (02/01/04)
  • Re: nomenclature issue (01/31/04)
  • Re: floating point precision problem (01/31/04)
• Keith Vetter
  • is this valid c or a compiler bug? (02/26/04)
• Kelsey Bjarnason
  • Re: which is the better way to declare dynamic single dimension array inside struct (02/27/04)
  • Re: which is the better way to declare dynamic single dimension array inside struct (02/27/04)
  • Re: How do i found out the number of lines in a file (02/20/04)
  • Re: Using Select() (02/18/04)
  • Re: question on fread() (02/18/04)
  • Re: Converting ASM to C (02/11/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/10/04)
  • Re: K&R chapter 6.3 Question 'how to calculate the number of array elements' (02/10/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/10/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/10/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/10/04)
  • Re: pointers and files (02/08/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/08/04)
  • Re: Check if a directory is empty and empty it (02/08/04)
  • Re: ANSI C - Filsize ? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: Christian Bau (02/02/04)
• Kelvin _at_ SG
  • Re: How to read/write raw bytes from a flash card in C++? (02/17/04)
  • Re: How to read/write raw bytes from a flash card in C++? (02/18/04)
  • Re: How to read/write raw bytes from a flash card in C++? (02/17/04)
  • How to read/write raw bytes from a flash card in C++? (02/17/04)
• Kenneth Brody
  • Re: 51MB size limit with fopen in append mode (02/28/04)
  • Re: 51MB size limit with fopen in append mode (02/25/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/23/04)
  • Re: Empty statement (02/20/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/20/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/19/04)
  • Re: Regarding Switch statement (02/19/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/13/04)
  • Re: Acessing registers with C (02/13/04)
  • Re: Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/13/04)
  • Re: quickest way to determine character sizes (02/13/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/06/04)
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/05/04)
  • Re: big to little endian (02/05/04)
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/05/04)
  • Re: getenv and carriage returns (02/04/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/02/04)
• Kenny McCormack
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/15/04)
• Keoncheol Shin
  • Long long int (02/15/04)
• Kevin
  • Linked List / Deleting any number of element while enumerating (02/24/04)
• Kevin Bracey
  • Re: semantics of loating point exception handling (02/27/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/12/04)
• Kevin D. Quitt
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/05/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: variable length record using struct/union - help (02/03/04)
  • Re: variable length record using struct/union - help (02/03/04)
  • Re: variable length record using struct/union - help (02/03/04)
  • Re: variable length record using struct/union - help (02/02/04)
• Kevin Handy
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/21/04)
• kimi
  • Why is sizeof(arrayname)=4 and not 67 in function? (02/16/04)
• Kishor
  • Trouble calculating 5th root of a given number using C (02/02/04)
  • (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/02/04)
• Kurt Watzka
  • Re: What can C do and Basic V2 not? (02/22/04)
  • Re: max value in an array (02/13/04)
• L337Hax0r
  • writing a shell in c (02/04/04)
• LaEisem
  • Re: Style question (02/05/04)
• Lafer
  • problems with copying/editing strings (02/18/04)
• Laksono Adhianto
  • WOMPAT 2004 (02/11/04)
• lallous
  • Re: tricky do-while (02/27/04)
  • Re: Long long int (02/15/04)
  • Re: printf with run-time format strings (02/10/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
• Larry Doolittle
  • Re: online C programming test (02/06/04)
  • Re: Style question (02/06/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/05/04)
• Larry Hazel
  • Re: Ada performance (was No call for Ada ) (02/12/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/05/04)
• Larry Jones
  • Re: signed and unsigned char (02/15/04)
• Larry Kilgallen
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping (02/25/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping (02/21/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping (02/18/04)
• lawrence.jones_at_ugsplm.com
  • Re: Re-using a 'va_list' (02/28/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/27/04)
  • Re: weird 'C' warning - can you solve this? (02/25/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/24/04)
  • Re: Fibonacci number (02/24/04)
  • Re: Why the zero case in fabs()? (02/17/04)
  • Re: Portable assignment (02/16/04)
  • Re: Why the zero case in fabs()? (02/16/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/14/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/10/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/08/04)
  • Re: ANSI C - Filsize ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Trouble calculating 5th root of a given number using C (02/04/04)
• LBJ
  • volatile ptr question (02/10/04)
• Lebplaya
  • How to check if child is done executing ... (01/31/04)
• Leor Zolman
  • Re: Standard question (02/29/04)
  • Re: Standard question (02/29/04)
  • Re: is this valid c or a compiler bug? (02/28/04)
  • Re: Binary constant macros (02/27/04)
  • Re: Check if value is defined in enum (02/27/04)
  • Re: C String/int question + Win/Unix Compile (02/26/04)
  • Re: is this valid c or a compiler bug? (02/26/04)
  • Re: need some help with arrays (02/26/04)
  • Re: Read a binary file until "\name\" is encountered... (02/26/04)
  • Re: need some help with arrays (02/26/04)
  • Re: Read a binary file until "\name\" is encountered... (02/25/04)
  • Re: Read a binary file until "\name\" is encountered... (02/25/04)
  • Re: Read a binary file until "\name\" is encountered... (02/25/04)
  • Re: Read a binary file until "\name\" is encountered... (02/25/04)
  • Re: algorithm to split number into two pieces (02/25/04)
  • Re: Comments requested: brief summary of C (02/24/04)
  • Re: algorithm to split number into two pieces (02/24/04)
  • Re: reading a file using fread() (02/23/04)
  • Re: getc() only returns 1500 chars on a 5 Meg file (02/22/04)
  • Re: Fibonacci number (02/22/04)
  • Re: error when passing value to function (02/22/04)
  • Re: dictionary + binary search = counting words (02/22/04)
  • Re: const char *const (02/21/04)
  • Re: > (02/20/04)
  • Re: [OT, probably] stpcpy (02/17/04)
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/14/04)
  • Re: Reading from array is faster than writing ??? (02/13/04)
  • Re: > (02/13/04)
  • Re: > (02/13/04)
  • > (02/13/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/13/04)
  • Re: signed and unsigned char (02/12/04)
  • Re: signed and unsigned char (02/12/04)
  • Re: Assiciativity (02/12/04)
  • Re: Globals vs passing in by reference (02/11/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/11/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/09/04)
  • Re: [OT, probably] stpcpy (02/09/04)
  • Re: [OT, probably] stpcpy (02/09/04)
  • Re: Problem with structs and strings in C (02/09/04)
  • Re: Problem with structs and strings in C (02/09/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: File access permission (02/09/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/08/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/08/04)
  • Re: returning array size (02/07/04)
  • Re: placement of volatile in typedef of struct (02/07/04)
  • Re: placement of volatile in typedef of struct (02/07/04)
  • Re: placement of volatile in typedef of struct (02/07/04)
  • Re: code review (02/07/04)
  • Re: code review (02/06/04)
  • Re: code review (02/06/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/06/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/06/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/06/04)
  • Re: Identifier collisions between global level and static identifiers (02/06/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: How would I use qsort to sort a struct with a char* member and a long member - I want to sort in order of the long member (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: How would I use qsort to sort a struct with a char* member and a long member - I want to sort in order of the long member (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: beginer C question (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Masking (02/05/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Wanting to Learn (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/03/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/03/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/03/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/03/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/03/04)
  • Re: variable length record using struct/union - help (02/02/04)
• Les Cargill
  • Re: [OT] - propagation of incorrect information (02/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/15/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/08/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/08/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/06/04)
  • Re: How many Zen Buddhists does it take to cast malloc()s return value? (02/01/04)
• Lester T. Linpord
  • Is D better than C? (02/06/04)
• Lew Pitcher
  • Re: Function definition into main() function. (02/27/04)
  • Re: value of ((int)0.7) and ((int)-0.7) (02/23/04)
  • Re: [OT, probably] stpcpy (02/09/04)
  • Re: [OT, probably] stpcpy (02/09/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Trouble calculating 5th root of a given number using C (02/02/04)
  • Re: ANSI C - Filsize ? (02/02/04)
  • Re: nomenclature issue (02/01/04)
• Lewis Bowers
  • Re: Problems dereferensing my C structures (custom types) (02/23/04)
  • Re: Problems dereferensing my C structures (custom types) (02/22/04)
  • Re: linked lists (02/21/04)
  • Re: linked lists (02/21/04)
  • Re: allocating for an array of pointers (02/21/04)
  • Re: malloc Q (02/19/04)
  • Re: malloc Q (02/19/04)
  • Re: How do i found out the number of lines in a file (02/19/04)
  • Re: struct problem (02/19/04)
  • Re: struct problem (02/18/04)
• lilburne
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/05/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/05/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/04/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/04/04)
• Liu, Qingzhu [CAR:2N84:EXCH]
  • extend/shrink heap ? (02/10/04)
• Liux
  • Re: why does this fail in turbo c? (02/22/04)
  • why does this fail in turbo c? (02/22/04)
  • Re: why doesn't it print 1.0? (02/22/04)
• Lorenzo Villari
  • Re: K&r typo (02/10/04)
  • K&r typo (02/09/04)
• Ludovic Brenta
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/09/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/07/04)
• m...
  • Re: [OT] Origins of a.out (02/16/04)
  • Re: Learning c, need a little help with compiling. (02/16/04)
• m..._at_home
  • Re: linked list (02/13/04)
• M.Senthil Kumar
  • Boxline in curses ( Linux ) (02/21/04)
• Mac
  • Re: zeroing structure of char pointers (02/29/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: [OT] Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Re: Read a binary file until "\name\" is encountered... (02/26/04)
  • Re: need some help with arrays (02/26/04)
  • Re: need some help with arrays (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: writing a plugin for ethereal ... where to start (02/20/04)
  • Re: 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/18/04)
  • Re: Bits How to program them (02/11/04)
  • Re: How to get make to work under Cygwin bash shell (02/11/04)
  • Re: convert a single to multiuser.. in sock.c program (02/09/04)
  • Re: generating waves (02/07/04)
  • Re: generating waves (02/06/04)
  • Re: Newbie question (02/06/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/06/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
• Mad Ant
  • increment doubt (02/04/04)
• madhukar_bm
  • Re: increment doubt (02/05/04)
• Makiyo
  • string assign to multi-dimension array w/o using pointer. (02/22/04)
• Maksim Sipos
  • Re: Empty statement (02/20/04)
  • Empty statement (02/20/04)
• Malcolm
  • Re: type promotions (02/29/04)
  • Re: is this correct (02/29/04)
  • Re: Palm programming (displaying different char-set) (02/28/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: [OT] Efficiency of math.h (02/28/04)
  • Re: Search a binary file for a string... again! (its to slow) (02/28/04)
  • Re: errno-like variables in threaded environments (02/27/04)
  • Re: C String/int question + Win/Unix Compile (02/26/04)
  • Re: 51MB size limit with fopen in append mode (02/25/04)
  • Re: C Programming Assignment: (02/25/04)
  • Re: What can C do and Basic V2 not? (02/24/04)
  • Re: What can C do and Basic V2 not? (02/22/04)
  • Re: reading macro (02/22/04)
  • Input file donkey work. (02/22/04)
  • Re: What is the single most helpfull guide/reference one could go to!? (02/22/04)
  • Re: why doesn't it print 1.0? (02/22/04)
  • Re: complexity of an algorithm (02/21/04)
  • Re: Error handling - how to get rid of multiple flags? (02/21/04)
  • OT: Boxline in curses ( Linux ) (02/21/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/21/04)
  • Re: Issues with input (02/21/04)
  • Re: Motion Detection in JPeg frames (02/21/04)
  • Re: Issues with input (02/20/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/17/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/18/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/19/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/19/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/18/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/17/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/16/04)
  • Re: JPEG/TIFF routines? (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/16/04)
  • Re: Floating point literals (02/16/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/16/04)
  • Re: Long long int (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/15/04)
  • Re: Array of Pointers Question (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/15/04)
  • Re: using bits as flags (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/15/04)
  • Re: The behaviour of getchar() (02/14/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/14/04)
  • Re: Building an application.. (02/14/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/13/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/13/04)
  • Re: Acessing registers with C (02/13/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/13/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/11/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
  • Re: extend/shrink heap ? (02/10/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/10/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/10/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/09/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/09/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/08/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/08/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/08/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/08/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/08/04)
  • Re: C Linked List - (02/05/04)
  • Re: Struggling with bsearch - on a struct! (02/05/04)
  • Re: big to little endian (02/05/04)
  • Re: A more efficient way (02/04/04)
  • Re: malloc and calloc (02/04/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/04/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: stringise DBL_DIG (02/01/04)
  • stringise DBL_DIG (02/01/04)
  • Re: Polymorphism in C (02/01/04)
• Mansour Al-Aqeel
  • Re: overwriting in the terminal (02/12/04)
• Mantorok Redgormor
  • Re: value of ((int)0.7) and ((int)-0.7) (02/24/04)
  • perils of memset (02/22/04)
  • volatile const int foo (02/16/04)
  • [OT] - propagation of incorrect information (02/11/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/11/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/08/04)
  • undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/08/04)
  • lvalues -> incomplete types (02/06/04)
• Marcia Hon
  • Re: bit operation (02/16/04)
  • Re: Segmentation fault need help (02/16/04)
  • Losing a variable (02/16/04)
  • Segmentation fault need help (02/15/04)
  • Re: Help with Select (02/14/04)
  • Help with Select (02/14/04)
  • Re: Bits How to program them (02/11/04)
  • Bits How to program them (02/11/04)
  • Re: File access permission (02/09/04)
  • Re: errno 13 (02/09/04)
  • File access permission (02/09/04)
  • errno 13 (02/09/04)
  • cannot write file, cannot do variable length packet (02/08/04)
  • Variable Length Packet (02/08/04)
  • Cannot create file for write (02/08/04)
  • Re: Check if a directory is empty and empty it (02/08/04)
  • Re: Append to char * (02/08/04)
  • Append to char * (02/08/04)
  • Check if a directory is empty and empty it (02/08/04)
• Maria
  • Re: getting resource information: battery level and more (02/02/04)
  • getting resource information: battery level and more (02/02/04)
• Maria Gaitani
  • Re: getting resource information: battery level and more (02/04/04)
  • Re: getting resource information: battery level and more (02/03/04)
• Marin David Condic
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping (02/26/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping (02/26/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping (02/17/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping (02/17/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/15/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/14/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/13/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/12/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/11/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/10/04)
• Mark A. Odell
  • Re: Style - imbedding data files (02/19/04)
  • Re: global scope on paramaters (02/18/04)
  • Re: How to read/write raw bytes from a flash card in C++? (02/18/04)
  • Re: How to read/write raw bytes from a flash card in C++? (02/17/04)
  • Re: macros and functions (02/13/04)
  • Re: macros and functions (02/13/04)
  • Re: Tricky Code (02/12/04)
  • Re: Tricky Code (02/12/04)
  • Re: Tricky Code (02/12/04)
  • Re: Tricky Code (02/12/04)
  • Re: Just want to know why (02/11/04)
  • Re: Tricky Code (02/11/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (02/11/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/09/04)
  • Re: generating waves (02/06/04)
  • Re: generating waves (02/06/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/06/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/05/04)
  • Re: finding redundant #includes to shorten compile time (02/05/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/05/04)
  • Re: finding redundant #includes to shorten compile time (02/05/04)
  • Re: Style question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Style question (02/05/04)
  • Re: beginer C question (02/05/04)
  • Re: variable length record using struct/union - help (02/04/04)
  • Re: Style question (02/04/04)
  • Re: variable length record using struct/union - help (02/03/04)
  • Re: Condensing nested switch statements (02/03/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/02/04)
  • Re: using typedef for structures in C (02/02/04)
  • Re: determine offset point (02/02/04)
  • Re: variable length record using struct/union - help (02/02/04)
• Mark Brader
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/07/04)
• Mark F. Haigh
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/26/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/26/04)
  • Re: weird 'C' warning - can you solve this? (02/25/04)
• Mark Healey
  • Probably a stupid newbie question. (02/07/04)
• Mark McIntyre
  • Re: Standard question (02/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/26/04)
  • Re: Difference? (02/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] Outsourcing your C-progammer (02/25/04)
  • Re: Comments requested: brief summary of C (02/25/04)
  • Re: Difference? (02/24/04)
  • Re: Difference? (02/24/04)
  • Re: What can C do and Basic V2 not? (02/24/04)
  • Re: Weird problem: sscanf (02/24/04)
  • Re: What can C do and Basic V2 not? (02/23/04)
  • Re: Keyboard = Stop (02/21/04)
  • Re: Style - imbedding data files (02/21/04)
  • Re: Regarding Switch statement (02/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: about hash table (02/18/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/18/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/18/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/18/04)
  • Re: How to handle this problem in MS VC++ (02/18/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/17/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/17/04)
  • Re: Use of const in parameter specification (02/16/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/15/04)
  • Re: Problem - program exited with code 0377 (02/15/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/15/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/15/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/15/04)
  • Re: Problem - program exited with code 0377 (02/15/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/15/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/15/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/15/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/15/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/15/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/15/04)
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/15/04)
  • Re: gdb SIGSEGV (02/15/04)
  • Re: Acessing registers with C (02/14/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/13/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/13/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/13/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: monitors in C? (02/12/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/12/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: extend/shrink heap ? (02/11/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/11/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/11/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/10/04)
  • Re: extend/shrink heap ? (02/10/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/10/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/10/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/10/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/10/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/10/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/10/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/10/04)
  • Re: VSIPL (02/09/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/09/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/09/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: [OT, probably] stpcpy (02/09/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/09/04)
  • Re: number of 1's in an integer (02/09/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/09/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mystery: static variables & performance (02/09/04)
  • Re: File I/O (02/09/04)
  • Re: return all non-blank lines in a file(linux) (02/09/04)
  • Re: What's the best way to create an associative array in C? (02/08/04)
  • Re: sprintf function (02/08/04)
  • Re: beginer C question (02/08/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/08/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/08/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/08/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: how to run the index with 1, 2, 2,3,4,5..... in an array from a do loop (02/08/04)
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/08/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: calculations in C, userinterface in PHP (02/08/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/08/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/07/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/07/04)
  • Re: #define Question (02/07/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/07/04)
  • Re: #define Question (02/06/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/06/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/05/04)
  • Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/05/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/05/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/05/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/05/04)
  • Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/05/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/04/04)
  • Re: getting resource information: battery level and more (02/04/04)
  • Re: A few things remain unclear... (02/04/04)
  • Re: malloc and calloc (02/04/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/04/04)
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/04/04)
  • Re: C perfomance (02/01/04)
  • Re: ANSI C - Filsize ? (02/01/04)
  • Re: Allocating space for char*? (02/01/04)
• Mark Shelor
  • Re: tmpnam question (02/24/04)
  • Re: tmpnam question (02/24/04)
  • Re: tmpnam question (02/23/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/17/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/19/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/19/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/18/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/18/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/18/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/18/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/18/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/18/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/17/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/17/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/17/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/17/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/17/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/17/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/16/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/15/04)
  • Re: Long long int (02/15/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/15/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/15/04)
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/14/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/14/04)
  • Re: Topic ***** (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/13/04)
  • Re: Topic ***** (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: strtol question (02/12/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/12/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/10/04)
  • Re: K&R chapter 6.3 Question 'how to calculate the number of array elements' (02/10/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/10/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/10/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/09/04)
  • Re: return all non-blank lines in a file(linux) (02/09/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/09/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mystery: static variables & performance (02/09/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/09/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/08/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/08/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/07/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/07/04)
  • Mystery: static variables & performance (02/07/04)
• Markus Gyger
  • Re: longjmp vs goto (02/02/04)
• Markus Muessig
  • ssl-connect over tcp (02/24/04)
• Martien Verbruggen
  • Re: getc() only returns 1500 chars on a 5 Meg file (02/27/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/11/04)
• Martijn Lievaart
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/07/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/06/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/06/04)
• Martijn van den Branden
  • Re: the trouble with mex c (02/01/04)
  • Re: the trouble with mex c (02/01/04)
  • Re: the trouble with mex c (01/31/04)
  • Re: the trouble with mex c (01/31/04)
• Martin
  • Re: Use of const in parameter specification (02/21/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/21/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/20/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/19/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/19/04)
  • Re: Why the zero case in fabs()? (02/16/04)
  • Re: Portable assignment (02/16/04)
  • Portable assignment (02/16/04)
  • Why the zero case in fabs()? (02/16/04)
  • Use of const in parameter specification (02/16/04)
• Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Function definition into main() function. (02/27/04)
  • Re: unsigned short; (02/27/04)
  • Re: help with type-punned warning please (02/26/04)
  • Re: why does this fail in turbo c? (02/22/04)
  • Re: why doesn't it print 1.0? (02/22/04)
  • Re: Error in typedef (02/17/04)
  • Re: comma in string (02/15/04)
  • Re: Array of Pointers Question (02/15/04)
  • Re: using bits as flags (02/15/04)
  • Re: malloc - to cast or not to cast, that is the question... (02/14/04)
  • Re: Reading from array is faster than writing ??? (02/13/04)
  • Re: malloc - to cast or not to cast, that is the question... (02/13/04)
  • Re: linklist (02/13/04)
  • Re: pointers switch function (02/13/04)
  • Re: pointers switch function (02/13/04)
  • Re: Typecasting (02/12/04)
  • Re: strtol question (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: problem in K&R answer book (02/10/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/09/04)
  • Re: File access permission (02/09/04)
  • Re: Cannot write file, cannot do variable length packets (02/08/04)
  • Re: Check if a directory is empty and empty it (02/08/04)
  • Re: how to increment pointer in a file (02/08/04)
  • Re: sprintf function (02/08/04)
  • Re: sprintf function (02/08/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/08/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/08/04)
  • Re: how to run the index with 1, 2, 2,3,4,5..... in an array from a do loop (02/08/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/08/04)
  • Re: returning array size (02/07/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/07/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/07/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • Re: How to pass by reference a dinamic array to a C routine (02/07/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/06/04)
  • Re: How to calculate size of an array of dynaically malloc'd structs? (02/06/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/05/04)
  • Re: system shell command (02/04/04)
  • Re: Trouble calculating 5th root of a given number using C (02/02/04)
  • Re: Trouble calculating 5th root of a given number using C (02/02/04)
  • Re: determine offset point (02/02/04)
  • Re: stringise DBL_DIG (02/01/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/01/04)
  • Re: string copy (02/01/04)
  • Re: the trouble with mex c (01/31/04)
• Martin Dickopp
  • Re: is this correct (02/29/04)
  • [OT] Mail-Copies-To header set to invalid address (was Re: is this correct) (02/29/04)
  • Re: is this correct (02/29/04)
  • Re: Function definition into main() function. (02/28/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/27/04)
  • Re: Volatile variables (02/27/04)
  • Re: unsigned short; (02/27/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/27/04)
  • Re: problem with char array (02/26/04)
  • Re: problem with char array (02/26/04)
  • Re: Linked list or realloc()? (02/25/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/25/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/25/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/19/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/19/04)
  • Re: Use of const in parameter specification (02/19/04)
  • Re: problems with copying/editing strings (02/18/04)
  • Re: struct problem (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: limits.h and int len (02/18/04)
  • Re: Qualifier not checked (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: Statements and expressions. (02/17/04)
  • Re: Statements and expressions. (02/17/04)
  • Re: bit operation (02/17/04)
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/17/04)
  • Re: Why the zero case in fabs()? (02/16/04)
  • Re: Losing a variable (02/16/04)
  • Re: volatile const int foo (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/16/04)
  • Re: Use of const in parameter specification (02/16/04)
  • Re: Use of const in parameter specification (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/15/04)
  • Re: using bits as flags (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/15/04)
  • Re: EOF and getchar/fgetc (02/14/04)
  • Re: malloc - to cast or not to cast, that is the question... (02/14/04)
  • Re: malloc - to cast or not to cast, that is the question... (02/14/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/13/04)
  • Re: Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/13/04)
  • Re: Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/13/04)
  • Re: Assiciativity (02/12/04)
  • Re: Assiciativity (02/12/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/12/04)
  • Re: Assiciativity (02/12/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/12/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/11/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/11/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/11/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/10/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/10/04)
  • Re: pow problem (02/10/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/10/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/06/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/06/04)
  • [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/06/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/06/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/06/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/05/04)
  • Re: #define Question (02/05/04)
  • Re: getenv and carriage returns (02/05/04)
  • Re: A more efficient way (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/04/04)
  • Re: getenv and carriage returns (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/04/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/04/04)
  • Re: Need help with c macro. (02/03/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/03/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: A few things remain unclear... (02/03/04)
  • Re: array to pointer decay question !! (02/02/04)
  • Re: standard change (02/01/04)
• Martin Dowie
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/10/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/10/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/10/04)
• Martin Johansen
  • Statements and expressions. (02/17/04)
  • Re: comma in string (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/15/04)
  • Re: signed and unsigned char (02/12/04)
  • Re: searching a substring (02/12/04)
  • Re: searching a substring (02/12/04)
  • Re: Assiciativity (02/12/04)
  • Re: Assiciativity (02/12/04)
  • Re: Typecasting (02/12/04)
  • Re: searching a substring (02/12/04)
  • Re: Typecasting (02/12/04)
  • Typecasting (02/12/04)
• Martin Krischik
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/08/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/08/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/08/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/07/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/06/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/06/04)
• Martin O'Brien
  • Re: Use of const in parameter specification (02/19/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/19/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/18/04)
• Martin Rydstr|m
  • Re: [OT] Re: ed rules (was vi rules) (02/13/04)
• Massimiliano Alberti
  • Re: Find Greater or Equal (02/20/04)
  • Find Greater or Equal (02/20/04)
  • Re: limits.h and int len (02/19/04)
  • Re: limits.h and int len (02/18/04)
  • limits.h and int len (02/18/04)
• Matt Wolinsky
  • Re: the trouble with mex c (02/02/04)
• Matthew
  • Purify problem or compiler problem? (02/06/04)
• Matthew Wilson
  • Whats wrong with this crc32 code? (02/16/04)
• Matthias Klaey
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/16/04)
• Maurizio Loreti
  • Re: string concatenation (02/13/04)
• mcalhoun
  • Re: system shell command (02/06/04)
• Menno Duursma
  • Re: Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/12/04)
  • Re: Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/12/04)
• Michael
  • Re: Please help........... (02/25/04)
  • OT: Re: Einsendeaufgabe (02/17/04)
  • Re: Problem with structs and strings in C (02/09/04)
  • Re: ***what is the reason for this strange problem?*** (02/04/04)
  • Re: ***what is the reason for this strange problem?*** (02/03/04)
  • Re: ***what is the reason for this strange problem?*** (02/03/04)
  • ***what is the reason for this strange problem?*** (02/03/04)
• Michael Fyles
  • Re: need help new to C programming (02/28/04)
• Michael Kelly
  • Software Quality & Fault Measurement (02/10/04)
• Michael Mclaughlin
  • New Webmaster Forum (02/20/04)
• Michael Str.
  • Re: dictionary + binary search = counting words (02/22/04)
• Michael Wojcik
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/26/04)
  • Re: pstack help (02/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/25/04)
  • Re: Difference? (02/25/04)
  • Re: limits.h and int len (02/25/04)
  • Re: struct stat *stbuf seg fault (02/24/04)
  • Re: limits.h and int len (02/23/04)
  • Re: Memory Allocation for Dynamic Alloccation (02/22/04)
  • Re: limits.h and int len (02/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/21/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (02/20/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/20/04)
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/16/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/16/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/16/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/16/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/16/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/16/04)
  • Re: signed and unsigned char (02/13/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (02/13/04)
  • Re: Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/13/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/13/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/13/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/12/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/12/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/12/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/12/04)
• Michel Bardiaux
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/09/04)
• miguel.ossa
  • initialize serial port (02/13/04)
• Miika Karanki
  • Re: newbie question (02/06/04)
• Mike
  • Polymorphism in C (02/01/04)
• Mike Copeland
  • Masking (02/05/04)
• Mike Wahler
  • Re: Why (long)NULL ? (02/29/04)
  • Re: Press enter to continue (02/29/04)
  • Re: 0a appending w/strcpy (02/29/04)
  • Re: Press enter to continue (02/29/04)
  • Re: Search a binary file for a string... again! (its to slow) (02/28/04)
  • Re: [OT, welcome msg] socket wrapper (02/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Is that a constant expression? (02/26/04)
  • Re: [OT, welcome msg, link] Combobox on gtk+ 2 (02/26/04)
  • Re: C String/int question + Win/Unix Compile (02/26/04)
  • Re: C String/int question + Win/Unix Compile (02/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/25/04)
  • Re: Comments requested: brief summary of C (02/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] Switch question (02/21/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/20/04)
  • Re: Topicality (02/13/04)
  • Re: max value in an array (02/13/04)
  • Re: [OT] what "google" do to search a pattern (02/13/04)
  • Re: Split C soup (was: [OT, was Topic Nazis] Etymology) (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: [another! corr] How to find a string in a stream of binary data? (02/11/04)
  • Re: Converting ASM to C (02/11/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/11/04)
  • Re: [corr] How to find a string in a stream of binary data? (02/11/04)
  • Re: How to find a string in a stream of binary data? (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/10/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/10/04)
  • Re: [OT, welcome msg] How to get make to work under Cygwin bash shell (02/10/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/10/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/10/04)
  • Re: Need help: Pointer to String (02/10/04)
  • Re: K&R chapter 6.3 Question 'how to calculate the number of array elements' (02/10/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/10/04)
  • Re: Main [was File IO] (02/10/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/10/04)
  • Re: Usoing fopen etc is there a way to find file size (02/10/04)
  • Re: Cannot create file for write (02/10/04)
  • Re: Usoing fopen etc is there a way to find file size (02/10/04)
  • Re: Cannot create file for write (02/09/04)
  • Re: Main [was File IO] (02/09/04)
  • Re: javadoc like (02/09/04)
  • Re: Cannot create file for write (02/09/04)
  • Re: Main [was File IO] (02/09/04)
  • Re: Main [was File IO] (02/09/04)
  • Re: [OT, welcome msg] errno 13 (02/09/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/08/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/08/04)
  • Re: Cannot write file, cannot do variable length packets (02/08/04)
  • Re: Cannot create file for write (02/08/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: [OT, welcome msg] convert a single to multiuser.. in sock.c program (02/08/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: [OT, welcome msg] convert a single to multiuser.. in sock.c program (02/08/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: Memory allocation questions (02/08/04)
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/07/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/07/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/07/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: A C tutorial (02/07/04)
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/07/04)
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/07/04)
  • Re: how to manage temporary files in C ? (02/07/04)
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/07/04)
  • Re: [OT, FAQ] Probably a stupid newbie question. (02/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] Shooting yourself in the foot (02/04/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/04/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/03/04)
  • Re: [OT] Shooting yourself in the foot (02/02/04)
  • Re: running c program (02/01/04)
• MJSR
  • Re: Statements and expressions. (02/23/04)
• MK
  • Re: Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/12/04)
  • Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/12/04)
• MNQ
  • Re: Problem with prints twice instead of once. (02/06/04)
  • Problem with prints twice instead of once. (02/06/04)
• Mohanasundaram
  • tricky do-while (02/27/04)
  • Re: c89 and c99 (02/27/04)
  • c89 and c99 (02/26/04)
  • Re: Difference? (02/25/04)
  • Re: Difference? (02/24/04)
  • Difference? (02/23/04)
  • malloc and calloc (02/20/04)
  • Assiciativity (02/12/04)
  • Tricky Code (02/11/04)
  • Memory question (02/06/04)
• Morgan
  • Again on passing arrays as arguments (02/08/04)
  • How to pass by reference a dinamic array to a C routine (02/06/04)
• Morris Dovey
  • Re: [OT] Sig query (02/13/04)
  • Re: [OT] Sig query (02/13/04)
  • Re: gdb SIGSEGV (02/12/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/12/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/12/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/12/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: sprintf function (02/08/04)
  • Re: code review (02/07/04)
  • Re: code review (02/07/04)
  • Re: code review (02/07/04)
  • Re: code review (02/06/04)
  • Re: code review (02/06/04)
  • Re: code review (02/06/04)
  • Re: Fibonacci series and the exact longitude and latitude (02/06/04)
  • Re: Wanting to Learn (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/02/04)
  • Re: [OT] Shooting yourself in the foot (02/02/04)
• MSG
  • Ada performance (was No call for Ada ) (02/13/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/10/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/10/04)
  • Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/10/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/10/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/09/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/07/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/07/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/07/04)
  • to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/06/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: MSG (02/06/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: MSG (02/05/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/05/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/04/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/04/04)
  • Re: why is casting malloc a bad thing? (02/03/04)
• Mystic Mouflon
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/05/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/04/04)
• Måns Rullgård
  • Re: Segmentation fault need help (02/16/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (02/13/04)
• Naren
  • Just want to know why (02/11/04)
• nav
  • Exist a function for path management? (02/27/04)
• NeedHelp
  • Re: Array of Pointers Question (02/16/04)
  • Array of Pointers Question (02/15/04)
• Neil Aggarwal
  • gethostbyaddr returning null for CNAME records (02/25/04)
• Neil Zanella
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/08/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/08/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/08/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/08/04)
  • efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/05/04)
• Nejat AYDIN
  • Re: which is the better way to declare dynamic single dimension array inside struct (02/27/04)
  • Re: unsigned short; (02/27/04)
  • Re: weird 'C' warning - can you solve this? (02/25/04)
• Nick
  • Re: longjmp vs goto (02/04/04)
  • Re: C perfomance (02/03/04)
• Nick Landsberg
  • Re: Search a binary file for a string... again! (its to slow) (02/28/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/27/04)
  • Re: 51MB size limit with fopen in append mode (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/26/04)
  • Re: 51MB size limit with fopen in append mode (02/25/04)
  • Re: 51MB size limit with fopen in append mode (02/25/04)
  • Re: algorithm to split number into two pieces (02/25/04)
  • Re: algorithm to split number into two pieces (02/25/04)
  • Re: Input file donkey work. (02/22/04)
  • Re: Style - imbedding data files (02/20/04)
  • Re: Style - imbedding data files (02/20/04)
  • Re: writing program from a book (02/19/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/18/04)
  • Re: edit list (02/18/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/17/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/17/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/17/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/17/04)
  • [OT] Origins of a.out (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/15/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: ed rules (was vi rules) (02/13/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/13/04)
  • Re: call by address vs. call by value (02/11/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/11/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/10/04)
  • Re: reading decimal data.... (02/09/04)
  • Re: A more efficient way (02/09/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/09/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/08/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/08/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/08/04)
• Nils Petter Vaskinn
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/26/04)
  • OT pdf. (was: Re: Comments requested: brief summary of C) (02/25/04)
  • OT: why pdf (was: Comments requested: brief summary of C) (02/24/04)
  • Re: Comments requested: brief summary of C (02/24/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/23/04)
  • Re: Einsendeaufgabe (02/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/19/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/19/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: OT: Re: Einsendeaufgabe (02/18/04)
  • Re: Einsendeaufgabe (02/17/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/17/04)
  • Re: Reading from array is faster than writing ??? (02/17/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/17/04)
  • Re: Reading from array is faster than writing ??? (02/16/04)
  • Re: Reading from array is faster than writing ??? (02/13/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Topic Nazis (OR Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/11/04)
  • OT: How to get what you want (was: Mystery: static variables & performance) (02/10/04)
  • Re: Cannot create file for write (02/10/04)
  • [OT] Chivalry? (was: File access permission) (02/09/04)
  • Re: Cannot create file for write (02/09/04)
  • Re: Append to char * (02/09/04)
  • Re: Cannot create file for write (02/09/04)
  • Re: output to *.xls (02/06/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/05/04)
  • Re: malloc and calloc (02/02/04)
• Nitin
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/21/04)
• Nitin Bhardwaj
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/23/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/20/04)
  • What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/19/04)
  • Re: big to little endian (02/11/04)
  • Re: pointers and files (02/10/04)
  • Re: pointers and files (02/09/04)
• Norbert Juffa
  • Re: how to simplify/shorten this loop of bit shifting code? (02/17/04)
• nospam
  • Re: difference (02/08/04)
  • Re: difference (02/08/04)
  • Re: register caching of static variables (02/08/04)
  • Re: difference (02/01/04)
  • Re: difference (02/01/04)
• nrk
  • Re: Function definition into main() function. (02/27/04)
  • Re: problem with char array (02/26/04)
  • Re: Read a binary file until "\name\" is encountered... (02/26/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/25/04)
  • Re: Read a binary file until "\name\" is encountered... (02/25/04)
  • Re: Linked list or realloc()? (02/25/04)
  • Re: Linked list or realloc()? (02/25/04)
  • Re: Read a binary file until "\name\" is encountered... (02/25/04)
  • Re: problem parsing strings (02/24/04)
  • Re: Difference? (02/24/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/24/04)
  • Re: algorithm to split number into two pieces (02/24/04)
  • Re: algorithm to split number into two pieces (02/24/04)
  • Re: algorithm to split number into two pieces (02/24/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/23/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/23/04)
  • Re: Boxline in curses ( Linux ) (02/21/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/21/04)
  • Re: Regarding Switch statement (02/20/04)
  • Re: Regarding Switch statement (02/20/04)
  • Re: Style - imbedding data files (02/20/04)
  • Re: Regarding Switch statement (02/20/04)
  • Re: a shorter strchr (02/17/04)
  • Re: How do i found out the number of lines in a file (02/20/04)
  • Re: Regarding Switch statement (02/20/04)
  • Re: limits.h and int len (02/20/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/20/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/20/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/18/04)
  • Re: limits.h and int len (02/18/04)
  • Re: Weird problem: sscanf (02/18/04)
  • Re: Problem with pointer to array of structures (02/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/17/04)
  • Re: a shorter strchr (02/17/04)
  • Re: Problem with pointer to array of structures (02/17/04)
  • [OT] Re: A C tutorial (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/15/04)
  • Re: comma in string (02/15/04)
  • Re: How to call an external command? (02/15/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (02/15/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/15/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/15/04)
  • Re: A quick question (02/15/04)
  • [OT] Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/15/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (02/14/04)
  • Re: A C tutorial (02/14/04)
  • Re: Question about pipes (02/14/04)
  • Re: strtol question (02/12/04)
  • Re: strtol question (02/12/04)
  • Re: strtol question (02/12/04)
  • strtol question (02/12/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/12/04)
  • Re: quickest way to determine character sizes (02/12/04)
  • Re: quickest way to determine character sizes (02/12/04)
  • [OT] Re: ed rules (was vi rules) (02/11/04)
  • Re: const array declaration (02/09/04)
  • Re: pointers and files (02/08/04)
  • Re: sprintf function (02/08/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/08/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/08/04)
  • Re: sprintf function (02/08/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/07/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/06/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/06/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/06/04)
  • Re: [OT] Shooting yourself in the foot (02/06/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/05/04)
  • Re: Struggling with bsearch - on a struct! (02/05/04)
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/05/04)
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/05/04)
  • Re: #define Question (02/05/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/05/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/05/04)
  • [OT] Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/05/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/05/04)
  • [OT] Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: getenv and carriage returns (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Shooting yourself in the foot (02/04/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/04/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Condensing nested switch statements (02/03/04)
  • Re: Condensing nested switch statements (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Sufficient error checking of strtol()? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Trouble calculating 5th root of a given number using C (02/02/04)
  • Re: Too obfuscated? (02/02/04)
  • Re: variable length record using struct/union - help (02/02/04)
  • Re: [OT] Shooting yourself in the foot (02/01/04)
  • Re: Allocating space for char*? (02/01/04)
• Nudge
  • Re: Tricky Code (02/12/04)
  • Re: Tricky Code (02/12/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/08/04)
  • Re: new arm board (02/01/04)
• Old Wolf
  • Re: bitfield and enum, is this legal? (02/25/04)
  • Re: Loops, switches, embedded returns (02/24/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/23/04)
  • Re: Loops, switches, embedded returns (02/22/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/19/04)
  • Re: bit operation (02/19/04)
  • Re: question on fread() (02/19/04)
  • Re: [ansi 89] inline (02/18/04)
  • Re: Can anyone improve this any further...... (02/08/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/08/04)
  • Re: Condensing nested switch statements (02/04/04)
  • Re: variable length record using struct/union - help (02/04/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/04/04)
  • Re: (Info) Test Your C Programming Strengths (02/04/04)
  • Re: Question re. integral promotion, signed->unsigned (02/04/04)
  • Re: variable length record using struct/union - help (02/03/04)
  • Re: variable length record using struct/union - help (02/02/04)
  • Re: Review: 3D-Array (02/02/04)
  • Re: stringise DBL_DIG (02/02/04)
• Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping (02/26/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/13/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/12/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/11/04)
• Oleg Kornilov
  • Reading from array is faster than writing ??? (02/13/04)
• Oleg Melnikov
  • Re: Need help: Pointer to String (02/11/04)
  • Re: problem in K&R answer book (02/11/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/10/04)
  • Re: [C] simple string question (02/06/04)
• OneLG13
  • Creating an argument list for sprintf (02/23/04)
• osmium
  • Re: Fibonacci number (02/23/04)
  • Re: Fibonacci number (02/22/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/14/04)
  • Re: Assiciativity (02/12/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/08/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/07/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/06/04)
  • Re: Book Opinion-Expert C programming (02/05/04)
  • Re: Trouble calculating 5th root of a given number using C (02/02/04)
• OZ
  • Re: [OT, welcome msg] convert a single to multiuser.. in sock.c program (02/08/04)
  • convert a single to multiuser.. in sock.c program (02/08/04)
  • how to run the index with 1, 2, 2,3,4,5..... in an array from a do loop (02/08/04)
  • new arm board (02/01/04)
• P.J. Plauger
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (02/26/04)
  • Re: Why the zero case in fabs()? (02/16/04)
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (02/16/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/07/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • Re: Trouble calculating 5th root of a given number using C (02/02/04)
• P.T. Breuer
  • Re: bit operation (02/19/04)
  • Re: bit operation (02/17/04)
• P.T.B
  • Re: bit operation (02/19/04)
• Panchal V
  • Re: variable length record using struct/union - help (02/03/04)
  • Re: variable length record using struct/union - help (02/03/04)
  • Re: variable length record using struct/union - help (02/03/04)
  • variable length record using struct/union - help (02/02/04)
• pandapower
  • array to pointer decay question !! (02/02/04)
• Papadopoulos Giannis
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/24/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/23/04)
  • Re: Fibonacci number (02/23/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/23/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/21/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/20/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/20/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/20/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/12/04)
  • Re: Converting ASM to C (02/11/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/10/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/10/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/09/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: Main [was File IO] (02/09/04)
  • Re: File access permission (02/09/04)
  • Re: File I/O (02/09/04)
  • Re: Main [was File IO] (02/09/04)
  • Re: File I/O (02/09/04)
  • File I/O (02/09/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/08/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/08/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/05/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/04/04)
  • Re: Up-to-dateness of the c.l.c. FAQ (02/03/04)
  • Re: Help for students, provided by a Scientists Group (02/03/04)
  • Re: getting resource information: battery level and more (02/02/04)
• pashmina g.
  • Re: problem with char array (02/26/04)
  • problem with char array (02/26/04)
• pat saunders
  • pstack help (02/25/04)
• Paul Hsieh
  • Re: Issues with input (02/21/04)
  • Re: What's the best way to create an associative array in C? (02/03/04)
  • Re: C perfomance (02/01/04)
  • Re: C perfomance (02/01/04)
• Paul Mensonides
  • Re: Error in Preprocessing (02/03/04)
• Paul Pluzhnikov
  • Re: Segmentation fault need help (02/16/04)
• Paul Victor Birke
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/02/04)
• Pavan Zope
  • problem with using Fortran routine in C. (02/02/04)
• pendell
  • Re: FAR * in 64-bit machines (02/02/04)
• PengHQ
  • why shoule write code like these? (02/11/04)
• pete
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/28/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/28/04)
  • Re: errno-like variables in threaded environments (02/27/04)
  • Re: pointers and array (02/27/04)
  • Re: Please help........... (02/25/04)
  • Re: Please help........... (02/25/04)
  • Re: Please help........... (02/25/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/25/04)
  • Re: Comments requested: brief summary of C (02/24/04)
  • Re: tmpnam question (02/24/04)
  • Re: tmpnam question (02/24/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/24/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/23/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/23/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/23/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/23/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: a shorter strchr (02/18/04)
  • Re: Floating point literals (02/17/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (02/19/04)
  • Re: bit operation (02/19/04)
  • Re: Looking for an intro C programming book? (02/19/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/19/04)
  • Re: a shorter strchr (02/19/04)
  • Re: Problem with pointer to array of structures (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: a shorter strchr (02/18/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (02/18/04)
  • Re: How to read/write raw bytes from a flash card in C++? (02/17/04)
  • Re: Einsendeaufgabe (02/17/04)
  • Re: Floating point literals (02/17/04)
  • Re: Statements and expressions. (02/17/04)
  • Re: Problem with pointer to array of structures (02/17/04)
  • Re: Requirements of floating point comparisons (02/17/04)
  • Re: Floating point literals (02/17/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/17/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/17/04)
  • Re: char * vs. const char * (02/16/04)
  • Re: Requirements of floating point comparisons (02/16/04)
  • Re: Losing a variable (02/16/04)
  • Re: char * vs. const char * (02/16/04)
  • Re: Requirements of floating point comparisons (02/16/04)
  • Re: Requirements of floating point comparisons (02/16/04)
  • Re: Data Alignment Macros? (02/16/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/15/04)
  • Re: The behaviour of getchar() (02/14/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/14/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/14/04)
  • Re: max value in an array (02/13/04)
  • Re: signed and unsigned char (02/13/04)
  • Re: Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/13/04)
  • Re: signed and unsigned char (02/13/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/13/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/13/04)
  • Re: signed and unsigned char (02/12/04)
  • Re: signed and unsigned char (02/12/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/12/04)
  • Re: Tricky Code (02/12/04)
  • Re: Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/12/04)
  • Re: searching a substring (02/12/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/12/04)
  • Re: Help with warning when using calloc/malloc (02/12/04)
  • Re: Typecasting (02/12/04)
  • Re: Tricky Code (02/12/04)
  • Re: searching a substring (02/12/04)
  • Re: Casting (signed long)(unsigned long) (02/12/04)
  • [ot]Re: Typecasting (02/12/04)
  • Re: searching a substring (02/12/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/12/04)
  • Re: why shoule write code like these? (02/11/04)
  • Re: problem in K&R answer book (02/11/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/10/04)
  • Re: K&R chapter 6.3 Question 'how to calculate the number of array elements' (02/10/04)
  • Re: K&R chapter 6.3 Question 'how to calculate the number of array elements' (02/10/04)
  • Re: problem in K&R answer book (02/10/04)
  • Re: problem in K&R answer book (02/10/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/10/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/10/04)
  • Re: pointers and files (02/09/04)
  • Re: Problem with structs and strings in C (02/09/04)
  • Re: accessing array element as pointer (02/09/04)
  • Re: size of a sizeof(pointer) (02/09/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: Review: My C FAQ Page (02/09/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Aho Corasick source code needed, please help (02/08/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/08/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/08/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/08/04)
  • Re: difference (02/08/04)
  • Re: Union type variable assignation --- in expression, in function argues (02/08/04)
  • Re: OT: Re: Purify problem or compiler problem? (02/07/04)
  • Re: Can anyone improve this any further...... (02/07/04)
  • Re: lvalues -> incomplete types (02/07/04)
  • Re: Purify problem or compiler problem? (02/07/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/07/04)
  • Re: Review: My C FAQ Page (02/07/04)
  • Re: Review: My C FAQ Page (02/07/04)
  • Re: code review (02/07/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/07/04)
  • Re: Book Opinion-Expert C programming (02/06/04)
  • Re: Can anyone improve this any further...... (02/06/04)
  • Re: How to read data columnwise (02/06/04)
  • Re: C Linked List - (02/06/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/06/04)
  • Re: Can anyone improve this any further...... (02/06/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/06/04)
  • Re: How to calculate size of an array of dynaically malloc'd structs? (02/06/04)
  • Re: Review: My C FAQ Page (02/06/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/06/04)
  • Re: lvalues -> incomplete types (02/06/04)
  • Re: Can anyone improve this any further...... (02/06/04)
  • Re: efficiency concern: when to really use unsigned ints and when not to (02/06/04)
  • Re: lvalues -> incomplete types (02/06/04)
  • Re: Union type variable assignation --- in expression, in function argues (02/06/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/06/04)
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/05/04)
  • Re: Union type variable assignation --- in expression, in function argues (02/05/04)
  • Re: Union type variable assignation --- in expression, in function argues (02/05/04)
  • Re: Union type variable assignation --- in expression, in function argues (02/05/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/03/04)
  • Re: C perfomance (02/03/04)
  • Re: C perfomance (02/03/04)
  • Re: difference (02/02/04)
  • Re: C perfomance (02/02/04)
  • Re: Review: 3D-Array (02/02/04)
  • Re: My toy stdio, Re: how can i make functions which behaves like printf (02/02/04)
  • Re: running c program (02/02/04)
  • Re: C perfomance (02/02/04)
  • Re: My toy stdio, Re: how can i make functions which behaves like printf (02/02/04)
  • Re: difference (02/01/04)
  • Re: difference (02/01/04)
  • Re: itoa in pure C (02/01/04)
  • My toy stdio, Re: how can i make functions which behaves like printf (02/01/04)
  • Re: difference (02/01/04)
  • Re: itoa in pure C (02/01/04)
  • Re: itoa in pure C (02/01/04)
  • Re: Extent of the "as-if" rule (02/01/04)
  • Re: itoa in pure C (02/01/04)
• Pete Fenelon
  • Re: Binary constant macros (02/27/04)
• Peter
  • Re: getc() only returns 1500 chars on a 5 Meg file (02/27/04)
  • Re: Lint doesn't catch signed => unsigned arg passing (02/27/04)
  • Re: struct problem (02/27/04)
  • Re: Problems dereferensing my C structures (custom types) (02/27/04)
  • Re: struct problem (02/22/04)
  • Re: pointers to pointers (02/22/04)
  • Re: Problems dereferensing my C structures (custom types) (02/22/04)
  • Re: Question on Pointer Indirections (02/22/04)
  • Re: Too obfuscated? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: Christian Bau (02/05/04)
  • Re: What's the best way to create an associative array in C? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: Christian Bau (02/05/04)
  • Re: Allocating space for char*? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Error in Preprocessing (02/03/04)
• Peter Ammon
  • Re: Check if value is defined in enum (02/28/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (02/25/04)
  • Re: Please help........... (02/24/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/21/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (02/20/04)
  • Re: Memory Allocation for Dynamic Alloccation (02/19/04)
  • Most negative double value (02/19/04)
  • Re: Copying structures of different type (02/18/04)
  • Re: JPEG/TIFF routines? (02/17/04)
  • Requirements of floating point comparisons (02/16/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/16/04)
  • Re: Typecasting (02/14/04)
• Peter J Ross
  • Re: Is it really necessary? (02/05/04)
• Peter Mount
  • Newbie with ANSI C (02/02/04)
• Peter Nilsson
  • Re: value of ((int)0.7) and ((int)-0.7) (02/25/04)
  • Re: value of ((int)0.7) and ((int)-0.7) (02/24/04)
  • Re: value of ((int)0.7) and ((int)-0.7) (02/24/04)
  • Re: Difference? (02/24/04)
  • Re: bitfield and enum, is this legal? (02/24/04)
  • Re: value of ((int)0.7) and ((int)-0.7) (02/24/04)
  • Re: struct problem (02/22/04)
  • Re: Looking for an intro C programming book? (02/22/04)
  • Re: why doesn't it print 1.0? (02/22/04)
  • Re: Problems dereferensing my C structures (custom types) (02/22/04)
  • Re: why doesn't it print 1.0? (02/22/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/21/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/21/04)
  • Re: Mystery: static variables & performance (02/19/04)
  • Re: 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/18/04)
  • Re: 32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication (02/18/04)
  • Re: Bounds checked string library (02/16/04)
  • Re: > (02/16/04)
  • Re: The behaviour of getchar() (02/15/04)
  • Re: using bits as flags (02/15/04)
  • Re: > (02/15/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/15/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/14/04)
  • Re: > (02/14/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/14/04)
  • Re: linked list (02/13/04)
  • Re: problem in K&R answer book (02/12/04)
  • Re: Tricky Code (02/11/04)
  • Re: Main [was File IO] (02/09/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/09/04)
  • Re: Main [was File IO] (02/09/04)
  • Re: undefined behavior or not undefined behavior? That is the question (02/09/04)
  • Re: sprintf function (02/09/04)
  • Re: sprintf function (02/09/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/08/04)
  • Re: how to run the index with 1, 2, 2,3,4,5..... in an array from a do loop (02/08/04)
  • Re: code review (02/07/04)
  • Re: code review (02/07/04)
  • Re: number of 1's in an integer (02/07/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/05/04)
  • Re: getenv and carriage returns (02/05/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: [ERT] Re: online C programming test (02/03/04)
  • Re: struct hack question (02/03/04)
  • Re: longjmp vs goto (02/03/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: C perfomance (02/03/04)
  • Re: stringise DBL_DIG (02/03/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: C routines for Special Functions (02/02/04)
  • Re: C perfomance (02/02/04)
  • Re: Initialization of global variables (02/02/04)
  • Re: malloc and calloc (02/02/04)
  • Re: array to pointer decay question !! (02/02/04)
  • Re: stringise DBL_DIG (02/02/04)
  • Re: ANSI C - Filsize ? (02/01/04)
  • Re: ANSI C - Filsize ? (02/01/04)
  • Re: how can i make functions which behaves like printf (02/01/04)
  • Re: itoa in pure C (02/01/04)
• Peter Pichler
  • Re: 0a appending w/strcpy (02/29/04)
  • Re: 0a appending w/strcpy (02/28/04)
  • Re: 0a appending w/strcpy (02/28/04)
  • Re: Palm programming (displaying different char-set) (02/28/04)
  • Re: 0a appending w/strcpy (02/28/04)
  • Re: Connect Oracle Database C (02/27/04)
  • Re: C String/int question + Win/Unix Compile (02/27/04)
  • [Way OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/26/04)
  • Re: weird 'C' warning - can you solve this? (02/26/04)
  • Re: weird 'C' warning - can you solve this? (02/26/04)
  • Re: weird 'C' warning - can you solve this? (02/25/04)
  • Re: weird 'C' warning - can you solve this? (02/24/04)
  • Re: tmpnam question (02/24/04)
  • Re: What can C do and Basic V2 not? (02/22/04)
  • Re: Loops, switches, embedded returns (02/22/04)
  • Re: "Hello World" without semicolon with a difference (02/22/04)
  • Re: can we write program without loops (02/22/04)
  • Re: linked lists (02/21/04)
  • Re: linked lists (02/21/04)
  • Re: Issues with input (02/21/04)
  • Re: Data Alignment Macros? (02/20/04)
  • Re: multi dimension arrays (02/20/04)
  • Re: K&R chapter 6.3 Question 'how to calculate the number of array elements' (02/20/04)
  • Re: Empty statement (02/20/04)
  • Re: Buffered _read and _write... how to get more buffer memory? (02/20/04)
  • Re: Keyboard = Stop (02/20/04)
  • Re: Issues with input (02/20/04)
  • Re: Error handling - how to get rid of multiple flags? (02/20/04)
  • Re: Loops, switches, embedded returns (02/20/04)
  • Re: Spelling (02/20/04)
  • Re: Regarding Switch statement (02/20/04)
  • Re: useless warnings (02/20/04)
  • Re: Just want to know why (02/19/04)
  • Re: Just want to know why (02/19/04)
  • Re: struct problem (02/18/04)
  • Re: forward declaration for typedef of unnamed structs (02/18/04)
  • Re: Just want to know why (02/18/04)
  • Re: Copying structures of different type (02/18/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: C dangerous? (02/18/04)
  • Re: redefinition (02/17/04)
  • Re: Requirements of floating point comparisons (02/16/04)
  • Re: Win32 hardware coding (02/15/04)
  • Re: redefinition (02/15/04)
  • Re: K&r typo (02/15/04)
  • Re: Vigenere Cipher (02/15/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/15/04)
  • Re: Is D better than C? (02/08/04)
  • Re: Append to char * (02/08/04)
  • Re: Check if a directory is empty and empty it (02/08/04)
  • Re: sprintf function (02/08/04)
  • Re: pointers and files (02/08/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/08/04)
  • Re: sprintf function (02/08/04)
  • Re: sprintf function (02/08/04)
  • Re: Vigenere Cipher (02/08/04)
  • Re: how to run the index with 1, 2, 2,3,4,5..... in an array from a do loop (02/08/04)
  • Re: memory oraganisation?? (02/08/04)
  • Re: memory oraganisation?? (02/07/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/07/04)
  • Re: Vigenere Cipher (02/07/04)
  • Re: to cast or not to cast malloc ? (02/07/04)
  • Re: calculate value of 73! (02/07/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/06/04)
  • Re: code review (02/06/04)
  • Re: code review (02/06/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/06/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/06/04)
  • Re: random numbers (02/06/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (02/06/04)
  • Re: Memory question (02/06/04)
  • Re: Fibonacci series and the exact longitude and latitude (02/06/04)
  • Re: How to pass by reference a dinamic array to a C routine (02/06/04)
  • Re: How to read data columnwise (02/06/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/05/04)
  • Re: Another style question (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/04/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/04/04)
  • Re: Condensing nested switch statements (02/04/04)
  • Re: K&R 2 exercise 2-3 (02/04/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Program without conditional Statements - Possible ? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Any C/C++ LINT type checking recomendations (02/04/04)
  • Re: online C programming test (02/04/04)
  • Re: C program works on W98 but not new WXP machine (02/04/04)
  • Re: Questions, please (02/03/04)
  • Re: string copy (02/02/04)
  • Re: string copy (02/01/04)
  • Re: string copy (02/01/04)
  • Re: My toy stdio, Re: how can i make functions which behaves like printf (02/01/04)
  • Re: Recording trigger (02/01/04)
  • Re: the trouble with mex c (02/01/04)
• phax
  • Re: Bits How to program them (02/11/04)
• Phil Tregoning
  • Re: Bounds checked arrays (02/16/04)
• phillnash_at_btinternet.com
  • Re: Keyboard = Stop (02/20/04)
• Phlip
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/10/04)
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/07/04)
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/07/04)
  • Re: How to Parse a CSV formatted text file (02/07/04)
• Pierre Maurette
  • Re: Losing a variable (02/17/04)
• pillip
  • Re: need some help with arrays (02/26/04)
  • Re: need some help with arrays (02/26/04)
  • need some help with arrays (02/26/04)
  • Re: generating waves (02/06/04)
  • generating waves (02/06/04)
• Piotr Turkowski
  • Re: Vigenere Cipher (02/07/04)
  • Vigenere Cipher (02/07/04)
• Pizzor2000
  • Re: String Functions (02/23/04)
  • String Functions (02/22/04)
• PlasmaDragon
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't there a logical XOR operator? (02/04/04)
• pooja
  • pointers and files (02/08/04)
  • how to increment pointer in a file (02/08/04)
• prafulla
  • Regarding Switch statement (02/19/04)
• Preben Randhol
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/12/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/11/04)
  • Re: No call for Ada (was Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language) (02/11/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (02/06/04)
• Prem Mallappa
  • Re: problem in K&R answer book (02/10/04)
  • problem in K&R answer book (02/10/04)
  • beginer C question (02/05/04)