Re: [OT] Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types?
From: Kevin Goodsell (usenet2.spamfree.fusion_at_neverbox.com)
Date: 04/14/04
- Next message: Kevin Goodsell: "Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types?"
- Previous message: CBFalconer: "Re: Simple Parser"
- In reply to: Ioannis Vranos: "Re: [OT] Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types?"
- Next in thread: Dan Pop: "Re: [OT] Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 05:18:52 GMT
Ioannis Vranos wrote:
> "Matt" <matt@themattfella.zzzz.com> wrote in message
> news:4DYec.1040$Ab3.254@news02.roc.ny...
>
>>
>>The post to which I am now replying appears to me in a normal-size font.
>> Your first post showed up tiny in my browser (Mozilla 1.4.1).
>
>
>
> And entirely off topic in this world, i strongly suggest Mozilla Firefox.
> It is my default browser now and i do not switch any kind of programs so
> easily. Definetely it is worth to check it out.
>
I use Firefox myself, but I think he mis-spoke when he said "browser".
He was probably referring to his news client (Mozilla is both, and
more). Firefox is, of course, only a web browser. I also use
Thunderbird, the stand-alone version of Mozilla's mail and news client.
In any case, the actual problem is the fonts used by Mozilla,
apparently. I know you can adjust them in Thunderbird, and I'm sure you
can in Mozilla as well. I've seen different fonts used for unusual
character sets before, but it should be easy to fix.
Incidentally Mozilla 1.4.1 is a bit old now. 1.7 is in beta, I think.
-Kevin
-- My email address is valid, but changes periodically. To contact me please use the address from a recent posting.
- Next message: Kevin Goodsell: "Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types?"
- Previous message: CBFalconer: "Re: Simple Parser"
- In reply to: Ioannis Vranos: "Re: [OT] Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types?"
- Next in thread: Dan Pop: "Re: [OT] Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|