comp.lang.c
By Author

4416 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 02/28/04
Ending: 03/31/04

• - CASE -
  • Re: Yet another pointer related problem (03/04/04)
• 0.2993983001893563
  • Urgent: 5000 Euro Reward (0.6646425140282815) (03/08/04)
• <- Chameleon ->
  • Re: @@@ TEMPTATION KINDLED MY FAITH @@@ (03/28/04)
• _libra_
  • Re: Unicode to GB2312-80 table needed (03/25/04)
  • Re: newbie question (03/24/04)
• Aaron Walker
  • Re: allocating memory for array of pointers to char (03/10/04)
  • Re: allocating memory for array of pointers to char (03/10/04)
  • Re: allocating memory for array of pointers to char (03/09/04)
  • Re: allocating memory for array of pointers to char (03/08/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/08/04)
  • allocating memory for array of pointers to char (03/08/04)
• Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/08/04)
• Abhishek Verma
  • During linking do I need header files (03/22/04)
• Abra K. Dabra
  • Re: Is a newline at the end of a C file a better style than a blank at the end of the file or is it better to place none? (03/18/04)
  • Is a newline at the end of a C file a better style than a blank at the end of the file or is it better to place none? (03/17/04)
  • Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
• Adi
  • detect loops in memory trace (03/26/04)
  • Re: memory accesses (03/08/04)
  • Re: memory accesses (03/05/04)
  • memory accesses (03/03/04)
  • Re: segmentation fault with printf (03/02/04)
• Admirer
  • BRILLLLIANT ARTICLE BY DR THOMAS FRIEDMAN OF NYTIMES (03/30/04)
• Adrian
  • enum in header files (03/12/04)
• Adrian de los Santos
  • Re: is this correct (03/06/04)
  • Re: header files (03/06/04)
  • Re: header files (03/06/04)
  • Re: Reset a string? (03/06/04)
  • Re: Reset a string? (03/06/04)
  • Re: Reset a string? (03/06/04)
• Ahmed S. Badran
  • Re: difference: char **argv <-> char *argv[] ??? (03/23/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Printing a decimal value stored in a char without converstion to int (03/21/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/21/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Printing a decimal value stored in a char without converstion to int (03/21/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • C standard online? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Printing a decimal value stored in a char without converstion to int (03/21/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: How to compile with GCC? (03/21/04)
  • Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Printing a decimal value stored in a char without converstion to int (03/21/04)
  • Printing a decimal value stored in a char without converstion to int (03/17/04)
  • Re: #include <> (03/10/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/08/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/08/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/08/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/08/04)
• Al Bowers
  • Re: Date validation function issue (03/31/04)
  • Re: Deleting a node in a singly link list if intermediate pointer is given (03/30/04)
  • Re: Limit to the length of argument list (03/29/04)
  • Re: Portability question (03/28/04)
  • Re: C/C++ string comparison (03/27/04)
  • Re: Strings, memory and files... Oh my (03/27/04)
  • Re: Strings, memory and files... Oh my (03/26/04)
  • Re: Having problem populating time structure (03/23/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/22/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/22/04)
  • Re: more linked lists (03/21/04)
  • Re: string litterals and char * and standard c (03/18/04)
  • Re: Accessing a member of a struct via various pointers (03/17/04)
  • Re: Accessing a member of a struct via various pointers (03/17/04)
  • Re: arbitrary timezone conversion routines (03/16/04)
  • Re: Why a pointer to a pointer makes the difference ? (03/13/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (03/09/04)
  • Re: Allocating Concatenation For Array (03/08/04)
• Alan
  • What is the equivalent of DLL in a Unix environment?? (03/08/04)
  • What is the equivalent of DLL in a Unix environment?? (03/07/04)
  • [C] double/float to string (03/07/04)
  • Re: [C] copy string question (03/07/04)
  • [C] copy string question (03/07/04)
• Alan Balmer
  • Re: [OT] "thx" (was: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ?) (03/31/04)
  • Re: Nested sorting problem with linked list (03/31/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/31/04)
  • Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/26/04)
  • Re: Self-referential function (03/25/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/25/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/23/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/23/04)
  • Re: Curious about differences between two compilers (03/23/04)
  • Re: Curious about differences between two compilers (03/23/04)
  • Re: A C code from SNIPPET,help to Analyze. (03/19/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/19/04)
  • Re: Error handling (03/18/04)
  • Re: struct initialization? (03/18/04)
  • Re: Error handling (03/18/04)
  • Re: Weird runtime problem (03/18/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/18/04)
  • Re: Is strncat slow? (03/17/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/17/04)
  • Re: Weird runtime problem (03/17/04)
  • Re: what does it mean? (03/17/04)
  • Re: working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/16/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/16/04)
  • Re: finding structure defines (03/15/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/15/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/15/04)
  • Re: decimals where hexadecimal should be??? (03/15/04)
  • Re: finding structure defines (03/15/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/15/04)
  • Re: decimals where hexadecimal should be??? (03/12/04)
  • [OT] Anonymous remailers (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/12/04)
  • Re: libclc? (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/11/04)
  • Re: libclc? (03/11/04)
  • Re: Is it still worth it to learn C? (03/11/04)
  • Re: IP address fastest storage/searching (03/09/04)
  • Re: header files (03/08/04)
  • Re: HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE CHRISTIANS KILLED SINCE BIBLICAL TIMES? (03/08/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/08/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/08/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: segmentation fault with printf (03/03/04)
• Alex
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/22/04)
  • Re: what does it mean? (03/17/04)
  • Re: Difference (03/15/04)
  • Pixel data type (03/02/04)
• Alex Malkis
  • Differences C/C++ (03/23/04)
  • Re: exit & return (03/23/04)
• Alex Monjushko
  • Re: #undef, #define (03/30/04)
  • Re: Const union (03/18/04)
  • Re: howto convert/translate c2asm (03/16/04)
  • Re: what does it mean? (03/16/04)
  • Re: Who can explain the sentence for me? (03/01/04)
• Alex Vinokur
  • Re: What is volatile? (03/17/04)
• Alexander Bartolich
  • Re: Delimiting problems (03/31/04)
  • Re: strlen() argument warning (03/07/04)
  • Re: strlen() argument warning (03/07/04)
• Alexander Krotov
  • Re: string concatenation (03/10/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (03/08/04)
• Alexander Leidinger
  • Re: Code/Object analyzer for fixing (03/09/04)
• Alexander Malkis
  • Re: Definition of NULL (03/17/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/16/04)
  • Re: Is that a constant expression? (03/08/04)
  • Re: Is that a constant expression? (03/08/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/08/04)
  • Re: how to "wait for any key" (03/07/04)
  • how to "wait for any key" (03/07/04)
  • Re: Is that a constant expression? (03/07/04)
  • Re: Is that a constant expression? (03/06/04)
• Alexander Terekhov
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/16/04)
• Alexei Cioina
  • Re: [OT] Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: coding a simple calculator (03/09/04)
  • Re: coding a simple calculator (03/08/04)
  • Re: coding a simple calculator (03/08/04)
  • Re: coding a simple calculator (03/08/04)
• Allan Bruce
  • Re: Pointers to pointers (03/24/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/24/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/23/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: Converting an integer to an array of bytes (03/13/04)
  • Re: the random number? (03/12/04)
  • Re: string question (03/05/04)
  • Re: grabbing file size (03/03/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/02/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/02/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/02/04)
• Allin Cottrell
  • Re: remembering arrays (03/12/04)
• aman
  • Re: scan codes (03/26/04)
  • Re: scan codes (03/18/04)
  • scan codes (03/01/04)
• Amarendra GODBOLE
  • Re: cast in memcpy() (03/02/04)
  • Re: cast in memcpy() (03/02/04)
  • cast in memcpy() (03/01/04)
• Amit Bhatia
  • Re: How to "sleep" or "delay"? (03/03/04)
  • Re: How to "sleep" or "delay"? (03/03/04)
• AMMullan
  • Re: Pointers to pointers (03/24/04)
  • Pointers to pointers (03/24/04)
  • Re: difference: char **argv <-> char *argv[] ??? (03/23/04)
• Andrej Prsa
  • Passing va_list two times? (03/04/04)
  • Re: Pointer-to-function with variable argument number (03/04/04)
  • Pointer-to-function with variable argument number (03/04/04)
  • Re: strdup() (was Re: Struct of pointer-to-function) (03/02/04)
  • Re: Struct of pointer-to-function (03/02/04)
  • Struct of pointer-to-function (03/02/04)
• Andrew
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/14/04)
• Andrew Koenig
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
• andrews
  • Error handling (03/18/04)
• Andrey Tarasevich
  • Re: Why isn't srand working? (03/03/04)
  • Re: Passing commas into macros (03/02/04)
• andy
  • floating-point float (03/21/04)
• Anil Akkur
  • What is volatile? (03/17/04)
• Animist African
  • ## POLYGAMY FOR THE AFRICAN, ASIAN, BUDDHIST, HINDU and ALL ## (03/28/04)
• anony*mouse
  • Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/04/04)
  • Re: string-search-and-replace function wanted (03/04/04)
  • Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/04/04)
  • Re: MIDI project (03/04/04)
  • Re: How to "sleep" or "delay"? (03/04/04)
• anonymous
  • Re: Please solve following string related problems... (03/30/04)
  • expression (03/21/04)
  • 2Q's (03/16/04)
  • function call? (03/08/04)
  • Re: Who can explain the sentence for me? (03/01/04)
• Arjan Kenter
  • Const union (03/18/04)
• arjix
  • detecting escape key on console (03/10/04)
• arsenic
  • Re: HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE CHRISTIANS KILLED SINCE BIBLICAL TIMES? (03/06/04)
• Arthur J. O'Dwyer
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/31/04)
  • Re: $$ WHY DEMOCRATS WILL VOTE FOR BUSH $$ (03/30/04)
  • [OT] Google and IP, was Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/30/04)
  • Re: Please solve following string related problems... (03/30/04)
  • Re: Please solve following string related problems... (03/30/04)
  • Re: Help with code from "O'Reily's Practical C Prgramming, 3rd Edition" (03/29/04)
  • Re: Beginner here.... (03/28/04)
  • Re: Writing a prepreprocessor! (03/27/04)
  • Re: Stack with file access. (03/25/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/25/04)
  • Re: Syntax Curiosity: -> versus . (03/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/25/04)
  • [OT] Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/24/04)
  • Re: Self-referential function (03/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/24/04)
  • Re: Macro define function? (03/24/04)
  • Self-referential function (03/23/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/23/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/22/04)
  • Re: Read in/handling a large file (03/22/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/22/04)
  • Re: expression (03/21/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/21/04)
  • Re: Printing a decimal value stored in a char without converstion to int (03/20/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/19/04)
  • Re: A C code from SNIPPET,help to Analyze. (03/19/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/19/04)
  • Re: Undefined Operation (03/19/04)
  • Re: var arg list (03/18/04)
  • Re: Is a newline at the end of a C file a better style than a blank at the end of the file or is it better to place none? (03/18/04)
  • Re: Error handling (03/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] insults (03/18/04)
  • Re: C structure definition (03/18/04)
  • Re: Woe is me. I am best by trolls. (03/18/04)
  • Re: integer size and portability-a wishful controversy (03/17/04)
  • Re: [CODE REVIEW again] (03/17/04)
  • Re: [C] integer to string (03/17/04)
  • Re: [CODE REVIEW again] (03/16/04)
  • Re: [CODE REVIEW again] (was: [CODE REVIEW] Re: Generic C) (03/16/04)
  • Re: [CODE REVIEW again] (was: [CODE REVIEW] Re: Generic C) (03/16/04)
  • [CODE REVIEW] Re: Generic C (03/16/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/16/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/16/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: Expert preprocessor question (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: useless casts (03/15/04)
  • [OT] Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/13/04)
  • Re: [OT] insults (03/12/04)
  • Re: How to write? (03/12/04)
  • Re: ANSI Standard for << (03/12/04)
  • Re: gets_mem (03/12/04)
  • Re: pattern matching code - little help needed (03/12/04)
  • Re: pattern matching code - little help needed (03/11/04)
  • Re: wrong with using default parameter of function (03/10/04)
  • Re: pattern matching code - little help needed (03/10/04)
  • Re: gets_mem (03/10/04)
  • Re: Question to function code( ) : (03/10/04)
  • Re: Declaration statement (03/10/04)
  • Re: Command line arguments (03/09/04)
  • Re: gets_mem (03/09/04)
  • Re: Command line arguments (03/09/04)
  • Re: IP address fastest storage/searching (03/09/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/09/04)
  • [OT] Re: coding a simple calculator (03/08/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/08/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/06/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/06/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/06/04)
  • Re: Is that a constant expression? (03/05/04)
  • [FAQ] Re: string question (03/05/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/04/04)
  • Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Question about #define (03/03/04)
  • Re: character/byte equality, again (03/03/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mail-Copies-To header set to invalid address (03/02/04)
  • Re: character/byte equality, again (03/02/04)
  • Re: Question about #define (03/02/04)
• Artie Gold
  • Re: Help with code from "O'Reily's Practical C Prgramming, 3rd Edition" (03/29/04)
  • Re: memory mapped files (03/29/04)
  • Re: A couple of questions... (03/27/04)
  • Re: array declaration (03/25/04)
  • Re: getting output from system commands with system() (03/21/04)
  • Re: immediate structs (03/14/04)
  • Re: immediate structs (03/14/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/12/04)
  • Re: metatype in c (03/10/04)
  • Re: term_info.c_cflag (03/09/04)
  • [OT]Re: What is the equivalent of DLL in a Unix environment?? (03/07/04)
  • Re: [C] copy string question (03/07/04)
  • [OT]Re: Porting to Linux. (03/06/04)
  • Re: Doubt about pass pointer to int. (02/29/04)
• August Derleth
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/16/04)
  • Re: Vectors and C (03/14/04)
  • Re: Off Topic: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/14/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/09/04)
• B. v Ingen Schenau
  • Re: [C] integer to string (03/18/04)
• Baju Antony
  • Limitations/Difficulties of Object Oriented Design in C (03/09/04)
• Barry Margolin
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/19/04)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
• Barry Schwarz
  • Re: find the length of an array (03/29/04)
  • Re: binary IO and portability (03/28/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • Re: Can anybody tell me the difference between this three group of code? (03/27/04)
  • Re: Trouble with types! (03/27/04)
  • Re: Stack with file access?. (03/27/04)
  • Re: Strings, memory and files... Oh my (03/26/04)
  • Re: Stack with file access…. (03/26/04)
  • Re: Can anybody tell me the difference between this three group of code? (03/25/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/25/04)
  • Re: newbie question (03/24/04)
  • Re: Having problem populating time structure (03/23/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: fill a union in a struct (03/20/04)
  • Re: Section from the C standard. (03/20/04)
  • Re: Accessing a member of a struct via various pointers (03/18/04)
  • Re: working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/17/04)
  • Re: [C] integer to string (03/17/04)
  • Re: decimals where hexadecimal should be??? (03/13/04)
  • Re: Pointer and BitWise Operator. (03/08/04)
  • Re: Reset a string? (03/07/04)
  • Re: weird behaviour by gcc (03/06/04)
  • Re: float (*Data)[4] vs float *Data[4] (03/04/04)
  • Re: going crazy, invalid conversion from `char*' to `char' help needed (03/04/04)
  • Re: segmentation fault with printf (03/04/04)
  • Re: Who can explain the sentence for me? (03/01/04)
  • Re: A NULL pointer changed after returned? (03/01/04)
  • Re: A NULL pointer changed after returned? (03/01/04)
• BartenderSam
  • Re: going crazy, invalid conversion from `char*' to `char' help needed (03/04/04)
• Beginner Programmer
  • Re: Pointer Watches in TurboC++ (03/30/04)
  • Pointer Watches in TurboC++ (03/28/04)
• Ben
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/16/04)
  • concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
  • Re: pass variable argument list on somehow? (03/08/04)
  • Re: pass variable argument list on somehow? (03/08/04)
  • Re: pass variable argument list on somehow? (03/08/04)
  • Re: pass variable argument list on somehow? (03/08/04)
  • pass variable argument list on somehow? (03/08/04)
  • Re: small bit shifting q (03/05/04)
  • small bit shifting q (03/05/04)
• Ben Halicki
  • Code to connect to MSSQL Database (03/19/04)
  • Re: Vectors and C (03/14/04)
  • Vectors and C (03/14/04)
• Ben Pfaff
  • Re: Reading program output from stdin (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Quick question (03/30/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/30/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/30/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/29/04)
  • Re: find the length of an array (03/29/04)
  • Re: Compile-time constant in C89? (03/29/04)
  • Re: Compile-time constant in C89? (03/29/04)
  • Re: memory mapped files (03/29/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • Re: free fails (03/28/04)
  • Re: linked-list (03/28/04)
  • Re: C in Visual Studio.NET (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
  • Re: long integer (03/26/04)
  • Re: detect loops in memory trace (03/26/04)
  • Re: atoi and overflow (03/25/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/24/04)
  • Re: Differences C/C++ (03/24/04)
  • Re: Differences C/C++ (03/24/04)
  • Re: What principle does C use to generate a random value? (03/24/04)
  • Re: Variable name (03/23/04)
  • Re: Self-referential function (03/23/04)
  • Re: more linked lists (03/21/04)
  • Re: floating-point float (03/21/04)
  • Re: vprintf (03/20/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/19/04)
  • Re: Union and Struct Declarations (03/19/04)
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/19/04)
  • Re: var arg list (03/18/04)
  • Re: Const union (03/18/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/17/04)
  • Re: Is strncat slow? (03/17/04)
  • Re: Trouble with pointer indirection (03/16/04)
  • Re: howto convert/translate c2asm (03/16/04)
  • Re: [CODE REVIEW again] (03/16/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: immediate structs (03/14/04)
  • Re: immediate structs (03/14/04)
  • Re: immediate structs (03/14/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/13/04)
  • Re: finding structure defines (03/13/04)
  • Re: [OT] A R-Ms (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
  • Re: Writing bits to a file (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: Please !!! (03/12/04)
  • Re: ANSI Standard for << (03/12/04)
  • Re: ANSI Standard for << (03/12/04)
  • Re: Union as raw memory (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/11/04)
  • Re: help! anyway to split string and store in array (03/11/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/11/04)
  • Re: c89 and c99 (03/10/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/10/04)
  • Re: Is memcpy a stadard function in c? (03/10/04)
  • Re: is there reference type in c language? (03/10/04)
  • Re: wrong with using default parameter of function (03/10/04)
  • Re: Compile for a dedivated machine (03/09/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: header files (03/08/04)
  • Re: Compile for a dedivated machine (03/08/04)
  • Re: code for knapsack problem using iterative deepening method (03/08/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/08/04)
  • Re: What is the equivalent of DLL in a Unix environment?? (03/07/04)
  • Re: How to retain function test code? (03/06/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/05/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mail-Copies-To header set to invalid address (03/05/04)
  • Re: letting free() know how much to free...? (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't srand working? (03/03/04)
  • Re: How to "sleep" or "delay"? (03/03/04)
  • Re: FILE Access (03/02/04)
  • Re: finding the name of the function (03/02/04)
  • Re: error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _errno (03/02/04)
  • Re: Dynamic string allocation (03/02/04)
  • Re: Casting (time_t)(-1) (03/02/04)
  • Re: cast in memcpy() (03/01/04)
  • Re: cast in memcpy() (03/01/04)
  • Re: hello world (03/01/04)
  • Re: A NULL pointer changed after returned? (03/01/04)
• Ben Wyrosdick
  • help with client/server socket c code (03/12/04)
  • client server socket code (03/11/04)
• benjamin disraeli
  • Re: HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE CHRISTIANS KILLED SINCE BIBLICAL TIMES? (03/06/04)
• Benjamin Joseph
  • Re: c# (03/18/04)
• Bernhard Holzmayer
  • Re: returning a half-volatile pointer? (03/30/04)
  • Re: GCC passing arg from incompatible pointer type (03/29/04)
  • Re: returning a half-volatile pointer? (03/29/04)
  • returning a half-volatile pointer? (03/26/04)
  • Re: Statically create a table of data in C: How? (03/26/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/26/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/25/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/25/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/24/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/24/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/23/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/19/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/19/04)
• Bertrand Mollinier Toublet
  • Re: #undef, #define (03/30/04)
  • Re: reversing a string - newbie question (03/02/04)
• BIGSTORM
  • ** CHAVEZ CALLS BUSH "AN A-S-S-H-O-L-E" ** (03/08/04)
  • ** CHAVEZ CALLS BUSH "AN A-S-S-H-O-L-E" ** (03/08/04)
• Bill Cunningham
  • Re: typedef and struct (03/28/04)
  • typedef and struct (03/28/04)
  • Re: Gaussian-Jordon Reduction C Library (03/22/04)
  • Re: obs function (03/20/04)
  • Re: obs function (03/20/04)
  • Re: obs function (03/20/04)
  • obs function (03/19/04)
  • printf (03/15/04)
• Bill Seurer
  • Re: $$ WHY DEMOCRATS WILL VOTE FOR BUSH $$ (03/30/04)
  • Re: Differences C/C++ (03/24/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/24/04)
  • Re: enums with only 1 byte storage (03/15/04)
• Bill Zhao
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/22/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/22/04)
  • ---What this mean (03/22/04)
• Bio_Computer
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/20/04)
  • Problem with recursion :( (03/19/04)
• Björn Schmidt
  • Initializing arrays at runtime (03/28/04)
  • Re: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Re: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Newbie Quaestion (03/13/04)
• Bliss Family
  • Re: pointer problems (03/14/04)
• Blitzen
  • finding structure defines (03/13/04)
• Bluedoze
  • Re: fopen related questions (03/24/04)
• bnp
  • Please solve following string related problems... (03/27/04)
• boa
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
• Bob Day
  • Re: loop in a singly linked list (03/30/04)
• Bob Jenkins
  • Re: A width agnostic hash function (03/30/04)
• Bootstrap Bill
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/10/04)
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/08/04)
• BrandonInDenver
  • Connect() problems (03/22/04)
• Brian Quincy Hutchings
  • Re: BRILLLLIANT ARTICLE BY DR THOMAS FRIEDMAN OF NYTIMES (03/30/04)
• Brian Inglis
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/28/04)
  • Re: Copy-on-write tree data structure (03/11/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (03/06/04)
  • Re: Copy-on-write tree data structure (03/05/04)
• Brian MacBride
  • Re: Please solve following string related problems... (03/31/04)
  • Re: pattern matching code - little help needed (03/11/04)
  • Re: pattern matching code - little help needed (03/11/04)
  • Re: pattern matching code - little help needed (03/10/04)
  • Re: Vigenere Cipher II - how to use files (03/04/04)
  • Re: Vigenere Cipher II - how to use files (03/04/04)
• Brian Mastenbrook
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/06/04)
• Bryan Bullard
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/22/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/19/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/19/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/19/04)
  • Re: Linker error in call from C to ASM (03/17/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/11/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/11/04)
  • Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/11/04)
• Bryce Schober
  • nested structure const initialization (03/31/04)
• Buck Rogers
  • Re: Borland C++ vs. Microsoft C++? (03/11/04)
  • Re: Is it still worth it to learn C? (03/11/04)
• C GIllespie
  • Removing zeros from floats (03/19/04)
• C-turtle
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/26/04)
  • Re: c-mode question, emacs specific (03/15/04)
  • c-mode question, emacs specific (03/08/04)
  • How to retain function test code? (03/06/04)
  • How to retain function test code? (03/05/04)
• carl mcguire
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
• Carsten Hansen
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/12/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/11/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/10/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/10/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/09/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/08/04)
• Catcher
  • Visual c++ (03/11/04)
• CBFalconer
  • Re: event generation (03/28/04)
  • Re: linked-list (03/28/04)
  • Re: Please solve following string related problems... (03/27/04)
  • Re: Ideas in Plauger's book stdclib (03/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
  • Re: Doubts regarding macros (03/26/04)
  • Re: huge pointer (03/26/04)
  • Re: Statically create a table of data in C: How? (03/26/04)
  • Re: Strings, memory and files... Oh my (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
  • Re: long integer (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/25/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/25/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/24/04)
  • Re: How does this C function work? (03/24/04)
  • Re: makefile problem (03/24/04)
  • Re: Differences C/C++ (03/24/04)
  • Re: exit & return (03/24/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/24/04)
  • Re: small database written in Ansi C (03/23/04)
  • Re: inline function vs macro (03/22/04)
  • Re: small database written in Ansi C (03/22/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Printing a decimal value stored in a char without converstion to int (03/21/04)
  • Re: mixing old C code with new C++ code (03/21/04)
  • Re: is there a way to download a free c compiler and builder (03/21/04)
  • Re: Printing a decimal value stored in a char without converstion to int (03/21/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/21/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/21/04)
  • Re: vprintf (03/20/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/20/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/20/04)
  • Re: c (03/19/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/19/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/19/04)
  • Re: Removing zeros from floats (03/19/04)
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/19/04)
  • Re: Code to connect to MSSQL Database (03/19/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/19/04)
  • Re: Error handling (03/18/04)
  • Re: Weird runtime problem (03/18/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/18/04)
  • Re: working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/18/04)
  • Re: what does it mean? (03/18/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/17/04)
  • Re: Is strncat slow? (03/17/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/17/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/17/04)
  • Re: Is strncat slow? (03/17/04)
  • Re: Definition of NULL (03/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] insults (03/17/04)
  • Re: what does it mean? (03/16/04)
  • Re: integer size and portability-a wishful controversy (03/16/04)
  • Re: howto convert/translate c2asm (03/16/04)
  • Re: howto translate c2asm and asm2c (03/16/04)
  • Re: memory allocation/deallocation problem (03/16/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/16/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/16/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/16/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/16/04)
  • Re: c# (03/15/04)
  • Re: finding structure defines (03/15/04)
  • Re: libraries (03/15/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/15/04)
  • Re: function prototypes (03/15/04)
  • Re: function prototypes (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/14/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/13/04)
  • Re: char - signed or unsigned ? (03/13/04)
  • Re: Why a pointer to a pointer makes the difference ? (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: iswspace and iswprint (03/13/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/13/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/13/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/13/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/13/04)
  • Re: function prototypes (03/13/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/12/04)
  • Re: signed int overflow (03/12/04)
  • Re: simple c-programming project (03/12/04)
  • Re: function prototypes (03/12/04)
  • Re: How to write? (03/12/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/12/04)
  • Re: [OT] dumb word correction (03/11/04)
  • Re: function prototypes (03/11/04)
  • Re: function prototypes (03/11/04)
  • Re: CRT heap debugging routines (03/11/04)
  • Re: ANSI Standard for << (03/11/04)
  • Re: function prototypes (03/11/04)
  • Re: Segfault for passing element of an array to a regex function? (03/11/04)
  • Re: character classification routines (03/11/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/11/04)
  • Re: Borland C++ vs. Microsoft C++? (03/11/04)
  • Re: metatype in c (03/10/04)
  • Re: function prototypes (03/10/04)
  • Re: What are the difference among them? (03/10/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/10/04)
  • Re: [ot]Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/10/04)
  • Re: gets_mem (03/10/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/10/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/10/04)
  • Re: IP address fastest storage/searching (03/09/04)
  • Re: how does printf work? (03/09/04)
  • Re: Yet another pointer related problem (03/09/04)
  • Re: How to print ^M (ctrl M) (03/09/04)
  • Re: c89 and c99 (03/09/04)
  • Bulletproof reading of ints (was Re: string concatenation) (03/09/04)
  • Re: Yet another pointer related problem (03/09/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/09/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/09/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/08/04)
  • Re: gcc warning not understood (03/08/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/08/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/08/04)
  • Re: What is the equivalent of DLL in a Unix environment?? (03/08/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/08/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/08/04)
  • Re: Conversion to and from based real numbers (03/08/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/08/04)
  • Re: gcc warning not understood (03/08/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/08/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/08/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/08/04)
  • Re: Pointer and BitWise Operator. (03/07/04)
  • Re: Pointer and BitWise Operator. (03/07/04)
  • Re: strlen() argument warning (03/07/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/07/04)
  • Re: Conversion to and from based real numbers (03/07/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/07/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/07/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/07/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/07/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/07/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (03/06/04)
  • Re: weird behaviour by gcc (03/06/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/06/04)
  • Re: reset a string. empty it totally. (03/06/04)
  • Re: Reset a string? (03/06/04)
  • Re: allowing user to enter paragraphs (03/06/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/06/04)
  • Re: Reset a string? (03/06/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/05/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/05/04)
  • Re: NULL pointer (was Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy) (03/05/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/05/04)
  • Re: alligned memory allocation (03/05/04)
  • Re: [OT] Phone mnemonics (was: Increasing efficiency in C) (03/05/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Why isn't srand working? (03/05/04)
  • Re: alligned memory allocation (03/05/04)
  • Re: fork() problems (03/05/04)
  • Re: alligned memory allocation (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: poss soln (03/04/04)
  • Re: alligned memory allocation (03/04/04)
  • Re: Array of Pointers to Structs (03/04/04)
  • Re: Array of Pointers to Structs (03/03/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/03/04)
  • Re: Yet another pointer related problem (03/03/04)
  • Re: grabbing file size (03/03/04)
  • Re: reversing a string - newbie question (03/02/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/02/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/02/04)
  • Re: Dynamic string allocation (03/02/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/02/04)
  • Re: cast in memcpy() (03/02/04)
  • Re: Loops, switches, embedded returns (03/02/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/02/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/01/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/01/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (03/01/04)
  • Re: Question about #define (03/01/04)
  • Re: In and Out on port space within C - any standard? (03/01/04)
  • Re: A NULL pointer changed after returned? (03/01/04)
• Cedric
  • Accessing memory (03/31/04)
• Chalawal Maliwan
  • Re: What principle does C use to generate a random value? (03/24/04)
  • What principle does C use to generate a random value? (03/22/04)
• Charles Harrison Caudill
  • Re: Undefined Operation (03/19/04)
  • Re: Undefined Operation (03/19/04)
  • Undefined Operation (03/19/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/03/04)
• Charles Richmond
  • Re: [C] copy string question (03/08/04)
• Charles Sullivan
  • Re: char - signed or unsigned ? (03/13/04)
  • Re: char - signed or unsigned ? (03/13/04)
  • Re: char - signed or unsigned ? (03/13/04)
  • char - signed or unsigned ? (03/13/04)
• Che
  • Pointer and BitWise Operator. (03/07/04)
• Chen Houwu
  • Re: Is memcpy a stadard function in c? (03/10/04)
  • Re: is there reference type in c language? (03/10/04)
  • Re: wrong with using default parameter of function (03/10/04)
  • Is memcpy a stadard function in c? (03/10/04)
  • is there reference type in c language? (03/10/04)
  • wrong with using default parameter of function (03/10/04)
• Cherrish Vaidiyan
  • Different areas of specialisation in C programming. (03/18/04)
• choi
  • [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ? (03/28/04)
  • [C] integer to string (03/17/04)
• Chris
  • Allocating Concatenation For Array (03/08/04)
• Chris F.A. Johnson
  • Re: string concatenation (03/08/04)
• Chris Spiegel
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/19/04)
• Chris Torek
  • Re: i can't understand behaviour of if statement (03/28/04)
  • Re: inline function vs macro (03/28/04)
  • Re: problems with ANSI C grammar for yacc (03/28/04)
  • Re: Syntax Curiosity: -> versus . (03/26/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/25/04)
  • Re: Differences between programming in Win98 and Win2k? (03/24/04)
  • Re: typedef struct and extern (03/22/04)
  • Re: inline function vs macro (03/21/04)
  • stdout, fflush, and stdin (was Problem with recursion) (03/21/04)
  • Re: short unsigned and %hu (03/20/04)
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/19/04)
  • Re: Trouble with pointer indirection (03/19/04)
  • Re: pass variable argument list on somehow? (03/19/04)
  • Re: pass variable argument list on somehow? (03/19/04)
  • Re: C structure definition (03/18/04)
  • Re: doubts regarding extern,volatile in C (03/18/04)
  • Re: Trouble with pointer indirection (03/16/04)
  • Re: memory allocation/deallocation problem (03/16/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/15/04)
  • Re: libraries (03/15/04)
  • Re: doubts regarding extern,volatile in C (03/13/04)
  • Re: Declaration statement (03/13/04)
  • Re: function prototypes (03/11/04)
  • Re: Declaration statement (03/11/04)
  • Re: Declaration statement (03/10/04)
  • Re: pass variable argument list on somehow? (03/08/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/08/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/08/04)
  • Re: gcc warning not understood (03/08/04)
  • Re: volatile structures, and similar (03/08/04)
  • string literals (was Reset a string?) (03/06/04)
  • Re: alligned memory allocation (03/06/04)
  • Re: semantics of loating point exception handling (03/04/04)
  • Re: Pointer-to-function with variable argument number (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: character/byte equality, again (03/03/04)
  • Re: character/byte equality, again (03/03/04)
• chrismiceli
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/10/04)
• Christian Bau
  • Re: What does the standard say? (03/30/04)
  • Re: Bit reversal problem (03/30/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/26/04)
  • Re: long integer (03/26/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/23/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/23/04)
  • Re: Checking if a key was pressed during a decrement loop (03/22/04)
  • Re: is there a way to download a free c compiler and builder (03/21/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: Is strncat slow? (03/19/04)
  • Re: signed int overflow (03/17/04)
  • Re: ANSI Standard for << (03/15/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
  • Re: ANSI Standard for << (03/12/04)
  • Re: ANSI Standard for << (03/11/04)
  • Re: Negative float? (03/11/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/10/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/09/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/09/04)
  • Re: alligned memory allocation (03/05/04)
  • Re: alligned memory allocation (03/04/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
  • Re: alligned memory allocation (03/04/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/03/04)
  • Re: Pixel data type (03/02/04)
  • Re: cast in memcpy() (03/02/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: [OT] Efficiency of math.h (03/01/04)
• Christian Lynbech
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
• Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/30/04)
  • Re: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ? (03/30/04)
  • Re: #undef, #define (03/30/04)
  • #undef, #define (03/30/04)
  • Re: memory mapped files (03/29/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/29/04)
  • Re: Beginner here.... (03/29/04)
  • Re: Operating System (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Troll alert (03/26/04)
  • Re: C in Visual Studio.NET (03/26/04)
  • Re: Input in C under linux (03/26/04)
  • [OT] View older posts (03/25/04)
  • Re: Unicode to GB2312-80 table needed (03/25/04)
  • Re: Unicode to GB2312-80 table needed (03/25/04)
  • Re: makefile problem (03/24/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/23/04)
  • C++ recursive main (was exit & return) (03/23/04)
  • [OT] punctuation (03/23/04)
  • Re: seg fault core dumped (03/22/04)
  • Re: is there a way to download a free c compiler and builder (03/22/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/22/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/22/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/20/04)
  • Re: obs function (03/20/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/20/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/20/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/20/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/19/04)
  • Re: A C code from SNIPPET,help to Analyze. (03/19/04)
  • Re: c (03/19/04)
  • Re: Code to connect to MSSQL Database (03/19/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/17/04)
  • Re: Is a newline at the end of a C file a better style than a blank at the end of the file or is it better to place none? (03/17/04)
  • Re: string litterals and char * and standard c (03/17/04)
  • Re: Is a newline at the end of a C file a better style than a blank at the end of the file or is it better to place none? (03/17/04)
  • Re: register attribute (03/17/04)
  • Re: string litterals and char * and standard c (03/17/04)
  • Re: link error: can not find shared library (03/16/04)
  • Re: Pointer to function gives illegal operation (MSC6) (03/16/04)
  • Re: what does it mean? (03/16/04)
  • Re: what does it mean? (03/16/04)
  • [OT] tin (03/16/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/16/04)
  • Re: Understand some code (03/16/04)
  • Re: howto translate c2asm and asm2c (03/16/04)
  • Re: Difference (03/16/04)
  • Re: c-mode question, emacs specific (03/15/04)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/12/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/12/04)
  • [OT] insults (03/12/04)
  • Re: help with client/server socket c code (03/12/04)
  • Re: Prefering C to VB, racist and classist? (was : RAF NetNews - Local visitor missing after train of thought derails!) (03/12/04)
  • Re: How to count the number of elements of the first row of a 2D array ??? (03/11/04)
  • Re: Prefering C to VB, racist and classist? (was : RAF NetNews - Local visitor missing after train of thought derails!) (03/11/04)
  • Re: Borland C++ vs. Microsoft C++? (03/11/04)
  • Re: Visual c++ (03/11/04)
  • [OT] dumb word correction (03/11/04)
  • Re: simple c-programming project (03/11/04)
  • Re: Create a curve from points selected by user (03/11/04)
  • Re: CRT heap debugging routines (03/11/04)
  • Re: Borland C++ vs. Microsoft C++? (03/11/04)
  • Re: gets_mem (03/10/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/10/04)
  • Re: gets_mem (03/10/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/09/04)
  • [OT] pate and beef (03/09/04)
  • Re: Conditions and use of if, elseif or ORed ifs (03/09/04)
  • Re: reset a string. empty it totally. (03/08/04)
  • Re: What is the equivalent of DLL in a Unix environment?? (03/08/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/08/04)
  • [OT] Re: hacking /dev/audio (03/08/04)
  • Re: Code/Object analyzer for fixing (03/07/04)
  • Re: HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE CHRISTIANS KILLED SINCE BIBLICAL TIMES? (03/07/04)
  • Re: reset a string. empty it totally. (03/06/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/05/04)
  • Re: Reset a string? (03/05/04)
  • Re: letting free() know how much to free...? (03/04/04)
  • Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/03/04)
  • Re: read() error - Bad Address (03/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't srand working? (03/03/04)
  • Re: MIDI project (03/03/04)
  • int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/03/04)
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/03/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/03/04)
  • Re: finding the name of the function (03/02/04)
  • character/byte equality, again (03/02/04)
• Christopher M. Lusardi
  • How to overwrite integers at start of a file (03/29/04)
  • Re: For SGI Computer, Looking for Code to Open/Create, Write/Read to/from a BINARY File (03/28/04)
  • Re: For SGI Computer, Looking for Code to Open/Create, Write/Read to/from a BINARY File (03/27/04)
  • For SGI Computer, Looking for Code to Open/Create, Write/Read to/from a BINARY File (03/26/04)
  • For SGI Computer, Looking for Code to Open/Create, Write/Read to/from a BINARY File (03/26/04)
• Clark Cox
  • Re: Undefined Operation (03/19/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/19/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Re: Writing bits to a file (03/12/04)
  • Re: C99 bool question (03/12/04)
  • Re: the random number? (03/12/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/11/04)
  • [OT] Re: C/C++ development environment that fits in your pocket (03/11/04)
  • Re: ANSI Standard for << (03/11/04)
  • Re: wrong with using default parameter of function (03/10/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/10/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/09/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/09/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/09/04)
  • Re: How do you decide which integer type to use? (bitmasking question) (03/08/04)
  • Re: How do you decide which integer type to use? (bitmasking question) (03/08/04)
  • Re: gcc warning not understood (03/08/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/08/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/05/04)
  • Re: Reset a string? (03/05/04)
  • Re: NULL pointer (was Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy) (03/05/04)
  • Re: cast odd boundary? (03/03/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/03/04)
• Claudio Puviani
  • [OT and tasteless] Re: @@@ TEMPTATION KINDLED MY FAITH @@@ (03/28/04)
  • Re: Differences C/C++ (03/24/04)
  • Re: Differences C/C++ (03/23/04)
  • Re: Seeking Useful Variant of mktime (03/19/04)
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/08/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
• Claus Reibenstein
  • Re: Is that a constant expression? (03/05/04)
• Clint Olsen
  • Re: A width agnostic hash function (03/30/04)
  • A width agnostic hash function (03/30/04)
• Coby Beck
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/07/04)
• copx
  • binary IO and portability (03/28/04)
  • C99 bool question (03/12/04)
• Corey Murtagh
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/04/04)
• Cris Ding
  • the random number? (03/12/04)
  • How to write? (03/11/04)
• Critic
  • CRAP ARTICLE BY DR THOMAS FRIEDMAN OF NYTIMES (03/31/04)
• cturtle
  • RP: Ideas in Plauger's book stdclib (03/26/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/26/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] A CHALLENGING problem (03/26/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/25/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/25/04)
  • Re: Ideas in Plauger's book stdclib (03/25/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/24/04)
  • Ideas in Plauger's book stdclib (03/24/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/24/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/24/04)
  • Re: Self-referential function (03/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/24/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/24/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/24/04)
  • A CHALLENGING problem (03/23/04)
• Curley Q.
  • C locale? (03/29/04)
• CViniciusM
  • Doubt about pass pointer to int. (02/29/04)
• D. Hilley
  • Re: Undefined Operation (03/19/04)
  • Re: Undefined Operation (03/19/04)
• Dale King
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/08/04)
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/04/04)
• dam_fool_2003_at_yahoo.com
  • Counting total space,tab,new line in a string. (03/31/04)
• Dan Henry
  • Re: makefile problem (03/25/04)
• Dan Pop
  • Re: [OT] "thx" (was: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ?) (03/31/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/31/04)
  • Re: how to define memory position and assign number.... (03/31/04)
  • Re: how to define memory position and assign number.... (03/31/04)
  • Re: how to define memory position and assign number.... (03/31/04)
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/31/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Quick question (03/31/04)
  • Re: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ? (03/31/04)
  • Re: [OT] Google and IP, was Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/31/04)
  • Re: [FAQs, welcome msg] Problems with compiler and c for dummies book (03/31/04)
  • Re: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ? (03/31/04)
  • Re: What does the standard say? (03/31/04)
  • Re: What does the standard say? (03/31/04)
  • Re: #undef, #define (03/31/04)
  • [OT] Re: Quick question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Problems with compiler and c for dummies book (03/31/04)
  • Re: printf justification question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/31/04)
  • Re: Accessing memory (03/31/04)
  • Re: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ? (03/30/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/30/04)
  • Re: What does the standard say? (03/30/04)
  • Re: unable to find Segmentation Fault (03/30/04)
  • Re: #undef, #define (03/30/04)
  • Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/30/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/30/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/30/04)
  • Re: What does the standard say? (03/30/04)
  • Re: #undef, #define (03/30/04)
  • Re: long integer (03/30/04)
  • Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/30/04)
  • Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/30/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/30/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/30/04)
  • Re: GCC passing arg from incompatible pointer type (03/29/04)
  • Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/29/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/29/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/29/04)
  • Re: Possible way to overcome the file size limit (03/29/04)
  • Re: Portability question (03/29/04)
  • Re: Portability question (03/29/04)
  • Re: long integer (03/29/04)
  • Re: inline function vs macro (03/29/04)
  • Re: Ideas in Plauger's book stdclib (03/29/04)
  • Re: how to make program invisible (03/29/04)
  • Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/29/04)
  • Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/29/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
  • Re: huge pointer (03/26/04)
  • Re: Doubts regarding macros (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
  • Re: Possible way to overcome the file size limit (03/26/04)
  • Re: compilation to C (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
  • Re: long integer (03/26/04)
  • Re: long integer (03/26/04)
  • Re: huge pointer (03/26/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/26/04)
  • Re: Looking for sparse array code (03/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/25/04)
  • Re: Looking for sparse array code (03/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/25/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/25/04)
  • Re: What is a bitmask? (03/25/04)
  • Re: size of huge memory (03/25/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/25/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/24/04)
  • Re: How does this C function work? (03/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] punctuation mark names (03/24/04)
  • Re: Rewrite more lines (03/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] punctuation mark names (was Re: newbie question) (03/24/04)
  • Re: time format (03/24/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/24/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/24/04)
  • Re: Rewrite more lines (03/24/04)
  • Re: Rewrite more lines (03/24/04)
  • Re: fopen related questions (03/24/04)
  • [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] punctuation mark names (was Re: newbie question) (03/24/04)
  • Re: Macro define function? (03/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] punctuation (03/24/04)
  • Re: Variable name (03/24/04)
  • Re: Variable name (03/24/04)
  • Re: exit & return (03/24/04)
  • Re: exit & return (03/24/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/24/04)
  • Re: Variable name (03/23/04)
  • Re: Variable name (03/23/04)
  • Re: Variable name (03/23/04)
  • Re: Section from the C standard. (03/23/04)
  • Re: inline function vs macro (03/23/04)
  • Re: Curious about differences between two compilers (03/23/04)
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/23/04)
  • Re: Section from the C standard. (03/22/04)
  • Re: inline function vs macro (03/22/04)
  • Re: [HS[ sig (was: Not waiting for input) (03/22/04)
  • Re: Section from the C standard. (03/22/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/22/04)
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/22/04)
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/19/04)
  • Re: Variable length arguments (03/19/04)
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/19/04)
  • Re: Is a newline at the end of a C file a better style than a blank at the end of the file or is it better to place none? (03/19/04)
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/19/04)
  • Re: working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/18/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/18/04)
  • Re: Is a newline at the end of a C file a better style than a blank at the end of the file or is it better to place none? (03/18/04)
  • Re: integer size and portability-a wishful controversy (03/18/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/17/04)
  • Re: integer size and portability-a wishful controversy (03/17/04)
  • Re: What is volatile? (03/17/04)
  • Re: working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/17/04)
  • Re: working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/17/04)
  • Re: what does it mean? (03/17/04)
  • Re: what does it mean? (03/17/04)
  • Re: integer size and portability-a wishful controversy (03/17/04)
  • Re: integer size and portability-a wishful controversy (03/17/04)
  • Re: Borland C++ vs. Microsoft C++? (03/17/04)
  • Re: integer size and portability-a wishful controversy (03/16/04)
  • Re: enums with only 1 byte storage (03/16/04)
  • Re: enums with only 1 byte storage (03/16/04)
  • Re: 2Q's (03/16/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/16/04)
  • Re: function prototypes (03/16/04)
  • Re: enums with only 1 byte storage (03/16/04)
  • Re: libraries (03/15/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: function prototypes (03/15/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/15/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/15/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/15/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/15/04)
  • Re: enums with only 1 byte storage (03/15/04)
  • Re: Declaration statement (03/15/04)
  • Re: char - signed or unsigned ? (03/15/04)
  • Re: ANSI Standard for << (03/15/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/12/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/12/04)
  • Re: Unsigned Char format character? (03/12/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/12/04)
  • Re: ANSI Standard for << (03/12/04)
  • Re: dumb q moving to gcc - c99 mode (03/12/04)
  • Re: ANSI Standard for << (03/12/04)
  • Re: Declaration statement (03/12/04)
  • Re: dumb q moving to gcc - c99 mode (03/11/04)
  • Re: Declaration statement (03/11/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/11/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/11/04)
  • Re: Borland C++ vs. Microsoft C++? (03/11/04)
  • Re: Borland C++ vs. Microsoft C++? (03/11/04)
  • Re: ANSI Standard for << (03/11/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/10/04)
  • Re: Is it still worth it to learn C? (03/10/04)
  • Re: wrong with using default parameter of function (03/10/04)
  • Re: wrong with using default parameter of function (03/10/04)
  • Re: What are the difference among them? (03/10/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/10/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/10/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/10/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/10/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/09/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/09/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/09/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/09/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/09/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (03/09/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/09/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/09/04)
  • Re: how does printf work? (03/09/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/09/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/08/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/08/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/08/04)
  • Re: Endianness, was: Most negative double value (03/08/04)
  • Re: c89 and c99 (03/08/04)
  • Re: allowing user to enter paragraphs (03/08/04)
  • Re: alligned memory allocation (03/08/04)
  • Re: alligned memory allocation (03/08/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (03/08/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: alligned memory allocation (03/05/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: OT: Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/05/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/05/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/05/04)
  • Re: alligned memory allocation (03/05/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/04/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/04/04)
  • Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/04/04)
  • Re: letting free() know how much to free...? (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mail-Copies-To header set to invalid address (03/04/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/04/04)
  • Re: extern local variables (03/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/04/04)
  • Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/04/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/04/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/04/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/03/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (03/03/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/03/04)
  • Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/03/04)
  • Re: Yet another pointer related problem (03/03/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/03/04)
  • Re: const char problem (03/03/04)
  • Re: Function definition into main() function. (03/03/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (03/03/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/03/04)
  • Re: const char problem (03/03/04)
  • Re: Arithmetic and C (03/03/04)
  • Re: Arithmetic and C (03/03/04)
  • Re: Yet another pointer related problem (03/03/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/03/04)
  • Re: character/byte equality, again (03/03/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mail-Copies-To header set to invalid address (03/03/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (03/03/04)
  • Re: Function definition into main() function. (03/03/04)
  • Re: Elementary questions from a beginner (03/03/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mail-Copies-To header set to invalid address (03/02/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mail-Copies-To header set to invalid address (03/02/04)
  • Re: Plain Char (03/02/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (03/02/04)
  • Re: Function definition into main() function. (03/02/04)
  • Re: Elementary questions from a beginner (03/02/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/02/04)
  • Re: Casting (time_t)(-1) (03/02/04)
  • Re: Is that a constant expression? (03/02/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (03/01/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mail-Copies-To header set to invalid address (was Re: is this correct) (03/01/04)
  • Re: Why (long)NULL ? (03/01/04)
  • Re: Why (long)NULL ? (03/01/04)
  • Re: Who can explain the sentence for me? (03/01/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (03/01/04)
  • Re: Volatile variables (03/01/04)
  • Re: type promotions (03/01/04)
  • Re: Standard question (03/01/04)
  • Re: Press enter to continue (03/01/04)
  • Re: network byte order (03/01/04)
  • Re: hello world (03/01/04)
  • Re: Function definition into main() function. (03/01/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (03/01/04)
  • Re: Efficiency of math.h (03/01/04)
• Darklight
  • Re: is this correct (03/07/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/07/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/06/04)
  • is this correct (03/06/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/02/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/01/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/01/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/01/04)
• Darrell Grainger
  • Re: i can't understand behaviour of if statement (03/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] punctuation mark names (was Re: newbie question) (03/24/04)
  • Re: Checking if a key was pressed during a decrement loop (03/18/04)
  • Re: What is volatile? (03/17/04)
  • Re: integer size and portability-a wishful controversy (03/16/04)
  • Re: 2Q's (03/16/04)
  • Re: How to count the number of elements of the first row of a 2D array ??? (03/11/04)
  • Re: What are the difference among them? (03/10/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/09/04)
• Dave Sinkula
  • Casting (time_t)(-1) (03/02/04)
• Dave Thompson
  • Re: atoi and overflow (03/29/04)
  • Re: How can I get rid of the variable "temp" in this function? (03/29/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/22/04)
  • Re: Accessing a member of a struct via various pointers (03/22/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/22/04)
  • Re: Borland C++ vs. Microsoft C++? (03/17/04)
  • Re: doubts regarding extern,volatile in C (03/17/04)
  • Re: signed int overflow (03/17/04)
  • Re: help with client/server socket c code (03/17/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/17/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/13/04)
  • Re: c89 and c99 (03/13/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/13/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is that a constant expression? (03/13/04)
  • Re: string question (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is there a difference? (03/08/04)
  • Re: Passing va_list two times? (03/08/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/08/04)
  • Re: grabbing file size (03/08/04)
  • Re: read() error - Bad Address (03/08/04)
  • Re: c89 and c99 (03/08/04)
  • Re: A NULL pointer changed after returned? (03/08/04)
  • Re: Standard question (03/08/04)
  • Re: Search a binary file for a string... again! (its to slow) (03/08/04)
  • Re: need some help with arrays (03/01/04)
  • Re: Please help........... (03/01/04)
  • Re: Comments requested: brief summary of C (03/01/04)
  • Re: procedure parameter struct order (03/01/04)
  • Re: Loops, switches, embedded returns (03/01/04)
  • Re: What is difference b/w "UNSPECIFIED" and "UNDEFINED" behaviour ? (03/01/04)
• Dave Vandervies
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/27/04)
  • Re: Visual c++ (03/11/04)
• David Harmon
  • Re: OT: Re: @@@ TEMPTATION KINDLED MY FAITH @@@ (03/28/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/24/04)
• David Rubin
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
  • Re: Vigenere Cipher II - how to use files (03/03/04)
  • bit field initialization (03/03/04)
  • Re: Vigenere Cipher II - how to use files (03/03/04)
  • Re: float (*Data)[4] vs float *Data[4] (03/03/04)
• David Schwartz
  • string question (03/05/04)
• David Shaw
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/04/04)
  • Why isn't srand working? (03/03/04)
• David Steuber
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
• Dean Edis
  • Re: find the length of an array (03/29/04)
• Default User
  • Re: Colours on console outputs (03/30/04)
  • Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/30/04)
  • Re: A couple of questions... (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/25/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: *z++ and strings (03/25/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: *z++ and strings (03/24/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: *z++ and strings (03/24/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/24/04)
  • Re: Macro define function? (03/24/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: newbie question (03/24/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/24/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/22/04)
  • Re: reverse string array - how to do it efficiently (03/20/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: Undefined Operation (03/19/04)
  • Re: Code to connect to MSSQL Database - Hey CB Falconer (03/19/04)
  • Re: Undefined Operation (03/19/04)
  • Re: [OT] insults (03/18/04)
  • Re: string litterals and char * and standard c (03/18/04)
  • Re: string litterals and char * and standard c (03/17/04)
  • Re: howto convert/translate c2asm (03/17/04)
  • Re: string litterals and char * and standard c (03/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] insults (03/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] insults (03/17/04)
  • Re: Off Topic: link error: can not find shared library (03/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] insults (03/12/04)
  • Re: [OT] insults (03/12/04)
  • Re: gets_mem (03/09/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/09/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: MIDI project (03/04/04)
  • Re: Struct of pointer-to-function (03/02/04)
• Denis Pithon
  • Re: S: small database written in Ansi C (03/22/04)
• Dennis Allison
  • interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/05/04)
• Derk Gwen
  • Re: getting output from system commands with system() (03/22/04)
  • Re: How to compile with GCC? (03/22/04)
  • Re: small C XML Parser / lib ? (03/18/04)
  • Re: Resolving dependency trees (03/18/04)
  • Re: Is a newline at the end of a C file a better style than a blank at the end of the file or is it better to place none? (03/18/04)
  • Re: Israel behind spanish terrorism (03/16/04)
  • Re: enums with only 1 byte storage (03/14/04)
  • Re: finding structure defines (03/14/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/09/04)
  • Re: pass variable argument list on somehow? (03/09/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (03/07/04)
  • Re: how to "wait for any key" (03/07/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/06/04)
  • Re: Porting to Linux. (03/06/04)
  • Re: Pointer-to-function with variable argument number (03/04/04)
  • Re: extern local variables (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
  • Re: FILE Access (03/03/04)
  • Re: Question about #define (03/03/04)
  • Re: Passing commas into macros (03/03/04)
• Devrobcom
  • const argument (03/17/04)
  • cast odd boundary? (03/03/04)
• Dietmar Kuehl
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
• Dik T. Winter
  • Re: [OT] punctuation mark names (was Re: newbie question) (03/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] punctuation mark names (was Re: newbie question) (03/24/04)
  • Re: enums with only 1 byte storage (03/16/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/07/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/06/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/06/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/02/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/02/04)
• Direnis Gundogdu
  • Re: struct initialization? (03/19/04)
  • struct initialization? (03/18/04)
• Don Tucker
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/08/04)
  • pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/05/04)
• Douglas A. Gwyn
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/29/04)
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/21/04)
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/20/04)
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/19/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (03/10/04)
• DRM
  • View older posts (03/25/04)
• Duane Rettig
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
• Duke Robillard
  • Re: Porting to Linux. (03/17/04)
• E. Robert Tisdale
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/31/04)
  • Troll Alert: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/31/04)
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/30/04)
  • Re: memory mapped files (03/29/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/28/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/25/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: *z++ and strings (03/25/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/25/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/24/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: *z++ and strings (03/24/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/24/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/24/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: *z++ and strings (03/24/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/24/04)
  • Troll Alert: *z++ and strings (03/24/04)
  • Off Topic: makefile problem (03/24/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/24/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/24/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: newbie question (03/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] punctuation mark names (was Re: newbie question) (03/24/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/23/04)
  • Homework: A CHALLENGING problem (03/23/04)
  • Re: difference: char **argv <-> char *argv[] ??? (03/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] punctuation (03/23/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/23/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Troll Alert: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Re: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/19/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/19/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/19/04)
  • Off Topic: standard signal function problem (03/19/04)
  • Off Topic: Checking if a key was pressed during a decrement loop (03/19/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/19/04)
  • Re: Error handling (03/19/04)
  • Re: Error handling (03/19/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Woe is me. I am best by trolls. (03/18/04)
  • Re: what does it mean? (03/18/04)
  • Re: Woe is me. I am best by trolls. (03/18/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/18/04)
  • Re: Woe is me. I am beset by trolls. (03/18/04)
  • Woe is me. I am best by trolls. (03/18/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/17/04)
  • Troll Alert: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: link error: can not find shared library (03/16/04)
  • Off Topic: link error: can not find shared library (03/16/04)
  • Re: link error: can not find shared library (03/16/04)
  • Re: howto convert/translate c2asm (03/16/04)
  • Re: what does it mean? (03/16/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
  • Off Topic: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/11/04)
  • Troll Alert: gets_mem (03/09/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/09/04)
  • Re: gcc warning not understood (03/09/04)
  • Troll Alert: cynical sexism (03/09/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: Ben Pfaff (03/08/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: header files (03/08/04)
  • Re: What is the equivalent of DLL in a Unix environment?? (03/08/04)
  • Re: What is the equivalent of DLL in a Unix environment?? (03/08/04)
  • Troll Alert: header files (03/08/04)
  • Troll Alert: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/03/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/02/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/02/04)
  • off-topic cops: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/02/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/01/04)
  • Re: scan codes (03/01/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: [OT] Efficiency of math.h (03/01/04)
• Ed Morton
  • Re: Declaration statement (03/09/04)
  • Re: FSM in C? (03/05/04)
• eKa
  • Re: Read in/handling a large file (03/22/04)
  • Read in/handling a large file (03/22/04)
• Electric Nachos
  • Re: Prefering C to VB, racist and classist? (was : RAF NetNews - Local visitor missing after train of thought derails!) (03/12/04)
• electric sheep
  • readdir() and S_ISDIR(stat.st_mode) question (OT ?) (03/04/04)
• Elvin Vedar
  • Converting an integer to an array of bytes (03/13/04)
• Emmanuel Delahaye
  • Re: long integer (03/29/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • Re: Portability question (03/28/04)
  • Re: Initializing arrays at runtime (03/28/04)
  • Re: assembler in c ? (03/27/04)
  • Re: Strings, memory and files... Oh my (03/26/04)
  • Re: Strings, memory and files... Oh my (03/26/04)
  • Re: long integer (03/26/04)
  • Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/26/04)
  • Re: atoi and overflow (03/26/04)
  • Re: atoi and overflow (03/25/04)
  • Re: size of huge memory (03/24/04)
  • Re: bits array (03/23/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/21/04)
  • Re: [HS[ sig (was: Not waiting for input) (03/21/04)
  • Re: How to compile with GCC? (03/21/04)
  • Re: is there a way to download a free c compiler and builder (03/21/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/20/04)
  • Re: obs function (03/20/04)
  • Re: obs function (03/20/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/19/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: GNU Version of Borland c++ Builder (03/15/04)
  • Re: immediate structs (03/15/04)
  • Re: immediate structs (03/14/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
  • Re: enum in header files (03/12/04)
  • Re: date in string format to struct tm (03/12/04)
  • Re: union question (03/10/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/08/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/07/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/07/04)
  • Re: header files (03/06/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/06/04)
  • Re: warning: excess elements in scalar initializer (03/06/04)
  • Re: warning: excess elements in scalar initializer (03/06/04)
  • Re: How to get the limit on it's range of the double type? (03/06/04)
  • Re: How to retain function test code? (03/06/04)
  • Re: FSM in C? (03/05/04)
• Emre Akbag
  • How does this C function work? (03/24/04)
• Eric Sosman
  • Re: Set Operations on floating point arrays (03/31/04)
  • Re: Nested sorting problem with linked list (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Date validation function issue (03/30/04)
  • Re: Date validation function issue (03/30/04)
  • Re: Quick question (03/30/04)
  • Re: A width agnostic hash function (03/30/04)
  • Re: Compile-time constant in C89? (03/30/04)
  • Re: RP: Ideas in Plauger's book stdclib (03/27/04)
  • Re: For SGI Computer, Looking for Code to Open/Create, Write/Read to/from a BINARY File (03/27/04)
  • Re: For SGI Computer, Looking for Code to Open/Create, Write/Read to/from a BINARY File (03/26/04)
  • Re: How can I get rid of the variable "temp" in this function? (03/25/04)
  • Re: Ideas in Plauger's book stdclib (03/24/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/24/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/24/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/24/04)
  • Re: Variable name (03/23/04)
  • Re: Memory access error w/realloc (03/23/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/19/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/19/04)
  • Re: Variable length arguments (03/19/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/18/04)
  • Re: Error handling (03/18/04)
  • Re: Is strncat slow? (03/17/04)
  • Re: memory allocation/deallocation problem (03/17/04)
  • Re: memory allocation/deallocation problem (03/16/04)
  • Re: memory allocation/deallocation problem (03/16/04)
  • Re: time.h: time delay and system time (03/10/04)
  • Re: IP address fastest storage/searching (03/09/04)
  • Re: how does printf work? (03/09/04)
  • Re: pass variable argument list on somehow? (03/08/04)
  • Re: pass variable argument list on somehow? (03/08/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/08/04)
  • Re: Conversion to and from based real numbers (03/08/04)
  • Re: How to retain function test code? (03/06/04)
  • Re: Reset a string? (03/05/04)
  • Re: typedef and multiple file projects (03/04/04)
  • Re: bit field initialization (03/04/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/03/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/02/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/01/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/01/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/01/04)
• Erik Cato
  • Writing a prepreprocessor! (03/26/04)
  • Writing a prepreprocessor! (03/26/04)
• Erik de Castro Lopo
  • Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/03/04)
• ESOJAY
  • ANSI Standard for << (03/11/04)
• Ess355
  • Delimiting problems (03/31/04)
• Evangelista Sami
  • Re: compilation to C (03/26/04)
  • compilation to C (03/25/04)
  • bits array (03/23/04)
• EventHelix.com
  • Re: [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/25/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/05/04)
• exonic
  • Re: Hash table question, code posted (~40ines) (03/31/04)
  • Hash table question, code posted (~40ines) (03/31/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/11/04)
  • Re: IP address fastest storage/searching (03/09/04)
  • IP address fastest storage/searching (03/09/04)
• Faith
  • error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _errno (03/02/04)
• Fao, Sean
  • Re: [OT] insults (03/16/04)
• fdunne2
  • Trouble with types! (03/27/04)
• fhf
  • Understand some code (03/16/04)
• fishfry
  • Re: BRILLLLIANT ARTICLE BY DR THOMAS FRIEDMAN OF NYTIMES (03/30/04)
• fix
  • Re: Doubt about pass pointer to int. (02/29/04)
  • Re: A NULL pointer changed after returned? (02/29/04)
  • Re: A NULL pointer changed after returned? (02/29/04)
  • Re: A NULL pointer changed after returned? (02/29/04)
• Flash Gordon
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/12/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/12/04)
  • Re: doesn't work (03/11/04)
  • Re: Pixel data type (03/02/04)
  • Re: error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _errno (03/02/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (02/28/04)
• Flying Naked People
  • Re: Prefering C to VB, racist and classist? (was : RAF NetNews - Local visitor missing after train of thought derails!) (03/11/04)
• fouziah
  • linked-list (03/28/04)
• Francisco
  • How to count the number of elements of the first row of a 2D array ??? (03/11/04)
• Francois Grieu
  • Re: Difference between struct tag and typedef name? (03/18/04)
  • Difference between struct tag and typedef name? (03/18/04)
  • Re: float (*Data)[4] vs float *Data[4] (03/03/04)
  • Re: Question about #define (03/01/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/01/04)
• Francois Labreque
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
• Frank Cusack
  • Re: string concatenation (03/08/04)
• Frank van Eijkelenburg
  • fill a union in a struct (03/19/04)
  • Re: Question about #define (03/01/04)
• Franz
  • Unsigned Char format character? (03/11/04)
• Fred L. Kleinschmidt
  • Re: enum in header files (03/12/04)
  • Re: signed int overflow (03/12/04)
  • Re: Conditions and use of if, elseif or ORed ifs (03/09/04)
  • Re: reset a string. empty it totally. (03/06/04)
• FredBriand
  • Re: difference: char **argv <-> char *argv[] ??? (03/23/04)
  • linux + ncurses + readline (03/23/04)
  • difference: char **argv <-> char *argv[] ??? (03/23/04)
• Friedrich Dominicus
  • Re: Please solve following string related problems... (03/27/04)
• G Matthew J
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/19/04)
  • newbie strcmp woes (03/19/04)
• Gabe
  • C in Visual Studio.NET (03/26/04)
• ganja_dre
  • simple c-programming project (03/11/04)
• Gary
  • Re: MSVC, stdint.h, and C99 ("long long" type) (03/19/04)
  • MSVC, stdint.h, and C99 ("long long" type) (03/18/04)
• GASOLINE
  • GNU Version of Borland c++ Builder (03/15/04)
• Gattaca
  • Re: Declaration statement (03/10/04)
  • Declaration statement (03/09/04)
• gautam
  • weird behaviour by gcc (03/06/04)
  • int pointing to char (03/03/04)
• genuine_karthi
  • c-pointers and functions---More interesting than ever (03/15/04)
• Gerald R. Generoso
  • Re: segmentation fault with printf (03/03/04)
• Gernot
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/22/04)
• Gianni Mariani
  • Re: Expert preprocessor question (03/15/04)
  • Re: Passing commas into macros (03/02/04)
• glen herrmannsfeldt
  • Re: Integer representation (03/20/04)
  • Re: register attribute (03/17/04)
  • Re: Most negative double value (03/08/04)
  • Re: Endianness, was: Most negative double value (03/08/04)
  • Re: alligned memory allocation (03/08/04)
• Goh, Yong Kwang
  • GCC passing arg from incompatible pointer type (03/29/04)
• goose
  • Re: How can I get rid of the variable "temp" in this function? (03/26/04)
  • Re: Please help........... (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
  • Re: How can I get rid of the variable "temp" in this function? (03/25/04)
  • Re: pointers as arguments to a function (03/25/04)
  • Re: pointers as arguments to a function (03/25/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/25/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/25/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/24/04)
  • Re: more linked lists (03/22/04)
  • Re: Printing a decimal value stored in a char without converstion to int (03/22/04)
  • Re: more linked lists (03/22/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/22/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/22/04)
  • Re: seg fault core dumped (03/22/04)
  • Re: Checking if a key was pressed during a decrement loop (03/19/04)
  • Re: Checking if a key was pressed during a decrement loop (03/19/04)
  • Re: [CODE REVIEW again] (03/17/04)
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/05/04)
• Gordon Burditt
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Limit to the length of argument list (03/29/04)
  • Re: free fails (03/28/04)
  • Re: binary IO and portability (03/28/04)
  • Re: Possible way to overcome the file size limit (03/27/04)
  • Re: Possible way to overcome the file size limit (03/27/04)
  • Re: Differences C/C++ (03/23/04)
  • Re: floating-point float (03/21/04)
  • Re: more linked lists (03/21/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/20/04)
• Graham
  • Set Operations on floating point arrays (03/31/04)
• grahamo
  • copy ctor questions... (03/08/04)
• Grant Austin
  • Re: assembler in c ? (03/27/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/20/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/20/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/20/04)
  • Not waiting for input (03/20/04)
  • Re: Dynamically malloc'd array of structs (03/05/04)
  • Re: Dynamically malloc'd array of structs (03/05/04)
  • Dynamically malloc'd array of structs (03/05/04)
  • Re: Array of Pointers to Structs (03/04/04)
  • Re: Array of Pointers to Structs (03/04/04)
  • Re: Array of Pointers to Structs (03/04/04)
  • Re: Array of Pointers to Structs (03/03/04)
  • Array of Pointers to Structs (03/03/04)
  • FILE Access (03/02/04)
• Greg Barron
  • Re: Comments requested: brief summary of C (03/01/04)
  • Re: cast in memcpy() (03/01/04)
• Greg Comeau
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/28/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/10/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/10/04)
  • Re: buffer (03/10/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/10/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/10/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/10/04)
  • Re: Pointer-to-function with variable argument number (03/08/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
• Greg Ewing (using news.cis.dfn.de)
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/04/04)
• Greg Schmidt
  • Re: Why isn't srand working? (03/03/04)
• gregg
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/03/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/03/04)
• Gregory Pietsch
  • Re: How to print ^M (ctrl M) (03/11/04)
  • Re: How to print ^M (ctrl M) (03/09/04)
  • Re: Limitations/Difficulties of Object Oriented Design in C (03/09/04)
  • Re: FSM in C? (03/06/04)
• Grey Plastic
  • enums with only 1 byte storage (03/14/04)
  • Passing commas into macros (03/02/04)
• grobbeltje
  • Re: printf justification question (03/30/04)
  • Re: the random number? (03/12/04)
• Grumble
  • Re: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ? (03/31/04)
  • Re: How can I get rid of the variable "temp" in this function? (03/24/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/24/04)
  • Re: howto translate c2asm and asm2c (03/16/04)
  • Re: CRT heap debugging routines (03/11/04)
  • Re: IP address fastest storage/searching (03/09/04)
  • [OT] Re: small bit shifting q (03/09/04)
  • Re: Conditions and use of if, elseif or ORed ifs (03/09/04)
  • [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/04/04)
  • Re: Yet another pointer related problem (03/03/04)
• gswork
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/31/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/30/04)
  • Re: Is it still worth it to learn C? (03/11/04)
• gtxy611_at_yahoo.com.cn
  • Question to function code( ) : (03/10/04)
• Guesszzz_who
  • Linker error in call from C to ASM (03/17/04)
• Guillaume
  • Re: how to define memory position and assign number.... (03/31/04)
  • Re: Problems with compiler and c for dummies book (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Difference (03/15/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/14/04)
  • Re: Is it still worth it to learn C? (03/14/04)
  • Re: Is it still worth it to learn C? (03/11/04)
  • Re: What are the difference among them? (03/10/04)
  • Re: pointers and array (03/05/04)
  • Re: OT: Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/04/04)
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/03/04)
• guna
  • creation of font using c (03/27/04)
  • huge pointer (03/25/04)
  • Re: makefile problem (03/24/04)
  • size of huge memory (03/24/04)
  • Re: inline function vs macro (03/20/04)
  • vprintf (03/20/04)
  • exit & return (03/19/04)
  • Re: What is volatile? (03/19/04)
  • c (03/19/04)
• Guohua Jing
  • code for knapsack problem using iterative deepening method (03/08/04)
• GVK
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/14/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/14/04)
  • pointer problems (03/14/04)
  • Re: help with client/server socket c code (03/12/04)
  • Re: Please !!! (03/12/04)
  • Re: client server socket code (03/11/04)
  • read() error - Bad Address (03/02/04)
  • Re: finding the name of the function - done (03/02/04)
  • finding the name of the function (03/02/04)
• Hamilton
  • Re: Nested sorting problem with linked list (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: printf justification question (03/30/04)
  • Re: printf justification question (03/30/04)
  • Re: printf justification question (03/30/04)
  • printf justification question (03/30/04)
  • Re: Is there a visualization method for C program? (03/29/04)
• Hans-Bernhard Broeker
  • Re: Is that a constant expression? (03/02/04)
• Harti Brandt
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/22/04)
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/21/04)
• hasadh
  • Re: makefile problem (03/31/04)
  • makefile problem (03/24/04)
  • Re: date in string format to struct tm (03/22/04)
  • Re: date in string format to struct tm (03/13/04)
  • date in string format to struct tm (03/12/04)
• helmut januschka
  • warning: excess elements in scalar initializer (03/06/04)
• Henry Jie
  • Re: Definition of NULL (03/15/04)
  • Re: Definition of NULL (03/15/04)
  • Definition of NULL (03/15/04)
• heyo
  • OT: Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/09/04)
  • Re: OT: Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
• Hirajoshi
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/16/04)
• Howard
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/23/04)
  • Re: Copy-on-write tree data structure (03/02/04)
• Howard Ding
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
• hpy_awad_at_yahoo.com
  • inline function question (03/07/04)
• Huey
  • How to make "fork/wait" to WAIT longer? (03/01/04)
• huhu
  • Re: Who can explain the sentence for me? (03/02/04)
• Ian Woods
  • Re: Bit reversal problem (03/30/04)
• Ira Baxter
  • Re: Code/Object analyzer for fixing (03/05/04)
• Irrwahn Grausewitz
  • Re: Nested sorting problem with linked list (03/31/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/31/04)
  • Re: Accessing memory (03/31/04)
  • Re: Nested sorting problem with linked list (03/31/04)
  • Re: Please solve following string related problems... (03/30/04)
  • Re: Bit reversal problem (03/30/04)
  • Re: Please solve following string related problems... (03/30/04)
  • Re: Compile-time constant in C89? (03/30/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/30/04)
  • Re: Please solve following string related problems... (03/30/04)
  • Re: array initialisation question (03/29/04)
  • Re: find the length of an array (03/29/04)
  • Re: Compile-time constant in C89? (03/29/04)
  • Re: Compile-time constant in C89? (03/29/04)
  • Compile-time constant in C89? (03/29/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • Re: typedef and struct (03/28/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • Re: typedef and struct (03/28/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • Re: how to make program invisible (03/27/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/27/04)
  • Re: how to make program invisible (03/27/04)
  • Re: For SGI Computer, Looking for Code to Open/Create, Write/Read to/from a BINARY File (03/27/04)
  • Re: how to make program invisible (03/27/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/27/04)
  • Re: Doubts regarding macros (03/27/04)
  • Re: Strings, memory and files... Oh my (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Idiots abroad, was: Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/26/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/26/04)
  • [OT] Idiots abroad, was: Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/26/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/25/04)
  • Re: How can I get rid of the variable "temp" in this function? (03/25/04)
  • Re: pointers as arguments to a function (03/25/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/25/04)
  • Re: pointers as arguments to a function (03/25/04)
  • Re: makefile problem (03/25/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/25/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: *z++ and strings (03/25/04)
  • Re: How can I get rid of the variable "temp" in this function? (03/25/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: newbie question (03/24/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/24/04)
  • Re: How can I get rid of the variable "temp" in this function? (03/24/04)
  • Re: Variable name (03/24/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: newbie question (03/24/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/24/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/24/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/24/04)
  • Re: How can I get rid of the variable "temp" in this function? (03/24/04)
  • Re: How can I get rid of the variable "temp" in this function? (03/23/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/23/04)
  • Re: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Re: exit & return (03/23/04)
  • Re: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/23/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/23/04)
  • Re: seg fault core dumped (03/23/04)
  • Re: Memory access error w/realloc (03/23/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/23/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/23/04)
  • Re: seg fault core dumped (03/23/04)
  • Re: How can I get rid of the variable "temp" in this function? (03/23/04)
  • Re: Having problem populating time structure [LONG SIGNATURE] (03/23/04)
  • Re: Having problem populating time structure [LONG SIGNATURE] (03/23/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/22/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/22/04)
  • Re: typedef struct and extern (03/22/04)
  • Re: seg fault core dumped (03/22/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/22/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/22/04)
  • Re: C standard online? (03/22/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/22/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/22/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/22/04)
  • Re: more linked lists (03/22/04)
  • Re: selecting a random operator (03/22/04)
  • Re: Curious about differences between two compilers (03/22/04)
  • Re: Curious about differences between two compilers (03/22/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/22/04)
  • Re: more linked lists (03/22/04)
  • Re: more linked lists (03/22/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/22/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/21/04)
  • Re: Printing a decimal value stored in a char without converstion to int (03/21/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/21/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Printing a decimal value stored in a char without converstion to int (03/21/04)
  • Re: C standard online? (03/21/04)
  • Re: is there a way to download a free c compiler and builder (03/21/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/21/04)
  • Re: more linked lists (03/21/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/21/04)
  • Re: more linked lists (03/21/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/21/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/20/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/20/04)
  • Re: inline function vs macro (03/20/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/20/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/20/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/20/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/20/04)
  • Re: C sources for Dijkstra algorithm (03/20/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/20/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/20/04)
  • Re: inline function vs macro (03/20/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: obs function (03/20/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/19/04)
  • Re: c (03/19/04)
  • Re: What is volatile? (03/19/04)
  • Re: Preventing Recursive calls (03/19/04)
  • Re: c (03/19/04)
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/19/04)
  • Re: fill a union in a struct (03/19/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/19/04)
  • Re: A C code from SNIPPET,help to Analyze. (03/19/04)
  • Re: Checking if a key was pressed during a decrement loop (03/19/04)
  • Re: Undefined Operation (03/19/04)
  • Re: 'PPWDATA' undeclared error (03/18/04)
  • Re: Checking if a key was pressed during a decrement loop (03/18/04)
  • Re: Is a newline at the end of a C file a better style than a blank at the end of the file or is it better to place none? (03/17/04)
  • Re: string litterals and char * and standard c (03/17/04)
  • Re: integer size and portability-a wishful controversy (03/17/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/17/04)
  • Re: Weird runtime problem (03/17/04)
  • Re: Weird runtime problem (03/16/04)
  • Re: c# (03/15/04)
  • Re: Difference (03/15/04)
  • Re: useless casts (03/15/04)
  • Re: Difference (03/15/04)
  • Re: Difference (03/15/04)
  • Re: useless casts (03/15/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/15/04)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
  • Re: immediate structs (03/14/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
  • Re: Vectors and C (03/14/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/14/04)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/14/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/14/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: Converting an integer to an array of bytes (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: Why a pointer to a pointer makes the difference ? (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/13/04)
  • Re: C99 bool question (03/12/04)
  • Re: libclc? (03/12/04)
  • Re: iswspace and iswprint (03/12/04)
  • Re: Visual c++ (03/12/04)
  • Re: intermittently failing malloc() call (03/11/04)
  • Re: intermittently failing malloc() call (03/11/04)
  • Re: Segfault for passing element of an array to a regex function? (03/11/04)
  • Re: Returning pointer to array of structure from function (03/11/04)
  • Re: doesn't work (03/11/04)
  • Re: wrong with using default parameter of function (03/10/04)
  • Re: wrong with using default parameter of function (03/10/04)
  • Re: #include <> (03/10/04)
  • Re: Command line arguments (03/10/04)
  • Re: Command line arguments (03/10/04)
  • Re: Command line arguments (03/09/04)
  • Re: Command line arguments (03/09/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/09/04)
  • Re: Command line arguments (03/09/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/09/04)
  • Re: Yet another pointer related problem (03/09/04)
  • Re: md5.h file (03/09/04)
  • Re: How to print ^M (ctrl M) (03/09/04)
  • Re: Yet another pointer related problem (03/09/04)
  • Re: Command line arguments (03/09/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/08/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/08/04)
  • Re: allocating memory for array of pointers to char (03/08/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/08/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/08/04)
• j
  • Re: char - signed or unsigned ? (03/13/04)
• J French
  • Re: Prefering C to VB, racist and classist? (was : RAF NetNews - Local visitor missing after train of thought derails!) (03/11/04)
• J. J. Farrell
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/08/04)
  • Re: weird behaviour by gcc (03/06/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/06/04)
  • Re: Reset a string? (03/06/04)
  • Re: MIDI project (03/04/04)
• j0mbolar
  • function prototypes (03/10/04)
  • header files (03/06/04)
  • extern local variables (03/04/04)
  • C floating point (03/01/04)
• Jacek Generowicz
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/05/04)
• Jack Klein
  • Re: What does the standard say? (03/31/04)
  • Re: What does the standard say? (03/30/04)
  • Re: Limit to the length of argument list (03/29/04)
  • Re: long integer (03/26/04)
  • Re: array declaration (03/25/04)
  • Re: Differences between programming in Win98 and Win2k? (03/24/04)
  • Re: Differences C/C++ (03/24/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/22/04)
  • Re: 'PPWDATA' undeclared error (03/19/04)
  • Re: Checking if a key was pressed during a decrement loop (03/19/04)
  • Re: Internet Switch May Just Do the Trick for Internet Security (03/18/04)
  • Re: Is a newline at the end of a C file a better style than a blank at the end of the file or is it better to place none? (03/18/04)
  • Re: string litterals and char * and standard c (03/18/04)
  • Re: working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/17/04)
  • Re: Definition of NULL (03/15/04)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
  • Re: Vectors and C (03/14/04)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
  • Re: problem with ASCII types, should be easy :( (03/13/04)
  • Re: Please !!! (03/12/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/12/04)
  • Re: Conditions and use of if, elseif or ORed ifs (03/10/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/09/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/09/04)
  • Re: code for knapsack problem using iterative deepening method (03/08/04)
  • Re: Reset a string? (03/06/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/06/04)
  • Re: Arithmetic and C (03/04/04)
  • Re: How to "sleep" or "delay"? (03/03/04)
  • Re: going crazy, invalid conversion from `char*' to `char' help needed (03/03/04)
  • Re: Casting (time_t)(-1) (03/02/04)
  • Re: [OT] In and Out on port space within C - any standard? (03/01/04)
• jacob navia
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/31/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/30/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/30/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/29/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/29/04)
  • Re: how to make program invisible (03/27/04)
  • Re: A couple of questions... (03/27/04)
  • Re: A couple of questions... (03/27/04)
  • Re: A couple of questions... (03/27/04)
  • Re: long integer (03/25/04)
  • Decoding mars images (03/23/04)
  • Re: c (03/19/04)
  • Re: MSVC, stdint.h, and C99 ("long long" type) (03/18/04)
  • Re: Error handling (03/18/04)
  • Re: Error handling (03/18/04)
  • Re: Error handling (03/18/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/17/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/17/04)
  • Name aid requested (03/17/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/17/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/16/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/16/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Re: Vectors and C (03/14/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/14/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: IP address fastest storage/searching (03/10/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/08/04)
  • Re: Saving registers in C functions (03/06/04)
  • Re: Porting to Linux. (03/06/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/06/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: OT: Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/03/04)
  • Increasing efficiency in C (03/03/04)
• jah
  • union question (03/10/04)
• James Bond
  • how do you feel.. (03/22/04)
• James Deutsch
  • Re: Reading program output from stdin (03/31/04)
• James Harris
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/16/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/15/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/15/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/15/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/15/04)
  • Re: In and Out on port space within C - any standard? (03/01/04)
  • In and Out on port space within C - any standard? (03/01/04)
• James Hu
  • Welcome to comp.lang.c! (03/20/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/10/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/10/04)
  • Welcome to comp.lang.c! (03/07/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/05/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/05/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/05/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/04/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/04/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/04/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/03/04)
• James Kuyper
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/30/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/30/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/30/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/29/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/29/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/29/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/26/04)
• James McIninch
  • Re: Internet Switch May Just Do the Trick for Internet Security (03/18/04)
  • Re: Visual c++ (03/11/04)
• Jarmo
  • Re: Colours on console outputs (03/30/04)
• JaSeong Ju
  • Re: Problems with compiler and c for dummies book (03/31/04)
  • Re: Problems with compiler and c for dummies book (03/31/04)
  • Re: Please solve following string related problems... (03/27/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/22/04)
  • Re: obs function (03/20/04)
• Jason Spashett
  • Re: FSM in C? (03/05/04)
• Jay
  • Help : pro*c (03/31/04)
  • Re: Looking for sparse array code (03/25/04)
  • Re: Looking for sparse array code (03/25/04)
  • Re: Looking for sparse array code (03/25/04)
  • Re: Looking for sparse array code (03/25/04)
  • Looking for sparse array code (03/25/04)
• Jean
  • Re: huge pointer (03/26/04)
• Jeff
  • Re: Is there a difference? (03/02/04)
• Jeff Mott
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/29/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • Newb- Global Array (03/27/04)
• Jeff Schwab
  • Re: Looking for sparse array code (03/25/04)
  • Re: Looking for sparse array code (03/25/04)
  • Re: Looking for sparse array code (03/25/04)
  • Re: Looking for sparse array code (03/25/04)
  • Re: Looking for sparse array code (03/25/04)
  • Re: [C] copy string question (03/07/04)
  • Re: Is that a constant expression? (03/05/04)
  • Re: Is that a constant expression? (03/02/04)
• jeffc
  • Re: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ? (03/29/04)
• Jeffrey
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
• Jens.Toerring_at_physik.fu-berlin.de
  • Re: GCC passing arg from incompatible pointer type (03/29/04)
  • Re: Stack with file access?. (03/27/04)
  • Re: Stack with file access?. (03/27/04)
  • Re: Doubts regarding macros (03/26/04)
  • Re: Stack with file access…. (03/25/04)
  • Re: Removing zeros from floats (03/19/04)
  • Re: why #define is being ignored in my code by gcc 3.2.2? (03/17/04)
  • Re: link error: can not find shared library (03/16/04)
  • Re: Difference between strcpy() and strcat()? (03/05/04)
  • Re: Difference between strcpy() and strcat()? (03/05/04)
  • Re: How to make "fork/wait" to WAIT longer? (03/01/04)
• Jerald Fijerald
  • Re: Colours on console outputs (03/31/04)
  • Re: memory mapped files (03/29/04)
• Jeremy Yallop
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/31/04)
  • Re: nested structure const initialization (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/31/04)
  • Re: array initialisation question (03/29/04)
  • Re: How can I get rid of the variable "temp" in this function? (03/25/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/25/04)
  • Re: time format (03/24/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: newbie question (03/24/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/23/04)
  • Re: Differences C/C++ (03/23/04)
  • Re: Differences C/C++ (03/23/04)
  • Re: difference: char **argv <-> char *argv[] ??? (03/23/04)
  • Re: difference: char **argv <-> char *argv[] ??? (03/23/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/22/04)
  • Re: Section from the C standard. (03/22/04)
  • Re: Definition of NULL (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: metatype in c (03/10/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/10/04)
  • Re: Declaration statement (03/10/04)
  • Re: Declaration statement (03/09/04)
  • Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/04/04)
  • Re: finding the name of the function (03/02/04)
  • Re: Array typedef vs. structure (03/02/04)
  • Re: Loops, switches, embedded returns (03/02/04)
  • Re: multi-lines deprecated (03/01/04)
  • Re: Loops, switches, embedded returns (03/01/04)
  • Re: Elementary questions from a beginner (03/01/04)
• Jesse Engle
  • need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: allowing user to enter paragraphs (03/06/04)
  • allowing user to enter paragraphs (03/06/04)
  • grabbing file size (03/03/04)
• Jim Ford
  • Re: Operating System (03/07/04)
• Jim H
  • Re: letting free() know how much to free...? (03/04/04)
  • letting free() know how much to free...? (03/04/04)
• Joe \
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/04/04)
• Joe Marshall
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/04/04)
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/03/04)
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
• Joe Melville
  • Re: Code to connect to MSSQL Database (03/19/04)
• Joe Piscapo
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • My strcpy code (03/19/04)
• Joe Wright
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/30/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • Re: Possible way to overcome the file size limit (03/27/04)
  • Re: Syntax Curiosity: -> versus . (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
  • Re: Variable name (03/24/04)
  • Re: seg fault core dumped (03/23/04)
  • Re: Printing a decimal value stored in a char without converstion to int (03/23/04)
  • Re: getting output from system commands with system() (03/21/04)
  • Re: Printing a decimal value stored in a char without converstion to int (03/21/04)
  • Re: Printing a decimal value stored in a char without converstion to int (03/21/04)
  • Re: Printing a decimal value stored in a char without converstion to int (03/21/04)
  • Re: Printing a decimal value stored in a char without converstion to int (03/20/04)
  • Re: printf (03/16/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/14/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/13/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/13/04)
  • Re: union question (03/12/04)
  • Re: warning: excess elements in scalar initializer (03/06/04)
  • Re: How to get the limit on it's range of the double type? (03/06/04)
  • Re: warning: excess elements in scalar initializer (03/06/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/06/04)
• Joerg Schoen
  • Re: read() error - Bad Address (03/02/04)
• Johan Lindh
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/12/04)
  • Re: ANSI Standard for << (03/12/04)
• john
  • Portability question (03/28/04)
  • Re: How to "sleep" or "delay"? (03/03/04)
  • How to "sleep" or "delay"? (03/03/04)
• John Bode
  • Re: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ? (03/29/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/09/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/08/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/08/04)
  • Re: Who can explain the sentence for me? (03/02/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/01/04)
• John Cochran
  • Re: Elementary questions from a beginner (03/01/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/01/04)
  • Re: Question about #define (03/01/04)
  • Re: Question about #define (03/01/04)
• John Douglas
  • Re: event generation (03/28/04)
  • event generation (03/28/04)
• John Harrison
  • Re: iswspace and iswprint (03/13/04)
  • Re: iswspace and iswprint (03/12/04)
  • Re: iswspace and iswprint (03/12/04)
  • iswspace and iswprint (03/12/04)
  • Re: character classification routines (03/11/04)
  • character classification routines (03/11/04)
  • Re: Conditions and use of if, elseif or ORed ifs (03/09/04)
  • Re: Conditions and use of if, elseif or ORed ifs (03/09/04)
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
• John L
  • Re: Code to connect to MSSQL Database (03/19/04)
• John Michael Davison
  • Seeking Useful Variant of mktime (03/18/04)
• John P
  • Re: CRT heap debugging routines (03/12/04)
  • Re: CRT heap debugging routines (03/12/04)
  • Re: CRT heap debugging routines (03/12/04)
  • Re: CRT heap debugging routines (03/12/04)
  • CRT heap debugging routines (03/11/04)
• John Smith
  • Re: Is it still worth it to learn C? (03/14/04)
• Jon
  • Re: Unicode to GB2312-80 table needed (03/25/04)
  • Unicode to GB2312-80 table needed (03/25/04)
  • Re: Macro define function? (03/25/04)
  • Re: Pointers to pointers (03/24/04)
  • Re: Variable memory string in linklist. (03/24/04)
  • Re: Variable memory string in linklist. (03/24/04)
  • Variable memory string in linklist. (03/24/04)
  • Re: Macro define function? (03/24/04)
  • Re: Macro define function? (03/24/04)
  • Re: Macro define function? (03/23/04)
  • Macro define function? (03/23/04)
• Jon A. Cruz
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/17/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/16/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/16/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/16/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/04/04)
• jon wild
  • Re: remembering arrays (03/14/04)
• Jon Willeke
  • Re: find the length of an array (03/29/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/28/04)
  • Re: is there a way to download a free c compiler and builder (03/21/04)
  • Re: floating-point float (03/21/04)
  • Re: acquire image data from webcam (03/16/04)
  • Re: enums with only 1 byte storage (03/14/04)
  • Re: Converting an integer to an array of bytes (03/13/04)
  • Re: Converting an integer to an array of bytes (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
  • Re: How to count the number of elements of the first row of a 2D array ??? (03/11/04)
  • Re: Borland C++ vs. Microsoft C++? (03/11/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/11/04)
  • Re: Is it still worth it to learn C? (03/11/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/10/04)
  • Re: Declaration statement (03/10/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/09/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/09/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/09/04)
  • Re: gcc warning not understood (03/09/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/06/04)
• Jonathan Turkanis
  • Re: @@@ TEMPTATION KINDLED MY FAITH @@@ (03/28/04)
  • Re: @@@ TEMPTATION - A MUST SEE @@@ (03/28/04)
  • Re: Possible way to overcome the file size limit (03/27/04)
• Joona I Palaste
  • Re: array with pointers..... (03/31/04)
  • Re: Help : pro*c (03/31/04)
  • Re: What does the standard say? (03/31/04)
  • [OT] "thx" (was: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ?) (03/31/04)
  • Re: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ? (03/31/04)
  • Re: loop in a singly linked list (03/30/04)
  • Re: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ? (03/30/04)
  • Re: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ? (03/30/04)
  • Re: unable to find Segmentation Fault (03/30/04)
  • Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/30/04)
  • Re: What does the standard say? (03/30/04)
  • Re: Is there a visualization method for C program? (03/29/04)
  • Re: GCC passing arg from incompatible pointer type (03/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/29/04)
  • Re: Portability question (03/28/04)
  • Re: i can't understand behaviour of if statement (03/28/04)
  • Re: @@@ TEMPTATION KINDLED MY FAITH @@@ (03/28/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • Re: For SGI Computer, Looking for Code to Open/Create, Write/Read to/from a BINARY File (03/28/04)
  • Re: Pointer Watches in TurboC++ (03/28/04)
  • Re: A couple of questions... (03/27/04)
  • Re: A couple of questions... (03/27/04)
  • Re: A couple of questions... (03/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
  • Re: Doubts regarding macros (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/25/04)
  • [Way OT] C++ for C programmers (03/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/25/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: *z++ and strings (03/25/04)
  • Re: Statically create a table of data in C: How? (03/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/25/04)
  • Re: What is a bitmask? (03/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/25/04)
  • Re: How does this C function work? (03/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/24/04)
  • Re: Rewrite more lines (03/24/04)
  • Re: fopen related questions (03/24/04)
  • Re: Rewrite more lines (03/24/04)
  • Re: newbie question (03/24/04)
  • Re: Differences C/C++ (03/24/04)
  • Re: Differences C/C++ (03/24/04)
  • Re: Differences C/C++ (03/23/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Re: exit & return (03/23/04)
  • Re: Differences C/C++ (03/23/04)
  • Re: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Re: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Re: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Re: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Re: Variable name (03/23/04)
  • Re: difference: char **argv <-> char *argv[] ??? (03/23/04)
  • Re: Macro define function? (03/23/04)
  • Re: Variable name (03/23/04)
  • Re: Checking if a key was pressed during a decrement loop (03/22/04)
  • Re: Connect() problems (03/22/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/21/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Help for fellow c noobs like (03/21/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Is a newline at the end of a C file a better style than a blank at the end of the file or is it better to place none? (03/19/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/19/04)
  • Re: Is a newline at the end of a C file a better style than a blank at the end of the file or is it better to place none? (03/18/04)
  • Re: Is a newline at the end of a C file a better style than a blank at the end of the file or is it better to place none? (03/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] insults (03/18/04)
  • Re: Difference between struct tag and typedef name? (03/18/04)
  • Re: scan codes (03/18/04)
  • Re: Resolving dependency trees (03/18/04)
  • Re: howto convert/translate c2asm (03/17/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/17/04)
  • Re: Linker error in call from C to ASM (03/17/04)
  • Re: what does it mean? (03/17/04)
  • Re: howto convert/translate c2asm (03/16/04)
  • Re: what does it mean? (03/16/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: Why a pointer to a pointer makes the difference ? (03/13/04)
  • Re: compilator c/c++ (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/12/04)
  • Re: [OT] insults (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/12/04)
  • Re: the random number? (03/12/04)
  • Re: Internal heap ERROR KGHALO2 addr=0x0 (03/12/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/11/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/11/04)
  • Re: simple c-programming project (03/11/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/11/04)
  • Re: Visual c++ (03/11/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/11/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/11/04)
  • Re: malloc()1 (03/11/04)
  • Re: client server socket code (03/11/04)
  • Re: What are the difference among them? (03/10/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/10/04)
  • Re: What are the difference among them? (03/10/04)
  • Re: What are the difference among them? (03/10/04)
  • Re: buffer (03/10/04)
  • Re: What are the difference among them? (03/10/04)
  • Re: What are the difference among them? (03/10/04)
  • Re: detecting escape key on console (03/10/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/10/04)
  • Re: Declaration statement (03/09/04)
  • Re: Please tell me if I've written this correctly (03/09/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/09/04)
  • Re: gcc warning not understood (03/09/04)
  • Re: inline function question (03/07/04)
  • Re: What is the equivalent of DLL in a Unix environment?? (03/07/04)
  • Re: header files (03/06/04)
  • Re: Help wanted (cgi script) (03/06/04)
  • Re: Help wanted (cgi script) (03/06/04)
  • Re: allowing user to enter paragraphs (03/06/04)
  • Re: allowing user to enter paragraphs (03/06/04)
  • Re: pointers and array (03/05/04)
  • Re: pointers and array (03/05/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/05/04)
  • Re: error message (03/04/04)
  • Re: poss soln (03/04/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
  • Re: Function definition into main() function. (03/03/04)
  • Re: grabbing file size (03/03/04)
  • Re: grabbing file size (03/03/04)
  • Re: Function definition into main() function. (03/02/04)
  • Re: Serial port line termination (03/02/04)
  • Re: Is there a difference? (03/02/04)
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
  • Re: Elementary questions from a beginner (03/01/04)
  • Re: Function definition into main() function. (03/01/04)
  • Re: Char const for backslash (03/01/04)
  • Re: Wierd output instead of 0s and 1s (03/01/04)
  • Re: Wierd output instead of 0s and 1s (03/01/04)
  • Re: Elementary questions from a beginner (03/01/04)
  • Re: What is sequence point ? (03/01/04)
• Jorge
  • Re: Question about #define (03/02/04)
• Jorge Naxus
  • Question about #define (03/01/04)
• Jorge Rivera
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/04/04)
• josh
  • Re: atoi and overflow (03/26/04)
  • Re: atoi and overflow (03/25/04)
• José de Paula
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/20/04)
  • Re: simple c-programming project (03/11/04)
  • Re: Borland C++ vs. Microsoft C++? (03/11/04)
  • Re: Borland C++ vs. Microsoft C++? (03/11/04)
  • Re: What are the difference among them? (03/10/04)
  • Re: What is the equivalent of DLL in a Unix environment?? (03/08/04)
  • Re: What is the equivalent of DLL in a Unix environment?? (03/07/04)
• Juergen Edelbluth
  • Colours on console outputs (03/30/04)
• juergen perlinger
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/15/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/15/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: [OT] Efficiency of math.h (03/05/04)
  • Re: semantics of loating point exception handling (03/05/04)
  • Re: semantics of loating point exception handling (03/04/04)
• Juha-markku Liikala
  • What is a bitmask? (03/25/04)
• Julian V. Noble
  • Re: compilation to C (03/25/04)
  • Re: selecting a random operator solved... OT (03/22/04)
  • Re: Weird runtime problem (03/17/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/03/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/01/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/01/04)
• Julie
  • Re: Possible way to overcome the file size limit (03/27/04)
  • Re: Possible way to overcome the file size limit (03/26/04)
  • Re: Conditions and use of if, elseif or ORed ifs (03/09/04)
  • Re: Conditions and use of if, elseif or ORed ifs (03/09/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
• junky_fellow
  • inline function vs macro (03/20/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/10/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/09/04)
  • passing arguments to a function (03/08/04)
  • Re: fork() problems (03/01/04)
• Jurgen
  • acquire image data from webcam (03/16/04)
• K.G.Stoler
  • how to make program invisible (03/27/04)
• kal
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/26/04)
• Kamilche
  • Re: Limitations/Difficulties of Object Oriented Design in C (03/10/04)
• Kamran Mahmood
  • Help wanted (cgi script) (03/06/04)
• Karl Heinz Buchegger
  • Re: Why isn't srand working? (03/05/04)
• Kasper Dupont
  • Re: Porting to Linux. (03/06/04)
• Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/03/04)
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/03/04)
• Kedar
  • Re: Internal heap ERROR KGHALO2 addr=0x0 (03/15/04)
  • Internal heap ERROR KGHALO2 addr=0x0 (03/12/04)
• Keith Thompson
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/31/04)
  • Re: exit & return (03/24/04)
  • Re: Curious about differences between two compilers (03/23/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/23/04)
  • Re: Borland C++ vs. Microsoft C++? (03/17/04)
  • Re: integer size and portability-a wishful controversy (03/16/04)
  • Re: integer size and portability-a wishful controversy (03/16/04)
  • Re: ANSI Standard for << (03/16/04)
  • Re: ANSI Standard for << (03/15/04)
  • Re: Definition of NULL (03/15/04)
  • Re: the random number? (03/13/04)
  • Re: the random number? (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: union question (03/11/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/11/04)
  • Re: #include <> (03/10/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/10/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/09/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/09/04)
  • Re: How do you decide which integer type to use? (bitmasking question) (03/09/04)
  • Re: HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE CHRISTIANS KILLED SINCE BIBLICAL TIMES? (03/07/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (03/07/04)
  • Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/06/04)
  • Re: NULL pointer (was Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy) (03/05/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/05/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/05/04)
  • Re: How to "sleep" or "delay"? (03/03/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/03/04)
  • Re: Why isn't srand working? (03/03/04)
  • Re: type promotions (03/01/04)
• Kelsey Bjarnason
  • Re: Is a newline at the end of a C file a better style than a blank at the end of the file or is it better to place none? (03/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] insults (03/18/04)
  • Re: Test msg. (03/01/04)
  • Re: cast in memcpy() (03/01/04)
• Kenneth Brody
  • Re: Reading program output from stdin (03/31/04)
  • Re: How to overwrite integers at start of a file (03/30/04)
  • Re: seg fault core dumped (03/25/04)
  • NULL pointer (was Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy) (03/05/04)
  • Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/05/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/05/04)
  • Re: read() error - Bad Address (03/03/04)
  • Re: Serial port line termination (03/03/04)
• Kenny Tilton
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/07/04)
• Ketil Malde
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
• Kevin
  • Preventing Recursive calls (03/19/04)
• Kevin Bracey
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/31/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/31/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/31/04)
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/31/04)
  • Re: returning a half-volatile pointer? (03/29/04)
  • Re: fill a union in a struct (03/26/04)
  • Re: Statically create a table of data in C: How? (03/26/04)
  • Re: returning a half-volatile pointer? (03/26/04)
  • Re: Syntax Curiosity: -> versus . (03/25/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/19/04)
  • Re: pass variable argument list on somehow? (03/19/04)
  • Re: Unions: Casting To Member Type and Member Access (03/19/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/19/04)
  • Re: struct initialization? (03/18/04)
  • Re: function prototypes (03/15/04)
  • Re: function prototypes (03/12/04)
  • Re: C99 bool question (03/12/04)
  • Re: function prototypes (03/12/04)
  • Re: [OT] dumb word correction (03/11/04)
  • Re: function prototypes (03/11/04)
  • Re: dumb q moving to gcc - c99 mode (03/11/04)
  • Re: function prototypes (03/11/04)
  • Re: ANSI Standard for << (03/11/04)
  • Re: function prototypes (03/11/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/10/04)
  • Re: c89 and c99 (03/10/04)
  • Re: function prototypes (03/10/04)
  • Re: volatile structures, and similar (03/10/04)
  • Re: wrong with using default parameter of function (03/10/04)
  • Re: volatile structures, and similar (03/09/04)
  • Re: c89 and c99 (03/09/04)
  • volatile structures, and similar (03/08/04)
  • Re: semantics of loating point exception handling (03/05/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
• Kevin D. Quitt
  • Re: How can I get rid of the variable "temp" in this function? (03/25/04)
  • Re: How can I get rid of the variable "temp" in this function? (03/24/04)
  • Re: How can I get rid of the variable "temp" in this function? (03/23/04)
  • Re: How can I get rid of the variable "temp" in this function? (03/23/04)
  • Re: exit & return (03/19/04)
  • Re: volatile structures, and similar (03/10/04)
  • Re: volatile structures, and similar (03/09/04)
  • Re: volatile structures, and similar (03/09/04)
• Kevin Goodsell
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/30/04)
  • Re: exit & return (03/24/04)
• Kevin Klein
  • What program do you use for visualization of C program? (03/29/04)
  • Is there a visualization method for C program? (03/29/04)
  • Re: array initialisation question (03/29/04)
• Kevin Torr
  • Re: Command line arguments (03/09/04)
  • md5.h file (03/09/04)
  • Command line arguments (03/09/04)
• Knack
  • Return of string from function (03/21/04)
• kodo
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/08/04)
  • Re: error message (03/04/04)
• Kristofer Berggren
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/08/04)
  • Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/08/04)
• Kuba Araszkiewicz
  • Re: MIDI project (03/03/04)
  • MIDI project (03/03/04)
• Kurt
  • Objective C: Interprocess Communication (03/31/04)
• Kutty Banerjee
  • Re: free fails (03/28/04)
  • free fails (03/28/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
  • alligned memory allocation (03/04/04)
  • Re: grabbing file size (03/03/04)
  • float (*Data)[4] vs float *Data[4] (03/03/04)
• L K
  • e book about C99 (03/10/04)
  • Re: error message (03/04/04)
  • error message (03/04/04)
• laberth_at_voila.fr
  • C sources for Dijkstra algorithm (03/20/04)
• LaDainian Tomlinson
  • Re: working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/17/04)
• lallous
  • Re: What principle does C use to generate a random value? (03/22/04)
  • Re: Read in/handling a large file (03/22/04)
  • Re: Difference (03/15/04)
  • Re: useless casts (03/14/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/09/04)
  • Re: array initialisation question (03/08/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/08/04)
• Larry Doolittle
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/09/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/08/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/08/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/07/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/01/04)
• Lawrence V. Cipriani
  • Re: Question about #define (03/02/04)
• lawrence.jones_at_ugsplm.com
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] punctuation mark names (was Re: newbie question) (03/24/04)
  • Re: exit & return (03/24/04)
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/20/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/09/04)
• learner1
  • Create a curve from points selected by user (03/11/04)
• Leor Zolman
  • Re: Opinions on resources, C99, FAQs on C (03/31/04)
  • Re: Compile-time constant in C89? (03/30/04)
  • Re: Compile-time constant in C89? (03/29/04)
  • Re: Compile-time constant in C89? (03/29/04)
  • Re: Portability question (03/28/04)
  • Re: Can anybody tell me the difference between this three group of code? (03/27/04)
  • Re: For SGI Computer, Looking for Code to Open/Create, Write/Read to/from a BINARY File (03/26/04)
  • Re: Strings, memory and files... Oh my (03/26/04)
  • Re: long integer (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/25/04)
  • Re: Can anybody tell me the difference between this three group of code? (03/25/04)
  • Re: Variable memory string in linklist. (03/24/04)
  • Re: Variable memory string in linklist. (03/24/04)
  • Re: Memory access error w/realloc (03/23/04)
  • Re: Having problem populating time structure (03/23/04)
  • Re: typedef struct and extern (03/22/04)
  • Re: typedef struct and extern (03/22/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/22/04)
  • Re: selecting a random operator solved... (03/22/04)
  • Re: selecting a random operator (03/22/04)
  • Re: Curious about differences between two compilers (03/22/04)
  • Re: inline function vs macro (03/21/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/21/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/21/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/21/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/20/04)
  • Re: doubts regarding extern,volatile in C (03/18/04)
  • Re: doubts regarding extern,volatile in C (03/17/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/12/04)
  • Re: doubts regarding extern,volatile in C (03/12/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/12/04)
  • Re: help! anyway to split string and store in array (03/11/04)
  • Re: Unsigned Char format character? (03/11/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/10/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/09/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/09/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/09/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/09/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/09/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/09/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/09/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/05/04)
  • Re: Reset a string? (03/05/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/05/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/05/04)
  • Re: Dynamically malloc'd array of structs (03/05/04)
  • Re: Dynamically malloc'd array of structs (03/05/04)
  • Re: OT: Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Difference between strcpy() and strcat()? (03/05/04)
  • Re: Difference between strcpy() and strcat()? (03/05/04)
  • Re: small bit shifting q (03/05/04)
  • Re: letting free() know how much to free...? (03/05/04)
  • Re: typedef and multiple file projects (03/04/04)
  • Re: typedef and multiple file projects (03/04/04)
  • Re: letting free() know how much to free...? (03/04/04)
  • Re: extern local variables (03/04/04)
  • OT: Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Pointer-to-function with variable argument number (03/04/04)
  • Re: going crazy, invalid conversion from `char*' to `char' help needed (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Pointer-to-function with variable argument number (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't srand working? (03/03/04)
  • Re: going crazy, invalid conversion from `char*' to `char' help needed (03/03/04)
  • Re: Casting (time_t)(-1) (03/02/04)
  • Re: Is that a constant expression? (03/01/04)
  • Re: Question about #define (03/01/04)
  • -l (03/01/04)
  • Re: Doubt about pass pointer to int. (03/01/04)
  • Re: type promotions (02/29/04)
• Lew Pitcher
  • Re: [OT] Re: Quick question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Variable name (03/24/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/19/04)
  • Re: exit & return (03/19/04)
  • Re: Preventing Recursive calls (03/19/04)
  • Re: howto translate c2asm and asm2c (03/16/04)
  • Re: gets_mem (03/11/04)
  • Re: metatype in c (03/10/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (03/08/04)
  • Re: Why isn't srand working? (03/03/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/01/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/01/04)
  • Re: scan codes (03/01/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/01/04)
• lilburne
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
• Link Skywalker 14
  • Beginner here.... (03/28/04)
• Mac
  • Re: [FAQs, welcome msg] Problems with compiler and c for dummies book (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: #undef, #define (03/30/04)
  • Re: memory mapped files (03/30/04)
  • Re: Is there a visualization method for C program? (03/30/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: How to compile with GCC? (03/21/04)
  • Re: short unsigned and %hu (03/21/04)
  • short unsigned and %hu (03/20/04)
  • Re: working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/19/04)
  • Re: working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/19/04)
  • Re: working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/18/04)
  • Re: [C] integer to string (03/18/04)
  • Re: [C] integer to string (03/17/04)
  • Re: working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/17/04)
  • Re: working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/17/04)
  • Re: Understand some code (03/16/04)
  • Re: char - signed or unsigned ? (03/16/04)
  • Re: Newbie Quaestion (03/13/04)
  • Re: char - signed or unsigned ? (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
  • Re: libclc? (03/13/04)
  • Re: Segfault for passing element of an array to a regex function? (03/12/04)
  • Re: intermittently failing malloc() call (03/12/04)
  • Re: Prefering C to VB, racist and classist? (was : RAF NetNews - Local visitor missing after train of thought derails!) (03/12/04)
  • Re: libclc? (03/12/04)
  • Re: dumb q moving to gcc - c99 mode (03/12/04)
  • Re: Detecting macro defined as empty (as opposed to zero or undefined) (03/11/04)
  • requesting critique of word indexing program (~300 lines) (03/11/04)
  • Re: dumb q moving to gcc - c99 mode (03/11/04)
  • Re: Inserting data into a MySQL DB via the C API (03/11/04)
  • Re: Critique (or use) this base64 decoder (03/11/04)
  • Re: libclc? (03/11/04)
  • Re: Returning pointer to array of structure from function (03/11/04)
  • Re: Prefering C to VB, racist and classist? (was : RAF NetNews - Local visitor missing after train of thought derails!) (03/11/04)
  • Re: intermittently failing malloc() call (03/11/04)
  • Re: Segfault for passing element of an array to a regex function? (03/11/04)
  • Re: Returning pointer to array of structure from function (03/11/04)
  • Re: doesn't work (03/11/04)
  • Re: looking for a complete CRC32 program (03/11/04)
  • Re: allowing user to enter paragraphs (03/07/04)
  • Re: allowing user to enter paragraphs (03/06/04)
  • Re: allowing user to enter paragraphs (03/06/04)
  • Re: allowing user to enter paragraphs (03/06/04)
• macluvitch
  • assembler in c ? (03/26/04)
  • Re: Operating System (03/26/04)
  • Re: Operating System (03/06/04)
  • Re: allowing user to enter paragraphs (03/06/04)
• Macro Maniac
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/30/04)
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/30/04)
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/30/04)
  • Challenging macro with default value (03/30/04)
• madhur
  • Re: Pointer Watches in TurboC++ (03/28/04)
• Magnus Danielson
  • Re: how does printf work? (03/09/04)
• Malcolm
  • Re: Delimiting problems (03/31/04)
  • Re: Counting total space,tab,new line in a string. (03/31/04)
  • Re: Colours on console outputs (03/30/04)
  • Re: printf justification question (03/30/04)
  • Re: Date validation function issue (03/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/30/04)
  • Re: How to overwrite integers at start of a file (03/29/04)
  • Re: Portability question (03/28/04)
  • Re: Pointer Watches in TurboC++ (03/28/04)
  • Re: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ? (03/28/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/28/04)
  • Re: binary IO and portability (03/28/04)
  • Re: free fails (03/28/04)
  • Re: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ? (03/28/04)
  • Re: C/C++ string comparison (03/27/04)
  • Re: Possible way to overcome the file size limit (03/27/04)
  • Re: creation of font using c (03/27/04)
  • Re: RP: Ideas in Plauger's book stdclib (03/27/04)
  • Re: Possible way to overcome the file size limit (03/26/04)
  • Re: C in Visual Studio.NET (03/26/04)
  • Re: A couple of questions... (03/26/04)
  • Re: compilation to C (03/25/04)
  • Re: huge pointer (03/25/04)
  • Re: size of huge memory (03/24/04)
  • Re: Differences C/C++ (03/24/04)
  • Re: During linking do I need header files (03/22/04)
  • Re: seg fault core dumped (03/22/04)
  • Re: seg fault core dumped (03/21/04)
  • Re: floating-point float (03/21/04)
  • Re: mixing old C code with new C++ code (03/21/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/21/04)
  • Re: vprintf (03/20/04)
  • Re: obs function (03/20/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: obs function (03/20/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/20/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/19/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/19/04)
  • Re: Removing zeros from floats (03/19/04)
  • Re: Gaussian-Jordon Reduction C Library (03/19/04)
  • Re: Error handling (03/19/04)
  • Re: Description of Memory Heaps for Different OS's. (03/19/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/18/04)
  • Re: Different areas of specialisation in C programming. (03/18/04)
  • Re: Error handling (03/18/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/18/04)
  • Re: Is strncat slow? (03/17/04)
  • Re: string litterals and char * and standard c (03/17/04)
  • Re: integer size and portability-a wishful controversy (03/16/04)
  • Re: what does it mean? (03/16/04)
  • Re: Explanation (03/16/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Re: char - signed or unsigned ? (03/14/04)
  • Re: libraries (03/14/04)
  • Re: Vectors and C (03/14/04)
  • Re: char - signed or unsigned ? (03/13/04)
  • Re: finding structure defines (03/13/04)
  • Re: compilator c/c++ (03/13/04)
  • Re: remembering arrays (03/13/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/13/04)
  • Re: simple c-programming project (03/12/04)
  • Re: help! anyway to split string and store in array (03/12/04)
  • Re: How to write? (03/12/04)
  • Re: malloc (03/12/04)
  • Re: malloc (03/11/04)
  • Re: Is it still worth it to learn C? (03/11/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/11/04)
  • Re: metatype in c (03/10/04)
  • Re: Limitations/Difficulties of Object Oriented Design in C (03/10/04)
  • Re: Declaration statement (03/10/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/10/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/10/04)
  • Re: how does printf work? (03/10/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/08/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/08/04)
  • Re: coding a simple calculator (03/07/04)
  • Re: Pointer and BitWise Operator. (03/07/04)
  • Re: hacking /dev/audio (03/07/04)
  • Re: Saving registers in C functions (03/06/04)
  • Re: weird behaviour by gcc (03/06/04)
  • Re: How to get the limit on it's range of the double type? (03/06/04)
  • Re: letting free() know how much to free...? (03/06/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: letting free() know how much to free...? (03/04/04)
  • Re: Why isn't srand working? (03/03/04)
  • Re: FILE Access (03/02/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/01/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/01/04)
  • Re: In and Out on port space within C - any standard? (03/01/04)
  • Re: A NULL pointer changed after returned? (02/29/04)
• Manish Singh
  • Re: What is sequence point ? (03/01/04)
• Mansoor
  • Input in C under linux (03/26/04)
• Mantorok Redgormor
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/26/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/25/04)
  • time format (03/24/04)
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/19/04)
  • standard signal function problem (03/19/04)
• Marco Antoniotti
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
• Mark
  • array with pointers..... (03/31/04)
  • SOLVED! [Re: how to define memory position and assign number....] (03/31/04)
  • how to define memory position and assign number.... (03/31/04)
  • Re: problem with ASCII types, should be easy :( (03/14/04)
  • Re: decimals where hexadecimal should be??? (03/14/04)
  • Re: decimals where hexadecimal should be??? (03/14/04)
  • decimals where hexadecimal should be??? (03/12/04)
  • problem with ASCII types, should be easy :( (03/12/04)
• Mark A. Nicolosi
  • Strings, memory and files... Oh my (03/26/04)
• Mark A. Odell
  • Re: Error handling (03/18/04)
  • Re: What is volatile? (03/17/04)
  • Re: howto convert/translate c2asm (03/16/04)
  • Re: howto translate c2asm and asm2c (03/16/04)
  • Re: howto convert/translate c2asm (03/16/04)
  • Re: 2Q's (03/16/04)
  • Re: How to write? (03/11/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/05/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/05/04)
  • Re: Dynamically malloc'd array of structs (03/05/04)
  • Re: mod_jk2 compilation issues on tru64 with gcc (03/04/04)
  • Re: MIDI project (03/03/04)
  • Re: MIDI project (03/03/04)
  • Re: read() error - Bad Address (03/02/04)
  • Re: Array typedef vs. structure (03/02/04)
  • Re: Struct of pointer-to-function (03/02/04)
  • Re: Please tell me if I've written this correctly (03/02/04)
• Mark F. Haigh
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/31/04)
  • Re: alligned memory allocation (03/05/04)
  • Re: alligned memory allocation (03/05/04)
• Mark Henning
  • Re: Variable name (03/23/04)
  • Re: small database written in Ansi C (03/23/04)
  • Re: small database written in Ansi C (03/22/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/19/04)
  • Re: [OT] dumb word correction (03/12/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/12/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/11/04)
  • Re: Segfault for passing element of an array to a regex function? (03/11/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mail-Copies-To header set to invalid address (03/08/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mail-Copies-To header set to invalid address (03/05/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mail-Copies-To header set to invalid address (03/04/04)
  • Re: reversing a string - newbie question (03/02/04)
  • Re: reversing a string - newbie question (03/02/04)
  • Re: Question about #define (03/01/04)
• Mark McIntyre
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/29/04)
  • Re: how to make program invisible (03/27/04)
  • Re: A couple of questions... (03/27/04)
  • Re: Possible way to overcome the file size limit (03/26/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/26/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/26/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/26/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/26/04)
  • Re: difference: char **argv <-> char *argv[] ??? (03/23/04)
  • Re: Checking if a key was pressed during a decrement loop (03/22/04)
  • Re: Linux C header files on Windows? (03/21/04)
  • Re: is there a way to download a free c compiler and builder (03/21/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/20/04)
  • Re: Not waiting for input (03/20/04)
  • Re: C sources for Dijkstra algorithm (03/20/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/20/04)
  • Re: obs function (03/20/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/20/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/20/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/20/04)
  • Re: [OT] insults (03/18/04)
  • Re: [CODE REVIEW again] (03/18/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/16/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/16/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/15/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/15/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/15/04)
  • Re: printf (03/15/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/13/04)
  • Re: Writing bits to a file (03/12/04)
  • Re: gcc warning not understood (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it still worth it to learn C? (03/11/04)
  • Re: time.h: time delay and system time (03/10/04)
  • Re: Is it still worth it to learn C? (03/10/04)
  • Re: gets_mem (03/10/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/10/04)
  • Re: [ot]Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/10/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/10/04)
  • Re: Reset a string? (03/10/04)
  • Re: IP address fastest storage/searching (03/09/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/09/04)
  • Re: Compile for a dedivated machine (03/09/04)
  • Re: [ot]Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/09/04)
  • Re: Compile for a dedivated machine (03/09/04)
  • Re: coding a simple calculator (03/09/04)
  • Re: [ot]Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/09/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/08/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/08/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/08/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/08/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/08/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/06/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/05/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/02/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (03/01/04)
• Martien Verbruggen
  • Re: How can I get rid of the variable "temp" in this function? (03/23/04)
  • Re: readdir() and S_ISDIR(stat.st_mode) question (OT ?) (03/04/04)
  • Re: cast in memcpy() (03/02/04)
• Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Problems with compiler and c for dummies book (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Beginner here.... (03/28/04)
  • Re: Looking for sparse array code (03/25/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/24/04)
  • Re: Memory access error w/realloc (03/23/04)
  • Re: Macro define function? (03/23/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/22/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/21/04)
  • Re: How to compile with GCC? (03/21/04)
  • Re: Undefined Operation (03/19/04)
  • Re: struct initialization? (03/18/04)
  • Re: integer size and portability-a wishful controversy (03/16/04)
  • Re: Difference (03/15/04)
  • Re: printf (03/15/04)
  • Re: Converting an integer to an array of bytes (03/13/04)
  • Re: the random number? (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is memcpy a stadard function in c? (03/10/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/08/04)
  • Re: inline function question (03/08/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/03/04)
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/03/04)
  • Re: cast in memcpy() (03/01/04)
• Martin Buchleitner
  • Re: coding a simple calculator (03/07/04)
• Martin Dickopp
  • Re: [OT] Quick question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/31/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Quick question (03/30/04)
  • Re: Quick question (03/30/04)
  • Re: Quick question (03/30/04)
  • Re: Compile-time constant in C89? (03/30/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/30/04)
  • Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/30/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/30/04)
  • Re: find the length of an array (03/29/04)
  • Re: Help with code from "O'Reily's Practical C Prgramming, 3rd Edition" (03/29/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/27/04)
  • Re: Trouble with types! (03/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] punctuation mark names (03/24/04)
  • Re: Rewrite more lines (03/24/04)
  • Re: Rewrite more lines (03/24/04)
  • Re: Rewrite more lines (03/24/04)
  • Re: Rewrite more lines (03/24/04)
  • [OT] punctuation mark names (was Re: newbie question) (03/24/04)
  • Re: What principle does C use to generate a random value? (03/22/04)
  • Re: How to compile with GCC? (03/22/04)
  • Re: seg fault core dumped (03/22/04)
  • Re: seg fault core dumped (03/21/04)
  • [OT] Re: expression (03/21/04)
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/19/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/19/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/19/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/18/04)
  • Re: string litterals and char * and standard c (03/17/04)
  • Re: string litterals and char * and standard c (03/17/04)
  • Re: why #define is being ignored in my code by gcc 3.2.2? (03/17/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/17/04)
  • [OT] Re: link error: can not find shared library (03/16/04)
  • Re: c-pointers and functions---More interesting than ever (03/15/04)
  • Re: useless casts (03/15/04)
  • Re: Definition of NULL (03/15/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/13/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/12/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/09/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/09/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/09/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/09/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/08/04)
  • Re: copy ctor questions... (03/08/04)
  • Re: Allocating Concatenation For Array (03/08/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/07/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/07/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/07/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/07/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/07/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/07/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/06/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/06/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/06/04)
  • Re: Reset a string? (03/06/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/06/04)
  • Re: reset a string. empty it totally. (03/06/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (03/04/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/03/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (03/03/04)
  • [OT] Re: Freestanding Environment (03/03/04)
  • Re: Arithmetic and C (03/03/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (03/03/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/03/04)
  • [OT] spelling reform (was Re: grabbing file size) (03/03/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (03/02/04)
  • Re: reversing a string - newbie question (03/02/04)
  • Re: reversing a string - newbie question (03/02/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/02/04)
  • Re: multi-lines deprecated (03/02/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/01/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/01/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mail-Copies-To header set to invalid address (03/01/04)
  • Re: which is the better path (03/01/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/01/04)
  • Re: Char const for backslash (03/01/04)
  • Re: What is sequence point ? (03/01/04)
  • Re: cast in memcpy() (03/01/04)
• Martin Johansen
  • Re: Converting an integer to an array of bytes (03/13/04)
  • #include <> (03/10/04)
  • typedef and multiple file projects (03/04/04)
• Martin Stromberg
  • Re: string concatenation (03/09/04)
• Martin Woolley
  • Re: Serial port line termination (03/02/04)
  • Serial port line termination (03/02/04)
• Massimiliano Alberti
  • Re: Arithmetic and C (03/03/04)
  • Re: Arithmetic and C (03/03/04)
  • Arithmetic and C (03/03/04)
• Materialised
  • Re: Beginner here.... (03/28/04)
  • Is there a difference? (03/02/04)
• Matt
  • find the length of an array (03/29/04)
  • C/C++ string comparison (03/27/04)
• matt melton
  • Description of Memory Heaps for Different OS's. (03/19/04)
• Matt Suther
  • Problems with compiler and c for dummies book (03/31/04)
  • Re: is there a way to download a free c compiler and builder (03/21/04)
  • is there a way to download a free c compiler and builder (03/21/04)
• Matt Wolinsky
  • Re: Memory access error w/realloc (03/23/04)
  • Memory access error w/realloc (03/23/04)
• Matthias Felleisen
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/03/04)
• max(01)*
  • Re: [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/26/04)
  • [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/24/04)
  • Re: S: small database written in Ansi C (03/23/04)
  • Re: simple c-programming project (03/11/04)
  • Re: Borland C++ vs. Microsoft C++? (03/11/04)
  • Re: how to "wait for any key" (03/08/04)
• McVeigh, Timothy
  • Israel behind spanish terrorism (03/16/04)
  • Israel behind spanish terrorism (03/16/04)
  • Israel behind spanish terrorism (03/16/04)
• mehul raval
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/05/04)
  • Re: float (*Data)[4] vs float *Data[4] (03/04/04)
  • poss soln (03/04/04)
• MetaCharacter
  • Help for fellow c noobs like (03/21/04)
  • How to compile with GCC? (03/21/04)
• Michael
  • Re: Rewrite more lines (03/24/04)
  • Rewrite more lines (03/24/04)
  • var arg list (03/18/04)
  • Re: FSM in C? (03/08/04)
  • FSM in C? (03/05/04)
• Michael B Allen
  • Union and Struct Declarations (03/19/04)
  • Unions: Casting To Member Type and Member Access (03/19/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/17/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
  • Re: iswspace and iswprint (03/13/04)
  • Re: iswspace and iswprint (03/13/04)
  • Re: iswspace and iswprint (03/12/04)
• Michael Borgwardt
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/05/04)
• Michael Fyles
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/31/04)
  • Re: What does the standard say? (03/30/04)
  • Re: Please solve following string related problems... (03/30/04)
  • Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/30/04)
• Michael Harris
  • Re: arbitrary timezone conversion routines (03/17/04)
  • Re: arbitrary timezone conversion routines (03/16/04)
  • arbitrary timezone conversion routines (03/15/04)
• Michael Hassey
  • Re: BRILLLLIANT ARTICLE BY DR THOMAS FRIEDMAN OF NYTIMES (03/31/04)
• Michael Mendelsohn
  • Re: [OT] Troll alert (03/27/04)
• Michael Sig Birkmose
  • Re: problems with ANSI C grammar for yacc (03/26/04)
  • problems with ANSI C grammar for yacc (03/26/04)
• Michael Wojcik
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/26/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/24/04)
  • Re: Section from the C standard. (03/22/04)
  • Re: C standard online? (03/22/04)
  • Re: Description of Memory Heaps for Different OS's. (03/22/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/18/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/18/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/17/04)
  • Re: [CODE REVIEW again] (was: [CODE REVIEW] Re: Generic C) (03/16/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/16/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/12/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/12/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/12/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/11/04)
  • Re: wrong with using default parameter of function (03/11/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/10/04)
  • Re: volatile structures, and similar (03/10/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/09/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/08/04)
  • Re: Question about #define (03/02/04)
  • Re: cast in memcpy() (03/02/04)
  • Re: which is the better way to declare dynamic single dimension array inside struct (03/02/04)
  • Re: Why (long)NULL ? (03/01/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: C dangerous? (03/01/04)
• Michele
  • what does it mean? (03/16/04)
• Mickey
  • Conditions and use of if, elseif or ORed ifs (03/09/04)
• Mik Mifflin
  • Re: Difference between strcpy() and strcat()? (03/05/04)
• Mike Frayn
  • Re: Conditions and use of if, elseif or ORed ifs (03/09/04)
• Mike Jeffers
  • Re: Nested sorting problem with linked list (03/31/04)
  • Nested sorting problem with linked list (03/31/04)
• Mike Nishizawa
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/04/04)
• Mike Schilling
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/16/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/15/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
• Mike Wahler
  • Re: [OT] "thx" (was: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ?) (03/31/04)
  • Re: Help : pro*c (03/31/04)
  • Re: Delimiting problems (03/31/04)
  • Re: [FAQs, welcome msg] Problems with compiler and c for dummies book (03/31/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/29/04)
  • Re: find the length of an array (03/29/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/28/04)
  • Re: For SGI Computer, Looking for Code to Open/Create, Write/Read to/from a BINARY File (03/28/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/28/04)
  • Re: A couple of questions... (03/28/04)
  • Re: binary IO and portability (03/28/04)
  • Re: how to make program invisible (03/27/04)
  • Re: (corr) For SGI Computer, Looking for Code to Open/Create, Write/Read to/from a BINARY File (03/27/04)
  • Re: For SGI Computer, Looking for Code to Open/Create, Write/Read to/from a BINARY File (03/27/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/27/04)
  • Re: Please solve following string related problems... (03/27/04)
  • Re: Ideas in Plauger's book stdclib (03/27/04)
  • Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/26/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] A CHALLENGING problem (03/25/04)
  • Re: Statically create a table of data in C: How? (03/25/04)
  • Re: size of huge memory (03/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/25/04)
  • Re: How does this C function work? (03/24/04)
  • Re: vprintf (03/20/04)
  • Re: Removing zeros from floats (03/19/04)
  • Re: exit & return (03/19/04)
  • Re: c (03/19/04)
  • Re: var arg list (03/18/04)
  • Re: Difference between struct tag and typedef name? (03/18/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/18/04)
  • Re: string litterals and char * and standard c (03/17/04)
  • Re: Is a newline at the end of a C file a better style than a blank at the end of the file or is it better to place none? (03/17/04)
  • Re: string litterals and char * and standard c (03/17/04)
  • Re: string litterals and char * and standard c (03/17/04)
  • Re: Is strncat slow? (03/17/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/17/04)
  • Re: What is volatile? (03/17/04)
  • Re: working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/17/04)
  • Re: What is volatile? (03/17/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/17/04)
  • Re: Trouble with pointer indirection (03/17/04)
  • Re: Trouble with pointer indirection (03/16/04)
  • Re: Pointer to function gives illegal operation (MSC6) (03/16/04)
  • Re: working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/16/04)
  • Re: Pointer to function gives illegal operation (MSC6) (03/16/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: File handling problem (03/15/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: Explanation (03/15/04)
  • Re: Difference (03/15/04)
  • Re: printf (03/15/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
  • Re: Unsigned Char format character? (03/11/04)
  • Re: Is it still worth it to learn C? (03/10/04)
  • Re: Declaration statement (03/10/04)
  • Re: Declaration statement (03/10/04)
  • Re: gets_mem (03/10/04)
  • Re: Command line arguments (03/09/04)
  • Re: Command line arguments (03/09/04)
  • Re: Command line arguments (03/09/04)
  • Re: how does printf work? (03/09/04)
  • Re: Declaration statement (03/09/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/09/04)
  • Re: pass variable argument list on somehow? (03/08/04)
  • Re: [C] double/float to string (03/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE CHRISTIANS KILLED SINCE BIBLICAL TIMES? (03/06/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/06/04)
  • Re: allowing user to enter paragraphs (03/06/04)
  • Re: How to retain function test code? (03/06/04)
  • Re: reset a string. empty it totally. (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: memory accesses (03/05/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/05/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: OT: Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Passing va_list two times? (03/04/04)
  • Re: string-search-and-replace function wanted (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/03/04)
  • Re: Array of Pointers to Structs (03/03/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/03/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/03/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Freestanding Environment (03/03/04)
  • Re: Vigenere Cipher II - how to use files (03/03/04)
  • Re: memory accesses (03/03/04)
  • Re: Vigenere Cipher II - how to use files (03/03/04)
  • Re: [OT] scan codes (03/01/04)
  • Re: [OT] In and Out on port space within C - any standard? (03/01/04)
  • Re: [OT] In and Out on port space within C - any standard? (03/01/04)
• Mikhail Vladimirov
  • Re: A width agnostic hash function (03/30/04)
• Minti
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/22/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/22/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/21/04)
• Minty
  • Differences between programming in Win98 and Win2k? (03/24/04)
• Misha
  • Re: binary IO and portability (03/29/04)
  • Re: integer size and portability-a wishful controversy (03/17/04)
  • Re: char - signed or unsigned ? (03/13/04)
  • Re: Newbie Quaestion (03/13/04)
  • Re: decimals where hexadecimal should be??? (03/12/04)
• MJSR
  • Re: Statements and expressions. (03/13/04)
• Mohanasundaram
  • Re: Variable name (03/24/04)
  • Variable name (03/23/04)
  • Explanation (03/15/04)
  • Difference (03/15/04)
• Monika Levinsky
  • Expert preprocessor question (03/15/04)
• mpearo
  • Reading program output from stdin (03/31/04)
• mrby
  • Limit to the length of argument list (03/29/04)
• mshetty
  • Possible way to overcome the file size limit (03/26/04)
• Måns Rullgård
  • Re: string concatenation (03/08/04)
• Neil Cerutti
  • Re: Nested sorting problem with linked list (03/31/04)
  • Re: find the length of an array (03/29/04)
• Neil Zanella
  • Re: useless casts (03/15/04)
  • useless casts (03/14/04)
• netforce
  • reversing a string - newbie question (03/02/04)
• nett
  • Negative float? (03/11/04)
• Ng Pheng Siong
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/23/04)
• Nick Hounsome
  • Re: Understand some code (03/16/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/05/04)
• Nick Landsberg
  • Re: Please solve following string related problems... (03/30/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/26/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] Idiots abroad, was: Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/26/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] punctuation mark names (was Re: newbie question) (03/25/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/13/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/13/04)
  • Re: [OT] Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/09/04)
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/08/04)
  • Re: Search a binary file for a string... again! (its to slow) (03/08/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/07/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/06/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Loops, switches, embedded returns (03/02/04)
• Nick Maclaren
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/16/04)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
• nikhil bhargav
  • Re: Segmentation fault need help (03/17/04)
• Niklas Borson
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
• Nils Gösche
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
• Nils Petter Vaskinn
  • Re: Deleting a node in a singly link list if intermediate pointer is given (03/30/04)
  • Re: Deleting a node in a singly link list if intermediate pointer is given (03/30/04)
  • Re: Deleting a node in a singly link list if intermediate pointer is given (03/30/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/11/04)
  • Re: how does printf work? (03/09/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/09/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] Phone mnemonics (was: Increasing efficiency in C) (03/05/04)
  • Re: [OT] Phone mnemonics (was: Increasing efficiency in C) (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Please tell me if I've written this correctly (03/02/04)
  • Re: Comments requested: brief summary of C (03/01/04)
• Noah Roberts
  • OT: Re: @@@ TEMPTATION KINDLED MY FAITH @@@ (03/28/04)
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
• nobody
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/07/04)
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/06/04)
  • OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/03/04)
  • off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
• none
  • Re: During linking do I need header files (03/22/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/22/04)
• Noper
  • metatype in c (03/10/04)
• nospam_at_nowhere.com
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
• NOSPAM_january_at_uni-muenster.de
  • Re: Weird runtime problem (03/18/04)
  • Weird runtime problem (03/16/04)
• nrk
  • Re: const argument (03/18/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/18/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/18/04)
  • Re: working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/18/04)
  • [OT] Re: what does it mean? (03/18/04)
  • [OT] Re: Woe is me. I am best by trolls. (03/18/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/18/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/14/04)
  • [OT] Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: Newbie Quaestion (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/13/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/13/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/13/04)
  • Re: remembering arrays (03/13/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/13/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/12/04)
  • Re: reversing a string - newbie question (03/12/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/11/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/10/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/08/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/08/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/08/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/08/04)
  • Re: warning: excess elements in scalar initializer (03/06/04)
  • Re: Difference between strcpy() and strcat()? (03/05/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/04/04)
  • Re: string-search-and-replace function wanted (03/04/04)
  • Re: string-search-and-replace function wanted (03/04/04)
  • [OT] Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/03/04)
  • Re: Please tell me if I've written this correctly (03/02/04)
• Nudge
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/11/04)
• OcelotIguana
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/04/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/03/04)
  • Fast sincos routine (03/01/04)
• Ognen Duzlevski
  • Re: memory allocation/deallocation problem (03/16/04)
  • Re: memory allocation/deallocation problem (03/16/04)
  • Re: memory allocation/deallocation problem (03/16/04)
  • memory allocation/deallocation problem (03/16/04)
• Old Wolf
  • Re: #undef, #define (03/31/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/31/04)
  • Re: Please solve following string related problems... (03/31/04)
  • Re: Compile-time constant in C89? (03/29/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/29/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/29/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/29/04)
  • Re: Please solve following string related problems... (03/29/04)
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/29/04)
  • Re: Doubts regarding macros (03/29/04)
  • Re: Doubts regarding macros (03/27/04)
  • Re: Accessing a member of a struct via various pointers (03/19/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/18/04)
  • Re: Trouble with pointer indirection (03/18/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/16/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: enums with only 1 byte storage (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Union as raw memory (03/12/04)
  • Re: Declaration statement (03/11/04)
  • Re: Borland C++ vs. Microsoft C++? (03/11/04)
  • Re: reset a string. empty it totally. (03/09/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/09/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/09/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/08/04)
  • Re: reversing a string - newbie question (03/08/04)
  • Re: mod_jk2 compilation issues on tru64 with gcc (03/05/04)
  • Re: Arithmetic and C (03/05/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/05/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/04/04)
  • Re: Question about #define (03/01/04)
• Olivier MERIGON
  • Re: gcc warning not understood (03/10/04)
  • Re: gcc warning not understood (03/08/04)
  • Re: gcc warning not understood (03/08/04)
  • Re: gcc warning not understood (03/08/04)
  • gcc warning not understood (03/08/04)
• Orlin Zafirov
  • libraries (03/14/04)
• osmium
  • Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/29/04)
  • Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/29/04)
  • Re: Please solve following string related problems... (03/27/04)
  • OT: Re: huge pointer (03/26/04)
  • Re: [OT] punctuation mark names (was Re: newbie question) (03/24/04)
  • Re: Variable name (03/23/04)
  • Re: What principle does C use to generate a random value? (03/22/04)
  • Re: scan codes (03/18/04)
  • Re: 2Q's (03/16/04)
  • Re: simple c-programming project (03/11/04)
  • Re: simple c-programming project (03/11/04)
  • Re: Is it still worth it to learn C? (03/10/04)
  • Re: How to print ^M (ctrl M) (03/09/04)
  • Re: How to print ^M (ctrl M) (03/09/04)
  • Re: coding a simple calculator (03/07/04)
  • Re: how to "wait for any key" (03/07/04)
  • Re: Please tell me if I've written this correctly (03/02/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/01/04)
• P.J. Plauger
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/28/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/28/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/10/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/09/04)
  • Re: Endianness, was: Most negative double value (03/08/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/02/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/01/04)
• Papadopoulos Giannis
  • signed/unsigned question (03/12/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/01/04)
• Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: c-mode question, emacs specific (03/08/04)
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
• Pascal Damian
  • Re: Difference between strcpy() and strcat()? (03/06/04)
  • Re: Difference between strcpy() and strcat()? (03/05/04)
  • Difference between strcpy() and strcat()? (03/05/04)
• Paul
  • coding a simple calculator (03/07/04)
• Paul Eggert
  • Re: arbitrary timezone conversion routines (03/17/04)
• Paul Emmons
  • Re: Curious about differences between two compilers (03/23/04)
  • Curious about differences between two compilers (03/22/04)
• Paul Hsieh
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/28/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/18/04)
  • Re: Is strncat slow? (03/18/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/08/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/07/04)
• Paul Humphrey
  • Re: How do you decide which integer type to use? (bitmasking question) (03/08/04)
  • How do you decide which integer type to use? (bitmasking question) (03/08/04)
• Paul J?rstad
  • Compile for a dedivated machine (03/08/04)
• paul Z
  • hacking /dev/audio (03/07/04)
• paul_z
  • Re: File handling problem (03/15/04)
  • File handling problem (03/15/04)
• Paula
  • Re: i can't understand behaviour of if statement (03/29/04)
  • i can't understand behaviour of if statement (03/28/04)
  • why #define is being ignored in my code by gcc 3.2.2? (03/17/04)
• Pawel
  • c# (03/15/04)
  • compilator c/c++ (03/13/04)
• Pedro Graca
  • Re: Undefined Operation (03/19/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/09/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/08/04)
• pembed2003
  • reverse string array - how to do it efficiently (03/20/04)
• PengHQ
  • Re: Can anybody tell me the difference between this three group of code? (03/27/04)
  • Can anybody tell me the difference between this three group of code? (03/25/04)
• pete
  • Re: Delimiting problems (03/31/04)
  • Re: Delimiting problems (03/31/04)
  • Re: Compile-time constant in C89? (03/29/04)
  • Re: long integer (03/26/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/24/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/24/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/24/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/24/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/24/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/24/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/24/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/24/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/23/04)
  • Re: bits array (03/23/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/23/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/23/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/23/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/23/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/22/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/20/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: Weird runtime problem (03/16/04)
  • Re: what does it mean? (03/16/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/15/04)
  • Re: Difference (03/15/04)
  • Re: useless casts (03/15/04)
  • Re: signed int overflow (03/12/04)
  • Re: Please !!! (03/12/04)
  • Re: Union as raw memory (03/12/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/11/04)
  • Re: e book about C99 (03/10/04)
  • Re: Freestanding Environment (03/10/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/10/04)
  • Re: [ot]Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/10/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/09/04)
  • Re: how to use multithreading to do my Job (03/09/04)
  • Re: Yet another pointer related problem (03/09/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/09/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/09/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/09/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: header files (03/08/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: header files (03/08/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/08/04)
  • [ot]Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/08/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/08/04)
  • Re: Urgent: 5000 Euro Reward (0.6646425140282815) (03/08/04)
  • Re: Struct problem (03/08/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mail-Copies-To header set to invalid address (03/08/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/08/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/08/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/07/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/07/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/06/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/06/04)
  • Re: typedef and multiple file projects (03/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mail-Copies-To header set to invalid address (03/04/04)
  • Re: string-search-and-replace function wanted (03/04/04)
  • Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/04/04)
  • Re: string-search-and-replace function wanted (03/04/04)
  • Re: string-search-and-replace function wanted (03/04/04)
  • Re: int pointing to char (03/04/04)
  • Re: poss soln (03/04/04)
  • Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/04/04)
  • Re: string-search-and-replace function wanted (03/04/04)
  • Re: string-search-and-replace function wanted (03/04/04)
  • Re: Array of Pointers to Structs (03/04/04)
  • Re: const char problem (03/03/04)
  • Re: const char problem (03/03/04)
  • Re: Arithmetic and C (03/03/04)
  • Re: Arithmetic and C (03/03/04)
  • Re: Elementary questions from a beginner (03/03/04)
  • Re: Arithmetic and C (03/03/04)
  • Re: character/byte equality, again (03/03/04)
  • Re: Please tell me if I've written this correctly (03/02/04)
  • Re: Elementary questions from a beginner (03/02/04)
  • Re: reversing a string - newbie question (03/02/04)
  • Re: cast in memcpy() (03/02/04)
  • Re: Please tell me if I've written this correctly (03/02/04)
  • Re: Plain Char (03/02/04)
  • Re: cast in memcpy() (03/01/04)
• Peter
  • Re: var arg list (03/22/04)
  • Re: Checking if a key was pressed during a decrement loop (03/22/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/17/04)
  • Re: date in string format to struct tm (03/17/04)
  • Re: reversing a string - newbie question (03/14/04)
  • Re: signed/unsigned question (03/14/04)
  • Re: How to print ^M (ctrl M) (03/12/04)
  • Re: Allocating Concatenation For Array (03/12/04)
  • Re: reversing a string - newbie question (03/12/04)
  • Re: strlen() argument warning (03/10/04)
  • Re: string question (03/08/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/06/04)
  • Re: MIDI project (03/06/04)
  • Re: Please tell me if I've written this correctly (03/06/04)
  • Re: reversing a string - newbie question (03/06/04)
• Peter Ammon
  • Re: expression (03/21/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
  • Re: How to "sleep" or "delay"? (03/03/04)
• Peter B. Steiger
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/09/04)
  • to stdio or not to stdio (03/09/04)
• Peter D.
  • Re: MIDI project (03/04/04)
• Peter Dunker
  • Re: Re: C-API for Xerces-c ? (03/31/04)
  • Re: C-API for Xerces-c ? (03/31/04)
  • C-API for Xerces-c ? (03/31/04)
  • Re: small database written in Ansi C (03/23/04)
  • Re: small database written in Ansi C (03/23/04)
  • Re: small database written in Ansi C (03/22/04)
  • Re: small database written in Ansi C (03/22/04)
  • S: small database written in Ansi C (03/22/04)
  • small C XML Parser / lib ? (03/18/04)
• Peter H.M. Brooks
  • Re: Prefering C to VB, racist and classist? (was : RAF NetNews - Local visitor missing after train of thought derails!) (03/12/04)
  • Re: Prefering C to VB, racist and classist? (was : RAF NetNews - Local visitor missing after train of thought derails!) (03/11/04)
  • Re: Prefering C to VB, racist and classist? (was : RAF NetNews - Local visitor missing after train of thought derails!) (03/11/04)
  • Re: Prefering C to VB, racist and classist? (was : RAF NetNews - Local visitor missing after train of thought derails!) (03/11/04)
• Peter Hille
  • Re: allowing user to enter paragraphs (03/06/04)
  • Re: allowing user to enter paragraphs (03/06/04)
  • Re: reset a string. empty it totally. (03/06/04)
• Peter Nilsson
  • Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/30/04)
  • Re: Rewrite more lines (03/24/04)
  • Re: Variable name (03/24/04)
  • Re: Rewrite more lines (03/24/04)
  • Re: fopen related questions (03/24/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: newbie question (03/24/04)
  • Re: difference: char **argv <-> char *argv[] ??? (03/23/04)
  • Re: more linked lists (03/22/04)
  • Re: more linked lists (03/22/04)
  • Re: Section from the C standard. (03/22/04)
  • Re: What is volatile? (03/22/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/22/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/22/04)
  • Re: selecting a random operator (03/22/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/22/04)
  • Re: more linked lists (03/22/04)
  • Re: mixing old C code with new C++ code (03/21/04)
  • Re: expression (03/21/04)
  • Re: Section from the C standard. (03/20/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: Removing zeros from floats (03/20/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/20/04)
  • Re: Problem with recursion :( (03/20/04)
  • Re: reverse string array - how to do it efficiently (03/20/04)
  • Re: working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/18/04)
  • Re: what does it mean? (03/18/04)
  • Re: what does it mean? (03/18/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/16/04)
  • Re: enums with only 1 byte storage (03/16/04)
  • Re: Definition of NULL (03/15/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/15/04)
  • Re: Definition of NULL (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
  • Re: signed int overflow (03/13/04)
  • Re: reset a string. empty it totally. (03/10/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/10/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/10/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/07/04)
  • Re: strlen() argument warning (03/07/04)
  • Re: reset a string. empty it totally. (03/06/04)
  • Plain Char (03/02/04)
• Peter Olcott
  • C/C++ development environment that fits in your pocket (03/11/04)
• Peter Pichler
  • Re: constant string (03/10/04)
  • Re: Is there a difference? (03/10/04)
  • Re: Elementary questions from a beginner (03/01/04)
  • Re: cast in memcpy() (03/01/04)
  • Re: type promotions (03/01/04)
• Peter Slootweg
  • Re: How can I get rid of the variable "temp" in this function? (03/24/04)
  • Re: Trouble with pointer indirection (03/16/04)
• Peter Steiner
  • Re: seg fault core dumped (03/23/04)
  • seg fault core dumped (03/21/04)
• Phil
  • Accessing a member of a struct via various pointers (03/17/04)
• Philipp Bachmann
  • Re: Looking for sparse array code (03/30/04)
• Phipps Xue
  • Re: Unicode to GB2312-80 table needed (03/31/04)
• Pierre Maurette
  • Re: What is volatile? (03/17/04)
  • Re: What are the difference among them? (03/10/04)
  • Re: In and Out on port space within C - any standard? (03/01/04)
• Pieterjan Vandegaer
  • Struct problem (03/08/04)
• Piotr Turkowski
  • Re: Vigenere Cipher II - how to use files (03/04/04)
  • Re: Vigenere Cipher II - how to use files (03/03/04)
  • Vigenere Cipher II - how to use files (03/03/04)
• pkq
  • link error: can not find shared library (03/16/04)
• Poor Chap
  • Opinions on resources, C99, FAQs on C (03/31/04)
• pradeep
  • loop in a singly linked list (03/30/04)
• Prem Mallappa
  • constant string (03/08/04)
• Profetas
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/19/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/15/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/11/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/08/04)
  • puts with numbers (03/08/04)
• r martin
  • Re: working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/19/04)
  • working with 8 and 16 bit regions of mem (03/16/04)
• Raghavendra
  • Porting to Linux. (03/06/04)
• Rahul Jain
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
• Ralph Loizzo
  • Re: simple c-programming project (03/12/04)
  • Re: simple c-programming project (03/12/04)
• Ram Firestone
  • Sedgewick's Red-Black Tree implementation (03/12/04)
• Ram Laxman
  • Deleting a node in a singly link list if intermediate pointer is given (03/30/04)
• Rampage
  • Re: how do you feel.. (03/23/04)
• Randy Howard
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/30/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/29/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/29/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/28/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
• Ravi
  • Bit reversal problem (03/30/04)
• Ravi Uday
  • Re: Elementary questions from a beginner (03/04/04)
• Ray Dillinger
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/05/04)
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/03/04)
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/03/04)
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/03/04)
• raydpratt
  • Re: BRILLLLIANT ARTICLE BY DR THOMAS FRIEDMAN OF NYTIMES (03/30/04)
• Raymond Toy
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/07/04)
• Rich Teer
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
• Richard
  • Re: segmentation fault with printf (03/03/04)
• Richard Riehle
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (03/04/04)
  • Re: Announcing new scripting/prototyping language (03/04/04)
• Richard Bos
  • Re: Nested sorting problem with linked list (03/31/04)
  • Re: [OT] "thx" (was: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ?) (03/31/04)
  • Re: Objective C: Interprocess Communication (03/31/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Quick question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Counting total space,tab,new line in a string. (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
  • Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/30/04)
  • Re: Deleting a node in a singly link list if intermediate pointer is given (03/30/04)
  • Re: Deleting a node in a singly link list if intermediate pointer is given (03/30/04)
  • Re: What does the standard say? (03/30/04)
  • Re: What does the standard say? (03/30/04)
  • Re: C locale? (03/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] Asterisk vs Asterix (03/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] punctuation mark names (03/25/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/24/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/24/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/24/04)
  • Re: newbie question (03/24/04)
  • Re: Pointers to pointers (03/24/04)
  • Re: Differences C/C++ (03/24/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/23/04)
  • Re: Section from the C standard. (03/23/04)
  • Re: Section from the C standard. (03/22/04)
  • Re: seg fault core dumped (03/22/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/22/04)
  • Re: Gaussian-Jordon Reduction C Library (03/22/04)
  • Re: Section from the C standard. (03/22/04)
  • Re: standard signal function problem (03/22/04)
  • Re: Section from the C standard. (03/19/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/18/04)
  • Re: const argument (03/18/04)
  • Re: 2Q's (03/16/04)
  • Re: useless casts (03/15/04)
  • Re: Definition of NULL (03/15/04)
  • Re: useless casts (03/15/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/15/04)
  • Re: the random number? (03/12/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/12/04)
  • Re: character classification routines (03/12/04)
  • Re: CRT heap debugging routines (03/11/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/11/04)
  • Re: intermittently failing malloc() call (03/11/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/11/04)
  • Re: character classification routines (03/11/04)
  • Re: Negative float? (03/11/04)
  • Re: Is it still worth it to learn C? (03/11/04)
  • Re: [ot]Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/11/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/10/04)
  • Re: #include <> (03/10/04)
  • Re: #include <> (03/10/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/10/04)
  • Re: Compile for a dedivated machine (03/10/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/10/04)
  • Re: [ot]Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/10/04)
  • Re: [ot]Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/10/04)
  • Re: allocating memory for array of pointers to char (03/09/04)
  • Re: Compile for a dedivated machine (03/09/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/09/04)
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/09/04)
  • Re: Command line arguments (03/09/04)
  • Re: How to print ^M (ctrl M) (03/09/04)
  • Re: function call? (03/09/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/09/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/09/04)
  • Re: coding a simple calculator (03/09/04)
  • Re: [ot]Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/09/04)
  • Re: gcc warning not understood (03/08/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/08/04)
  • Re: [OT] Mail-Copies-To header set to invalid address (03/08/04)
  • Re: allocating memory for array of pointers to char (03/08/04)
  • Re: Compile for a dedivated machine (03/08/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/08/04)
  • Re: constant string (03/08/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/08/04)
  • Re: passing arguments to a function (03/08/04)
  • Re: Alternative rand()-algorithm? (03/08/04)
  • Re: coding a simple calculator (03/08/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/08/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/08/04)
  • Re: typedef and multiple file projects (03/05/04)
  • Re: Difference between strcpy() and strcat()? (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: letting free() know how much to free...? (03/04/04)
  • Re: Optimizing a switch statement (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: error message (03/04/04)
  • Re: error message (03/04/04)
  • Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
  • Re: Elementary questions from a beginner (03/04/04)
  • Re: const char problem (03/03/04)
  • Re: Yet another pointer related problem (03/03/04)
  • Re: FILE Access (03/03/04)
  • Re: Function definition into main() function. (03/03/04)
  • Re: character/byte equality, again (03/03/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (03/03/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (03/02/04)
  • Re: Pixel data type (03/02/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/02/04)
  • Re: C floating point (03/01/04)
  • Re: which is the better way to declare dynamic single dimension array inside struct (03/01/04)
  • Re: cast in memcpy() (03/01/04)
  • Re: In and Out on port space within C - any standard? (03/01/04)
  • Re: tricky do-while (03/01/04)
  • Re: is this valid c or a compiler bug? (03/01/04)
  • Re: procedure parameter struct order (03/01/04)
  • Re: strtoul bug (was Fibonacci number) (03/01/04)
• Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Decoding mars images (03/30/04)
  • Re: Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/30/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/30/04)
  • Re: What program do you use for visualization of C program? (03/30/04)
  • Re: Initializing arrays at runtime (03/29/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/29/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/28/04)
  • Re: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ? (03/28/04)
  • Re: [C] whats the difference between "char" and "Char" ? (03/28/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/27/04)
  • Re: how to make program invisible (03/27/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/27/04)
  • Re: C/C++ string comparison (03/27/04)
  • Re: Please solve following string related problems... (03/27/04)
  • Re: creation of font using c (03/27/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/27/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/25/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: *z++ and strings (03/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/24/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/24/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/23/04)
  • Re: exit & return (03/23/04)
  • Re: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Re: Troll Alert: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Re: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Re: exit & return (03/23/04)
  • Re: newbie question (03/23/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/22/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/21/04)
  • Re: obs function (03/20/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/18/04)
  • Re: Is a newline at the end of a C file a better style than a blank at the end of the file or is it better to place none? (03/17/04)
  • Re: Name aid requested (03/17/04)
  • Re: [C] integer to string (03/17/04)
  • Re: [C] integer to string (03/17/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/16/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/16/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/16/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/16/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/16/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: Definition of NULL (03/15/04)
  • Re: Definition of NULL (03/15/04)
  • Re: difference between library and header file (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/15/04)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/15/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/14/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Re: pointer problems (03/14/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Re: concurrent process vs. parallel process (03/14/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/14/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: Converting an integer to an array of bytes (03/13/04)
  • Re: Converting an integer to an array of bytes (03/13/04)
  • Re: Converting an integer to an array of bytes (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is it still worth it to learn C? (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
  • Re: [OT] A R-Ms (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
  • Re: need the file size via windows (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
  • Re: Is a { after the function head a good style? (03/13/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/13/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: malloc()1 (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/12/04)
  • Re: Is it poor design to have protected members in an abstract class? (03/11/04)
  • Re: Prefering C to VB, racist and classist? (was : RAF NetNews - Local visitor missing after train of thought derails!) (03/11/04)
  • Re: simple c-programming project (03/11/04)
  • Re: Prefering C to VB, racist and classist? (was : RAF NetNews - Local visitor missing after train of thought derails!) (03/11/04)
  • Re: Is it still worth it to learn C? (03/10/04)
  • Re: wrong with using default parameter of function (03/10/04)
  • Re: is there reference type in c language? (03/10/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/09/04)
  • Re: md5.h file (03/09/04)
  • Re: What is the equivalent of DLL in a Unix environment?? (03/08/04)
  • Re: [C] double/float to string (03/07/04)
  • Re: Porting to Linux. (03/06/04)
  • Re: allowing user to enter paragraphs (03/06/04)
  • Re: MIDI project (03/04/04)
  • Re: MIDI project (03/03/04)
  • Re: Doubt about pass pointer to int. (03/02/04)
  • Re: Doubt about pass pointer to int. (03/01/04)
• rif
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/07/04)
• risu23
  • getting output from system commands with system() (03/21/04)
• ritchie
  • Date validation function issue (03/30/04)
  • Re: Stack with file access?. (03/30/04)
  • Re: Stack with file access?. (03/27/04)
  • Re: Stack with file access?. (03/26/04)
  • Stack with file access…. (03/25/04)
• Rob Johnson
  • Re: 'erf' function in C (03/01/04)
• Rob Mitchell
  • Re: Pointer to function gives illegal operation (MSC6) (03/16/04)
  • Pointer to function gives illegal operation (MSC6) (03/16/04)
  • Pointer to function gives illegal operation (MSC6) (03/16/04)
• Rob Thorpe
  • Re: Generic C (03/16/04)
  • Re: Borland C++ vs. Microsoft C++? (03/11/04)
  • Re: Code/Object analyzer for fixing (03/07/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
• Robert
  • help! anyway to split string and store in array (03/11/04)
• Robert Bachmann
  • Re: strdup() (was Re: Struct of pointer-to-function) (03/05/04)
  • strdup() (was Re: Struct of pointer-to-function) (03/02/04)
• Robert Futrell
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/08/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/06/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/06/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/06/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/06/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/06/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/06/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/06/04)
  • Re: Fast sincos routine (03/05/04)
• Robert Harris
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/29/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/27/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/27/04)
  • Re: problems with ANSI C grammar for yacc (03/26/04)
  • Re: problems with ANSI C grammar for yacc (03/26/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/24/04)
  • Re: puts with numbers (03/19/04)
  • Re: File handling problem (03/15/04)
  • Re: File handling problem (03/15/04)
  • Re: #include <> (03/10/04)
  • Re: to stdio or not to stdio (03/09/04)
  • Re: array initialisation question (03/08/04)
• Robert Jones
  • Re: is there a way to download a free c compiler and builder (03/21/04)
• Robert Mark Bram
  • Re: array initialisation question (03/09/04)
  • term_info.c_cflag (03/09/04)
  • array initialisation question (03/08/04)
• Robert W Hand
  • Re: Compile-time constant in C89? (03/29/04)
• Robert Wessel
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/25/04)
  • Re: volatile structures, and similar (03/11/04)
  • Re: volatile structures, and similar (03/11/04)
  • Re: volatile structures, and similar (03/10/04)
  • Re: int/unsigned long * idiocy (03/04/04)
• Roberto Nunnari
  • Re: #include <> (03/10/04)
  • Re: Reset a string? (03/05/04)
  • Re: FSM in C? (03/05/04)
• robin.pain_at_tesco.net
  • Re: Statically create a table of data in C: How? (03/29/04)
  • Re: Statically create a table of data in C: How? (03/26/04)
  • Statically create a table of data in C: How? (03/25/04)
• Roc
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/05/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/04/04)
• Roedy Green
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
• Roger Binns
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/23/04)
• rohit
  • array declaration (03/25/04)
• Rolf Magnus
  • Re: enums with only 1 byte storage (03/16/04)
  • Re: enums with only 1 byte storage (03/16/04)
  • Re: enums with only 1 byte storage (03/14/04)
• Rookie
  • buffer (03/10/04)
• RoRsOaMrPiEo
  • Re: Vigenere Cipher II - how to use files (03/04/04)
• RoSsIaCrIiLoIA
  • Re: Strings, memory and files... Oh my (03/27/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/26/04)
  • Re: atoi and overflow (03/26/04)
  • Re: atoi and overflow (03/25/04)
  • atoi and overflow (03/25/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/25/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/25/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/25/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/25/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/23/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/23/04)
  • Re: Return of string from function (03/23/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/22/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/22/04)
  • Re: ---What this mean (03/22/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/22/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (03/19/04)
  • *z++ and strings (03/19/04)
  • Is strncat slow? (03/17/04)
  • Re: integer size and portability-a wishful controversy (03/17/04)
  • Re: integer size and portability-a wishful controversy (03/17/04)
  • Re: Is it still worth it to learn C? (03/13/04)
  • Re: gets_mem (03/11/04)
  • Re: malloc (03/11/04)
  • malloc()1 (03/11/04)
  • Re: gets_mem (03/10/04)
  • Re: malloc (03/10/04)
  • malloc (03/10/04)
  • Re: gets_mem (03/10/04)
  • Re: gets_mem (03/09/04)
  • Re: gets_mem (03/09/04)
  • Re: gets_mem (03/09/04)
  • Re: gets_mem (03/09/04)
  • Re: gets_mem (03/09/04)
  • gets_mem (03/09/04)
  • Re: string question (03/05/04)
  • Re: string question (03/05/04)
  • Re: string question (03/05/04)
  • Re: typedef and multiple file projects (03/05/04)
• Rouben Rostamian
  • Re: Writing a prepreprocessor! (03/26/04)
  • Re: Differences C/C++ (03/23/04)
• Russell Hanneken
  • Re: [C] integer to string (03/17/04)
  • Re: reset a string. empty it totally. (03/05/04)
  • Re: pgcc vs. gcc question - using <complex.h> (03/05/04)
• Russell Wallace
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC:: Why Lisp is not my favorite programming language (03/22/04)
• Ryan Stewart
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
  • Re: reading ints from a socket (03/14/04)
• s
  • C structure definition (03/18/04)
• sahukar, praveen
  • Variable length arguments (03/19/04)
• Sam Dennis
  • Re: Bit reversal problem (03/30/04)
  • [OT] K&R copyright violation (03/30/04)
  • Re: array initialisation question (03/29/04)
  • Re: Strings, memory and files... Oh my (03/26/04)
• sandbox
  • Re: Please help........... (03/25/04)
  • Re: Please help........... (03/25/04)
• sandy
  • how does printf work? (03/09/04)
• Sathyaish
  • Re: Please tell me if I've written this correctly (03/08/04)
  • Re: Please tell me if I've written this correctly (03/02/04)
  • Please tell me if I've written this correctly (03/02/04)
  • Re: Elementary questions from a beginner (03/02/04)
  • Re: Char const for backslash (03/02/04)
  • Re: Wierd output instead of 0s and 1s (03/02/04)
  • Char const for backslash (03/01/04)
  • Wierd output instead of 0s and 1s (03/01/04)
  • Elementary questions from a beginner (03/01/04)
• sathyashrayan
  • A C code from SNIPPET,help to Analyze. (03/19/04)
• Scott
  • Re: Help with code from "O'Reily's Practical C Prgramming, 3rd Edition" (03/30/04)
  • Help with code from "O'Reily's Practical C Prgramming, 3rd Edition" (03/29/04)
• Sean Burke
  • Re: string concatenation (03/07/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (03/07/04)
  • Re: string concatenation (03/06/04)
• Sean Kenwrick
  • Re: the random number? (03/12/04)
  • Re: problem with ASCII types, should be easy :( (03/12/04)
  • Re: How do you decide which integer type to use? (bitmasking question) (03/08/04)
• sellountos euripides
  • Re: float (*Data)[4] vs float *Data[4] (03/03/04)
• SenderX
  • Re: @@@ TEMPTATION - A MUST SEE @@@ (03/28/04)
• Serve Laurijssen
  • Re: What does the standard say? (03/31/04)
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/31/04)
  • Re: unable to find Segmentation Fault (03/30/04)
  • Re: What does the standard say? (03/30/04)
• Servé La
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/29/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/28/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/28/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/28/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/28/04)
  • Why is it taking so long? (03/28/04)
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/27/04)
  • Re: immediate structs (03/14/04)
  • Re: immediate structs (03/14/04)
  • immediate structs (03/14/04)
  • Re: strlen() argument warning (03/07/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/07/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/07/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/07/04)
  • Re: Increasing efficiency in C (03/06/04)
• Severian
  • Re: interpreting a null pointer as an empty (null string) (03/06/04)
• Severin Ecker
  • Re: string litterals and char * and standard c (03/17/04)
  • string litterals and char * and standard c (03/17/04)
• Severine Noll
  • Re: remembering arrays (03/15/04)
  • remembering arrays (03/12/04)
• Shailesh
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/30/04)
• Sharad Kala
  • Re: Section from the C standard. (03/23/04)
• Shaw
  • long integer (03/25/04)
• shellcode
  • Re: more linked lists (03/21/04)
  • Re: more linked lists (03/21/04)
  • more linked lists (03/20/04)
  • Re: fork() problems (03/01/04)
• Siemel Naran
  • Re: Looking for sparse array code (03/25/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/24/04)
  • Re: A CHALLENGING problem (03/24/04)
• Simon
  • Re: Newb- Global Array (03/28/04)
  • A couple of questions... (03/26/04)
• Simon Biber
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/31/04)
  • Re: Initializing arrays at runtime (03/28/04)
  • Re: Portability question (03/28/04)
  • Re: i can't understand behaviour of if statement (03/28/04)
  • Re: Why is it taking so long? (03/28/04)
  • Re: atoi and overflow (03/26/04)
• Sir Codelot
  • Re: Is a newline at the end of a C file a better style than a blank at the end of the file or is it better to place none? (03/19/04)
• SKH
  • Writing bits to a file (03/12/04)
• Sneaky Sammy
  • Syntax Curiosity: -> versus . (03/25/04)
• Software
  • Re: Code/Object analyzer for fixing (03/06/04)
  • Code/Object analyzer for fixing (03/05/04)
• Sourcerer
  • Re: Trouble with pointer indirection (03/16/04)
  • Trouble with pointer indirection (03/16/04)
• spike
  • reset a string. empty it totally. (03/05/04)
  • Reset a string? (03/05/04)
• spoilsport
  • going crazy, invalid conversion from `char*' to `char' help needed (03/03/04)
• Sriram
  • Re: help with client/server socket c code (03/12/04)
  • Re: volatile structures, and similar (03/12/04)
  • Re: volatile structures, and similar (03/10/04)
• Stan Tobias
  • Re: Dynamic string allocation (03/02/04)
  • Re: Question about #define (03/01/04)
• statical
  • Please !!! (03/12/04)
• Stefan Bauer
  • time.h: time delay and system time (03/10/04)
• Stefan Farfeleder
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/31/04)
  • Re: [CODE REVIEW again] (was: [CODE REVIEW] Re: Generic C) (03/16/04)
• stelios xanthakis
  • Re: [OT] C++ for C programmers (03/26/04)
• Sten Westerback
  • Re: Reading program output from stdin (03/31/04)
  • Re: What does the standard say? (03/31/04)
  • What does the standard say? (03/30/04)
• Stephan Tobies
  • Re: Copy-on-write tree data structure (03/09/04)
  • Copy-on-write tree data structure (03/02/04)
• Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: C/C++ string comparison (03/27/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/25/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/25/04)
  • Re: newbie strcmp woes (03/24/04)
  • Re: exit & return (03/23/04)
• Steve Gallagher
  • Re: Checking if a key was pressed during a decrement loop (03/23/04)
  • Re: Checking if a key was pressed during a decrement loop (03/23/04)
  • Re: Checking if a key was pressed during a decrement loop (03/22/04)
  • Re: Checking if a key was pressed during a decrement loop (03/22/04)
  • Checking if a key was pressed during a decrement loop (03/18/04)
• Steve Summit
  • comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) (03/15/04)
  • comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) (03/01/04)
• Stu Mac
  • Re: Checking if a key was pressed during a decrement loop (03/19/04)
  • Re: Checking if a key was pressed during a decrement loop (03/19/04)
  • Re: 'PPWDATA' undeclared error (03/19/04)
  • 'PPWDATA' undeclared error (03/18/04)
  • reading ints from a socket (03/13/04)
• study_hall
  • study_hall (03/24/04)
• subbarayan
  • Doubts regarding macros (03/26/04)
  • integer size and portability-a wishful controversy (03/16/04)
  • difference between library and header file (03/15/04)
  • doubts regarding extern,volatile in C (03/12/04)
• sugaray
  • Why a pointer to a pointer makes the difference ? (03/13/04)
  • const char problem (03/03/04)
  • Yet another pointer related problem (03/03/04)
  • What is sequence point ? (03/01/04)
  • Re: is this correct (03/01/04)
• sun
  • Re: $$ WHY DEMOCRATS WILL VOTE FOR BUSH $$ (03/30/04)
• Sundar Dorai-Raj
  • Re: pointers as arguments to a function (03/25/04)
  • pointers as arguments to a function (03/25/04)
• sunny
  • typedef struct and extern (03/22/04)
• surena abari
  • Re: hello world (03/01/04)
• Sweetmama005
  • Hey, im a noob at C, PLEASE READ (03/26/04)
• Sworn Democrats will vote for Detestable Bush
  • $$ WHY DEMOCRATS WILL VOTE FOR BUSH $$ (03/30/04)
• Tapio Kelloniemi
  • Resolving dependency trees (03/18/04)
  • Re: hacking /dev/audio (03/07/04)
  • Conversion to and from based real numbers (03/07/04)
• Tayssir John Gabbour
  • Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck (03/02/04)
• THE FAITHFUL
  • Re: @@@ TEMPTATION - A MUST SEE @@@ (03/28/04)
  • Re: @@@ TEMPTATION - A MUST SEE @@@ (03/28/04)
  • Re: @@@ TEMPTATION - A MUST SEE @@@ (03/28/04)
  • @@@ TEMPTATION - A MUST SEE @@@ (03/28/04)
  • @@@ TEMPTATION KINDLED MY FAITH @@@ (03/28/04)
• TheDD
  • Re: [CODE REVIEW again] (03/17/04)
  • Re: [CODE REVIEW again] (03/16/04)
  • Re: [CODE REVIEW again] (03/16/04)
  • Re: [CODE REVIEW again] (03/16/04)
  • Re: [CODE REVIEW again] (03/16/04)
  • Re: [CODE REVIEW again] (was: [CODE REVIEW] Re: Generic C) (03/16/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/16/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/16/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/15/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Re: Generic C (03/14/04)
  • Generic C (03/14/04)
• Thomas Matthews
  • Re: how to define memory position and assign number.... (03/31/04)
  • Re: Possible way to overcome the file size limit (03/26/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (03/21/04)
  • Re: small C XML Parser / lib ? (03/18/04)<