Re: use delete to destroy primitive/object types but memory is not freed
From: jimjim (FreeBSD_net_at_blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: 04/07/04
- Next message: Christopher Benson-Manica: "Re: how to remove a character from a string"
- Previous message: jimjim: "Re: use delete to destroy primitive/object types but memory is not freed"
- In reply to: Eric Sosman: "Re: use delete to destroy primitive/object types but memory is not freed"
- Next in thread: Alan Balmer: "Re: use delete to destroy primitive/object types but memory is not freed"
- Reply: Alan Balmer: "Re: use delete to destroy primitive/object types but memory is not freed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 21:11:52 GMT
change new to malloc and delete to free and if you dont know the answer
visit http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q7.21.html as Christopher pointed
out.
- Next message: Christopher Benson-Manica: "Re: how to remove a character from a string"
- Previous message: jimjim: "Re: use delete to destroy primitive/object types but memory is not freed"
- In reply to: Eric Sosman: "Re: use delete to destroy primitive/object types but memory is not freed"
- Next in thread: Alan Balmer: "Re: use delete to destroy primitive/object types but memory is not freed"
- Reply: Alan Balmer: "Re: use delete to destroy primitive/object types but memory is not freed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]