Re: if(a);
From: Martin Johansen (martinfj_at_is.online.no)
Date: 05/11/04
- Next message: Materialised: "Re: Another Understanding Pointers Question"
- Previous message: Joe Wright: "Re: Another Understanding Pointers Question"
- In reply to: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: if(a);"
- Next in thread: Ben Pfaff: "Re: if(a);"
- Reply: Ben Pfaff: "Re: if(a);"
- Reply: James Kuyper: "Re: if(a);"
- Reply: James Kanze: "Re: if(a);"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 02:57:39 +0200
> For the OP's benefit: The correct term for something that "acts
> like a cast" without the explicit "(sometype)" is an "implicit
> conversion."
Ok i see and accept, but just for the record, why not call it a cast? It was
implied that it was an implicit action.
- Next message: Materialised: "Re: Another Understanding Pointers Question"
- Previous message: Joe Wright: "Re: Another Understanding Pointers Question"
- In reply to: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: if(a);"
- Next in thread: Ben Pfaff: "Re: if(a);"
- Reply: Ben Pfaff: "Re: if(a);"
- Reply: James Kuyper: "Re: if(a);"
- Reply: James Kanze: "Re: if(a);"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]