Re: Cursor libraries

From: Thomas Dickey (dickey_at_saltmine.radix.net)
Date: 07/09/04 

Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 21:49:05 -0000

Dan Pop <Dan.Pop@cern.ch> wrote:
> You're missing my point which was that, for portable code, you have to
> rely on the original BSD specification. Which means that you cannot
> support function keys. It's the age old trade off between functionality
> and portability.

or else use a portable library.

It's been easily 5 years since anyone but me has built lynx with BSD curses. 

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net