Re: double money
From: Irrwahn Grausewitz (irrwahn33_at_freenet.de)
Date: 04/15/04
- Next message: wadeyin_at_tom.com: "FAQ is so long!"
- Previous message: Keith Thompson: "Re: char*& and char* ???"
- In reply to: P.J. Plauger: "Re: double money"
- Next in thread: Rob Thorpe: "Re: double money"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:07:41 +0200
[Decimal vs. binary floating point number representation]
>"CBFalconer" <cbfalconer@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> So you need a good reason to use any such decimal organization.
"P.J. Plauger" <pjp@dinkumware.com> wrote:
>Indeed, and several have been cited:
>
>-- way faster conversion between external decimal and internal form
>
>-- no roundoff problems in conversion, either way
>
>-- exact representation of decimal fractions (important for tax laws)
>
>-- way easier rounding to Nth decimal place
>
>-- 0.1 * 10.0 == 1.0 (reducing reflector traffic)
>
>People seldom notice the loss of a bit or two of precision --
>witness all the truly awful math functions out there whose
>sins have gone unnoticed for decades. They *do* notice slow
>conversions, unexpected truncations, etc. as cited above.
The curious lurker can find an interesting reading at:
http://www2.hursley.ibm.com/decimal
Regards
-- Irrwahn Grausewitz (irrwahn33@freenet.de) welcome to clc: http://www.ungerhu.com/jxh/clc.welcome.txt clc faq-list : http://www.faqs.org/faqs/C-faq/faq/ clc OT guide : http://benpfaff.org/writings/clc/off-topic.html
- Next message: wadeyin_at_tom.com: "FAQ is so long!"
- Previous message: Keith Thompson: "Re: char*& and char* ???"
- In reply to: P.J. Plauger: "Re: double money"
- Next in thread: Rob Thorpe: "Re: double money"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]