Re: <OT> gcc -Wall
From: Ben Pfaff (blp_at_cs.stanford.edu)
Date: 07/13/04
- Next message: Irrwahn Grausewitz: "Re: Swapping Bull***"
- Previous message: Ravi Uday: "<OT> gcc -Wall"
- In reply to: Ravi Uday: "<OT> gcc -Wall"
- Next in thread: Dan Pop: "Re: <OT> gcc -Wall"
- Reply: Dan Pop: "Re: <OT> gcc -Wall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 21:16:31 -0700
raviuday@gmail.com (Ravi Uday) writes:
> -Wall
> All of the `-W' options combined. These are all
> the options which pertain to usage that we recommend
> avoiding and that we believe is easy to avoid, even in
> conjunction with macros.
>
> Can anyone help me why does the author recommend to avoid this option(s),
> whereas in this group most of clc members recommend to do so before actually
> posting the code.
Where does the text recommend avoiding this option? It says that
you should avoid the usages that -Wall warns against, not that
you should avoid -Wall.
Followups set.
-- "The lusers I know are so clueless, that if they were dipped in clue musk and dropped in the middle of pack of horny clues, on clue prom night during clue happy hour, they still couldn't get a clue." --Michael Girdwood, in the monastery
- Next message: Irrwahn Grausewitz: "Re: Swapping Bull***"
- Previous message: Ravi Uday: "<OT> gcc -Wall"
- In reply to: Ravi Uday: "<OT> gcc -Wall"
- Next in thread: Dan Pop: "Re: <OT> gcc -Wall"
- Reply: Dan Pop: "Re: <OT> gcc -Wall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]