comp.lang.c
By Author

3171 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 08/31/04
Ending: 09/30/04

• A. Bolmarcich
  • Re: C compling Error on IBM 390 (09/21/04)
• AA
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/26/04)
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/26/04)
  • integer to char table problems (09/25/04)
• Aalok
  • need help with input and output files ASAP (09/16/04)
• AB
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/18/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/16/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/15/04)
  • Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/15/04)
• Abhinav
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/29/04)
• aditya
  • context switching with setjmp (09/22/04)
• Adrian
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/17/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/17/04)
• Afifov
  • Re: Does realloc (09/10/04)
• ajay
  • Re: static link a library (09/10/04)
• Al Bowers
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/25/04)
  • Re: malloc and pointer hell (09/21/04)
  • Re: Problem with DO-WHILE Loop (09/21/04)
  • Re: declaring array of pointers (09/19/04)
  • Re: declaring array of pointers (09/19/04)
  • Re: opendir doesn't work.. (add)... (09/12/04)
  • Re: opendir doesn't work.. (add)... (09/12/04)
  • Re: two dimensional arrays passed to functions (09/10/04)
  • Re: Typedef structs (09/05/04)
  • Re: How to convert int to char * ? (09/05/04)
• ala
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/13/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/13/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/13/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/13/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/13/04)
  • Re: Performance Programming (09/12/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/12/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/12/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/12/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/10/04)
  • malloc and free (09/10/04)
  • malloc and free (09/10/04)
• Alan Balmer
  • Re: Endless loop question (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: Endless loop question (09/29/04)
  • Re: Endless loop question (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: #include optimization (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/27/04)
  • Re: about header files (09/16/04)
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/10/04)
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/09/04)
  • Re: C++ wins over C !! (09/08/04)
  • Re: Bloodshed Dev. Compiler will only not show me my RUN execuable. Help! (09/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/07/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • [OT] C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: [OT] Printing source code (09/02/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/01/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/01/04)
• Alberto Giménez
  • Re: Timer in a C Program [OT] Answer (09/15/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/05/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/05/04)
  • How valid is a "draft"? (09/05/04)
  • Re: generalised linked list routines - opinion appreciated (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/02/04)
• Alex Fraser
  • Re: 6 byte integer to string (09/24/04)
  • Re: Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/15/04)
  • Re: Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/14/04)
  • Re: read files in dir (09/12/04)
  • Re: file operation (09/10/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/09/04)
  • Re: parsing in C (09/08/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/06/04)
  • Re: data type promotion (09/06/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (I WAS WRONG) (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (I WAS WRONG) (09/02/04)
• Alex Monjushko
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
• Alex Vinokur
  • Re: array a[(foo)()] (help) (09/16/04)
  • Re: array a[(foo)()] (help) (09/16/04)
• Alfredo
  • mysql problem (09/23/04)
• Allin Cottrell
  • Re: invalid floating point value (09/30/04)
  • invalid floating point value (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/01/04)
• Alwyn
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/15/04)
• Amanita
  • YOU LITTLE BITCH! (09/07/04)
• Amarendra Godbole
  • Re: free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/16/04)
  • Re: free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/15/04)
  • Re: free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/15/04)
• Amit
  • Re: need help creating a tree of processes(implemented in C) (09/24/04)
  • Re: Daylight saving (09/17/04)
  • Re: array a[(foo)()] (help) (09/16/04)
  • Re: creating a 2-d array using dynamic memory allocation (09/08/04)
• Amit Sharma
  • Function arguments (09/30/04)
• Amitabh Deepak
  • Daylight saving (09/17/04)
• Anders Mikkelsen
  • Re: Compiler (gcc) option to abort on nan? (09/06/04)
• Andre Kostur
  • Re: #include optimization (09/29/04)
• Andrew Au
  • Re: Object Oriented Programming in C, Avoid Memory Allocation (09/04/04)
  • Object Oriented Programming in C, Avoid Memory Allocation (09/04/04)
• Andrew Au \(Newsgroup\)
  • Re: New Hand of the C Program (09/26/04)
  • C Program Portability (09/19/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/17/04)
  • [OT] C function call cost. (09/16/04)
  • Re: Performance Programming (09/11/04)
  • Re: Performance Programming (09/11/04)
  • Performance Programming (09/11/04)
  • Re: creating a 2-d array using dynamic memory allocation (09/08/04)
  • Re: creating a 2-d array using dynamic memory allocation (09/08/04)
  • Shortcircuitting with -Inf float value. (09/02/04)
  • Re: Max Size of argv[1] ??? (09/01/04)
• Andrey Tarasevich
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/25/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/25/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/25/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/24/04)
  • Re: Endianess: why does this code not change value on BE machine? (09/14/04)
  • Re: Endianess: why does this code not change value on BE machine? (09/14/04)
• Andy
  • Re: Open a file in C (09/09/04)
• Angel Lopez
  • static link a library (09/10/04)
  • define a data type of 1 bit size (09/07/04)
  • define a data type of 1 bit size (09/06/04)
• anonymous
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/01/04)
• Apotheosis
  • Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/20/04)
• Arrive
  • How can I use socket.h? (09/25/04)
• Arthur J. O'Dwyer
  • Re: # inside a macro body (09/27/04)
  • Re: Isn't C Programming In DOS, A Part Of This Newsgroup? (09/26/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/25/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/23/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/23/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/23/04)
  • Re: C Program Portability (09/23/04)
  • Re: C Program Portability (09/22/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/16/04)
  • Re: variable changed, but i didn't change is. (09/16/04)
  • Re: Endianess: why does this code not change value on BE machine? (09/13/04)
  • Re: simple word wrap problem not wrapping (09/13/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/10/04)
  • [OT]Re: Different outputs in different environments. (09/09/04)
  • [OT] Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/09/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/06/04)
  • Re: Fix your FAQ (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/04/04)
  • Re: Post length for code. (09/03/04)
  • Re: Project (09/02/04)
  • Re: simple word wrap problem not wrapping (09/01/04)
• Artie Gold
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/23/04)
  • Re: C Program Portability (09/22/04)
  • Re: Pointer conversion (09/04/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/01/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/01/04)
• Ash
  • Re: Problem with binary strings (09/07/04)
  • Re: linux socket help (09/06/04)
  • Re: some C puzzles (09/02/04)
• asm
  • C language portability support (09/23/04)
  • ++i vs i++ (09/23/04)
• B. v Ingen Schenau
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/19/04)
• B.R.
  • Re: connect to ftp (09/21/04)
• Barry Margolin
  • Re: problem with implementing pipe (09/29/04)
• Barry Schwarz
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: Pointer question [ Newbie ] (09/28/04)
  • Re: How do I pass the & instead of a ptr? (09/28/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/26/04)
  • Re: strstr(char *str1, char *str2) (09/25/04)
  • Re: Pointer question [ Newbie ] (09/25/04)
  • Re: Invoking A DOS Program Through A "C" Program (09/24/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: Problem with DO-WHILE Loop (09/23/04)
  • Re: malloc and pointer hell (09/22/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: Does realloc "move" a block it shortens? (09/15/04)
  • Re: Difference between Structure & Union (09/10/04)
  • Re: Postfix / Prefix Operators on array / pointer, search key word wanted [OT] (09/10/04)
  • Re: creating a 2-d array using dynamic memory allocation (09/09/04)
  • Re: Problem with binary strings (09/08/04)
  • Accessing result of assignment (09/06/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/06/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/06/04)
  • Re: Problem with binary strings (09/06/04)
  • Re: Removing white spaces and tab characters - we can avoid tab characters (09/06/04)
  • Re: Segfault question. (09/06/04)
  • Re: how flushing standard io (09/06/04)
  • Re: strtok & global variables (09/06/04)
  • Re: Shortcircuitting with -Inf float value. (09/04/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/04/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/04/04)
• Bart Torbert
  • Cracking C structure (09/08/04)
• beliavsky_at_aol.com
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/27/04)
• Ben Noordhuis
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/07/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/07/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/06/04)
• Ben Pfaff
  • Re: a history question (09/29/04)
  • Re: SET ADT (09/29/04)
  • Re: SIOCGSTAMP question (09/28/04)
  • Re: Order of structure members in memory (09/26/04)
  • Re: 6 byte integer to string (09/26/04)
  • Re: New Hand of the C Program (09/26/04)
  • Re: Variable Sized Struct Members? (09/26/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/25/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/25/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: Managing global vars between files (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: union access (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: declaring array of pointers (09/19/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: declaring a function only if it isn't already declared (09/18/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/17/04)
  • Re: K and R & Fuehrerschaft (09/17/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/16/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/16/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/16/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/16/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/16/04)
  • Re: C external execution - trap stdout + stderr (09/16/04)
  • Re: New Annotations (09/16/04)
  • Re: union access (09/15/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/15/04)
  • Re: "does not give a valid preprocessing token"... Why? (09/15/04)
  • Re: union access (09/14/04)
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/09/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: Different outputs in different environments. (09/09/04)
  • Re: operator overloading (09/09/04)
  • Re: Structure Query.... (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/07/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/06/04)
  • Re: how flushing standard io (09/06/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/05/04)
  • Re: string literals question (09/05/04)
  • Re: qsort(...) in <stdlib.h> (09/05/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.c Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ List) (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Printing source code (09/04/04)
  • Re: Why va_start takes 2 arguments (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: string length questions related to fseek (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: string length questions related to fseek (09/02/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/02/04)
  • Re: One-past-end-of-object pointers (09/02/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
• Benjamin Ketcham
  • Re: union access (09/18/04)
  • Re: #ifdef (09/17/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/17/04)
  • Re: union access (09/17/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/17/04)
  • Re: system() doesnt give me the control back .. (09/17/04)
  • Re: Function Call Tree Command in UNIX. [OT] (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/07/04)
  • Re: C++ wins over C !! (09/07/04)
  • Re: Max Size of argv[1] ??? (09/03/04)
• Bigdakine
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/01/04)
  • Re: Calling fortran subroutine from c (09/01/04)
  • Calling fortran subroutine from c (09/01/04)
• Bill Cunningham
  • Re: Heathfield (09/04/04)
• Bill Marcum
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
• Billy Liu
  • Re: New Hand of the C Program (09/30/04)
  • New Hand of the C Program (09/26/04)
• Billy N. Patton
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/15/04)
• Bob
  • a history question (09/27/04)
• Bob Jenkins
  • Re: switch and if..else same at assemby code ? (09/14/04)
• bowsayge
  • Re: critique: conversion to binary (09/04/04)
  • Re: critique: conversion to binary (09/04/04)
  • Re: string length questions related to fseek (09/03/04)
  • critique: conversion to binary (09/03/04)
• Brett Frankenberger
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/26/04)
• Brian Gough
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/16/04)
  • Re: Compiler (gcc) option to abort on nan? (09/06/04)
• Brian Inglis
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: Unit / Coverage testing (09/22/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/22/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/08/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.c Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ List) (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/02/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
• Bruce Sam
  • Could VC6 be integrated with gcc, and if so,how to do it? (09/30/04)
• Bryan Bullard
  • Re: Why is this allowed in C? (09/28/04)
  • Why is this allowed in C? (09/27/04)
• buda
  • Re: attempt at qsort implementation (09/30/04)
  • Re: attempt at qsort implementation (09/29/04)
  • attempt at qsort implementation (09/28/04)
  • Re: variable changed, but i didn't change is. (09/16/04)
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/10/04)
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/09/04)
• Buzzard
  • Re: calling fopen using function (09/24/04)
  • Re: calling fopen using function (09/23/04)
  • Re: Calling a function using its pointer- (09/01/04)
• buzzdee
  • printf conversion problem (09/26/04)
• ByteSurfer
  • Re: Mail bomber (09/07/04)
  • Mail bomber (09/07/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/03/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/03/04)
• c453___
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: union access (09/14/04)
  • Re: union access (09/14/04)
  • Re: pwd (09/12/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/10/04)
  • Re: Open a file in C (09/08/04)
• Cancerbero
  • typedef function pointer (09/12/04)
• Cant Think Today
  • Labeling Jagged Arrays (09/03/04)
• Cao Tran
  • C Beginner Question (09/16/04)
• Carol Depore
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
• Carsten Maul
  • Creating an MD5 hash with crypt.h (09/23/04)
• CBFalconer
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/30/04)
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: #include optimization (09/30/04)
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/30/04)
  • Re: #include optimization (09/30/04)
  • Re: Pointer Usage (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: #include optimization (09/30/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/30/04)
  • Re: unsigned long long + int (09/29/04)
  • Re: while Vs for loop (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: unsigned long long + int (09/29/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/29/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.c.moderated group? (09/28/04)
  • Re: (argc == 0), was Re: elementary construction +1 (09/28/04)
  • Re: (argc == 0), was Re: elementary construction +1 (09/28/04)
  • Re: while Vs for loop (09/28/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/28/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.c.moderated group? (09/28/04)
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/28/04)
  • Re: a history question (09/28/04)
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: how do i link 3rd party lib on windows ? (09/27/04)
  • Re: 6 byte integer to string (09/27/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/26/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/26/04)
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/26/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/25/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/25/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/24/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/23/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: union access (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Problem with DO-WHILE Loop (09/21/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/21/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Problem with DO-WHILE Loop (09/21/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: C Beginner Question (09/20/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/20/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/20/04)
  • Re: C Beginner Question (09/20/04)
  • Re: union access (09/20/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
  • Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/20/04)
  • Re: declaring array of pointers (09/19/04)
  • Re: Need help on bit operations define (09/19/04)
  • Re: compilers & stack machines (09/19/04)
  • Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis (09/19/04)
  • Re: [OT] srand() troubles (09/19/04)
  • Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis (09/18/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/18/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/18/04)
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/17/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/17/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/16/04)
  • Re: C external execution - trap stdout + stderr (09/16/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/16/04)
  • Re: string & bytes (09/16/04)
  • Re: b = 2 / a[2] (09/16/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/16/04)
  • Re: b = 2 / a[2] (09/16/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/16/04)
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/15/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/15/04)
  • Re: Does realloc "move" a block it shortens? (09/10/04)
  • Re: removing Spaces (09/10/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/10/04)
  • Re: Reading Simple Flatfiles with a COBOL Mindset (09/09/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/09/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/09/04)
  • Re: removing Spaces (09/09/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/08/04)
  • Re: MARKING STRUCTS PROCESSED (09/08/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/08/04)
  • [OT] Re: How does free() knows? (09/08/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/07/04)
  • Re: Book Recommendations? (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: Mail bomber (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/07/04)
  • Re: Newbie Question about #ifdef (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: <OT> Re: How does free() knows? (09/07/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/06/04)
  • Re: scanf pushes back two chars? (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/06/04)
  • Re: How to make the text stand out (09/06/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/06/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/06/04)
  • Re: string literals question (09/05/04)
  • Re: linux socket help (09/05/04)
  • Re: Segfault question. (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: Segfault question. (09/05/04)
  • Re: nested function support (09/05/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/05/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/04/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Printing source code (09/04/04)
  • Re: glibc: socket and fdopen (09/04/04)
  • Re: Bloodshed Dev. Compiler will only not show me my RUN execuable. Help! (09/04/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/04/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/04/04)
  • Re: Pointer conversion (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/04/04)
  • Re: critique: conversion to binary (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: Post length for code. (09/03/04)
  • Re: generalised linked list routines - opinion appreciated (09/03/04)
  • Re: string length questions related to fseek (09/03/04)
  • Re: Develping a good scheduler for ARINC transmission... advice needed (09/03/04)
  • Re: [OT] Printing source code (09/03/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: Bloodshed Dev. Compiler will only not show me my RUN execuable. Help! (09/03/04)
  • Re: generalised linked list routines - opinion appreciated (09/03/04)
  • Re: Removing white spaces and tab characters (09/03/04)
  • Re: exit() (09/03/04)
  • Re: critique: conversion to binary (09/03/04)
  • Re: string length questions related to fseek (09/03/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: [OT] C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: Local Heap? (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/03/04)
  • Re: Colon (:) syntax in defining fields in a struct (09/02/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/02/04)
  • Re: What data type would you prefer and why? (09/02/04)
  • Re: I don't understand a past thread (help) (09/02/04)
  • Re: Local Heap? (09/02/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/02/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/02/04)
  • Re: type VARIANT and array - conversion to CString (09/02/04)
  • Re: Local Heap? (09/02/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/02/04)
  • Re: Calling fortran subroutine from c (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/02/04)
  • Re: Calling fortran subroutine from c (09/02/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/02/04)
  • Re: Colon (:) syntax in defining fields in a struct (09/01/04)
  • Re: webpage bookmark program in C (09/01/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
  • Re: Different outputs in different environments. (09/01/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/01/04)
  • Re: Small C "Puzzle" (09/01/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
  • Re: Small C "Puzzle" (09/01/04)
• Charles Sanders
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/02/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
• Charlie Gordon
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/16/04)
  • Re: Need help on bit operations define (09/16/04)
• chella mani
  • Doubt-Efficiecy of 3D arrays (09/20/04)
• chetan
  • operator overloading (09/09/04)
  • operator overloading (09/08/04)
• Choe
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/24/04)
• ChokSheak Lau
  • C external execution - trap stdout + stderr (09/16/04)
• Chris
  • Re: webpage bookmark program in C (09/02/04)
  • webpage bookmark program in C (09/01/04)
• Chris Barts
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/27/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/25/04)
  • Re: News (09/20/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/17/04)
  • Re: union access (09/15/04)
  • Re: Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/14/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/14/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/12/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/12/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/12/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/10/04)
  • Re: parsing in C (09/10/04)
  • Re: static link a library (09/10/04)
  • Re: Reading Simple Flatfiles with a COBOL Mindset (09/10/04)
  • Re: Book Recommendations? (09/10/04)
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/10/04)
  • Re: C Preprocessor - Cascaded Macros (09/10/04)
  • Re: Book Recommendations? (09/08/04)
  • Re: parsing in C (09/08/04)
• Chris Dollin
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: Function arguments (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: union access (09/24/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/22/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
• Chris Hills
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/13/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/11/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/11/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/09/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/09/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/08/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/01/04)
• Chris Torek
  • Re: while Vs for loop (09/30/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +1 (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: a history question (09/27/04)
  • Re: sscanf parsing doubt (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/26/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/25/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/25/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/25/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/24/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/23/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/23/04)
  • Re: Q: volatile struct elements or entire struct? (09/23/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/20/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/18/04)
  • Re: union access (09/16/04)
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/16/04)
  • Re: Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/15/04)
  • Re: Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/15/04)
  • Re: Wide string initializer syntax (09/15/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/09/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/09/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/08/04)
  • Re: volatile expression (09/07/04)
  • Re: scanf pushes back two chars? (09/06/04)
  • Re: Segfault question. (09/06/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/05/04)
  • Re: string literals question (09/05/04)
  • on indentation (was Re: Segfault question.) (09/05/04)
  • Re: Determining EOF using fseek()? (09/05/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/05/04)
  • Re: Fix your FAQ (09/04/04)
  • Re: Determining EOF using fseek()? (09/04/04)
  • Re: Object Oriented Programming in C, Avoid Memory Allocation (09/04/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/04/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT, welcom msg] Usage of VxWorks setsockopt() (09/03/04)
  • Re: Typedef structs (08/31/04)
• Christian Bau
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/16/04)
  • Re: union access (09/14/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/14/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/11/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/11/04)
  • Re: Performance Programming (09/11/04)
  • Re: Performance Programming (09/11/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/11/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/10/04)
  • Re: Does realloc "move" a block it shortens? (09/10/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/09/04)
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/09/04)
  • Re: switch and if..else same at assemby code ? (09/07/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/06/04)
  • Re: Object Oriented Programming in C, Avoid Memory Allocation (09/04/04)
• Christian Kandeler
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
• Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: Order of structure members in memory (09/26/04)
  • Order of structure members in memory (09/26/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/23/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/23/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/23/04)
  • Re: calling fopen using function (09/23/04)
  • Re: removing a loop from a linked list? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/20/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/16/04)
  • Re: string & bytes (09/15/04)
  • Re: Question about declaring Floating Point Variable in a Structure (09/15/04)
  • Re: Short-Circuit Evaluation of Boolean Expressions (09/13/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
  • Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/10/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/10/04)
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/09/04)
  • Re: Mail bomber (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: nested function support (09/05/04)
  • Re: How to convert int to char * ? (09/05/04)
  • Re: Dynamic loop nesting (09/02/04)
  • Re: Dynamic loop nesting (09/02/04)
  • Re: webpage bookmark program in C (09/02/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/01/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/01/04)
• clilley
  • Re: #include optimization (09/28/04)
• Code Raptor
  • Re: free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/15/04)
  • free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/15/04)
• Coos Haak
  • Re: Daylight saving (09/17/04)
  • Re: parsing in C (09/11/04)
• copx
  • string literals question (09/05/04)
• csudha
  • about header files (09/16/04)
  • Difference between Structure & Union (09/10/04)
• Curious Student
  • Screen Handling (09/22/04)
• Dag Viken
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: Pointer Usage (09/30/04)
  • Re: sscanf parsing doubt (09/27/04)
  • comp.lang.c.moderated group? (09/27/04)
  • Re: syntax for e (natural logs) (09/27/04)
• Dale
  • Re: Newbie Question about #ifdef (09/07/04)
• damian birchler
  • Re: no lcm in standard library? (09/14/04)
  • no lcm in standard library? (09/13/04)
• Dan Espen
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
• Dan Pop
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/30/04)
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/30/04)
  • Re: fopen() vs. open() (09/30/04)
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/30/04)
  • Re: invalid floating point value (09/30/04)
  • Re: Function arguments (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: a history question (09/30/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/30/04)
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/30/04)
  • Re: invalid floating point value (09/30/04)
  • Re: invalid floating point value (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/29/04)
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] struct and union alignment (09/29/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/29/04)
  • Re: invalid floating point value (09/29/04)
  • Re: #include optimization (09/29/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +1 (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: a history question (09/29/04)
  • Re: opinions on logical OR variation (09/28/04)
  • Re: #include optimization (09/28/04)
  • Re: (argc == 0), was Re: elementary construction +1 (09/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] struct and union alignment (09/28/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/28/04)
  • Re: sscanf parsing doubt (09/28/04)
  • Re: strstr(char *str1, char *str2) (09/28/04)
  • Re: Obtain sizeof struct element using offsetof()? (09/28/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/28/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/28/04)
  • Re: (argc == 0), was Re: elementary construction +1 (09/28/04)
  • Re: a history question (09/28/04)
  • Re: Why is this allowed in C? (09/27/04)
  • Re: a history question (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: Obtain sizeof struct element using offsetof()? (09/27/04)
  • Re: Embedded systems and C programming (09/27/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/27/04)
  • Re: strstr(char *str1, char *str2) (09/27/04)
  • Re: sscanf parsing doubt (09/27/04)
  • Re: Pointer question [ Newbie ] (09/27/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/27/04)
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/27/04)
  • Re: Embedded systems and C programming (09/27/04)
  • Re: elementary construction (09/27/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/27/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.c.moderated group? (09/27/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/27/04)
  • Re: (argc == 0), was Re: elementary construction +1 (09/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/24/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: Pointer question [ Newbie ] (09/24/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/24/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/24/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/24/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/24/04)
  • Re: Managing global vars between files (09/24/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/24/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/24/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/24/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/24/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/24/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/23/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: Managing global vars between files (09/23/04)
  • Re: elementary construction follow-up (09/23/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/23/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/22/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: c-book (09/22/04)
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/22/04)
  • Re: union access (09/22/04)
  • Re: Screen Handling (09/22/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: C compling Error on IBM 390 (09/21/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/21/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/21/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/21/04)
  • Re: union access (09/21/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/21/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Why not 64 bit under 32? (09/17/04)
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/17/04)
  • Re: union access (09/17/04)
  • Re: variable changed, but i didn't change is. (09/17/04)
  • Re: union access (09/17/04)
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/17/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/17/04)
  • Re: Loop Optimization, Array Alignment (09/16/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/16/04)
  • Re: about header files (09/16/04)
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/16/04)
  • Re: union access (09/16/04)
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/16/04)
  • Re: union access (09/15/04)
  • [OT] Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/15/04)
  • Re: union access (09/15/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/14/04)
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/14/04)
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/14/04)
  • Re: Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/14/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/09/04)
  • Re: operator overloading (09/09/04)
  • Re: Book Recommendations? (09/09/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/09/04)
  • Re: operator overloading (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: parsing in C (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: volatile expression (09/08/04)
  • Re: volatile expression (09/08/04)
  • Re: parsing in C (09/08/04)
  • Re: parsing in C (09/08/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/08/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/08/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/08/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/07/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/07/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/07/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/07/04)
  • Re: stripping newline from input (09/06/04)
  • Re: some C puzzles (09/06/04)
  • Re: Fix your FAQ (09/06/04)
  • Re: exit() (09/06/04)
  • Re: Compiler (gcc) option to abort on nan? (09/06/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/06/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/06/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/03/04)
  • Re: stripping newline from input (09/03/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/03/04)
  • Re: some C puzzles (09/03/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/03/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/03/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/01/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/01/04)
  • Re: returning an array of integers (09/01/04)
  • Re: Colon (:) syntax in defining fields in a struct (09/01/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
  • Re: Another one for the frame and the wall (Was: Re: C or Fortran obsolete? (was Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy")) (09/01/04)
  • Re: Project (09/01/04)
  • Re: C or Fortran obsolete? (was Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy") (09/01/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
  • Re: stripping newline from input (09/01/04)
  • Re: some C puzzles (09/01/04)
  • Re: C or Fortran obsolete? (was Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy") (09/01/04)
  • Re: C or Fortran obsolete? (was Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy") (09/01/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/01/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
• Dances With Crows
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/23/04)
• Darklight
  • Re: question (09/20/04)
  • question (09/19/04)
  • Re: exit() (09/03/04)
  • exit() (09/03/04)
• Dave
  • Re: opinions on logical OR variation (09/28/04)
  • Re: How do I pass the & instead of a ptr? (09/27/04)
  • Re: Timer in a C Program (09/15/04)
  • Re: Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/14/04)
  • Re: Difference between Structure & Union (09/10/04)
  • Re: Please find out what is wrong (09/10/04)
• Dave Hansen
  • Re: Programming Language Usage [was: C 99 compiler access] (09/10/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
• Dave Thompson
  • Re: Embedded systems and C programming (09/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/27/04)
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/23/04)
  • Re: #ifdef (09/23/04)
  • Re: simple word wrap problem not wrapping (09/20/04)
  • Re: simple word wrap problem not wrapping (09/13/04)
  • Re: linux socket help (09/13/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/08/04)
  • Re: simple word wrap problem not wrapping (09/08/04)
  • Re: Will EXIT_SUCCESS and EXIT_FAILURE have the same value on all platforms? (09/08/04)
  • Re: Typedef structs (09/03/04)
  • Re: #def question (09/03/04)
• Dave Vandervies
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: OO in C (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: Endless loop question (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: elementary construction follow-up (09/23/04)
  • Re: ping source code (09/17/04)
  • Re: ping source code (09/16/04)
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/15/04)
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/14/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/13/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/10/04)
  • Re: Reading Simple Flatfiles with a COBOL Mindset (09/10/04)
  • Re: Reading Simple Flatfiles with a COBOL Mindset (09/09/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/07/04)
  • Re: volatile expression (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/02/04)
  • Re: Dynamic loop nesting (09/02/04)
• David A. Holland
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/09/04)
• David Hopwood
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
• David R Tribble
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/07/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/04/04)
• dbtid
  • Re: Problems implementing Rijndael (09/03/04)
  • Re: Develping a good scheduler for ARINC transmission... advice needed (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/02/04)
• DD
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
• Default User
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.c.moderated group? (09/28/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/28/04)
  • Re: while Vs for loop (09/27/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/27/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: mysql problem (09/23/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/21/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
  • Re: union access (09/20/04)
  • Re: K and R & Fuehrerschaft (09/17/04)
  • Re: C Beginner Question (09/16/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/10/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/09/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/09/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/07/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/04/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/04/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/03/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: I don't understand a past thread (help) (09/02/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (I WAS WRONG) (09/02/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/02/04)
  • Re: Project (09/01/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
• Derek
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/09/04)
  • Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/09/04)
• Derrick Coetzee
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/28/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/28/04)
  • Re: Obtain sizeof struct element using offsetof()? (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: New Hand of the C Program (09/28/04)
  • Re: Why is this allowed in C? (09/28/04)
  • Re: Obtain sizeof struct element using offsetof()? (09/28/04)
  • Re: # inside a macro body (09/28/04)
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/28/04)
  • Re: syntax for e (natural logs) (09/27/04)
  • Re: Order of structure members in memory (09/27/04)
  • Re: 6 byte integer to string (09/26/04)
  • Re: 6 byte integer to string (09/26/04)
  • Re: 6 byte integer to string (09/26/04)
  • Re: 6 byte integer to string (09/26/04)
  • Re: 6 byte integer to string (09/26/04)
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/26/04)
  • Re: New Hand of the C Program (09/26/04)
  • Re: Variable Sized Struct Members? (09/26/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/26/04)
  • Re: Rectangle intersection (09/26/04)
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/26/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/25/04)
  • Re: elementary construction (09/25/04)
  • Re: elementary construction (09/25/04)
  • Re: strstr(char *str1, char *str2) (09/25/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/25/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/24/04)
  • Re: Pointer question [ Newbie ] (09/24/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: Unit / Coverage testing (09/22/04)
  • Re: malloc and pointer hell (09/21/04)
  • Re: removing a loop from a linked list? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Doubt-Efficiecy of 3D arrays (09/21/04)
  • Re: Need help on bit operations define (09/19/04)
  • Re: declaring array of pointers (09/19/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/17/04)
  • Re: C Beginner Question (09/16/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/16/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/16/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/16/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/16/04)
  • New Annotations (09/16/04)
  • Re: Wide string initializer syntax (09/15/04)
  • Re: union access (09/14/04)
  • Re: typedef function pointer (09/13/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/13/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/12/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/12/04)
  • Re: Wide string initializer syntax (09/12/04)
  • Re: Performance Programming (09/11/04)
  • Re: Need help for optimising nested ifs-help me plz panic situation!!! (09/11/04)
  • Wide string initializer syntax (09/11/04)
  • Re: switch and if..else same at assemby code ? (09/08/04)
  • Re: switch and if..else same at assemby code ? (09/08/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/05/04)
  • Re: Object Oriented Programming in C, Avoid Memory Allocation (09/04/04)
  • Re: Object Oriented Programming in C, Avoid Memory Allocation (09/04/04)
  • Re: Object Oriented Programming in C, Avoid Memory Allocation (09/04/04)
  • Re: Object Oriented Programming in C, Avoid Memory Allocation (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/04/04)
  • Re: Need help on bit operations define (09/02/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: fscanf and linked list problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/02/04)
  • Re: [OT] Printing source code (09/02/04)
  • Re: How to create folder at fopen? (09/01/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/01/04)
  • Re: How to create folder at fopen? (09/01/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/01/04)
• dieymir
  • SET ADT (09/29/04)
• D