Re: alternative to rand()
From: Dan Pop (Dan.Pop_at_cern.ch)
Date: 04/07/04
- Next message: anonymous: "Re: what's the difference between the next 2 declarations?"
- Previous message: Leor Zolman: "Re: main function address"
- In reply to: Martin Ambuhl: "Re: alternative to rand()"
- Next in thread: Joona I Palaste: "Re: alternative to rand()"
- Reply: Joona I Palaste: "Re: alternative to rand()"
- Reply: Eric Sosman: "Re: alternative to rand()"
- Reply: Martin Ambuhl: "Re: alternative to rand()"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 7 Apr 2004 13:34:47 GMT
In <c4vc9a$2n8v5g$4@ID-227552.news.uni-berlin.de> Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl@earthlink.net> writes:
>Sweety wrote:
>
>> thanks in advance,
>
>The above line is impolite.
Bull***. It is such a common courtesy phrase that it even has a
"standard" abbreviation: TIA.
Dan
-- Dan Pop DESY Zeuthen, RZ group Email: Dan.Pop@ifh.de
- Next message: anonymous: "Re: what's the difference between the next 2 declarations?"
- Previous message: Leor Zolman: "Re: main function address"
- In reply to: Martin Ambuhl: "Re: alternative to rand()"
- Next in thread: Joona I Palaste: "Re: alternative to rand()"
- Reply: Joona I Palaste: "Re: alternative to rand()"
- Reply: Eric Sosman: "Re: alternative to rand()"
- Reply: Martin Ambuhl: "Re: alternative to rand()"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]