Re: +++i

From: Alex Fraser (me_at_privacy.net)
Date: 09/09/04

Next message: John Bode: "Re: Newbie Question about #ifdef"
Previous message: Keith Thompson: "Re: +++i"
In reply to: Dan Pop: "Re: +++i"
Next in thread: Keith Thompson: "Re: +++i"
Reply: Keith Thompson: "Re: +++i"
Reply: SM Ryan: "Re: +++i"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 23:19:32 +0100

"Dan Pop" <Dan.Pop@cern.ch> wrote in message
news:chmvad$cm1$10@sunnews.cern.ch...
> In <2q6ctqFrc6joU1@uni-berlin.de> Alex Monjushko<monjushko@hotmail.com>
> writes:
> >I think you mean 'semantic error'.
>
> I think you mean constraint violation.

What is the distinction? Isn't what the standards term a constraint
violation just a type of semantic error?

Alex

Next message: John Bode: "Re: Newbie Question about #ifdef"
Previous message: Keith Thompson: "Re: +++i"
In reply to: Dan Pop: "Re: +++i"
Next in thread: Keith Thompson: "Re: +++i"
Reply: Keith Thompson: "Re: +++i"
Reply: SM Ryan: "Re: +++i"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Relevant Pages

Re: Arraym malloc() and free() question
... >> get a warning about the call to mallocwith no visible prototype. ... >constraint violation, ... Getting a diagnostic about ``an implicit conversion from type "int"'' is ... Dan Pop ...
(comp.lang.c)
Re: int pointing to char
... >> constraint violation is unspecified behavior, ... An implementation aborting the translation process after issuing a ... Dan Pop ...
(comp.lang.c)
Re: int pointing to char
... because the standard doesn't specify the semantics of any code ... >constraint violation is unspecified behavior, ... One of the expressions shall have type ``pointer to object type'', ... Dan Pop ...
(comp.lang.c)
Re: pointer int/char ...
... >executing a program that contained a constraint violation is undefined ... The subsection ordering inside a section of the standard is not chosen ... Dan Pop ...
(comp.lang.c)
Re: Objects and expressions - nitpicky questions
... after emitting the diagnostic). ... >Anyway, in C99 it is very clearly not a constraint violation, and ... so &3 is a constraint violation. ... Dan Pop ...
(comp.lang.c)