Re: buffering of stdio streams
From: Alan Balmer (albalmer_at_att.net)
Date: 08/10/04
- Next message: Nick Patavalis: "Re: Explications for malloc ang some questions about pointers"
- Previous message: Alan Balmer: "Re: [OT] What mean ALPHA and BETA version?"
- In reply to: Emmanuel Delahaye: "Re: buffering of stdio streams"
- Next in thread: CBFalconer: "Re: buffering of stdio streams"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:47:53 -0700
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:10:33 +0200, Emmanuel Delahaye
<emdel@YOURBRAnoos.fr> wrote:
>Tak-Shing Chan wrote on 10/08/04 :
>
>> 2002-2002: 5,930 in about 485,000 (approx 1.2%)
>> 2004-2004: 3,550 in about 90,800 (approx 3.9%)
>
>These figures seems to be nuts.
And this one even more so:
>> 2003-2003: 4,860 in about 9,880 (approx 49%)
-- Al Balmer Balmer Consulting removebalmerconsultingthis@att.net
- Next message: Nick Patavalis: "Re: Explications for malloc ang some questions about pointers"
- Previous message: Alan Balmer: "Re: [OT] What mean ALPHA and BETA version?"
- In reply to: Emmanuel Delahaye: "Re: buffering of stdio streams"
- Next in thread: CBFalconer: "Re: buffering of stdio streams"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]