comp.lang.c
By Author

3601 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 03/30/04
Ending: 04/30/04

• #kiss#
  • i don't want the dos wondow be closed (04/16/04)
• - CASE -
  • Re: Help with #define (04/22/04)
• - Kees van der Bent -
  • Re: Help with #define (04/23/04)
  • Re: sscanf fixed-width integer question (04/22/04)
  • Re: sscanf fixed-width integer question (04/22/04)
  • Re: assigning bit-field structure (04/22/04)
  • Re: check if char* is a ptr to mem or nirvana (04/21/04)
  • Re: Opinion) Overuse of symbolic constants (04/21/04)
  • Re: assigning bit-field structure (04/20/04)
  • Re: assigning bit-field structure (04/20/04)
  • Re: assigning bit-field structure (04/20/04)
  • assigning bit-field structure (04/19/04)
• 2B) || !(2B
  • Re: how to remove a character from a string (04/08/04)
  • Re: how to remove a character from a string (04/08/04)
• _libra_
  • Re: Special ascii values (04/08/04)
  • Re: Special ascii values (04/08/04)
  • Special ascii values (04/08/04)
• a.
  • Got: IP/HostName - Need: user login (BCB) (04/07/04)
• Abhinav
  • Re: Sony DRU-700A DVD+R Dual Layer[OT Comment for OT Post] (04/22/04)
  • Re: Sony DRU-700A DVD+R Dual Layer[OT Comment for OT Post] (04/22/04)
  • Re: [Slightly OT] Pointers on shifting to Systems Programming from QA (04/21/04)
• Achraf
  • c program running 2 terminal windows, how to specify in which to write? (04/28/04)
• Ahmed S. Badran
  • Re: Which is faster? (04/21/04)
  • Re: Some C/C++ books (04/18/04)
  • Re: converting char array to integer (04/15/04)
  • Re: odd/even bitwise and (04/06/04)
  • Re: odd/even bitwise and (04/06/04)
  • Re: Initialize char ** (04/05/04)
• Al Bowers
  • Re: flexible function parameter (04/30/04)
  • Re: main() (04/28/04)
  • Re: sizeof(struct something)?? (04/27/04)
  • Re: how do i write basic time function (04/25/04)
  • Re: programm stops (04/19/04)
  • Re: String Reverse Question (04/18/04)
  • Re: String Reverse Question (04/18/04)
  • Re: String Reverse Question (04/17/04)
  • Re: Dynamically growing an array (pointer question) (04/12/04)
  • Re: strtok problem (04/11/04)
  • Re: Global pointer pointing to locally defined type (04/07/04)
  • Re: Question about a pointer to an array of structs (04/06/04)
  • Re: newbie question seg fault printf (04/06/04)
  • Re: Multidimensional array problems (04/05/04)
  • Re: calloc problem (04/05/04)
  • Re: structs with fields that are structs (04/05/04)
  • Re: structs help (04/05/04)
  • Re: Problem with malloc (04/04/04)
  • Re: structs help (04/04/04)
  • Re: Pointer confusion with passing string array -- Segmentation fault (04/03/04)
  • Re: pointers going wild? (04/01/04)
• Alan Balmer
  • Re: Rob Pike's simple Include rule (04/28/04)
  • Re: Test-driven Development in C# (04/26/04)
  • Re: Rob Pike's simple Include rule (04/23/04)
  • Re: Rob Pike's simple Include rule (04/22/04)
  • Re: FAQ is so long! (04/19/04)
  • Re: exit & return (04/19/04)
  • Re: FAQ is so long! (04/17/04)
  • Re: OT (04/14/04)
  • Re: Strange global variable behavior (04/14/04)
  • Re: Special ascii values (04/14/04)
  • Re: Special ascii values (04/09/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: malloc + 4?? (04/09/04)
  • Re: how to allow only one instance? (04/09/04)
  • Re: Does ANSI C have something like PATHMAX or MAX_PATH? (04/08/04)
  • Re: Does ANSI C have something like PATHMAX or MAX_PATH? (04/08/04)
  • Re: use delete to destroy primitive/object types but memory is not freed (04/07/04)
  • Re: alternative to rand() (04/07/04)
  • Re: utility to intentionally mangle function names? (04/07/04)
  • Re: alternative to rand() (04/07/04)
  • Re: alternative to rand() (04/06/04)
  • Re: K&R (04/06/04)
  • Re: function sprintf (04/02/04)
  • Re: Does ANSI C have something like PATHMAX or MAX_PATH? (04/02/04)
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (04/02/04)
• Alan J. McFarlane
  • Re: NO_EXT_KEYS and strict ISO/ANSI modes (04/30/04)
• Alberto Giménez
  • Re: memory allocation nightmare (04/24/04)
  • Re: Error handling (04/23/04)
  • Error handling (04/22/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/14/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/14/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/13/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/13/04)
  • [OT] Re: main function address (04/07/04)
• Aless
  • Re: child pid (04/25/04)
  • child pid (04/25/04)
• Alex
  • Re: range limitation (04/26/04)
  • Re: Valid operations on pointers in C (04/23/04)
  • Re: Initialization of integer pointers (04/23/04)
  • Re: Printf (04/23/04)
  • Re: Which is faster? (04/22/04)
  • Re: Interval calculation (04/20/04)
  • Re: Interval calculation (04/19/04)
  • Re: Review of my answer (04/06/04)
  • Re: int array to string? (04/01/04)
• Alex Fraser
  • Re: Printf (04/25/04)
  • Re: Arithmetic on function address (04/23/04)
• Alex Monjushko
  • Re: Rob Pike's simple Include rule (04/29/04)
• Alexander Bartolich
  • Re: Large number in C (04/17/04)
  • Re: Function definition nesting (04/05/04)
  • Re: macros question (04/04/04)
• Alexander Malkis
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/14/04)
  • Re: max{i | f is an int and -i is an int and doesn't cause overflow} == ? (04/14/04)
  • max{f | f is a float and -f is a float and doesn't cause overflow} == ? (04/13/04)
  • Re: how to write a macro that calculate sizeof data types (04/04/04)
  • Re: how can i write C code that generate random number without using built in code (04/04/04)
  • Difference between DEBUG and NDEBUG? (04/01/04)
• Alexandre
  • sigaction : using "void (*sa_sigaction)(int, siginfo_t *, void *);" (04/06/04)
• Alexei Polkhanov
  • Re: "Ravenscar-like" profile for C/C++ (04/25/04)
• Allan Bruce
  • Re: flexible function parameter (04/30/04)
  • Re: Conditional Define (04/26/04)
  • Re: A puzzle (04/26/04)
  • Re: Conditional Define (04/26/04)
  • Re: Printf (04/22/04)
  • Re: Printf (04/22/04)
  • Re: What to do if you've made a new high performance data structure? (04/20/04)
  • Re: sscanf (04/18/04)
  • Re: sscanf (04/16/04)
  • Re: sscanf (04/16/04)
  • Re: sscanf (04/16/04)
  • sscanf (04/16/04)
• Allin Cottrell
  • Re: Opinion) Overuse of symbolic constants (04/27/04)
  • Re: main() (04/27/04)
  • Re: main() (04/27/04)
  • Re: Opinion) Overuse of symbolic constants (04/27/04)
  • Re: GCC inline assembly (04/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] Commodore 64, yet again (04/24/04)
  • Re: Implementing exceptions of C++ in C (04/19/04)
  • Re: Problem with simpe unixshell attempt (04/17/04)
  • Re: what's the difference between the next 2 declarations? (04/08/04)
• Alpha
  • Is it possible to choose a better way? (04/27/04)
• amit
  • help signed and unsigned in 64bits (04/07/04)
• Amittai Aviram
  • Re: int array to string? (04/01/04)
  • Re: int array to string? (04/01/04)
  • int array to string? (04/01/04)
• Andrej Prsa
  • Re: Global pointer pointing to locally defined type (04/07/04)
  • Re: Global pointer pointing to locally defined type (04/07/04)
  • Re: Global pointer pointing to locally defined type (04/07/04)
  • Re: Global pointer pointing to locally defined type (04/07/04)
  • Re: Global pointer pointing to locally defined type (04/07/04)
  • Global pointer pointing to locally defined type (04/07/04)
• Andrew Arro
  • Re: macros question #2 (04/09/04)
  • macros question #2 (04/08/04)
  • macros question (04/04/04)
• Andrew Clark
  • Re: Diffrence between ++i and i++ (04/13/04)
  • Re: Diffrence between ++i and i++ (04/13/04)
  • Re: Character Points/Structs/Input (04/03/04)
• anonymous
  • Re: what's the difference between the next 2 declarations? (04/07/04)
• Anthony Roberts
  • Re: question about inet_ntoa(3) (04/10/04)
  • question about inet_ntoa(3) (04/10/04)
• Anthony Wong
  • Re: Avoiding redundant functions (04/10/04)
• Ardhendu Nandan
  • Re: HELP ME -GCC COMPILER (04/22/04)
  • Re: HELP ME -GCC COMPILER (04/22/04)
  • Re: HELP ME -GCC COMPILER (04/21/04)
  • HELP ME -GCC COMPILER (04/17/04)
• Arthur J. O'Dwyer
  • Re: strange function syntax (04/30/04)
  • Re: [RFC] C token counter (04/30/04)
  • Re: [RFC] C token counter (04/30/04)
  • [RFC] C token counter (04/30/04)
  • Re: strange function syntax (04/29/04)
  • Re: Question on "if" statements... (04/29/04)
  • Re: static vs auto (04/28/04)
  • Re: Question on "if" statements... (04/27/04)
  • Re: `restrict' qualifer (04/27/04)
  • Re: Question on "if" statements... (04/27/04)
  • Re: Question on "if" statements... (04/27/04)
  • Re: Question on "if" statements... (04/26/04)
  • Re: Arithmetic on function address (04/23/04)
  • Re: Which is faster? (04/23/04)
  • Re: beginner question (04/22/04)
  • Re: Opinion) Overuse of symbolic constants (04/21/04)
  • Re: comma at end of initializer allowed? (04/20/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/19/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/18/04)
  • Re: easy CGI w/ C (04/18/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/17/04)
  • Re: integer overflow (04/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: nesting coments (04/17/04)
  • Re: FILE objects (04/16/04)
  • Re: rule for promotion (04/16/04)
  • Re: FAQ is so long! (04/16/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: nesting coments (04/15/04)
  • [OT] Re: malloc + 4?? (04/13/04)
  • Re: Help with scanf (04/12/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (04/11/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: nesting coments (04/11/04)
  • Re: fprintf() C variables into FORTRAN input file format ??? (04/11/04)
  • Re: *z++ and strings (04/10/04)
  • Re: File name macro (04/09/04)
  • Re: [Way OT] malloc + 4?? (04/09/04)
  • Re: Text location (04/08/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/08/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: main function address (04/08/04)
  • Pointer args to variadic fxns, was re: main function address (04/08/04)
  • Re: how to remove a character from a string (04/07/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/07/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (04/07/04)
  • Line-permutable, was re: Permutations of a String (04/07/04)
  • Re: odd/even bitwise and (04/07/04)
  • Re: pointer equality (04/07/04)
  • Re: justification check (04/06/04)
  • Re: justification check (04/06/04)
  • Re: French characters not recognised in C? (04/02/04)
  • Re: Help with scanf (04/02/04)
  • Re: Delimiting problems (04/01/04)
  • Re: Help with scanf (04/01/04)
  • Re: Challenging macro with default value (03/31/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (03/31/04)
• Artie Gold
  • Re: Linux c prog doesn't work on Sun Solaris Machine....? (04/26/04)
  • Re: multiline macro with embedded # (04/16/04)
• Arto Huusko
  • Re: What type of questions can be asked in an technical interview of C (04/05/04)
• aruna
  • Disadvantages of register storage class specifier (04/28/04)
  • static vs auto (04/28/04)
  • Volatile specifier (04/28/04)
  • Size of char on a 64 bit machine (04/28/04)
  • Sorting a list of integers in C (04/24/04)
  • Valid operations on pointers in C (04/23/04)
  • Initialization of integer pointers (04/23/04)
  • Size of Int on a machine (04/23/04)
• Arvind Doobary
  • Sony DRU-700A DVD+R Dual Layer (04/22/04)
• Ashutosh Iddya
  • Re: integer overflow (04/16/04)
  • integer overflow (04/16/04)
• ataraxia2500
  • how to allow only one instance? (04/09/04)
• August Derleth
  • Re: freeing allocated memory (04/30/04)
  • Re: Question on "if" statements... (04/27/04)
  • Re: ANSI C Challenge on readint (04/27/04)
  • Re: Ascii String to Intger (04/26/04)
  • Re: child pid (04/26/04)
  • Re: Large arrays: malloc or 'just declare'? (04/20/04)
  • Re: Large arrays: malloc or 'just declare'? (04/20/04)
  • Re: FAQ is so long! (04/20/04)
  • Re: FAT32 Disc Access (04/11/04)
  • Re: newbie question: how to compare char? (04/11/04)
  • [OT] Re: nesting coments (04/11/04)
  • Re: use delete to destroy primitive/object types but memory is not freed (04/08/04)
  • Re: OOP using C (04/07/04)
  • Re: odd/even bitwise and (04/07/04)
  • Re: Strange output problem (04/03/04)
  • Re: [OT] Quick question (04/01/04)
• Barry
  • strncpy() and null terminated strings (04/08/04)
• Barry Schwarz
  • Re: passing an array as argument (04/28/04)
  • Re: Need help reading macro-heavy code (04/25/04)
  • Re: String/Array Question (04/25/04)
  • Re: Sorting a list of integers in C (04/24/04)
  • Re: Error handling (04/23/04)
  • Re: memory allocation nightmare (04/23/04)
  • Re: Virtual Machines and structs (04/20/04)
  • Re: Interval calculation (04/20/04)
  • Re: programm stops (04/19/04)
  • Re: Interval calculation (04/18/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/18/04)
  • Re: String Reverse Question (04/18/04)
  • Re: String Reverse Question (04/18/04)
  • Re: Large number in C (04/17/04)
  • Re: pointers to struct members (04/17/04)
  • Re: reading file backwards and parsing (04/14/04)
  • Re: reading file backwards and parsing (04/13/04)
  • Re: what's the difference between the next 2 declarations? (04/13/04)
  • Re: Dynamically growing an array (pointer question) (04/13/04)
  • Re: fprintf() C variables into FORTRAN input file format ??? (04/11/04)
  • Re: Malloc, Structure Help (04/10/04)
  • Re: Work around of using 1D-LUT instead of 2D-LUT (04/10/04)
  • Re: simple problem (04/10/04)
  • Re: size_t range (04/10/04)
  • Re: Test a bit (04/10/04)
  • Re: odd/even bitwise and (04/09/04)
  • Re: what's the difference between the next 2 declarations? (04/09/04)
  • Re: Defined bahavior or otherwise? (04/08/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/08/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/08/04)
  • Re: copy a string into a 2d array of chars (04/08/04)
  • Re: pointer-in-array test (04/07/04)
  • Re: odd/even bitwise and (04/07/04)
  • Re: Writing a structure (04/07/04)
  • Re: newbie question seg fault printf (04/07/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (04/07/04)
  • Re: Does ANSI C have something like PATHMAX or MAX_PATH? (04/07/04)
  • Re: Question about a pointer to an array of structs (04/06/04)
  • Re: newbie question seg fault printf (04/06/04)
  • Re: structs help (04/05/04)
  • Re: structs help (04/04/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (04/03/04)
  • Re: Short circuiting.. (04/03/04)
  • Re: Pointer confusion with passing string array -- Segmentation fault (04/03/04)
  • Re: sizeof(str) or sizeof(str) - 1 ? (04/03/04)
  • Re: fgets and variants (04/03/04)
  • Re: Character Points/Structs/Input (04/03/04)
  • Re: File IO in C (04/03/04)
• Bart Oldeman
  • NO_EXT_KEYS and strict ISO/ANSI modes (04/30/04)
• bas
  • trouble reading from file (04/21/04)
  • trouble reading the text file (04/21/04)
• Basti
  • Re: programm stops (04/20/04)
  • Re: programm stops (04/19/04)
  • Re: programm stops (04/19/04)
  • programm stops (04/19/04)
• bd
  • Re: [OT] Spam in c.l.c.m (04/20/04)
• Beefheart
  • typedef struct _iobuf FILE; (04/30/04)
• Ben Measures
  • Re: [OT] "thx" (04/03/04)
• Ben Pfaff
  • Re: Size of char on a 64 bit machine (04/28/04)
  • Re: static vs auto (04/28/04)
  • Re: passing an array as argument (04/28/04)
  • Re: K&R reference. (04/28/04)
  • Re: qsort warning (04/27/04)
  • Re: qsort warning (04/27/04)
  • Re: qsort warning (04/27/04)
  • Re: Sorting a list of integers in C (04/27/04)
  • Re: Oracle acces from C (04/27/04)
  • Re: Linux c prog doesn't work on Sun Solaris Machine....? (04/26/04)
  • Re: beginner question (04/26/04)
  • Re: Ascii String to Intger (04/26/04)
  • Re: Rob Pike's simple Include rule (04/24/04)
  • Re: Rob Pike's simple Include rule (04/24/04)
  • Re: Sorting a list of integers in C (04/24/04)
  • Re: Efficient pseudo-random number generation (04/24/04)
  • Re: protect my char* from outside (04/24/04)
  • Re: typdef'ing from sig_atomic_t valid? (04/23/04)
  • Re: HELP ME -GCC COMPILER (04/22/04)
  • Re: Meaning for *p = +*q++ (04/22/04)
  • Re: GUI Programming with C? (04/22/04)
  • Re: What to do if you've made a new high performance data structure? (04/20/04)
  • Re: [OT] Spam in c.l.c.m (04/20/04)
  • Re: * and -> operator syntax (04/20/04)
  • Re: how to determine a file is ASCII or binary? (04/20/04)
  • Re: [OT] Spam in c.l.c.m (04/19/04)
  • Re: String Reverse Question (04/18/04)
  • Re: Linux Serial Programming (04/18/04)
  • Re: exit & return (04/18/04)
  • Re: Exponent question (04/17/04)
  • Re: String Reverse Question (04/17/04)
  • Re: multiline macro with embedded # (04/16/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/16/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/14/04)
  • Re: OT (04/14/04)
  • Re: max{f | f is a float and -f is a float and doesn't cause overflow} == ? (04/13/04)
  • Re: Diffrence between ++i and i++ (04/13/04)
  • Re: Diffrence between ++i and i++ (04/12/04)
  • Re: Malloc, Structure Help (04/10/04)
  • Re: Malloc, Structure Help (04/10/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: malloc + 4?? (04/10/04)
  • Re: Test a bit (04/10/04)
  • Re: standard reference manual (04/09/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: main function address (04/08/04)
  • Re: Text location (04/07/04)
  • Re: Permutations of a String (04/07/04)
  • Re: alternative to rand() (04/07/04)
  • Re: macros question (04/06/04)
  • Re: macros question (04/06/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/05/04)
  • Re: Does ANSI C have something like PATHMAX or MAX_PATH? (04/05/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/05/04)
  • Re: VCL TMemo find (04/05/04)
  • Re: macros question (04/05/04)
  • Re: how can i write C code that generate random number without using built in code (04/04/04)
  • Re: What is the value of relational expression (04/01/04)
• Bernard
  • Re: Implementing exceptions of C++ in C (04/17/04)
  • Implementing exceptions of C++ in C (04/17/04)
• Bernhard Holzmayer
  • Re: pointer-in-array test (04/08/04)
  • Re: pointer-in-array test (04/08/04)
  • Re: pointer-in-array test (04/08/04)
  • Re: pointer-in-array test (04/08/04)
  • Re: pointer-in-array test (04/08/04)
  • Re: pointer-in-array test (04/08/04)
  • Re: pointer-in-array test (04/08/04)
  • Re: pointer-in-array test (04/07/04)
  • Re: Global pointer pointing to locally defined type (04/07/04)
  • Re: Global pointer pointing to locally defined type (04/07/04)
  • Re: pointer-in-array test (04/07/04)
  • Re: Global pointer pointing to locally defined type (04/07/04)
  • Re: pointer-in-array test (04/07/04)
• berthelot samuel
  • Re: memory allocation nightmare (04/24/04)
  • Re: memory allocation nightmare (04/23/04)
  • Re: memory allocation nightmare (04/22/04)
  • Re: memory allocation nightmare (04/19/04)
  • memory allocation nightmare (04/18/04)
• Bill Cunningham
  • Re: main() (04/28/04)
  • Re: main() (04/28/04)
  • Re: main() (04/28/04)
  • Re: main() (04/28/04)
  • Re: main() (04/28/04)
  • Re: main() (04/27/04)
  • Re: main() (04/27/04)
  • Re: main() (04/27/04)
  • main() (04/27/04)
  • Re: C tokens (04/20/04)
  • C tokens (04/19/04)
  • Re: sscanf (04/18/04)
  • Re: sscanf (04/18/04)
  • Re: sscanf (04/18/04)
  • Re: FILE objects (04/18/04)
  • Re: FILE objects (04/16/04)
  • Re: FILE objects (04/16/04)
  • Re: FILE objects (04/16/04)
  • Re: FILE objects (04/16/04)
  • Re: FILE objects (04/16/04)
  • Re: FILE objects (04/16/04)
  • Re: Simple Parser (04/13/04)
  • Re: Parser (04/12/04)
  • Parser (04/12/04)
  • Re: Simple Parser (04/11/04)
  • Re: Simple Parser (04/11/04)
• Bill Seurer
  • Re: Headers/Libraries default locations (04/26/04)
• Bliss
  • Re: function sprintf (04/02/04)
  • Re: Strange output problem (04/02/04)
• Booted Cat
  • Re: Named argument view for IDE and more (04/25/04)
  • Named argument view for IDE and more (04/23/04)
• BQ
  • Re: Conditional Define (04/27/04)
  • Re: Conditional Define (04/26/04)
  • Re: Conditional Define (04/26/04)
  • Re: Conditional Define (04/26/04)
  • Re: Conditional Define (04/26/04)
  • Re: Conditional Define (04/26/04)
  • Re: Conditional Define (04/26/04)
  • Re: Conditional Define (04/26/04)
  • Re: Conditional Define (04/26/04)
  • Conditional Define (04/26/04)
• Bradley Bungmunch
  • Re: exit & return (04/20/04)
  • Re: exit & return (04/20/04)
  • Re: exit & return (04/20/04)
  • Re: exit & return (04/19/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (04/19/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (04/19/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (04/18/04)
  • Re: exit & return (04/17/04)
  • Re: My strcpy code (04/17/04)
  • Re: exit & return (04/17/04)
• Brent Lievers
  • Re: sscanf fixed-width integer question (04/23/04)
  • sscanf fixed-width integer question (04/22/04)
• Brian
  • Re: Does pc-lint catch this type of problem? (04/13/04)
  • Does pc-lint catch this type of problem? (04/12/04)
  • Re: how to remove a character from a string (04/10/04)
  • Using C for string search etc (04/08/04)
• Buster
  • Re: CX-Post: hello world [OT in comp.lang.c, followup set] (04/14/04)
• C++ Shark
  • Re: book for programming (04/24/04)
  • book for programming (04/22/04)
• Capstar
  • Re: opaque style question (04/16/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/16/04)
  • opaque style question (04/15/04)
• Carsten Hansen
  • Re: Efficient pseudo-random number generation (04/25/04)
• Case
  • Re: strange function syntax (04/29/04)
  • Re: strtol with hex greater than 4 byte ? (04/29/04)
  • Re: strtol with hex greater than 4 byte ? (04/29/04)
  • Re: static vs auto (04/29/04)
  • Re: KDE or GNOME? (04/29/04)
  • Re: Disadvantages of register storage class specifier (04/29/04)
  • Re: static vs auto (04/29/04)
  • Re: exceptions (04/29/04)
  • Re: KDE or GNOME? (04/28/04)
  • Re: JPEG HEADER (04/27/04)
  • Re: Ascii String to Intger (04/27/04)
  • Re: anyone out there knows how to use Microsoft Access (04/27/04)
  • Re: Conditional Define (04/27/04)
  • Re: A puzzle (04/26/04)
  • Re: Conditional Define (04/26/04)
  • Re: Conditional Define (04/26/04)
  • Re: Conditional Define (04/26/04)
• Case -
  • Re: strange function syntax (04/30/04)
  • Re: strange function syntax (04/30/04)
  • Re: static vs auto (04/29/04)
  • Re: static vs auto (04/29/04)
  • Re: Disadvantages of register storage class specifier (04/29/04)
  • Re: strange function syntax (04/29/04)
  • Re: strange function syntax (04/29/04)
  • Re: Help with #define (04/23/04)
• CBFalconer
  • Re: typedef struct _iobuf FILE; (04/30/04)
  • Re: [RFC] C token counter (04/30/04)
  • Re: interesting problem in turbo C++, involving fopen (04/30/04)
  • Re: [RFC] C token counter (04/30/04)
  • Re: Why is C good??? any experts? (04/30/04)
  • Re: Q=D0=B0=DD=A6p=A6=F3=A5=CEc=BBy=A8=A5=BCg=A4=40=B5=7B=A6=A1?= (04/30/04)
  • Re: string declaration(s) (04/29/04)
  • Re: Dynamic allocation of a triple indirection (04/29/04)
  • Re: Question on "if" statements... (04/29/04)
  • Re: A puzzle (04/29/04)
  • Re: Q=D0=B0=DD=A6p=A6=F3=A5=CEc=BBy=A8=A5=BCg=A4=40=B5=7B=A6=A1?= (04/29/04)
  • Re: Q=D0=B0=DD=A6p=A6=F3=A5=CEc=BBy=A8=A5=BCg=A4=40=B5=7B=A6=A1?= (04/29/04)
  • Re: Rob Pike's simple Include rule (04/29/04)
  • Re: Test-driven Development in C# (04/24/04)
  • Re: Printf (04/24/04)
  • Re: Arithmetic on function address (04/24/04)
  • Re: Rob Pike's simple Include rule (04/24/04)
  • Re: Valid operations on pointers in C (04/23/04)
  • Re: Initialization of integer pointers (04/23/04)
  • Re: Size of Int on a machine (04/23/04)
  • Re: Rob Pike's simple Include rule (04/23/04)
  • Re: Printf (04/23/04)
  • Re: memory allocation nightmare (04/23/04)
  • Re: Opinion) Overuse of symbolic constants (04/22/04)
  • Re: Which is faster? (04/21/04)
  • Re: HELP ME -GCC COMPILER (04/21/04)
  • Re: Interesting bug (04/21/04)
  • Re: Interesting bug (04/21/04)
  • Re: What to do if you've made a new high performance data structure? (04/20/04)
  • Re: OPTION TO OVERWRITE CONSTANT VARIABLE(STRING) IN C (VC++ IDE) (04/20/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/20/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/19/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/19/04)
  • Re: write a binary file? (04/19/04)
  • Re: Implementing exceptions of C++ in C (04/18/04)
  • Re: Linux Serial Programming (04/18/04)
  • Re: Exponent question (04/18/04)
  • Re: Exponent question (04/18/04)
  • Re: exit & return (04/18/04)
  • Re: Implementing exceptions of C++ in C (04/18/04)
  • Re: String Reverse Question (04/18/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/18/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/17/04)
  • Re: snprintf() for embedded (04/17/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/17/04)
  • Re: converting char array to integer (04/17/04)
  • Re: long long (04/17/04)
  • Re: Fast Division/Modulo Operation (04/16/04)
  • Re: FAQ is so long! (04/16/04)
  • Re: integer overflow (04/16/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/16/04)
  • Re: converting char array to integer (04/16/04)
  • Re: integer overflow (04/16/04)
  • Re: Fast Division/Modulo Operation (04/16/04)
  • Re: converting char array to integer (04/16/04)
  • Re: atof() failure case (04/16/04)
  • Re: Why not FILE instead of FILE*? (04/16/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/16/04)
  • Re: FILE objects (04/16/04)
  • Re: const structure & member pointers (04/16/04)
  • Re: struct my_struct *p = (struct my_struct *)malloc(sizeof(struct my_struct)); (04/16/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/16/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/16/04)
  • Re: double money (04/16/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/16/04)
  • Re: double money (04/15/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/15/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: malloc + 4?? (04/14/04)
  • Re: Incrementing a void pointer's member (04/14/04)
  • Re: RoSsIaCrIiLoIA is a troll (04/14/04)
  • Re: Strange global variable behavior (04/14/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: nesting coments (04/14/04)
  • Re: double money (04/14/04)
  • Re: system question (04/14/04)
  • Re: Hash table: some lines of code involving pointers (04/14/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/14/04)
  • Re: Simple Parser (04/14/04)
  • Re: size_t range (04/14/04)
  • Re: reading file backwards and parsing (04/14/04)
  • Re: Special ascii values (04/14/04)
  • Re: [OT] reading files from a directory (04/13/04)
  • Re: Special ascii values (04/13/04)
  • Re: casting from int to void* and back to int (04/13/04)
  • Re: casting from int to void* and back to int (04/13/04)
  • Re: problem sending code via rs232 (04/12/04)
  • Re: How can I use strtok for tokenize integers (04/12/04)
  • Re: Time (04/11/04)
  • Re: sizeof(str) or sizeof(str) - 1 ? (04/10/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: malloc + 4?? (04/10/04)
  • Re: structure containing incomplete array type (04/10/04)
  • Re: File name macro (04/10/04)
  • Re: File name macro (04/10/04)
  • Re: [Way OT] malloc + 4?? (04/09/04)
  • Re: how to allow only one instance? (04/09/04)
  • Re: how to allow only one instance? (04/09/04)
  • Re: nesting coments (04/09/04)
  • Re: [Way OT] malloc + 4?? (04/09/04)
  • Re: Special ascii values (04/09/04)
  • Re: Special ascii values (04/09/04)
  • Re: [Way OT] malloc + 4?? (04/09/04)
  • Re: nesting coments (04/09/04)
  • Re: Conflicting Libraries (04/08/04)
  • Re: use delete to destroy primitive/object types but memory is not freed (04/08/04)
  • Re: how to remove a character from a string (04/08/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/08/04)
  • Re: assembler in c ? (04/08/04)
  • Re: how to remove a character from a string (04/08/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/08/04)
  • Re: what's the difference between the next 2 declarations? (04/08/04)
  • Re: Global pointer pointing to locally defined type (04/08/04)
  • Re: OOP using C (04/08/04)
  • Re: help signed and unsigned in 64bits (04/08/04)
  • Re: [OT] trace of memory access (04/08/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/08/04)
  • Re: pointer-in-array test (04/07/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/07/04)
  • Re: what's the difference between the next 2 declarations? (04/07/04)
  • Re: Does ANSI C have something like PATHMAX or MAX_PATH? (04/07/04)
  • Re: pointer-in-array test (04/07/04)
  • Re: help signed and unsigned in 64bits (04/07/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (04/07/04)
  • Re: trace of memory access (04/06/04)
  • Re: Permutations of a String (04/06/04)
  • Re: justification check (04/06/04)
  • Re: Does ANSI C have something like PATHMAX or MAX_PATH? (04/06/04)
  • Re: odd/even bitwise and (04/06/04)
  • Re: macros question (04/06/04)
  • Re: What does the standard say? (04/05/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/05/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/05/04)
  • Re: pointer-to-pointer (invalid lvalue in unary `&) (04/05/04)
  • Re: External object definition and linkage (04/05/04)
  • Re: What does the standard say? (04/05/04)
  • Re: Function definition nesting (04/05/04)
  • Re: What type of questions can be asked in an technical interview of C (04/05/04)
  • Re: how to write a macro that calculate sizeof data types (04/05/04)
  • Re: how can i write C code that generate random number without using built in code (04/05/04)
  • Re: what is call by name & how it is done (04/05/04)
  • Re: how to create a dropdownlist in C using C graphics (04/04/04)
  • Re: Problem with malloc (04/04/04)
  • Re: Problem with malloc (04/04/04)
  • Re: Problem with malloc (04/04/04)
  • Re: BRILLLLIANT ARTICLE BY DR THOMAS FRIEDMAN OF NYTIMES (04/04/04)
  • Re: static function? (04/04/04)
  • Re: What type of questions can be asked in an technical interviewof C (04/03/04)
  • Re: What type of questions can be asked in an technical interview of C (04/03/04)
  • Re: What type of questions can be asked in an technical interview of C (04/03/04)
  • Re: External object definition and linkage (04/03/04)
  • Re: External object definition and linkage (04/03/04)
  • Re: int array to string? (04/02/04)
  • Re: long integer (04/02/04)
• Cedric
  • Re: Accessing memory (04/01/04)
• Charles Richmond
  • Re: Best way to learn C for a Teenager (04/18/04)
• Cherrish Vaidiyan
  • What type of questions can be asked in an technical interview of C (04/03/04)
• Chester
  • snprintf() for embedded (04/17/04)
• Chris Cranford
  • Re: Virtual Machines and structs (04/20/04)
  • Virtual Machines and structs (04/19/04)
• Chris Dollin
  • Re: Question on "if" statements... (04/27/04)
  • Re: Question on "if" statements... (04/26/04)
  • Re: Question on "if" statements... (04/26/04)
  • Re: Question on "if" statements... (04/26/04)
  • Re: comma at end of initializer allowed? (04/22/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (04/08/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (04/07/04)
  • Re: A quick if question (04/06/04)
• Chris Dutton
  • Re: Why is C good??? any experts? (04/30/04)
• Chris Fogelklou
  • Re: char*& and char* ??? (04/20/04)
  • Re: struct my_struct *p = (struct my_struct *)malloc(sizeof(struct my_struct)); (04/20/04)
  • Re: pointer-to-pointer (invalid lvalue in unary `&) (04/05/04)
  • Re: Problem with malloc (04/04/04)
  • Re: pointer-to-pointer (invalid lvalue in unary `&) (04/04/04)
  • Re: Problem with malloc (04/04/04)
  • Re: Problem with malloc (04/04/04)
  • Re: Problem with malloc (04/04/04)
  • Re: Problem with malloc (04/04/04)
  • Re: Problem with malloc (04/04/04)
  • Re: Problem with malloc (04/04/04)
  • Re: pointer-to-pointer (invalid lvalue in unary `&) (04/04/04)
  • Re: structs help (04/04/04)
• Chris Hauxwell
  • Re: const structs in other structs (04/27/04)
  • const structs in other structs (04/23/04)
• Chris McDonald
  • Re: A puzzle (04/26/04)
  • Re: A puzzle (04/26/04)
  • Re: size of long (04/25/04)
  • Re: Sorting a list of integers in C (04/24/04)
• Chris Sonnack
  • Re: [OT] Commodore 64 BASIC v2, again (was: Interesting bug) (04/22/04)
  • Re: Interesting bug (04/22/04)
• Chris Torek
  • Re: malloc question - what happens when chunk gets free? (04/27/04)
  • Re: union in struct without union name (04/26/04)
  • Re: Printf (04/25/04)
  • Re: Initialization of integer pointers (04/24/04)
  • Re: Named argument view for IDE and more (04/24/04)
  • Re: trouble reading from file (04/22/04)
  • Re: * and -> operator syntax (04/21/04)
  • Re: Interesting bug (04/20/04)
  • Re: comma at end of initializer allowed? (04/20/04)
  • Re: assigning bit-field structure (04/20/04)
  • Re: memory allocation nightmare (04/18/04)
  • Re: Linux Serial Programming (04/18/04)
  • Re: Implementing exceptions of C++ in C (04/17/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/17/04)
  • Re: struct my_struct *p = (struct my_struct *)malloc(sizeof(struct my_struct)); (04/16/04)
  • Re: const structure & member pointers (04/15/04)
  • Re: problem sending code via rs232 (04/12/04)
  • Re: Review of my answer (04/11/04)
  • Re: Restricted pointer parameters in printf() (04/10/04)
  • Re: Off Topic: use delete to destroy primitive/object types but memory is not freed (04/10/04)
  • Re: rvalue (04/10/04)
  • Re: double money (04/10/04)
  • Re: use delete to destroy primitive/object types but memory is not freed (04/08/04)
  • Re: pointer-in-array test (04/08/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/08/04)
  • Re: how to remove a character from a string (04/08/04)
  • Re: Pointer args to variadic fxns, was re: main function address (04/08/04)
  • Re: odd/even bitwise and (04/06/04)
  • Re: Question about a pointer to an array of structs (04/06/04)
  • Re: what is call by name & how it is done (04/04/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/04/04)
  • Re: Problem with malloc (04/04/04)
  • Re: structs help (04/04/04)
  • Re: function sprintf (04/02/04)
• Christian Bau
  • Re: Disadvantages of register storage class specifier (04/28/04)
  • Re: Disadvantages of register storage class specifier (04/28/04)
  • Re: Equal to operand (04/28/04)
  • Re: Integers larger than 64bit - Arithmetic (04/25/04)
  • Re: Interesting bug (04/25/04)
  • Re: Rob Pike's simple Include rule (04/24/04)
  • Re: Efficient pseudo-random number generation (04/24/04)
  • Re: Rob Pike's simple Include rule (04/24/04)
  • Re: Rob Pike's simple Include rule (04/24/04)
  • Re: Valid operations on pointers in C (04/24/04)
  • Re: Opinion) Overuse of symbolic constants (04/23/04)
  • Re: strange case of void main (04/23/04)
  • Re: Which is faster? (04/22/04)
  • Re: Meaning for *p = +*q++ (04/22/04)
  • Re: Interesting bug (04/21/04)
  • Re: Interesting bug (04/21/04)
  • Re: OPTION TO OVERWRITE CONSTANT VARIABLE(STRING) IN C (VC++ IDE) (04/20/04)
  • Re: OPTION TO OVERWRITE CONSTANT VARIABLE(STRING) IN C (VC++ IDE) (04/20/04)
  • Re: converting char array to integer (04/17/04)
  • Re: struct my_struct *p = (struct my_struct *)malloc(sizeof(struct my_struct)); (04/16/04)
  • Re: char*& and char* ??? (04/15/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/14/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/14/04)
  • Re: size_t range (04/14/04)
  • Re: size_t range (04/14/04)
  • Re: Diffrence between ++i and i++ (04/13/04)
  • Re: pointer-in-array test (04/08/04)
  • Re: pointer-in-array test (04/08/04)
  • Re: pointer-in-array test (04/08/04)
  • Re: Defined bahavior or otherwise? (04/08/04)
  • Re: pointer-in-array test (04/07/04)
  • Re: pointer equality (04/07/04)
  • Re: pointer equality (04/07/04)
  • Re: pointer equality (04/06/04)
  • Re: What type of questions can be asked in an technical interview of C (04/05/04)
  • Re: What type of questions can be asked in an technical interview of C (04/05/04)
  • Re: pointers to function problem (04/05/04)
  • Re: What type of questions can be asked in an technical interview of C (04/05/04)
  • Re: What type of questions can be asked in an technical interview of C (04/05/04)
  • Re: What type of questions can be asked in an technical interview of C (04/04/04)
  • Re: What type of questions can be asked in an technical interview of C (04/04/04)
  • Re: sizeof(str) or sizeof(str) - 1 ? (04/04/04)
  • Re: sizeof(str) or sizeof(str) - 1 ? (04/04/04)
• Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: simple conversion from C to C++ (04/30/04)
  • Re: register variable (04/30/04)
  • Re: is this an signal handler or a alarm ? (04/30/04)
  • Re: freeing allocated memory (04/28/04)
  • Re: Disadvantages of register storage class specifier (04/28/04)
  • Re: freeing allocated memory (04/28/04)
  • Re: static vs auto (04/28/04)
  • Re: Volatile specifier (04/28/04)
  • Re: static vs auto (04/28/04)
  • Re: Equal to operand (04/28/04)
  • Re: Speed up you typing speed more than 100 wpm (04/28/04)
  • Re: help with newbie code (04/28/04)
  • Re: main() (04/27/04)
  • Re: ANSI C Challenge on readint (04/27/04)
  • Re: Named argument view for IDE and more (04/23/04)
  • Re: strange behavior (04/23/04)
  • Re: GCC inline assembly (04/23/04)
  • Re: book for programming (04/22/04)
  • Re: Problem with getsubopt on AIX (04/22/04)
  • Re: Printf (04/22/04)
  • Re: Which is faster? (04/21/04)
  • Re: Which is faster? (04/21/04)
  • Re: TransferSpreadsheet - how to call this function (04/21/04)
  • Re: Which is faster? (04/21/04)
  • Re: HELP ME -GCC COMPILER (04/21/04)
  • Re: Opinion) Overuse of symbolic constants (04/21/04)
  • Re: Interesting bug (04/21/04)
  • Re: write a binary file? (04/20/04)
  • Re: String Reverse Question (04/20/04)
  • Re: write a binary file? (04/20/04)
  • Re: exit & return (04/20/04)
  • Re: * and -> operator syntax (04/20/04)
  • Re: Large arrays: malloc or 'just declare'? (04/20/04)
  • Re: pointers to struct members (04/19/04)
  • Re: assigning bit-field structure (04/19/04)
  • Re: * and -> operator syntax (04/19/04)
  • Re: * and -> operator syntax (04/19/04)
  • Re: String Reverse Question (04/19/04)
  • Re: OPTION TO OVERWRITE CONSTANT VARIABLE(STRING) IN C (VC++ IDE) (04/19/04)
  • Re: programm stops (04/19/04)
  • Re: programm stops (04/19/04)
  • Re: programm stops (04/19/04)
  • Re: Calling 'foo.c' or 'foo2.c' from my 'main_code.c' (04/19/04)
  • Re: String Reverse Question (04/19/04)
  • Re: msgsnd problem (04/19/04)
  • Re: programm stops (04/19/04)
  • Re: exit & return (04/18/04)
  • Re: msgsnd problem (04/18/04)
  • Re: String Reverse Question (04/17/04)
  • Re: String Reverse Question (04/17/04)
  • Re: FAQ is so long! (04/16/04)
  • Re: Critical Sections (04/16/04)
  • Re: FAQ is so long! (04/16/04)
  • Re: FILE objects (04/16/04)
  • Re: Incrementing a void pointer's member (04/14/04)
  • Re: OT (04/14/04)
  • Re: Strange global variable behavior (04/14/04)
  • Re: writing 6 items in one line. (04/14/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (04/13/04)
  • Re: encoding / decoding questions (04/12/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (04/12/04)
  • Re: Access to process memory from external programm (04/12/04)
  • Re: ##-concatenation (04/12/04)
  • Re: How can I use strtok for tokenize integers (04/12/04)
  • Re: How can I use strtok for tokenize integers (04/12/04)
  • Re: FAT32 Disc Access (04/12/04)
  • Re: File name macro (04/09/04)
  • Re: File name macro (04/09/04)
  • Re: linking executables (04/09/04)
  • Re: rvalue (04/09/04)
  • Re: about c (04/09/04)
  • Re: Conflicting Libraries (04/08/04)
  • Re: Defined bahavior or otherwise? (04/08/04)
  • Re: Using C for string search etc (04/08/04)
  • Re: how to remove a character from a string (04/07/04)
  • Re: use delete to destroy primitive/object types but memory is not freed (04/07/04)
  • Re: function sprintf (04/06/04)
  • Re: trace of memory access (04/06/04)
  • Re: Strange output problem (04/06/04)
  • Re: ftruncate() on MVS datasets. (04/06/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (04/05/04)
  • Re: macros question (04/05/04)
  • Re: Child process does not exit after receiving SIGTERM (04/05/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (04/05/04)
  • Re: what's the difference between the next 2 declarations? (04/05/04)
  • Re: How can I write my question in the message itself and not its title? (04/05/04)
  • Re: Review of my answer (04/05/04)
  • Re: binary threaded trees (04/02/04)
  • Re: Strange output problem (04/02/04)
• Claudio Puviani
  • Re: "Ravenscar-like" profile for C/C++ (04/25/04)
• code_wrong
  • Re: how to remove a character from a string (04/08/04)
  • Re: What type of questions can be asked in an technical interview of C (04/03/04)
• Colin Kern
  • Avoiding redundant functions (04/10/04)
• Colin MacDougall
  • Type casting- a larger type to a smaller type (04/01/04)
• cturtle
  • Re: Troll Alert: Comeau C99 Compiler more reliable than the standards (04/06/04)
• Curley Q.
  • Re: freeing allocated memory (04/28/04)
  • Re: freeing allocated memory (04/28/04)
  • freeing allocated memory (04/28/04)
• cylin
  • Re: write a binary file? (Can't low-level I/O functions do this case?) (04/19/04)
  • write a binary file? (04/19/04)
• dam_fool_2003_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: pointers going wild? (04/01/04)
  • Re: Counting total space,tab,new line in a string. (04/01/04)
• Dan Henry
  • Re: C Static program analyzer (04/28/04)
• Dan Pop
  • Re: strtol with hex greater than 4 byte ? && via & and || via | ? (04/29/04)
  • Re: strtol with hex greater than 4 byte ? (04/29/04)
  • Re: strange function syntax (04/29/04)
  • Re: Opinion) Overuse of symbolic constants (04/29/04)
  • Re: strange function syntax (04/29/04)
  • Re: Rob Pike's simple Include rule (04/29/04)
  • Re: Valid operations on pointers in C (04/29/04)
  • Re: strtol with hex greater than 4 byte ? (04/29/04)
  • Re: static vs auto (04/29/04)
  • Re: static vs auto (04/29/04)
  • Re: Disadvantages of register storage class specifier (04/29/04)
  • Re: typdef'ing from sig_atomic_t valid? (04/29/04)
  • Re: static vs auto (04/29/04)
  • Re: Size of char on a 64 bit machine (04/29/04)
  • Re: passing an array as argument (04/29/04)
  • Re: passing an array as argument (04/29/04)
  • Re: Disadvantages of register storage class specifier (04/29/04)
  • Re: Valid operations on pointers in C (04/28/04)
  • Re: passing an array as argument (04/28/04)
  • Re: string declaration(s) (04/28/04)
  • Re: main() (04/28/04)
  • Re: Arithmetic on function address (04/28/04)
  • Re: typdef'ing from sig_atomic_t valid? (04/27/04)
  • Re: typdef'ing from sig_atomic_t valid? (04/27/04)
  • Re: Opinion) Overuse of symbolic constants (04/27/04)
  • Re: Interesting bug (04/27/04)
  • Re: char s[500000]; (04/27/04)
  • Re: Arithmetic on function address (04/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] Commodore 64, yet again (was: Interesting bug) (04/26/04)
  • Re: typdef'ing from sig_atomic_t valid? (04/26/04)
  • Re: Test-driven Development in C# (04/26/04)
  • Re: sscanf fixed-width integer question (04/26/04)
  • Re: Opinion) Overuse of symbolic constants (04/26/04)
  • Re: K&R reference. (04/26/04)
  • Re: Interesting bug (04/26/04)
  • Re: Integers larger than 64bit - Arithmetic (04/26/04)
  • Re: Headers/Libraries default locations (04/26/04)
  • Re: GCC inline assembly (04/26/04)
  • Re: Conditional Define (04/26/04)
  • Re: Bus Model (04/26/04)
  • Re: Arithmetic on function address (04/26/04)
  • Re: Interesting bug (04/23/04)
  • Re: [OT] Commodore 64 BASIC v2, again (was: Interesting bug) (04/23/04)
  • Re: Valid operations on pointers in C (04/23/04)
  • Re: typdef'ing from sig_atomic_t valid? (04/23/04)
  • Re: strange case of void main (04/23/04)
  • Re: sscanf fixed-width integer question (04/23/04)
  • Re: Rob Pike's simple Include rule (04/23/04)
  • Re: Size of Int on a machine (04/23/04)
  • Re: programm stops (04/23/04)
  • Re: Opinion) Overuse of symbolic constants (04/23/04)
  • Re: Opinion) Overuse of symbolic constants (04/23/04)
  • Re: Opinion) Overuse of symbolic constants (04/23/04)
  • Re: Opinion) Overuse of symbolic constants (04/23/04)
  • Re: K&R reference. (04/23/04)
  • Re: Is this Ok? (?:) (04/23/04)
  • Re: Interesting bug (04/23/04)
  • Re: Help with #define (04/23/04)
  • Re: book for programming (04/22/04)
  • Re: sscanf fixed-width integer question (04/22/04)
  • Re: how to determine a file is ASCII or binary? (04/22/04)
  • Re: typdef'ing from sig_atomic_t valid? (04/22/04)
  • Re: Printf (04/22/04)
  • Re: [OT] Commodore 64 BASIC (was: Interesting bug) (04/22/04)
  • Re: time function not defined? (04/22/04)
  • Re: Sony DRU-700A DVD+R Dual Layer (04/22/04)
  • Re: programm stops (04/22/04)
  • Re: Opinion) Overuse of symbolic constants (04/22/04)
  • Re: Interesting bug (04/22/04)
  • Re: HELP ME -GCC COMPILER (04/22/04)
  • Re: GUI Programming with C? (04/22/04)
  • Re: declaring errno (04/22/04)
  • Re: Which is faster? (04/21/04)
  • Re: Interesting bug (04/21/04)
  • Re: write a binary file? (04/21/04)
  • Re: Which is faster? (04/21/04)
  • Re: programm stops (04/21/04)
  • Re: Which is faster? (04/21/04)
  • Re: HELP ME -GCC COMPILER (04/21/04)
  • Re: C tokens (04/21/04)
  • Re: Opinion) Overuse of symbolic constants (04/21/04)
  • Re: Interesting bug (04/21/04)
  • Re: check if char* is a ptr to mem or nirvana (04/21/04)
  • Re: Dynamic Arrays (04/21/04)
  • Re: comma at end of initializer allowed? (04/21/04)
  • Re: assigning bit-field structure (04/20/04)
  • Re: comma at end of initializer allowed? (04/20/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/20/04)
  • Re: integer overflow (04/20/04)
  • Re: comma at end of initializer allowed? (04/20/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/20/04)
  • Re: integer overflow (04/20/04)
  • Re: how to determine a file is ASCII or binary? (04/20/04)
  • Re: [OT] Spam in c.l.c.m (04/19/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: nesting coments (04/19/04)
  • Re: write a binary file? (Can't low-level I/O functions do this case?) (04/19/04)
  • Re: write a binary file? (04/19/04)
  • Re: Why not FILE instead of FILE*? (04/19/04)
  • Re: Why not FILE instead of FILE*? (04/19/04)
  • Re: time_t in seconds (04/19/04)
  • Re: Some C/C++ books (04/19/04)
  • Re: OPTION TO OVERWRITE CONSTANT VARIABLE(STRING) IN C (VC++ IDE) (04/19/04)
  • Re: OPTION TO OVERWRITE CONSTANT VARIABLE(STRING) IN C (VC++ IDE) (04/19/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/19/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/19/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/19/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/19/04)
  • Re: integer overflow (04/19/04)
  • Re: integer overflow (04/19/04)
  • Re: integer overflow (04/19/04)
  • Re: how to determine a file is ASCII or binary? (04/19/04)
  • Re: FILE objects (04/19/04)
  • Re: standard reference manual (04/19/04)
  • Re: integer overflow (04/16/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: nesting coments (04/16/04)
  • Re: Why not FILE instead of FILE*? (04/16/04)
  • Re: sscanf (04/16/04)
  • Re: integer overflow (04/16/04)
  • Re: how to determine a file is ASCII or binary? (04/16/04)
  • Re: FAQ is so long! (04/16/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: nesting coments (04/16/04)
  • Re: sscanf (04/16/04)
  • Re: prob w/the C prog. lang. book(ANSI C) (04/16/04)
  • Re: opaque style question (04/16/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/16/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/16/04)
  • Re: i don't want the dos wondow be closed (04/16/04)
  • Re: FILE objects (04/16/04)
  • Re: FILE objects (04/16/04)
  • Re: FILE objects (04/16/04)
  • Re: FAQ is so long! (04/16/04)
  • Re: FAQ is so long! (04/16/04)
  • Re: atof() failure case (04/16/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: malloc + 4?? (04/15/04)
  • Re: prob w/the C prog. lang. book(ANSI C) (04/15/04)
  • Re: prob w/the C prog. lang. book(ANSI C) (04/15/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/15/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/15/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/15/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/15/04)
  • Re: Incrementing a void pointer's member (04/15/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/15/04)
  • Re: Conflicting Libraries (04/15/04)
  • Re: char*& and char* ??? (04/15/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: nesting coments (04/14/04)
  • Re: OT (04/14/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/14/04)
  • Re: double money (04/14/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: malloc + 4?? (04/14/04)
  • Re: Strange global variable behavior (04/14/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/14/04)
  • Re: Global Static Variables (04/14/04)
  • Re: a self-checking program in standard C (04/14/04)
  • Re: system question (04/14/04)
  • Re: how to determine a file is ASCII or binary? (04/14/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: nesting coments (04/14/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/14/04)
  • Re: writing 6 items in one line. (04/14/04)
  • Re: Strange global variable behavior (04/14/04)
  • Re: size_t range (04/14/04)
  • Re: safety and C (04/14/04)
  • Re: nesting coments (04/14/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/14/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/14/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/14/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/14/04)
  • Re: File name macro (04/14/04)
  • Re: CX-Post: hello world (04/14/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: malloc + 4?? (04/13/04)
  • Re: Special ascii values (04/13/04)
  • Re: size_t range (04/13/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (04/13/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/13/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/13/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/13/04)
  • Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types? (04/13/04)
  • Re: how to determine a file is ASCII or binary? (04/13/04)
  • Re: how to determine a file is ASCII or binary? (04/13/04)
  • Re: how to allow only one instance? (04/13/04)
  • Re: Help with scanf (04/13/04)
  • Re: fprintf() C variables into FORTRAN input file format ??? (04/13/04)
  • Re: File name macro (04/13/04)
  • Re: File name macro (04/13/04)
  • Re: double money (04/13/04)
  • Re: Does ANSI C have something like PATHMAX or MAX_PATH? (04/13/04)
  • Re: current address (04/13/04)
  • Re: current address (04/13/04)
  • Re: Conflicting Libraries (04/13/04)
  • Re: standard reference manual (04/13/04)
  • Re: double money (04/08/04)
  • Re: Text location (04/08/04)
  • Re: Does ANSI C have something like PATHMAX or MAX_PATH? (04/08/04)
  • Re: Text location (04/08/04)
  • Re: Special ascii values (04/08/04)
  • Re: Special ascii values (04/08/04)
  • Re: Defined bahavior or otherwise? (04/08/04)
  • Re: Conflicting Libraries (04/08/04)
  • Re: Text location (04/08/04)
  • Re: strncpy() and null terminated strings (04/08/04)
  • Re: Pointer args to variadic fxns, was re: main function address (04/08/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/08/04)
  • Re: [OT] trace of memory access (04/08/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: main function address (04/08/04)
  • Re: what's the difference between the next 2 declarations? (04/08/04)
  • Re: Using C for string search etc (04/08/04)
  • Re: OOP using C (04/08/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/08/04)
  • Re: Text location (04/08/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/08/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/08/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/08/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/08/04)
  • Re: help signed and unsigned in 64bits (04/08/04)
  • Re: Does ANSI C have something like PATHMAX or MAX_PATH? (04/08/04)
  • Re: alternative to rand() (04/08/04)
  • Re: Text location (04/07/04)
  • Re: alternative to rand() (04/07/04)
  • Re: what's the difference between the next 2 declarations? (04/07/04)
  • Re: utility to intentionally mangle function names? (04/07/04)
  • Re: trace of memory access (04/07/04)
  • Re: trace of memory access (04/07/04)
  • Re: Outputting text to a file (04/07/04)
  • [OT] Re: malloc + 4?? (04/07/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/07/04)
  • Re: Does ANSI C have something like PATHMAX or MAX_PATH? (04/07/04)
  • Re: alternative to rand() (04/07/04)
  • Re: Writing a structure (04/07/04)
  • Re: what's the difference between the next 2 declarations? (04/07/04)
  • Re: what's the difference between the next 2 declarations? (04/07/04)
  • Re: pointer equality (04/07/04)
  • Re: OOP using C (04/07/04)
  • Re: OOP using C (04/07/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/07/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/07/04)
  • Re: main function address (04/07/04)
  • Re: macro for sizeof (04/07/04)
  • Re: macros question (04/07/04)
  • Re: help signed and unsigned in 64bits (04/07/04)
  • Re: Global pointer pointing to locally defined type (04/07/04)
  • Re: Does ANSI C have something like PATHMAX or MAX_PATH? (04/07/04)
  • Re: alternative to rand() (04/07/04)
  • Re: Writing a structure (04/06/04)
  • Re: Strange output problem (04/06/04)
  • Re: Writing a structure (04/06/04)
  • Re: what's the difference between the next 2 declarations? (04/06/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (04/06/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/06/04)
  • Re: K&R (04/06/04)
  • Re: Segmentation Fault (04/05/04)
  • Re: malloc + 4?? (04/05/04)
  • Re: what's the difference between the next 2 declarations? (04/05/04)
  • R