Re: who owns C
From: Keith Thompson (kst-u_at_mib.org)
Date: 06/17/04
- Next message: Keith Thompson: "Re: memset all bits to zero will let float/double to zero?"
- Previous message: Keith Thompson: "Re: who owns C"
- In reply to: Dan Pop: "Re: who owns C"
- Next in thread: Dan Pop: "Re: who owns C"
- Reply: Dan Pop: "Re: who owns C"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 23:41:57 GMT
Dan.Pop@cern.ch (Dan Pop) writes:
> In <Xns950A4C8346B8Chsnoservernet@212.27.42.66> Emmanuel Delahaye
> <emdelYOURBRA@noos.fr> writes:
[...]
> >There is no more "ANSI C".
>
> Huh?!? What happened to the C89 specification? Was it renamed in the
> meantime?
I thought ANSI officially adopted the ISO C90 specification when it
came out -- and also officially adopted the C99 specification as an
ANSI standard.
I don't know whether this makes it incorrect refer to C89 as "ANSI C".
-- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst> San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst> We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.
- Next message: Keith Thompson: "Re: memset all bits to zero will let float/double to zero?"
- Previous message: Keith Thompson: "Re: who owns C"
- In reply to: Dan Pop: "Re: who owns C"
- Next in thread: Dan Pop: "Re: who owns C"
- Reply: Dan Pop: "Re: who owns C"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]