Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy"
From: Alan Balmer (albalmer_at_att.net)
Date: 08/30/04
- Next message: Minti: "Re: Small C "Puzzle""
- Previous message: Dan Pop: "Re: C 99 compiler access"
- In reply to: jacob navia: "Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy""
- Next in thread: Kenny McCormack: "Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy""
- Reply: Kenny McCormack: "Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:51:20 -0700
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:36:56 +0200, jacob navia
<jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> wrote:
>Kenny McCormack wrote:
>>
>> Innovation is OT here (*). I thought you understood that by now.
>>
>
>Well, that is a sentence that needs to be framed, and
>right away kept in the museum.
>
>Down with innovation!
>
>Operator overloading is an accepted way of working with
>numerical quantities that has gotten accepted even in
>traditional languages like FORTRAN.
>
>I like C. I do not want it to disappear as a computer
>language that can provide simplicity and power.
>
There's another newsgroup, just down the hall, which discusses the C
standard and things which should go in its next version.
-- Al Balmer Balmer Consulting removebalmerconsultingthis@att.net
- Next message: Minti: "Re: Small C "Puzzle""
- Previous message: Dan Pop: "Re: C 99 compiler access"
- In reply to: jacob navia: "Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy""
- Next in thread: Kenny McCormack: "Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy""
- Reply: Kenny McCormack: "Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|