Re: C 99 compiler access
From: CBFalconer (cbfalconer_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 08/31/04
- Next message: E. Robert Tisdale: "Re: C 99 compiler access"
- Previous message: Eric Sosman: "Re: Processing Bit Fields (flag) that represent request as quickly/efficient as possible...is there better approach?"
- In reply to: Mabden: "Re: C 99 compiler access"
- Next in thread: Mabden: "Re: C 99 compiler access"
- Reply: Mabden: "Re: C 99 compiler access"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:39:12 GMT
Mabden wrote:
>
... snip ...
>
> Oh boy, I get to read another "E. Robert Tisdale" is a troll
> message.
>
> Q. When does pointing out a troll become trolling?
> A. Last year.
>
> Everyone knows that statements made on the Internet should be
> taken with a grain of salt. M'kay. Get over it. I can find the
> kill button all by myself, so STFU.
Unfortunately (or fortunately) there are always newbies appearing
here. Without periodic warnings they would have no idea who
should be listened to and who should not. You may note that not
all of his postings are so marked, because he does occasionally
say something that is not in error.
-- "Churchill and Bush can both be considered wartime leaders, just as Secretariat and Mr Ed were both horses." - James Rhodes. "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals. We now know that it is bad economics" - FDR
- Next message: E. Robert Tisdale: "Re: C 99 compiler access"
- Previous message: Eric Sosman: "Re: Processing Bit Fields (flag) that represent request as quickly/efficient as possible...is there better approach?"
- In reply to: Mabden: "Re: C 99 compiler access"
- Next in thread: Mabden: "Re: C 99 compiler access"
- Reply: Mabden: "Re: C 99 compiler access"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|