Re: C 99 compiler access
From: Alan Balmer (albalmer_at_att.net)
Date: 08/30/04
- Next message: Dan Pop: "Re: int array"
- Previous message: Minti: "Re: Small C "Puzzle""
- In reply to: CBFalconer: "Re: C 99 compiler access"
- Next in thread: Mabden: "Re: C 99 compiler access"
- Reply: Mabden: "Re: C 99 compiler access"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:40:19 -0700
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:44:31 GMT, CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>Richard Tobin wrote:
>> E. Robert Tisdale <E.Robert.Tisdale@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>
>>> I have access to a wide variety of different platforms here at
>>> JPL and they all have pretty good C 99 compilers.
>>
>> If JPL pays me to write some C code for them, I'll bear it in
>> mind.
I doubt that there's much danger of that happening. Although I've
never figured out what it is they do pay him for.
>
>Considering the normal accuracy of his comments, I have grave
>doubts. You will note he fails to specify the compilers involved,
>which makes this just another Trollsdale troll.
-- Al Balmer Balmer Consulting removebalmerconsultingthis@att.net
- Next message: Dan Pop: "Re: int array"
- Previous message: Minti: "Re: Small C "Puzzle""
- In reply to: CBFalconer: "Re: C 99 compiler access"
- Next in thread: Mabden: "Re: C 99 compiler access"
- Reply: Mabden: "Re: C 99 compiler access"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
