comp.lang.c
By Author

3171 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 08/31/04
Ending: 09/30/04

• A. Bolmarcich
  • Re: C compling Error on IBM 390 (09/21/04)
• AA
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/26/04)
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/26/04)
  • integer to char table problems (09/25/04)
• Aalok
  • need help with input and output files ASAP (09/16/04)
• AB
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/18/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/16/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/15/04)
  • Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/15/04)
• Abhinav
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/29/04)
• aditya
  • context switching with setjmp (09/22/04)
• Adrian
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/17/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/17/04)
• Afifov
  • Re: Does realloc (09/10/04)
• ajay
  • Re: static link a library (09/10/04)
• Al Bowers
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/25/04)
  • Re: malloc and pointer hell (09/21/04)
  • Re: Problem with DO-WHILE Loop (09/21/04)
  • Re: declaring array of pointers (09/19/04)
  • Re: declaring array of pointers (09/19/04)
  • Re: opendir doesn't work.. (add)... (09/12/04)
  • Re: opendir doesn't work.. (add)... (09/12/04)
  • Re: two dimensional arrays passed to functions (09/10/04)
  • Re: Typedef structs (09/05/04)
  • Re: How to convert int to char * ? (09/05/04)
• ala
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/13/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/13/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/13/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/13/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/13/04)
  • Re: Performance Programming (09/12/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/12/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/12/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/12/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/10/04)
  • malloc and free (09/10/04)
  • malloc and free (09/10/04)
• Alan Balmer
  • Re: Endless loop question (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: Endless loop question (09/29/04)
  • Re: Endless loop question (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: #include optimization (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/27/04)
  • Re: about header files (09/16/04)
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/10/04)
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/09/04)
  • Re: C++ wins over C !! (09/08/04)
  • Re: Bloodshed Dev. Compiler will only not show me my RUN execuable. Help! (09/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/07/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • [OT] C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: [OT] Printing source code (09/02/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/01/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/01/04)
• Alberto Giménez
  • Re: Timer in a C Program [OT] Answer (09/15/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/05/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/05/04)
  • How valid is a "draft"? (09/05/04)
  • Re: generalised linked list routines - opinion appreciated (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/02/04)
• Alex Fraser
  • Re: 6 byte integer to string (09/24/04)
  • Re: Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/15/04)
  • Re: Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/14/04)
  • Re: read files in dir (09/12/04)
  • Re: file operation (09/10/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/09/04)
  • Re: parsing in C (09/08/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/06/04)
  • Re: data type promotion (09/06/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (I WAS WRONG) (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (I WAS WRONG) (09/02/04)
• Alex Monjushko
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
• Alex Vinokur
  • Re: array a[(foo)()] (help) (09/16/04)
  • Re: array a[(foo)()] (help) (09/16/04)
• Alfredo
  • mysql problem (09/23/04)
• Allin Cottrell
  • Re: invalid floating point value (09/30/04)
  • invalid floating point value (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/01/04)
• Alwyn
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/15/04)
• Amanita
  • YOU LITTLE BITCH! (09/07/04)
• Amarendra Godbole
  • Re: free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/16/04)
  • Re: free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/15/04)
  • Re: free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/15/04)
• Amit
  • Re: need help creating a tree of processes(implemented in C) (09/24/04)
  • Re: Daylight saving (09/17/04)
  • Re: array a[(foo)()] (help) (09/16/04)
  • Re: creating a 2-d array using dynamic memory allocation (09/08/04)
• Amit Sharma
  • Function arguments (09/30/04)
• Amitabh Deepak
  • Daylight saving (09/17/04)
• Anders Mikkelsen
  • Re: Compiler (gcc) option to abort on nan? (09/06/04)
• Andre Kostur
  • Re: #include optimization (09/29/04)
• Andrew Au
  • Re: Object Oriented Programming in C, Avoid Memory Allocation (09/04/04)
  • Object Oriented Programming in C, Avoid Memory Allocation (09/04/04)
• Andrew Au \(Newsgroup\)
  • Re: New Hand of the C Program (09/26/04)
  • C Program Portability (09/19/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/17/04)
  • [OT] C function call cost. (09/16/04)
  • Re: Performance Programming (09/11/04)
  • Re: Performance Programming (09/11/04)
  • Performance Programming (09/11/04)
  • Re: creating a 2-d array using dynamic memory allocation (09/08/04)
  • Re: creating a 2-d array using dynamic memory allocation (09/08/04)
  • Shortcircuitting with -Inf float value. (09/02/04)
  • Re: Max Size of argv[1] ??? (09/01/04)
• Andrey Tarasevich
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/25/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/25/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/25/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/24/04)
  • Re: Endianess: why does this code not change value on BE machine? (09/14/04)
  • Re: Endianess: why does this code not change value on BE machine? (09/14/04)
• Andy
  • Re: Open a file in C (09/09/04)
• Angel Lopez
  • static link a library (09/10/04)
  • define a data type of 1 bit size (09/07/04)
  • define a data type of 1 bit size (09/06/04)
• anonymous
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/01/04)
• Apotheosis
  • Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/20/04)
• Arrive
  • How can I use socket.h? (09/25/04)
• Arthur J. O'Dwyer
  • Re: # inside a macro body (09/27/04)
  • Re: Isn't C Programming In DOS, A Part Of This Newsgroup? (09/26/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/25/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/23/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/23/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/23/04)
  • Re: C Program Portability (09/23/04)
  • Re: C Program Portability (09/22/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/21/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/16/04)
  • Re: variable changed, but i didn't change is. (09/16/04)
  • Re: Endianess: why does this code not change value on BE machine? (09/13/04)
  • Re: simple word wrap problem not wrapping (09/13/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/10/04)
  • [OT]Re: Different outputs in different environments. (09/09/04)
  • [OT] Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/09/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/06/04)
  • Re: Fix your FAQ (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/04/04)
  • Re: Post length for code. (09/03/04)
  • Re: Project (09/02/04)
  • Re: simple word wrap problem not wrapping (09/01/04)
• Artie Gold
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/23/04)
  • Re: C Program Portability (09/22/04)
  • Re: Pointer conversion (09/04/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/01/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/01/04)
• Ash
  • Re: Problem with binary strings (09/07/04)
  • Re: linux socket help (09/06/04)
  • Re: some C puzzles (09/02/04)
• asm
  • C language portability support (09/23/04)
  • ++i vs i++ (09/23/04)
• B. v Ingen Schenau
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/19/04)
• B.R.
  • Re: connect to ftp (09/21/04)
• Barry Margolin
  • Re: problem with implementing pipe (09/29/04)
• Barry Schwarz
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: Pointer question [ Newbie ] (09/28/04)
  • Re: How do I pass the & instead of a ptr? (09/28/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/26/04)
  • Re: strstr(char *str1, char *str2) (09/25/04)
  • Re: Pointer question [ Newbie ] (09/25/04)
  • Re: Invoking A DOS Program Through A "C" Program (09/24/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: Problem with DO-WHILE Loop (09/23/04)
  • Re: malloc and pointer hell (09/22/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: Does realloc "move" a block it shortens? (09/15/04)
  • Re: Difference between Structure & Union (09/10/04)
  • Re: Postfix / Prefix Operators on array / pointer, search key word wanted [OT] (09/10/04)
  • Re: creating a 2-d array using dynamic memory allocation (09/09/04)
  • Re: Problem with binary strings (09/08/04)
  • Accessing result of assignment (09/06/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/06/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/06/04)
  • Re: Problem with binary strings (09/06/04)
  • Re: Removing white spaces and tab characters - we can avoid tab characters (09/06/04)
  • Re: Segfault question. (09/06/04)
  • Re: how flushing standard io (09/06/04)
  • Re: strtok & global variables (09/06/04)
  • Re: Shortcircuitting with -Inf float value. (09/04/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/04/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/04/04)
• Bart Torbert
  • Cracking C structure (09/08/04)
• beliavsky_at_aol.com
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/27/04)
• Ben Noordhuis
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/07/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/07/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/06/04)
• Ben Pfaff
  • Re: a history question (09/29/04)
  • Re: SET ADT (09/29/04)
  • Re: SIOCGSTAMP question (09/28/04)
  • Re: Order of structure members in memory (09/26/04)
  • Re: 6 byte integer to string (09/26/04)
  • Re: New Hand of the C Program (09/26/04)
  • Re: Variable Sized Struct Members? (09/26/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/25/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/25/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: Managing global vars between files (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: union access (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: declaring array of pointers (09/19/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: declaring a function only if it isn't already declared (09/18/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/17/04)
  • Re: K and R & Fuehrerschaft (09/17/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/16/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/16/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/16/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/16/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/16/04)
  • Re: C external execution - trap stdout + stderr (09/16/04)
  • Re: New Annotations (09/16/04)
  • Re: union access (09/15/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/15/04)
  • Re: "does not give a valid preprocessing token"... Why? (09/15/04)
  • Re: union access (09/14/04)
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/09/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: Different outputs in different environments. (09/09/04)
  • Re: operator overloading (09/09/04)
  • Re: Structure Query.... (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/07/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/06/04)
  • Re: how flushing standard io (09/06/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/05/04)
  • Re: string literals question (09/05/04)
  • Re: qsort(...) in <stdlib.h> (09/05/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.c Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ List) (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Printing source code (09/04/04)
  • Re: Why va_start takes 2 arguments (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: string length questions related to fseek (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: string length questions related to fseek (09/02/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/02/04)
  • Re: One-past-end-of-object pointers (09/02/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
• Benjamin Ketcham
  • Re: union access (09/18/04)
  • Re: #ifdef (09/17/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/17/04)
  • Re: union access (09/17/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/17/04)
  • Re: system() doesnt give me the control back .. (09/17/04)
  • Re: Function Call Tree Command in UNIX. [OT] (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/07/04)
  • Re: C++ wins over C !! (09/07/04)
  • Re: Max Size of argv[1] ??? (09/03/04)
• Bigdakine
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/01/04)
  • Re: Calling fortran subroutine from c (09/01/04)
  • Calling fortran subroutine from c (09/01/04)
• Bill Cunningham
  • Re: Heathfield (09/04/04)
• Bill Marcum
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
• Billy Liu
  • Re: New Hand of the C Program (09/30/04)
  • New Hand of the C Program (09/26/04)
• Billy N. Patton
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/15/04)
• Bob
  • a history question (09/27/04)
• Bob Jenkins
  • Re: switch and if..else same at assemby code ? (09/14/04)
• bowsayge
  • Re: critique: conversion to binary (09/04/04)
  • Re: critique: conversion to binary (09/04/04)
  • Re: string length questions related to fseek (09/03/04)
  • critique: conversion to binary (09/03/04)
• Brett Frankenberger
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/26/04)
• Brian Gough
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/16/04)
  • Re: Compiler (gcc) option to abort on nan? (09/06/04)
• Brian Inglis
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: Unit / Coverage testing (09/22/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/22/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/08/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.c Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ List) (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/02/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
• Bruce Sam
  • Could VC6 be integrated with gcc, and if so,how to do it? (09/30/04)
• Bryan Bullard
  • Re: Why is this allowed in C? (09/28/04)
  • Why is this allowed in C? (09/27/04)
• buda
  • Re: attempt at qsort implementation (09/30/04)
  • Re: attempt at qsort implementation (09/29/04)
  • attempt at qsort implementation (09/28/04)
  • Re: variable changed, but i didn't change is. (09/16/04)
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/10/04)
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/09/04)
• Buzzard
  • Re: calling fopen using function (09/24/04)
  • Re: calling fopen using function (09/23/04)
  • Re: Calling a function using its pointer- (09/01/04)
• buzzdee
  • printf conversion problem (09/26/04)
• ByteSurfer
  • Re: Mail bomber (09/07/04)
  • Mail bomber (09/07/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/03/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/03/04)
• c453___
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: union access (09/14/04)
  • Re: union access (09/14/04)
  • Re: pwd (09/12/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/10/04)
  • Re: Open a file in C (09/08/04)
• Cancerbero
  • typedef function pointer (09/12/04)
• Cant Think Today
  • Labeling Jagged Arrays (09/03/04)
• Cao Tran
  • C Beginner Question (09/16/04)
• Carol Depore
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
• Carsten Maul
  • Creating an MD5 hash with crypt.h (09/23/04)
• CBFalconer
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/30/04)
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: #include optimization (09/30/04)
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/30/04)
  • Re: #include optimization (09/30/04)
  • Re: Pointer Usage (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: #include optimization (09/30/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/30/04)
  • Re: unsigned long long + int (09/29/04)
  • Re: while Vs for loop (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: unsigned long long + int (09/29/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/29/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.c.moderated group? (09/28/04)
  • Re: (argc == 0), was Re: elementary construction +1 (09/28/04)
  • Re: (argc == 0), was Re: elementary construction +1 (09/28/04)
  • Re: while Vs for loop (09/28/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/28/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.c.moderated group? (09/28/04)
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/28/04)
  • Re: a history question (09/28/04)
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: how do i link 3rd party lib on windows ? (09/27/04)
  • Re: 6 byte integer to string (09/27/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/26/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/26/04)
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/26/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/25/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/25/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/24/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/23/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: union access (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Problem with DO-WHILE Loop (09/21/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/21/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Problem with DO-WHILE Loop (09/21/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: C Beginner Question (09/20/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/20/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/20/04)
  • Re: C Beginner Question (09/20/04)
  • Re: union access (09/20/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
  • Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/20/04)
  • Re: declaring array of pointers (09/19/04)
  • Re: Need help on bit operations define (09/19/04)
  • Re: compilers & stack machines (09/19/04)
  • Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis (09/19/04)
  • Re: [OT] srand() troubles (09/19/04)
  • Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis (09/18/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/18/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/18/04)
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/17/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/17/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/16/04)
  • Re: C external execution - trap stdout + stderr (09/16/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/16/04)
  • Re: string & bytes (09/16/04)
  • Re: b = 2 / a[2] (09/16/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/16/04)
  • Re: b = 2 / a[2] (09/16/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/16/04)
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/15/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/15/04)
  • Re: Does realloc "move" a block it shortens? (09/10/04)
  • Re: removing Spaces (09/10/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/10/04)
  • Re: Reading Simple Flatfiles with a COBOL Mindset (09/09/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/09/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/09/04)
  • Re: removing Spaces (09/09/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/08/04)
  • Re: MARKING STRUCTS PROCESSED (09/08/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/08/04)
  • [OT] Re: How does free() knows? (09/08/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/07/04)
  • Re: Book Recommendations? (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: Mail bomber (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/07/04)
  • Re: Newbie Question about #ifdef (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: <OT> Re: How does free() knows? (09/07/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/06/04)
  • Re: scanf pushes back two chars? (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/06/04)
  • Re: How to make the text stand out (09/06/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/06/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/06/04)
  • Re: string literals question (09/05/04)
  • Re: linux socket help (09/05/04)
  • Re: Segfault question. (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: Segfault question. (09/05/04)
  • Re: nested function support (09/05/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/05/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/04/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Printing source code (09/04/04)
  • Re: glibc: socket and fdopen (09/04/04)
  • Re: Bloodshed Dev. Compiler will only not show me my RUN execuable. Help! (09/04/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/04/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/04/04)
  • Re: Pointer conversion (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/04/04)
  • Re: critique: conversion to binary (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: Post length for code. (09/03/04)
  • Re: generalised linked list routines - opinion appreciated (09/03/04)
  • Re: string length questions related to fseek (09/03/04)
  • Re: Develping a good scheduler for ARINC transmission... advice needed (09/03/04)
  • Re: [OT] Printing source code (09/03/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: Bloodshed Dev. Compiler will only not show me my RUN execuable. Help! (09/03/04)
  • Re: generalised linked list routines - opinion appreciated (09/03/04)
  • Re: Removing white spaces and tab characters (09/03/04)
  • Re: exit() (09/03/04)
  • Re: critique: conversion to binary (09/03/04)
  • Re: string length questions related to fseek (09/03/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: [OT] C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: Local Heap? (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/03/04)
  • Re: Colon (:) syntax in defining fields in a struct (09/02/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/02/04)
  • Re: What data type would you prefer and why? (09/02/04)
  • Re: I don't understand a past thread (help) (09/02/04)
  • Re: Local Heap? (09/02/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/02/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/02/04)
  • Re: type VARIANT and array - conversion to CString (09/02/04)
  • Re: Local Heap? (09/02/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/02/04)
  • Re: Calling fortran subroutine from c (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/02/04)
  • Re: Calling fortran subroutine from c (09/02/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/02/04)
  • Re: Colon (:) syntax in defining fields in a struct (09/01/04)
  • Re: webpage bookmark program in C (09/01/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
  • Re: Different outputs in different environments. (09/01/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/01/04)
  • Re: Small C "Puzzle" (09/01/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
  • Re: Small C "Puzzle" (09/01/04)
• Charles Sanders
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/02/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
• Charlie Gordon
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/16/04)
  • Re: Need help on bit operations define (09/16/04)
• chella mani
  • Doubt-Efficiecy of 3D arrays (09/20/04)
• chetan
  • operator overloading (09/09/04)
  • operator overloading (09/08/04)
• Choe
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/24/04)
• ChokSheak Lau
  • C external execution - trap stdout + stderr (09/16/04)
• Chris
  • Re: webpage bookmark program in C (09/02/04)
  • webpage bookmark program in C (09/01/04)
• Chris Barts
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/27/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/25/04)
  • Re: News (09/20/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/17/04)
  • Re: union access (09/15/04)
  • Re: Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/14/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/14/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/12/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/12/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/12/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/10/04)
  • Re: parsing in C (09/10/04)
  • Re: static link a library (09/10/04)
  • Re: Reading Simple Flatfiles with a COBOL Mindset (09/10/04)
  • Re: Book Recommendations? (09/10/04)
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/10/04)
  • Re: C Preprocessor - Cascaded Macros (09/10/04)
  • Re: Book Recommendations? (09/08/04)
  • Re: parsing in C (09/08/04)
• Chris Dollin
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: Function arguments (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: union access (09/24/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/22/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
• Chris Hills
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/13/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/11/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/11/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/09/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/09/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/08/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/01/04)
• Chris Torek
  • Re: while Vs for loop (09/30/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +1 (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: a history question (09/27/04)
  • Re: sscanf parsing doubt (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/26/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/25/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/25/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/25/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/24/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/23/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/23/04)
  • Re: Q: volatile struct elements or entire struct? (09/23/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/20/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/18/04)
  • Re: union access (09/16/04)
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/16/04)
  • Re: Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/15/04)
  • Re: Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/15/04)
  • Re: Wide string initializer syntax (09/15/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/09/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/09/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/08/04)
  • Re: volatile expression (09/07/04)
  • Re: scanf pushes back two chars? (09/06/04)
  • Re: Segfault question. (09/06/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/05/04)
  • Re: string literals question (09/05/04)
  • on indentation (was Re: Segfault question.) (09/05/04)
  • Re: Determining EOF using fseek()? (09/05/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/05/04)
  • Re: Fix your FAQ (09/04/04)
  • Re: Determining EOF using fseek()? (09/04/04)
  • Re: Object Oriented Programming in C, Avoid Memory Allocation (09/04/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/04/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT, welcom msg] Usage of VxWorks setsockopt() (09/03/04)
  • Re: Typedef structs (08/31/04)
• Christian Bau
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/16/04)
  • Re: union access (09/14/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/14/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/11/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/11/04)
  • Re: Performance Programming (09/11/04)
  • Re: Performance Programming (09/11/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/11/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/10/04)
  • Re: Does realloc "move" a block it shortens? (09/10/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/09/04)
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/09/04)
  • Re: switch and if..else same at assemby code ? (09/07/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/06/04)
  • Re: Object Oriented Programming in C, Avoid Memory Allocation (09/04/04)
• Christian Kandeler
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
• Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: Order of structure members in memory (09/26/04)
  • Order of structure members in memory (09/26/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/23/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/23/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/23/04)
  • Re: calling fopen using function (09/23/04)
  • Re: removing a loop from a linked list? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/20/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/16/04)
  • Re: string & bytes (09/15/04)
  • Re: Question about declaring Floating Point Variable in a Structure (09/15/04)
  • Re: Short-Circuit Evaluation of Boolean Expressions (09/13/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
  • Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/10/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/10/04)
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/09/04)
  • Re: Mail bomber (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: nested function support (09/05/04)
  • Re: How to convert int to char * ? (09/05/04)
  • Re: Dynamic loop nesting (09/02/04)
  • Re: Dynamic loop nesting (09/02/04)
  • Re: webpage bookmark program in C (09/02/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/01/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/01/04)
• clilley
  • Re: #include optimization (09/28/04)
• Code Raptor
  • Re: free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/15/04)
  • free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/15/04)
• Coos Haak
  • Re: Daylight saving (09/17/04)
  • Re: parsing in C (09/11/04)
• copx
  • string literals question (09/05/04)
• csudha
  • about header files (09/16/04)
  • Difference between Structure & Union (09/10/04)
• Curious Student
  • Screen Handling (09/22/04)
• Dag Viken
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: Pointer Usage (09/30/04)
  • Re: sscanf parsing doubt (09/27/04)
  • comp.lang.c.moderated group? (09/27/04)
  • Re: syntax for e (natural logs) (09/27/04)
• Dale
  • Re: Newbie Question about #ifdef (09/07/04)
• damian birchler
  • Re: no lcm in standard library? (09/14/04)
  • no lcm in standard library? (09/13/04)
• Dan Espen
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
• Dan Pop
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/30/04)
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/30/04)
  • Re: fopen() vs. open() (09/30/04)
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/30/04)
  • Re: invalid floating point value (09/30/04)
  • Re: Function arguments (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: a history question (09/30/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/30/04)
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/30/04)
  • Re: invalid floating point value (09/30/04)
  • Re: invalid floating point value (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/29/04)
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] struct and union alignment (09/29/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/29/04)
  • Re: invalid floating point value (09/29/04)
  • Re: #include optimization (09/29/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +1 (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: a history question (09/29/04)
  • Re: opinions on logical OR variation (09/28/04)
  • Re: #include optimization (09/28/04)
  • Re: (argc == 0), was Re: elementary construction +1 (09/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] struct and union alignment (09/28/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/28/04)
  • Re: sscanf parsing doubt (09/28/04)
  • Re: strstr(char *str1, char *str2) (09/28/04)
  • Re: Obtain sizeof struct element using offsetof()? (09/28/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/28/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/28/04)
  • Re: (argc == 0), was Re: elementary construction +1 (09/28/04)
  • Re: a history question (09/28/04)
  • Re: Why is this allowed in C? (09/27/04)
  • Re: a history question (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: Obtain sizeof struct element using offsetof()? (09/27/04)
  • Re: Embedded systems and C programming (09/27/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/27/04)
  • Re: strstr(char *str1, char *str2) (09/27/04)
  • Re: sscanf parsing doubt (09/27/04)
  • Re: Pointer question [ Newbie ] (09/27/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/27/04)
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/27/04)
  • Re: Embedded systems and C programming (09/27/04)
  • Re: elementary construction (09/27/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/27/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.c.moderated group? (09/27/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/27/04)
  • Re: (argc == 0), was Re: elementary construction +1 (09/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/24/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: Pointer question [ Newbie ] (09/24/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/24/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/24/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/24/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/24/04)
  • Re: Managing global vars between files (09/24/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/24/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/24/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/24/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/24/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/24/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/23/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: Managing global vars between files (09/23/04)
  • Re: elementary construction follow-up (09/23/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/23/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/22/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: c-book (09/22/04)
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/22/04)
  • Re: union access (09/22/04)
  • Re: Screen Handling (09/22/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: C compling Error on IBM 390 (09/21/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/21/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/21/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/21/04)
  • Re: union access (09/21/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/21/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Why not 64 bit under 32? (09/17/04)
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/17/04)
  • Re: union access (09/17/04)
  • Re: variable changed, but i didn't change is. (09/17/04)
  • Re: union access (09/17/04)
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/17/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/17/04)
  • Re: Loop Optimization, Array Alignment (09/16/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/16/04)
  • Re: about header files (09/16/04)
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/16/04)
  • Re: union access (09/16/04)
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/16/04)
  • Re: union access (09/15/04)
  • [OT] Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/15/04)
  • Re: union access (09/15/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/14/04)
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/14/04)
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/14/04)
  • Re: Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/14/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/09/04)
  • Re: operator overloading (09/09/04)
  • Re: Book Recommendations? (09/09/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/09/04)
  • Re: operator overloading (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: parsing in C (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: volatile expression (09/08/04)
  • Re: volatile expression (09/08/04)
  • Re: parsing in C (09/08/04)
  • Re: parsing in C (09/08/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/08/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/08/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/08/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/07/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/07/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/07/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/07/04)
  • Re: stripping newline from input (09/06/04)
  • Re: some C puzzles (09/06/04)
  • Re: Fix your FAQ (09/06/04)
  • Re: exit() (09/06/04)
  • Re: Compiler (gcc) option to abort on nan? (09/06/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/06/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/06/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/03/04)
  • Re: stripping newline from input (09/03/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/03/04)
  • Re: some C puzzles (09/03/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/03/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/03/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/01/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/01/04)
  • Re: returning an array of integers (09/01/04)
  • Re: Colon (:) syntax in defining fields in a struct (09/01/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
  • Re: Another one for the frame and the wall (Was: Re: C or Fortran obsolete? (was Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy")) (09/01/04)
  • Re: Project (09/01/04)
  • Re: C or Fortran obsolete? (was Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy") (09/01/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
  • Re: stripping newline from input (09/01/04)
  • Re: some C puzzles (09/01/04)
  • Re: C or Fortran obsolete? (was Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy") (09/01/04)
  • Re: C or Fortran obsolete? (was Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy") (09/01/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/01/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
• Dances With Crows
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/23/04)
• Darklight
  • Re: question (09/20/04)
  • question (09/19/04)
  • Re: exit() (09/03/04)
  • exit() (09/03/04)
• Dave
  • Re: opinions on logical OR variation (09/28/04)
  • Re: How do I pass the & instead of a ptr? (09/27/04)
  • Re: Timer in a C Program (09/15/04)
  • Re: Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/14/04)
  • Re: Difference between Structure & Union (09/10/04)
  • Re: Please find out what is wrong (09/10/04)
• Dave Hansen
  • Re: Programming Language Usage [was: C 99 compiler access] (09/10/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
• Dave Thompson
  • Re: Embedded systems and C programming (09/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/27/04)
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/23/04)
  • Re: #ifdef (09/23/04)
  • Re: simple word wrap problem not wrapping (09/20/04)
  • Re: simple word wrap problem not wrapping (09/13/04)
  • Re: linux socket help (09/13/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/08/04)
  • Re: simple word wrap problem not wrapping (09/08/04)
  • Re: Will EXIT_SUCCESS and EXIT_FAILURE have the same value on all platforms? (09/08/04)
  • Re: Typedef structs (09/03/04)
  • Re: #def question (09/03/04)
• Dave Vandervies
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: OO in C (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: Endless loop question (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: elementary construction follow-up (09/23/04)
  • Re: ping source code (09/17/04)
  • Re: ping source code (09/16/04)
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/15/04)
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/14/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/13/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/10/04)
  • Re: Reading Simple Flatfiles with a COBOL Mindset (09/10/04)
  • Re: Reading Simple Flatfiles with a COBOL Mindset (09/09/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/07/04)
  • Re: volatile expression (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/02/04)
  • Re: Dynamic loop nesting (09/02/04)
• David A. Holland
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/09/04)
• David Hopwood
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
• David R Tribble
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/07/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/04/04)
• dbtid
  • Re: Problems implementing Rijndael (09/03/04)
  • Re: Develping a good scheduler for ARINC transmission... advice needed (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/02/04)
• DD
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
• Default User
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.c.moderated group? (09/28/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/28/04)
  • Re: while Vs for loop (09/27/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/27/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: mysql problem (09/23/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/21/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
  • Re: union access (09/20/04)
  • Re: K and R & Fuehrerschaft (09/17/04)
  • Re: C Beginner Question (09/16/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/10/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/09/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/09/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/07/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/04/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/04/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/03/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: I don't understand a past thread (help) (09/02/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (I WAS WRONG) (09/02/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/02/04)
  • Re: Project (09/01/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
• Derek
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/09/04)
  • Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/09/04)
• Derrick Coetzee
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/28/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/28/04)
  • Re: Obtain sizeof struct element using offsetof()? (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: New Hand of the C Program (09/28/04)
  • Re: Why is this allowed in C? (09/28/04)
  • Re: Obtain sizeof struct element using offsetof()? (09/28/04)
  • Re: # inside a macro body (09/28/04)
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/28/04)
  • Re: syntax for e (natural logs) (09/27/04)
  • Re: Order of structure members in memory (09/27/04)
  • Re: 6 byte integer to string (09/26/04)
  • Re: 6 byte integer to string (09/26/04)
  • Re: 6 byte integer to string (09/26/04)
  • Re: 6 byte integer to string (09/26/04)
  • Re: 6 byte integer to string (09/26/04)
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/26/04)
  • Re: New Hand of the C Program (09/26/04)
  • Re: Variable Sized Struct Members? (09/26/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/26/04)
  • Re: Rectangle intersection (09/26/04)
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/26/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/25/04)
  • Re: elementary construction (09/25/04)
  • Re: elementary construction (09/25/04)
  • Re: strstr(char *str1, char *str2) (09/25/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/25/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/24/04)
  • Re: Pointer question [ Newbie ] (09/24/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: Unit / Coverage testing (09/22/04)
  • Re: malloc and pointer hell (09/21/04)
  • Re: removing a loop from a linked list? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Doubt-Efficiecy of 3D arrays (09/21/04)
  • Re: Need help on bit operations define (09/19/04)
  • Re: declaring array of pointers (09/19/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/17/04)
  • Re: C Beginner Question (09/16/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/16/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/16/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/16/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/16/04)
  • New Annotations (09/16/04)
  • Re: Wide string initializer syntax (09/15/04)
  • Re: union access (09/14/04)
  • Re: typedef function pointer (09/13/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/13/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/12/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/12/04)
  • Re: Wide string initializer syntax (09/12/04)
  • Re: Performance Programming (09/11/04)
  • Re: Need help for optimising nested ifs-help me plz panic situation!!! (09/11/04)
  • Wide string initializer syntax (09/11/04)
  • Re: switch and if..else same at assemby code ? (09/08/04)
  • Re: switch and if..else same at assemby code ? (09/08/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/05/04)
  • Re: Object Oriented Programming in C, Avoid Memory Allocation (09/04/04)
  • Re: Object Oriented Programming in C, Avoid Memory Allocation (09/04/04)
  • Re: Object Oriented Programming in C, Avoid Memory Allocation (09/04/04)
  • Re: Object Oriented Programming in C, Avoid Memory Allocation (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/04/04)
  • Re: Need help on bit operations define (09/02/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: fscanf and linked list problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/02/04)
  • Re: [OT] Printing source code (09/02/04)
  • Re: How to create folder at fopen? (09/01/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/01/04)
  • Re: How to create folder at fopen? (09/01/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/01/04)
• dieymir
  • SET ADT (09/29/04)
• Dik T. Winter
  • Re: invalid floating point value (09/30/04)
  • Re: invalid floating point value (09/30/04)
  • Re: invalid floating point value (09/29/04)
  • Re: no lcm in standard library? (09/16/04)
  • Re: no lcm in standard library? (09/15/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/09/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/09/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/09/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/02/04)
• Dingo
  • Re: bitwise subnetscanning? (08/31/04)
• DJP
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/23/04)
• Does It Matter
  • Re: Removing white spaces and tab characters (09/03/04)
  • Re: critique: conversion to binary (09/03/04)
• Dominic Maier
  • brother tree insert (09/07/04)
• Doug Freyburger
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/22/04)
• Douglas A. Gwyn
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/30/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/30/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/29/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/19/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/14/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/08/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/08/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/08/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/08/04)
  • Re: Need help on bit operations define (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: Need help on bit operations define (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/02/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
• Douglas G
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: simple word wrap problem not wrapping (09/09/04)
  • Re: simple word wrap problem not wrapping (09/01/04)
• Dragan Cvetkovic
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
• E. Robert Tisdale
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/29/04)
  • Re: #include optimization (09/29/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: #include optimization (09/28/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.c.moderated group? (09/28/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/28/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/28/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.c.moderated group? (09/27/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.c.moderated group? (09/27/04)
  • Re: a history question (09/27/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/27/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/26/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/26/04)
  • Re: Isn't C Programming In DOS, A Part Of This Newsgroup? (09/26/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/26/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/25/04)
  • Re: Managing global vars between files (09/24/04)
  • Re: Please find out what is wrong (09/10/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/09/04)
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/09/04)
  • Troll Alert: Mail bomber (09/07/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/07/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/06/04)
  • Re: Object Oriented Programming in C, Avoid Memory Allocation (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/02/04)
  • Re: Calling fortran subroutine from c (09/01/04)
  • Re: Calling fortran subroutine from c (09/01/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/01/04)
• Ed Davis
  • Re: compilers & stack machines (09/19/04)
• Ed Morton
  • Re: Need help for optimising nested ifs-help me plz panic situation!!! (09/11/04)
• Eddie
  • Re: Geting info (09/14/04)
  • Geting info (09/13/04)
• Edmund Bacon
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/20/04)
• Emlyn Corrin
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
• Emmanuel Delahaye
  • Re: Bete Test for MPC Compiler/IDE (09/21/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/19/04)
  • Re: Embedded systems and C programming (09/19/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/05/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/05/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/05/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/05/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/05/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/05/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/05/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/05/04)
  • Re: Puzzle (09/04/04)
  • Re: Bloodshed Dev. Compiler will only not show me my RUN execuable. Help! (09/04/04)
  • Re: array of functions (09/03/04)
  • Re: critique: conversion to binary (09/03/04)
  • Re: Bloodshed Dev. Compiler will only not show me my RUN execuable. Help! (09/03/04)
  • Re: Removing white spaces and tab characters (09/03/04)
  • Re: exit() (09/03/04)
• Emmet Gorhsen
  • Re: linux speaker beep (09/19/04)
• Eric Amick
  • Re: Order of structure members in memory (09/26/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/03/04)
• Eric Sosman
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/30/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/28/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/28/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/28/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/27/04)
  • Re: Why is this allowed in C? (09/27/04)
  • Re: Obtain sizeof struct element using offsetof()? (09/27/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/27/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/27/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: elementary construction (09/22/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/11/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
  • Re: Does realloc "move" a block it shortens? (09/10/04)
  • Re: Reading Simple Flatfiles with a COBOL Mindset (09/09/04)
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/09/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/09/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/09/04)
  • Re: Cracking C structure (09/08/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/08/04)
  • Re: MARKING STRUCTS PROCESSED (09/08/04)
  • Re: Creating a va_list (09/08/04)
  • Re: string length questions related to fseek (09/04/04)
  • Re: string length questions related to fseek (09/03/04)
  • Re: string length questions related to fseek (09/03/04)
  • Re: array of functions (09/03/04)
  • Re: string length questions related to fseek (09/03/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/02/04)
  • Re: How to create folder at fopen? (09/02/04)
  • Re: integer array (09/01/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/01/04)
  • Re: returning an array of integers (09/01/04)
  • Re: integer array (09/01/04)
  • Re: Calling a function using its pointer- (08/31/04)
• EricLi
  • "crunch"--I@can't understant its meaning! (09/28/04)
• Erik de Castro Lopo
  • Re: Bloodshed Dev. Compiler will only not show me my RUN execuable. Help! (09/04/04)
• Estella
  • strtok & global variables (09/06/04)
• Fao, Sean
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/02/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/01/04)
  • Re: Colon (:) syntax in defining fields in a struct (09/01/04)
  • Re: Colon (:) syntax in defining fields in a struct (09/01/04)
  • Re: A for loop iterating over the complete range of a variable (09/01/04)
• Fatted
  • Re: mysql problem (09/23/04)
  • malloc and pointer hell (09/21/04)
• fb
  • Pointer conversion (09/04/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/04/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
• Felipe Magno de Almeida
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/23/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: question (09/20/04)
  • Re: Doubt-Efficiecy of 3D arrays (09/20/04)
  • Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/20/04)
• Fergus Henderson
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/09/04)
• Flash Gordon
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/30/04)
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: Endless loop question (09/29/04)
  • Re: Endless loop question (09/29/04)
  • Re: printf conversion problem (09/26/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/26/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: newbie-question: comments (09/23/04)
  • Re: C Program Portability (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/22/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/22/04)
  • Re: C Program Portability (09/22/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/21/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/21/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/20/04)
  • Re: Doubt-Efficiecy of 3D arrays (09/20/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/17/04)
  • Re: Accessing members of array as a different type (09/17/04)
  • Re: Accessing members of array as a different type (09/16/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/16/04)
  • Re: free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/15/04)
  • Re: free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/15/04)
  • Re: Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/15/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/14/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/13/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/13/04)
  • Re: opendir doesn't work.. (add)... (09/12/04)
  • Re: Performance Programming (09/12/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/12/04)
  • Re: Book Recommendations? (09/12/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/12/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/09/04)
  • Re: removing Spaces (09/09/04)
  • Re: Book Recommendations? (09/09/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/09/04)
  • Re: removing Spaces (09/09/04)
  • Re: Book Recommendations? (09/08/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/03/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/03/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/03/04)
  • Re: exit() (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/03/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/02/04)
  • Re: some C puzzles (09/02/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/02/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
  • Re: Different outputs in different environments. (09/01/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/01/04)
  • Re: Small C "Puzzle" (09/01/04)
• Francis Glassborow
  • Re: Need help on bit operations define (09/19/04)
• Francois Grieu
  • Re: removing a loop from a linked list? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Does realloc "move" a block it shortens? (09/11/04)
  • Does realloc "move" a block it shortens? (09/10/04)
• Fred J. Tydeman
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
• Fred L. Kleinschmidt
  • Re: a history question (09/27/04)
  • Re: Calling fortran subroutine from c (09/01/04)
• Fredrik Tolf
  • OT: Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • OT: Re: fopen() vs. open() (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: fopen() vs. open() (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: C library VS (Unix) System calls ? (09/16/04)
  • Re: [OT] Printing source code (09/02/04)
• Frodo Baggins
  • Re: "does not give a valid preprocessing token"... Why? (09/16/04)
  • "does not give a valid preprocessing token"... Why? (09/15/04)
• G. S. Hayes
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/13/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/11/04)
  • Re: [OT} Function Call Tree Command in UNIX. (09/09/04)
  • Re: Function Call Tree Command in UNIX. (09/07/04)
• Gaurav Verma
  • Floating point number to binary (09/16/04)
• Gene Wirchenko
  • Re: comp.lang.c Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ List) (09/04/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/02/04)
• George Fulk
  • Re: Invoking A DOS Program Through A "C" Program (09/28/04)
• Gernot Frisch
  • Re: operator overloading (09/08/04)
• Giorgos Keramidas
  • Re: newbie-question: comments (09/23/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/23/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
• gnutuxy_at_yahoo.co.in
  • Unis signal handling in parent child scenario. (09/30/04)
• gopal srinivasan
  • Re: Removing white spaces and tab characters - we can avoid tab characters (09/07/04)
  • Re: Removing white spaces and tab characters - we can avoid tab characters (09/07/04)
  • Re: Removing white spaces and tab characters - we can avoid tab characters (09/06/04)
  • Removing white spaces and tab characters (09/03/04)
• Goran Larsson
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/27/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/02/04)
• Gordon Burditt
  • Re: attempt at qsort implementation (09/29/04)
  • Re: attempt at qsort implementation (09/29/04)
  • Re: invalid floating point value (09/29/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/20/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/19/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/18/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/17/04)
  • Re: union access (09/17/04)
  • Re: Question about declaring Floating Point Variable in a Structure (09/15/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
  • Re: MARKING STRUCTS PROCESSED (09/09/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/09/04)
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/09/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/07/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/07/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/05/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/04/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: Shortcircuitting with -Inf float value. (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
• Greg
  • problem with implementing pipe (09/29/04)
• Gregg
  • Re: #include optimization (09/29/04)
• Gregory Pietsch
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/18/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: qsort(...) in <stdlib.h> (09/06/04)
• Grocery Clerk
  • fopen() vs. open() (09/30/04)
• grv575
  • Re: Array size limits (09/03/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/03/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/03/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/03/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
• guggach
  • Re: pwd (09/14/04)
  • Re: removing Spaces (09/14/04)
• Guillaume
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/27/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/16/04)
• Hallvard B Furuseth
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/08/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/08/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
• Hans-Bernhard Broeker
  • Re: comp.lang.c Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ List) (09/04/04)
• Hardrock
  • Re: Dynamic loop nesting (09/13/04)
  • Re: Dynamic loop nesting (09/13/04)
  • Dynamic loop nesting (09/02/04)
• hasadh
  • Re: switch and if..else same at assemby code ? (09/08/04)
  • switch and if..else same at assemby code ? (09/07/04)
• Hash
  • #ifdef (09/16/04)
• Heiko Vogel
  • How to convert a double **ptr in a double const ** const ptr? (09/12/04)
• Henry Samuelson
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/03/04)
  • Some bit manipulation (09/01/04)
• Igmar Palsenberg
  • Re: Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/14/04)
  • Re: glibc: socket and fdopen (09/03/04)
• Ignacio De Marco
  • Problems implementing Rijndael (09/02/04)
• Ilja Booij
  • Re: parsing time string, getting timezone (09/10/04)
  • parsing time string, getting timezone (09/08/04)
• Ioannis Vranos
  • Re: C++ wins over C !! (09/07/04)
  • Re: C++ wins over C !! (09/07/04)
  • Re: C++ wins over C !! (09/07/04)
  • Re: C++ wins over C !! (09/07/04)
  • Re: Fix your FAQ (09/04/04)
  • Re: Fix your FAQ (09/04/04)
  • Re: Fix your FAQ (09/04/04)
  • Fix your FAQ (09/04/04)
• Ira Baxter
  • Re: Cracking C structure (09/10/04)
• Ivan A. Kosarev
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: Obtain sizeof struct element using offsetof()? (09/28/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/28/04)
• Ivan Voras
  • Re: Problems implementing Rijndael (09/08/04)
• iwaypathak_at_yahoo.com
  • turbo assembler (09/10/04)
• j
  • Re: b = 2 / a[2] (09/16/04)
  • Re: Geting info (09/14/04)
  • Re: How to convert a double **ptr in a double const ** const ptr? (09/14/04)
  • Re: strtok & global variables (09/06/04)
• J. J. Farrell
  • Re: Isn't C Programming In DOS, A Part Of This Newsgroup? (09/27/04)
  • Re: Wide string initializer syntax (09/16/04)
• j0mbolar
  • opinions on logical OR variation (09/28/04)
  • Re: Obtain sizeof struct element using offsetof()? (09/28/04)
• Jack Klein
  • Re: fopen() vs. open() (09/30/04)
  • Re: Pointer Usage (09/30/04)
  • Re: #include optimization (09/29/04)
  • Re: Order of structure members in memory (09/26/04)
  • Re: printf conversion problem (09/26/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/24/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/24/04)
  • Re: elementary construction follow-up (09/23/04)
  • Re: context switching with setjmp (09/22/04)
  • Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis (09/19/04)
  • Re: Exception handling (09/19/04)
  • Re: linux speaker beep (09/19/04)
  • Re: Why not 64 bit under 32? (09/17/04)
  • Re: Passing and returning arrays to and from functions (09/17/04)
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/17/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/17/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/17/04)
  • Re: Question about declaring Floating Point Variable in a Structure (09/16/04)
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/09/04)
  • Re: MARKING STRUCTS PROCESSED (09/09/04)
  • Re: operator overloading (09/09/04)
  • Re: volatile expression (09/08/04)
  • Re: Book Recommendations? (09/08/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/08/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/07/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/06/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/06/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/06/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/06/04)
  • Re: scanf pushes back two chars? (09/06/04)
  • Re: How to make the text stand out (09/06/04)
  • Re: string literals question (09/06/04)
  • Re: string literals question (09/06/04)
  • Re: qsort(...) in <stdlib.h> (09/05/04)
  • Re: Max Size of argv[1] ??? (09/02/04)
  • Re: input problem (09/01/04)
• jacob navia
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/21/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/20/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/20/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/20/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/20/04)
  • Re: about header files (09/16/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/12/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/11/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/11/04)
  • Re: operator overloading (09/08/04)
  • Re: switch and if..else same at assemby code ? (09/07/04)
  • Re: Function Call Tree Command in UNIX. (09/07/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/06/04)
  • Re: C or Fortran obsolete? (was Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy") (09/01/04)
• Jacques
  • how do i link 3rd party lib on windows ? (09/27/04)
• Jacques Labuschagne
  • Re: how do i link 3rd party lib on windows ? (09/27/04)
• James
  • Max Size of argv[1] ??? (09/01/04)
• James A
  • Re: Accessing members of array as a different type (09/17/04)
  • Re: Accessing members of array as a different type (09/17/04)
  • Accessing members of array as a different type (09/16/04)
• James Antill
  • Re: Unit / Coverage testing (09/29/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
• James Dow Allen
  • Re: declaring array of pointers (09/19/04)
  • Re: Processing Bit Fields (flag) that represent request as quickly/efficient as possible...is there better approach? (09/01/04)
• James Hu
  • Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/20/04)
  • Welcome to comp.lang.c! (09/20/04)
  • Welcome to comp.lang.c! (09/07/04)
• James Kuyper
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/30/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/28/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/28/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/27/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/12/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/11/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/02/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/01/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (08/31/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (08/31/04)
• James Pascoe
  • MARKING STRUCTS PROCESSED (09/08/04)
• James Stevenson
  • Re: signals (SIGBUS and SIGSEGV) (09/03/04)
• Jani Yusef
  • Re: need help creating a tree of processes(implemented in C) (09/23/04)
  • Re: need help creating a tree of processes(implemented in C) (09/23/04)
  • need help creating a tree of processes(implemented in C) (09/23/04)
  • removing a loop from a linked list? (09/21/04)
• Jarno A Wuolijoki
  • Re: [ot] Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/28/04)
• Jason Curl
  • Re: memory (09/22/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/22/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/20/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/13/04)
• Jasper Aikema
  • Re: variable changed, but i didn't change is. (09/16/04)
  • Re: variable changed, but i didn't change is. (09/16/04)
  • variable changed, but i didn't change is. (09/16/04)
• Jens.Toerring_at_physik.fu-berlin.de
  • Re: problem with implementing pipe (09/29/04)
  • Re: problem with implementing pipe (09/29/04)
  • Re: elementary construction (09/22/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/22/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/21/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/20/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/17/04)
  • Re: Accessing members of array as a different type (09/17/04)
  • Re: ping source code (09/16/04)
  • Re: Accessing members of array as a different type (09/16/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/16/04)
  • Re: variable changed, but i didn't change is. (09/16/04)
  • Re: variable changed, but i didn't change is. (09/16/04)
  • [OT] Re: C library VS (Unix) System calls ? (09/16/04)
  • Re: about header files (09/16/04)
  • Re: array a[(foo)()] (help) (09/16/04)
  • Re: free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/15/04)
  • Re: free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/15/04)
  • Re: LINKER/LOADER DOUBT (09/15/04)
  • Re: free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/15/04)
  • Re: typedef function pointer (09/13/04)
  • Re: Postfix / Prefix Operators on array / pointer, search key word wanted [OT] (09/10/04)
  • Re: two dimensional arrays passed to functions (09/10/04)
  • Re: two dimensional arrays passed to functions (09/09/04)
  • Re: Open a file in C (09/08/04)
  • Re: Structure Query.... (09/08/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/04/04)
  • Re: array of functions (09/03/04)
  • Re: exit() (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/03/04)
  • Re: I don't understand a past thread (help) (09/02/04)
  • Re: I don't understand a past thread (help) (09/02/04)
  • Re: Different outputs in different environments. (09/02/04)
  • Re: integer array (09/01/04)
  • Re: How to create folder at fopen? (09/01/04)
  • Re: integer array (09/01/04)
  • Re: Max Size of argv[1] ??? (09/01/04)
  • Re: Calling a function using its pointer- (09/01/04)
  • Re: Different outputs in different environments. (09/01/04)
• Jerald
  • Re: C program to flowchart (09/09/04)
• jgcrawford_at_gmail.com
  • Re: linux speaker beep (09/18/04)
  • linux speaker beep (09/18/04)
• Jim
  • Re: K and R & Fuehrerschaft (09/17/04)
  • Re: Why not 64 bit under 32? (09/17/04)
• JKop
  • Re: operator overloading (09/08/04)
• jmh
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/19/04)
• jnf
  • Re: malloc and free (09/07/04)
• Joakim Hove
  • Compiler (gcc) option to abort on nan? (09/06/04)
• Joe Wright
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/26/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/26/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/18/04)
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/15/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/14/04)
  • Re: file operation (09/14/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/12/04)
  • Re: removing Spaces (09/10/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/08/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/06/04)
  • Re: string literals question (09/05/04)
  • Re: Determining EOF using fseek()? (09/05/04)
  • Re: string length questions related to fseek (09/04/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/04/04)
  • Re: Max Size of argv[1] ??? (09/02/04)
  • Re: simple word wrap problem not wrapping (09/01/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
• John Bode
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/30/04)
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: calling fopen using function (09/23/04)
  • Re: Passing and returning arrays to and from functions (09/22/04)
  • Re: Passing and returning arrays to and from functions (09/21/04)
  • Re: malloc and pointer hell (09/21/04)
  • Re: string & bytes (09/17/04)
  • Re: Passing and returning arrays to and from functions (09/17/04)
  • Re: #ifdef (09/16/04)
  • Re: string & bytes (09/16/04)
  • Re: string & bytes (09/15/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/15/04)
  • Re: typedef function pointer (09/13/04)
  • Re: Does realloc "move" a block it shortens? (09/10/04)
  • Re: Newbie Question about #ifdef (09/09/04)
• John Burton
  • Re: glibc: socket and fdopen (09/05/04)
  • Re: glibc: socket and fdopen (09/04/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
• John F. Bode
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/25/04)
  • Re: Passing and returning arrays to and from functions (09/22/04)
• John Hanley
  • int to string (09/11/04)
• John Harrison
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/30/04)
• John Smith
  • Re: data type promotion (09/06/04)
  • data type promotion (09/06/04)
  • Re: critique: conversion to binary (09/03/04)
  • Re: [OT, welcom msg] Usage of VxWorks setsockopt() (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: stripping newline from input (09/01/04)
• John Temples
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/24/04)
  • Re: volatile expression (09/08/04)
  • volatile expression (09/07/04)
• JohnK
  • Re: Unit / Coverage testing (09/29/04)
• Jonathan Adams
  • Re: Unis signal handling in parent child scenario. (09/30/04)
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/27/04)
  • Re: C Beginner Question (09/20/04)
  • Re: C Beginner Question (09/20/04)
  • Re: problem adding into a tree (09/20/04)
  • Re: C Beginner Question (09/20/04)
• Jonathan Hoyle
  • Re: size of an integer ?? (09/01/04)
• Joona I Palaste
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: SMBus find devices (09/29/04)
  • Re: Qcrunch=22=2D=2DI=81=40can=27t?= understant its meaning! (09/28/04)
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/28/04)
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/27/04)
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/27/04)
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/27/04)
  • Re: New Hand of the C Program (09/26/04)
  • Re: Invoking A DOS Program Through A "C" Program (09/26/04)
  • Re: How can I use socket.h? (09/25/04)
  • Re: Rectangle intersection (09/25/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +1 (09/24/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/24/04)
  • Re: calling fopen using function (09/24/04)
  • Re: Pointer question [ Newbie ] (09/23/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/23/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/23/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/23/04)
  • Re: great (09/23/04)
  • Re: calling fopen using function (09/23/04)
  • Re: elementary construction (09/22/04)
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/22/04)
  • Re: WinAPI to locate a file in directory (09/22/04)
  • Re: Problem with DO-WHILE Loop (09/22/04)
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/20/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: linux speaker beep (09/18/04)
  • Re: ping source code (09/17/04)
  • Re: ping source code (09/17/04)
  • Re: ping source code (09/16/04)
  • Re: ping source code (09/16/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/16/04)
  • Re: variable changed, but i didn't change is. (09/16/04)
  • Re: variable changed, but i didn't change is. (09/16/04)
  • Re: b = 2 / a[2] (09/16/04)
  • Re: "does not give a valid preprocessing token"... Why? (09/15/04)
  • Re: Gmail invitation (09/15/04)
  • Re: typedef function pointer (09/14/04)
  • Re: How to make the text stand out (09/13/04)
  • Re: Geting info (09/13/04)
  • Re: porting curses driven to gui application (09/12/04)
  • Re: meaning of dialet or implementation of a programming language (09/11/04)
  • Re: turbo assembler (09/10/04)
  • Re: operator overloading (09/08/04)
  • Re: operator overloading (09/08/04)
  • Re: volatile expression (09/07/04)
  • Re: Bloodshed Dev. Compiler will only not show me my RUN execuable. Help! (09/07/04)
  • Re: Bloodshed Dev. Compiler will only not show me my RUN execuable. Help! (09/03/04)
  • Re: How to create folder at fopen? (09/03/04)
  • Re: Dynamic loop nesting (09/02/04)
  • Re: Detecting multiple keypress(es) in C (09/02/04)
  • Re: type VARIANT and array - conversion to CString (09/02/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/02/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/01/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/01/04)
• Joris Adriaenssens
  • Re: malloc and free (09/07/04)
  • malloc and free (09/06/04)
• Joseph Myers
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/02/04)
• joshua crawford
  • Re: linux speaker beep (09/21/04)
  • Re: linux speaker beep (09/19/04)
• José María Mateos
  • Re: Gmail invitation (09/26/04)
• Julian V. Noble
  • Re: compilers & stack machines (09/20/04)
• Julián Albo
  • Re: operator overloading (09/08/04)
• junky_fellow
  • Re: parsing in C (09/13/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/09/04)
  • parsing in C (09/08/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/08/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/07/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/02/04)
  • Re: Problem with passing dynamic arrays by reference (09/01/04)
• kal
  • Re: unsigned long long + int (09/29/04)
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/29/04)
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/28/04)
  • Re: Loop Optimization, Array Alignment (09/18/04)
  • Re: Reading Simple Flatfiles with a COBOL Mindset (09/10/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/07/04)
  • Re: switch and if..else same at assemby code ? (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
• Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
  • Re: Need help on bit operations define (09/06/04)
• kapilk
  • +++i (09/07/04)
• Karatza Helen
  • Call for Papers: 38th Annual Simulation Symposium (09/09/04)
• Karthik Kumar
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/09/04)
  • Re: Detecting multiple keypress(es) in C (09/03/04)
  • Re: Local Heap? (09/02/04)
  • Re: [OT] Printing source code (09/02/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: Colon (:) syntax in defining fields in a struct (09/01/04)
  • Re: Quadratic Formula Woes (09/01/04)
  • [OT] Re: make (09/01/04)
• Katrin Tomanek
  • SIOCGSTAMP question (09/28/04)
• kaul
  • creating a 2-d array using dynamic memory allocation (09/08/04)
• Kay
  • How to convert int to char * ? (09/05/04)
• Keith Thompson
  • Re: fopen() vs. open() (09/30/04)
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: a history question (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/29/04)
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/29/04)
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/29/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: #include optimization (09/29/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/28/04)
  • Re: #include optimization (09/28/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/28/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.c.moderated group? (09/28/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/28/04)
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/28/04)
  • Re: strstr(char *str1, char *str2) (09/28/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/28/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/28/04)
  • Re: syntax for e (natural logs) (09/28/04)
  • Re: syntax for e (natural logs) (09/27/04)
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/27/04)
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/27/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/27/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/26/04)
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/26/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/25/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/25/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/25/04)
  • Re: strstr(char *str1, char *str2) (09/25/04)
  • Re: strstr(char *str1, char *str2) (09/25/04)
  • Re: strstr(char *str1, char *str2) (09/25/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/25/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/25/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: Managing global vars between files (09/24/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/24/04)
  • Re: end thread (09/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: Screen Handling (09/24/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/24/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/23/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/23/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: elementary construction follow-up (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/22/04)
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/22/04)
  • Re: connect to ftp (09/22/04)
  • Re: union access (09/22/04)
  • Re: C compling Error on IBM 390 (09/21/04)
  • Re: union access (09/21/04)
  • Re: newbie-question: comments (09/21/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/21/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/20/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/20/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/20/04)
  • Re: [OT] linux speaker beep (09/19/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/19/04)
  • Re: union access (09/19/04)
  • Re: ping source code (09/18/04)
  • Re: ping source code (09/17/04)
  • Re: K and R & Fuehrerschaft (09/17/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/17/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/16/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/16/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/16/04)
  • Re: C external execution - trap stdout + stderr (09/16/04)
  • Re: union access (09/16/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/15/04)
  • Re: union access (09/14/04)
  • Re: union access (09/14/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/14/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/14/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/14/04)
  • Re: typedef function pointer (09/13/04)
  • Re: file operation (09/13/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/12/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/11/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/11/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
  • Re: turbo assembler (09/10/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
  • Re: volatile expression (09/10/04)
  • Re: volatile expression (09/10/04)
  • Re: Need help on bit operations define (09/10/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: Different outputs in different environments. (09/09/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: Different outputs in different environments. (09/09/04)
  • Re: How to make the text stand out (09/09/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/09/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/09/04)
  • Re: Open a file in C (09/08/04)
  • Re: operator overloading (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: creating a 2-d array using dynamic memory allocation (09/08/04)
  • Re: volatile expression (09/08/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/07/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/07/04)
  • Re: volatile expression (09/07/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/07/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: brother tree insert (09/07/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/07/04)
  • Re: scanf pushes back two chars? (09/07/04)
  • Re: Removing white spaces and tab characters - we can avoid tab characters (09/06/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/06/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/06/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: nested function support (09/05/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/05/04)
  • Re: Typedef structs (09/05/04)
  • Re: nested function support (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: Need help on bit operations define (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: glibc: socket and fdopen (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: some C puzzles (09/03/04)
  • Re: string length questions related to fseek (09/03/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/03/04)
  • Re: Max Size of argv[1] ??? (09/03/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/03/04)
  • Re: some C puzzles (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/03/04)
  • Re: Colon (:) syntax in defining fields in a struct (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: How to create folder at fopen? (09/02/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/02/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/02/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (I WAS WRONG) (09/02/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/02/04)
  • Re: Max Size of argv[1] ??? (09/02/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/02/04)
  • Re: Colon (:) syntax in defining fields in a struct (09/01/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/01/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/01/04)
  • Re: Colon (:) syntax in defining fields in a struct (09/01/04)
  • Re: How to create folder at fopen? (09/01/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (08/31/04)
  • Re: Typedef structs (08/31/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (08/31/04)
• Kelsey Bjarnason
  • Re: fopen() vs. open() (09/30/04)
  • Re: How do I pass the & instead of a ptr? (09/27/04)
  • Re: C library VS (Unix) System calls ? (09/18/04)
  • Re: [OT] Performance Programming (09/15/04)
  • Re: Performance Programming (09/13/04)
  • Re: Coding statements before declaration-a doubt on standard!!! (09/10/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/08/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (I WAS WRONG) (09/03/04)
• Kenneth Brody
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/27/04)
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/27/04)
  • Re: Isn't C Programming In DOS, A Part Of This Newsgroup? (09/26/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/19/04)
  • Re: ping source code (09/18/04)
  • Re: ping source code (09/18/04)
  • Re: ping source code (09/16/04)
  • Re: ping source code (09/16/04)
  • Re: Difference between Structure & Union (09/10/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/07/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (08/31/04)
• Kenneth Lantrip
  • Why not 64 bit under 32? (09/17/04)
• Kenny McCormack
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/27/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/22/04)
  • Re: Max Size of argv[1] ??? (09/03/04)
  • Re: Calling fortran subroutine from c (09/02/04)
  • Re: Calling fortran subroutine from c (09/02/04)
  • Re: Max Size of argv[1] ??? (09/02/04)
  • Re: [OT] Printing source code (09/02/04)
  • Re: Max Size of argv[1] ??? (09/02/04)
  • Re: Calling fortran subroutine from c (09/01/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/01/04)
  • Another one for the frame and the wall (Was: Re: C or Fortran obsolete? (was Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy")) (09/01/04)
• Kevin D. Quitt
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/22/04)
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/21/04)
• kevin.bagust
  • Re: Local Heap? (09/02/04)
• KevinD
  • Reading Simple Flatfiles with a COBOL Mindset (09/10/04)
  • Reading Simple Flatfiles with a COBOL Mindset (09/09/04)
• Kieran Simkin
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/28/04)
  • Re: [OT] Creating an MD5 hash with crypt.h (09/23/04)
  • Re: Developing chat application (09/19/04)
  • Re: int to string (09/11/04)
  • Re: Performance Programming (09/11/04)
  • Re: removing Spaces (09/09/04)
  • Re: Creating a va_list (09/08/04)
  • Re: Mail bomber (09/07/04)
  • Re: Mail bomber (09/07/04)
• kimos
  • Rectangle intersection (09/25/04)
• Kleenex
  • Re: Managing global vars between files (09/29/04)
  • Managing global vars between files (09/22/04)
• Kleidemos
  • Project (09/01/04)
• Krishna Sagiraju
  • electronic component connection routing (09/25/04)
• Kristofer Pettijohn
  • Re: [OT] Printing source code (09/05/04)
• Kurt Watzka
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/27/04)
• kyle york
  • Re: Embedded systems and C programming (09/27/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/24/04)
• Lakshmi
  • Re: WinAPI to locate a file in directory (09/22/04)
  • WinAPI to locate a file in directory (09/22/04)
• lallous
  • Re: 6 byte integer to string (09/24/04)
  • Re: parsing in C (09/08/04)
  • Re: switch and if..else same at assemby code ? (09/07/04)
• Lars Langer
  • Re: strstr(char *str1, char *str2) (09/25/04)
  • strstr(char *str1, char *str2) (09/25/04)
• lawrence.jones_at_ugs.com
  • Re: syntax for e (natural logs) (09/27/04)
  • Re: volatile expression (09/12/04)
  • Re: Programming Language Usage [was: C 99 compiler access] (09/12/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/12/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/08/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/02/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/02/04)
  • Re: integer array (09/01/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
• Lester Manry
  • Re: Book Recommendations? (09/08/04)
  • Re: Book Recommendations? (09/08/04)
  • Book Recommendations? (09/07/04)
• Lew Pitcher
  • Re: C compling Error on IBM 390 (09/21/04)
  • Re: ping source code (09/17/04)
  • Re: string & bytes (09/15/04)
  • Re: Local Heap? (09/02/04)
• Liang Chen
  • Re: Exception handling (09/19/04)
  • Re: Exception handling (09/18/04)
• Linus Torvalds
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/17/04)
• LM
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/19/04)
  • Re: Question about declaring Floating Point Variable in a Structure (09/15/04)
• LongBow
  • Develping a good scheduler for ARINC transmission... advice needed (09/02/04)
• Mabden
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/26/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/22/04)
  • Re: union access (09/20/04)
  • Re: union access (09/18/04)
  • Re: how to convert very large number to hex string (09/14/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/14/04)
  • Re: turbo assembler (09/11/04)
  • Re: nested function support (09/05/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/05/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/04/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: [OT] C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/03/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/03/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/03/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/02/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/02/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/02/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/02/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/02/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/01/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/01/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/01/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/01/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/01/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/01/04)
• Mac
  • Re: Open a file in C (09/09/04)
  • Re: stripping newline from input (09/04/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/04/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: stripping newline from input (09/02/04)
• macluvitch
  • Re: parsing in C (09/12/04)
  • Re: parsing in C (09/10/04)
• madhav_a_kelkar_at_hotmail.com
  • Re: some C puzzles (09/03/04)
  • small C puzzles (09/01/04)
  • some C puzzles (09/01/04)
• Magix
  • Re: file operation (09/10/04)
  • file operation (09/10/04)
  • Re: removing Spaces (09/10/04)
  • Re: removing Spaces (09/09/04)
  • removing Spaces (09/09/04)
• Mahesh Kumar Reddy.R
  • while Vs for loop (09/27/04)
• Malcolm
  • OO in C (09/29/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/29/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/29/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/26/04)
  • Re: Rectangle intersection (09/25/04)
  • Re: Managing global vars between files (09/25/04)
  • Re: electronic component connection routing (09/25/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/25/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/25/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/24/04)
  • Re: Screen Handling (09/23/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/23/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/23/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/23/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/23/04)
  • Re: need help creating a tree of processes(implemented in C) (09/23/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: Passing and returning arrays to and from functions (09/22/04)
  • Re: Passing and returning arrays to and from functions (09/21/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/20/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/20/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/20/04)
  • Re: Dynamically assigning data type (09/20/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/19/04)
  • Re: Developing chat application (09/19/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/18/04)
  • Re: linux speaker beep (09/18/04)
  • Re: Exception handling (09/18/04)
  • Re: Daylight saving (09/17/04)
  • Re: Passing and returning arrays to and from functions (09/17/04)
  • Re: Passing and returning arrays to and from functions (09/17/04)
  • Re: Please help beginner (09/17/04)
  • Re: about header files (09/16/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/16/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/15/04)
  • Re: how to convert very large number to hex string (09/14/04)
  • Re: Timer in a C Program (09/14/04)
  • Re: Endianess: why does this code not change value on BE machine? (09/12/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/11/04)
  • Re: Need help for optimising nested ifs-help me plz panic situation!!! (09/11/04)
  • Re: Does realloc "move" a block it shortens? (09/10/04)
  • Re: parsing in C (09/08/04)
  • Re: C program to flowchart (09/08/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/08/04)
  • Re: Book Recommendations? (09/08/04)
  • Re: Book Recommendations? (09/08/04)
  • Re: Mail bomber (09/08/04)
  • Re: Book Recommendations? (09/08/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/07/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/06/04)
  • Re: string literals question (09/05/04)
  • Re: Fix your FAQ (09/04/04)
  • Re: Removing white spaces and tab characters (09/04/04)
  • Re: Object Oriented Programming in C, Avoid Memory Allocation (09/04/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/04/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/04/04)
  • Re: How to create folder at fopen? (09/02/04)
  • Re: How to create folder at fopen? (09/01/04)
• Marcus Jacobs
  • Pointer Usage (09/30/04)
• Mark A. Odell
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: Endless loop question (09/29/04)
  • Re: Obtain sizeof struct element using offsetof()? (09/27/04)
  • Obtain sizeof struct element using offsetof()? (09/27/04)
  • Re: mysql problem (09/23/04)
  • Re: Q: volatile struct elements or entire struct? (09/23/04)
  • Re: Q: volatile struct elements or entire struct? (09/23/04)
  • Q: volatile struct elements or entire struct? (09/22/04)
  • Re: Managing global vars between files (09/22/04)
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/17/04)
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/16/04)
  • Re: system() doesnt give me the control back .. (09/16/04)
  • Re: C Beginner Question (09/16/04)
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/16/04)
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/16/04)
  • Re: Loop Optimization, Array Alignment (09/16/04)
  • Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/16/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/10/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: returning an array of integers (09/01/04)
• Mark F. Haigh
  • Re: Invoking A DOS Program Through A "C" Program (09/25/04)
  • Re: end thread (09/25/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/25/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/25/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/25/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/25/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/25/04)
• Mark McIntyre
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: EFAULT error in accept socket call (09/27/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/27/04)
  • Re: Isn't C Programming In DOS, A Part Of This Newsgroup? (09/27/04)
  • Re: while Vs for loop (09/27/04)
  • Re: end thread (09/27/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.c.moderated group? (09/27/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/26/04)
  • Re: Daylight saving (09/22/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/21/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/21/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/20/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/20/04)
  • Re: Daylight saving (09/20/04)
  • Re: Daylight saving (09/18/04)
  • Re: Daylight saving (09/18/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/12/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/12/04)
  • Re: pwd (09/12/04)
  • Re: meaning of dialet or implementation of a programming language (09/11/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/08/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/06/04)
  • Re: Develping a good scheduler for ARINC transmission... advice needed (09/04/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/02/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/02/04)
  • Re: Calling fortran subroutine from c (09/02/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/01/04)
  • Re: -= No Line Wrap Curses.h =- (09/01/04)
• Mark Piffer
  • Re: union access (09/16/04)
  • Re: union access (09/16/04)
  • Re: union access (09/16/04)
  • Re: union access (09/15/04)
  • Re: union access (09/15/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/09/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/07/04)
• Mark R.Bannister
  • Re: integer array (09/03/04)
  • Re: Max Size of argv[1] ??? (09/03/04)
  • Re: integer array (09/02/04)
  • Re: Max Size of argv[1] ??? (09/01/04)
  • Re: Calling fortran subroutine from c (09/01/04)
  • Re: integer array (09/01/04)
• markus
  • How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
  • C library VS (Unix) System calls ? (09/16/04)
• Markus Pitha
  • Re: pwd (09/12/04)
  • Re: pwd (09/12/04)
  • Re: opendir doesn't work.. (add)... (09/12/04)
  • Re: opendir doesn't work.. (add)... (09/12/04)
  • opendir doesn't work.. (09/12/04)
• Martin
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/28/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/28/04)
  • Warnings when using % operator (09/15/04)
• Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: problem with implementing pipe (09/30/04)
  • Re: problem with implementing pipe (09/30/04)
  • Re: syntax for e (natural logs) (09/27/04)
  • Re: printf conversion problem (09/27/04)
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/26/04)
  • Re: strstr(char *str1, char *str2) (09/25/04)
  • Re: strstr(char *str1, char *str2) (09/25/04)
  • Re: Max Path [Newbie] (09/24/04)
  • Re: Creating an MD5 hash with crypt.h (09/23/04)
  • Re: variable changed, but i didn't change is. (09/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/17/04)
  • Re: no lcm in standard library? (09/13/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/11/04)
  • Re: Please find out what is wrong (09/10/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/07/04)
  • Re: scanf pushes back two chars? (09/06/04)
  • Re: nested function support (09/06/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/05/04)
  • Re: nested function support (09/05/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/05/04)
  • Re: Pointer conversion (09/04/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/02/04)
  • Re: Shortcircuitting with -Inf float value. (09/02/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/02/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
• Martin Roos
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/27/04)
  • Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/27/04)
• Materialised
  • Re: Timer in a C Program [OT] Answer (09/14/04)
• Matt
  • meaning of dialet or implementation of a programming language (09/11/04)
• Matt Gostick
  • free() is useless... (I WAS WRONG) (09/02/04)
  • free() is useless... (09/02/04)
• Matthew Fisher
  • Re: free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/17/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/04/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/04/04)
  • Re: Local Heap? (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/03/04)
• MatthewMlane
  • Re: Bloodshed Dev. Compiler will only not show me my RUN execuable. Help! (09/04/04)
  • Bloodshed Dev. Compiler will only not show me my RUN execuable. Help! (09/03/04)
• Meher
  • Gmail invitation (09/15/04)
• merman
  • Re: c-book (09/23/04)
  • c-book (09/22/04)
  • great (09/21/04)
  • newbie-question: comments (09/21/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/20/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/20/04)
  • Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/20/04)
• Merrill & Michele
  • Re: Could VC6 be integrated with gcc, and if so,how to do it? (09/30/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +1 (09/29/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 OT (09/28/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/28/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/28/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/28/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/27/04)
  • elementary construction +2 (09/27/04)
  • Re: syntax for e (natural logs) (09/27/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +1 (09/27/04)
  • Re: end thread (09/27/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +1 (09/26/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/25/04)
  • elementary construction +1 (09/24/04)
  • end thread (09/24/04)
  • Re: elementary construction follow-up (09/23/04)
  • Re: elementary construction follow-up (09/23/04)
  • elementary construction (09/22/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/18/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/18/04)
  • K and R & Fuehrerschaft (09/17/04)
  • Wie sehr man die FU vermisst (09/17/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/17/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/16/04)
  • srand() troubles (09/16/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/16/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/16/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/14/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/13/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/12/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/11/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/11/04)
  • Church's lambda calculus (09/10/04)
  • Re: [OT] Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/10/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/08/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/08/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/08/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/07/04)
  • Re: define a data type of 1 bit size (09/06/04)
  • Heathfield (09/04/04)
• Method Man
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/24/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: How to convert a double **ptr in a double const ** const ptr? (09/14/04)
• Michael B Allen
  • Variable Sized Struct Members? (09/26/04)
  • Re: Error ifndef _REENTRANT? (09/22/04)
  • Error ifndef _REENTRANT? (09/21/04)
  • Anonymous Union Member Access (09/03/04)
  • Re: What's wrong with this macro? (09/01/04)
  • What's wrong with this macro? (09/01/04)
• Michael Blackney
  • C Preprocessor - Cascaded Macros (09/10/04)
• Michael Heiming
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
• Michael Kurz
  • Re: Local Heap? (09/02/04)
• Michael Mair
  • Re: #include optimization (09/30/04)
  • Re: #include optimization (09/30/04)
  • Re: attempt at qsort implementation (09/30/04)
  • Re: attempt at qsort implementation (09/30/04)
  • Re: attempt at qsort implementation (09/29/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: invalid floating point value (09/29/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/27/04)
  • Re: Why is this allowed in C? (09/27/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/27/04)
  • Re: sscanf parsing doubt (09/27/04)
  • Re: syntax for e (natural logs) (09/27/04)
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/26/04)
  • Re: sscanf parsing doubt (09/26/04)
  • Re: sscanf parsing doubt (09/26/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/26/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +1 (09/26/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +1 (09/25/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/23/04)
  • Re: newbie-question: comments (09/21/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/21/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/20/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: Daylight saving (09/17/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/17/04)
  • Re: Passing and returning arrays to and from functions (09/17/04)
  • Re: b = 2 / a[2] (09/16/04)
  • Re: A way to maintain a global set in many files by using preprocessing directives . Could we find a better method? (09/10/04)
• Michael Scarlett
  • Re: Bloodshed Dev. Compiler will only not show me my RUN execuable. Help! (09/04/04)
• Michael Steve
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: integer array (09/01/04)
  • Re: integer array (09/01/04)
• Michael Wojcik
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: (argc == 0), was Re: elementary construction +1 (09/28/04)
  • Re: EFAULT error in accept socket call (09/27/04)
  • Re: (argc == 0), was Re: elementary construction +1 (09/27/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/27/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/27/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/27/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/27/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +1 (09/27/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: elementary construction (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/22/04)
  • Re: union access (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: C library VS (Unix) System calls ? (09/16/04)
  • Re: Wide string initializer syntax (09/16/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/15/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/14/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/14/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/14/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/14/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/12/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/10/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/09/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/07/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: How to create folder at fopen? (09/03/04)
  • Re: [OT] Printing source code (09/03/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/03/04)
  • Re: stripping newline from input (09/03/04)
  • Re: webpage bookmark program in C (09/03/04)
  • Re: How to create folder at fopen? (09/03/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/03/04)
  • Re: Typedef structs (09/03/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/02/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/02/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/02/04)
• Michel Bardiaux
  • Re: Daylight saving (09/17/04)
  • Re: Bloodshed Dev. Compiler will only not show me my RUN execuable. Help! (09/06/04)
• Mike Cowlishaw
  • Re: Need help on bit operations define (09/06/04)
• Mike Tyka
  • Re: creating a 2-d array using dynamic memory allocation (09/08/04)
• Mike Wahler
  • Re: (corr) unsigned long long + int (09/29/04)
  • Re: unsigned long long + int (09/29/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: while Vs for loop (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/27/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/27/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/27/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/23/04)
  • Re: C compling Error on IBM 390 (09/21/04)
  • Re: K and R & Fuehrerschaft (09/19/04)
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/17/04)
  • Re: ping source code (09/16/04)
  • Re: Accessing members of array as a different type (09/16/04)
  • Re: no lcm in standard library? (09/13/04)
  • Re: file operation (09/13/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/10/04)
  • Re: Reading Simple Flatfiles with a COBOL Mindset (09/09/04)
  • Re: Book Recommendations? (09/07/04)
  • Re: Segfault question. (09/05/04)
  • Re: (corr) How to convert int to char * ? (09/05/04)
  • Re: [OT, redir, welcome msg, FAQ] nested function support (09/05/04)
  • Re: How to convert int to char * ? (09/05/04)
  • Re: How valid is a "draft"? (09/05/04)
  • Re: qsort(...) in <stdlib.h> (09/05/04)
  • Re: From where i can download C9X compiler for both linux and windows (09/04/04)
  • Re: Puzzle (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/04/04)
  • Re: Post length for code. (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT, welcom msg] Usage of VxWorks setsockopt() (09/03/04)
  • Re: [OT, welcom msg] Usage of VxWorks setsockopt() (09/03/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/02/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/02/04)
  • Re: One-past-end-of-object pointers (09/02/04)
  • Re: bitwise subnetscanning? (09/01/04)
  • Re: How to create folder at fopen? (09/01/04)
  • Re: How to create folder at fopen? (09/01/04)
• Miki Tebeka
  • # inside a macro body (09/27/04)
• Minti
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/23/04)
  • Re: Pointer question [ Newbie ] (09/23/04)
  • Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis (09/19/04)
  • Re: question (09/19/04)
  • Re: Why va_start takes 2 arguments (09/04/04)
  • Why va_start takes 2 arguments (09/03/04)
• Mohd Zamani
  • Bete Test for MPC Compiler/IDE (09/21/04)
• Moonie
  • Re: sscanf parsing doubt (09/28/04)
  • Re: linux speaker beep (09/20/04)
  • Re: How to make the text stand out (09/13/04)
  • Re: How to make the text stand out (09/09/04)
  • Re: Creating a va_list (09/09/04)
  • Re: Creating a va_list (09/09/04)
  • console library (09/02/04)
• Moritz Beller
  • Re: C program to flowchart (09/08/04)
• mrhicks
  • Re: Develping a good scheduler for ARINC transmission... advice needed (09/03/04)
• name
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/18/04)
  • [OT] Wrap (09/14/04)
  • Re: Segfault question. (09/06/04)
  • Re: Segfault question. (09/06/04)
  • Re: Segfault question. (09/05/04)
  • Segfault question. (09/05/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/04/04)
  • Re: [OT] Post length for code. (09/04/04)
  • Re: Post length for code. (09/04/04)
  • Post length for code. (09/03/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/02/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
• napi
  • Beta testers needed - C to Java byte-code compiler/IDE (09/23/04)
• Nasir Khan
  • Question about declaring Floating Point Variable in a Structure (09/15/04)
• Neil Ferguson
  • Re: strstr(char *str1, char *str2) (09/26/04)
• Neil Kurzman
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/29/04)
  • Re: how to efficiently find line number k (09/29/04)
  • Re: Invoking A DOS Program Through A "C" Program (09/25/04)
  • Re: #ifdef (09/16/04)
• New
  • problem adding into a tree (09/20/04)
• newby2c
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/04/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/04/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/04/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
• news.tkdsoftware.com
  • Re: compilers & stack machines (09/19/04)
  • compilers & stack machines (09/19/04)
• Nick Landsberg
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/06/04)
• Nicolas Pavlidis
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/23/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/21/04)
  • Re: newbie-question: comments (09/21/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/21/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/20/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/19/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/19/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: Performance Programming (09/11/04)
  • Re: Wide string initializer syntax (09/11/04)
• Niklas Matthies
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
• noname_is_me
  • Re: array a[(foo)()] (help) (09/16/04)
  • Re: b = 2 / a[2] (09/16/04)
  • Re: array a[(foo)()] (help) (09/16/04)
  • b = 2 / a[2] (09/16/04)
  • array a[(foo)()] (help) (09/16/04)
• nospam_timur_at_tabi.org
  • declaring a function only if it isn't already declared (09/17/04)
• NOSPAMdave_at_sebastian9.com
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/02/04)
• Nudge
  • Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/18/04)
• O. Zimmermann
  • Unit / Coverage testing (09/19/04)
• Ochal Christophe
  • Re: console library (09/07/04)
• oddstray
  • how to convert very large number to hex string (09/14/04)
• Olaf
  • Re: calling fopen using function (09/23/04)
• Old Wolf
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/30/04)
  • Re: a history question (09/29/04)
  • Re: a history question (09/29/04)
  • Re: union access (09/22/04)
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/17/04)
  • Re: Q: Type'ing the infamous 'flags' field (09/17/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/16/04)
  • Re: Endianess: why does this code not change value on BE machine? (09/12/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/12/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/10/04)
  • Re: creating a 2-d array using dynamic memory allocation (09/09/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/08/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/07/04)
  • Re: string literals question (09/06/04)
  • Re: scanf pushes back two chars? (09/06/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/06/04)
  • Re: array of functions (09/06/04)
  • Re: some C puzzles (09/06/04)
  • Re: string literals question (09/06/04)
  • Re: Different outputs in different environments. (09/01/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/01/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
• Oliver Knoll
  • Re: Endianess: why does this code not change value on BE machine? (09/13/04)
  • Endianess: why does this code not change value on BE machine? (09/12/04)
• one2001boy_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
• ozbear
  • One-past-end-of-object pointers (09/02/04)
• P. Hari Krishna
  • Re: Creating a va_list (09/09/04)
  • Creating a va_list (09/08/04)
• P.T. Breuer
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/21/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/21/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/21/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
• pankaj tiwary
  • Please find out what is wrong (09/10/04)
• Papadopoulos Giannis
  • Re: Performance Programming (09/12/04)
• Paul
  • Re: calling fopen using function (09/23/04)
  • Re: calling fopen using function (09/23/04)
  • Re: removing Spaces (09/10/04)
  • Re: C++ wins over C !! (09/07/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/03/04)
  • Re: some C puzzles (09/02/04)
  • C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
• Paul Burke
  • Re: Programming Language Usage [was: C 99 compiler access] (09/11/04)
• Paul D. Smith
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/11/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/11/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
• Paul E. Bennett
  • Re: Programming Language Usage [was: C 99 compiler access] (09/11/04)
  • Re: Programming Language Usage [was: C 99 compiler access] (09/10/04)
• Paul Hirose
  • Re: managing global variables (09/24/04)
• Paul Hsieh
  • Re: C language portability support (09/26/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/26/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/26/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] C function call cost. (09/17/04)
  • Re: no lcm in standard library? (09/16/04)
  • Re: Loop Optimization, Array Alignment (09/16/04)
  • Re: generalised linked list routines - opinion appreciated (09/05/04)
  • Re: generalised linked list routines - opinion appreciated (09/04/04)
• Paul Mensonides
  • Re: # inside a macro body (09/28/04)
• Pedro Graca
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
• Percival
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/04/04)
• pete
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/30/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/30/04)
  • Re: attempt at qsort implementation (09/30/04)
  • Re: attempt at qsort implementation (09/30/04)
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/30/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/30/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: attempt at qsort implementation (09/29/04)
  • Re: invalid floating point value (09/29/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: attempt at qsort implementation (09/29/04)
  • Re: (argc == 0), was Re: elementary construction +1 (09/29/04)
  • Re: (argc == 0), was Re: elementary construction +1 (09/28/04)
  • Re: How do I pass the & instead of a ptr? (09/28/04)
  • Re: (argc == 0), was Re: elementary construction +1 (09/28/04)
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/28/04)
  • Re: How do I pass the & instead of a ptr? (09/28/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/28/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: How do I pass the & instead of a ptr? (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/27/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +1 (09/27/04)
  • Re: Sizeof(X) on different architectures (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/27/04)
  • Re: New Hand of the C Program (09/26/04)
  • Re: sscanf parsing doubt (09/26/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/26/04)
  • (argc == 0), was Re: elementary construction +1 (09/26/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/26/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/26/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/26/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/25/04)
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/25/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/25/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/24/04)
  • Re: C language portability support (09/24/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: union access (09/24/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: Error ifndef _REENTRANT? (09/22/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/22/04)
  • Re: union access (09/22/04)
  • Re: Problem with DO-WHILE Loop (09/21/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/21/04)
  • Re: Error ifndef _REENTRANT? (09/21/04)
  • Re: removing a loop from a linked list? (09/21/04)
  • Re: malloc and pointer hell (09/21/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/21/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/21/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/21/04)
  • Re: union access (09/21/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/20/04)
  • Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/20/04)
  • Re: C Beginner Question (09/20/04)
  • Pop's device, was Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/20/04)
  • Re: union access (09/20/04)
  • Re: C Beginner Question (09/20/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/19/04)
  • Re: declaring array of pointers (09/19/04)
  • [ot]Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis (09/19/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/19/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/19/04)
  • [ot]Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis (09/19/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/18/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/18/04)
  • Re: Loop Optimization, Array Alignment (09/18/04)
  • Re: srand() troubles (09/18/04)
  • Passing and returning arrays to and from functions (09/17/04)
  • Re: Loop Optimization, Array Alignment (09/17/04)
  • Re: b = 2 / a[2] (09/16/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/14/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/14/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/13/04)
  • Re: Reading Simple Flatfiles with a COBOL Mindset (09/12/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/11/04)
  • Re: Church's lambda calculus (09/11/04)
  • Re: Postfix / Prefix Operators on array / pointer, search key word wanted [OT] (09/10/04)
  • Re: Postfix / Prefix Operators on array / pointer, search key word wanted [OT] (09/10/04)
  • Re: Please find out what is wrong (09/10/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/09/04)
  • [OT]Re: Different outputs in different environments. (09/09/04)
  • Re: integer array (09/08/04)
  • Entering a binary string (09/07/04)
  • Problem with binary strings (09/07/04)
  • Problem with binary strings (09/06/04)
  • Re: Local Heap? (09/02/04)
  • Re: One-past-end-of-object pointers (09/02/04)
  • Re: integer array (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/02/04)
  • Re: bsearch for Windows ce (09/02/04)
• Pete Glasscock
  • Re: malloc and free (09/15/04)
  • Re: how to convert very large number to hex string (09/14/04)
• Pete Gray
  • Re: Problem with DO-WHILE Loop (09/21/04)
  • Programming Language Usage [was: C 99 compiler access] (09/10/04)
• Peter
  • Re: elementary construction +1 (09/26/04)
  • Re: memory (09/25/04)
  • Re: malloc and pointer hell (09/25/04)
  • Re: great (09/23/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/21/04)
  • Re: ping source code (09/20/04)
  • Re: Short-Circuit Evaluation of Boolean Expressions (09/14/04)
  • Re: Different outputs in different environments. (09/06/04)
  • Re: Colon (:) syntax in defining fields in a struct (09/01/04)
• Peter Ammon
  • Re: unsigned long long + int (09/29/04)
  • unsigned long long + int (09/29/04)
• Peter Ho
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
• Peter Koch Larsen
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/07/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
• Peter Nilsson
  • Re: Postfix / Prefix Operators on array / pointer, search key word wanted [OT] (09/12/04)
• Peter van Merkerk
  • Re: #include optimization (09/30/04)
• Pradeep
  • LINKER/LOADER DOUBT (09/15/04)
• Profetas
  • How do I pass the & instead of a ptr? (09/27/04)
• QuantumG
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/26/04)
  • Re: Beta testers needed - C to Java byte-code compiler/IDE (09/25/04)
  • Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/25/04)
• raj
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/14/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/13/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/11/04)
  • speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/11/04)
• Raja Kiran Kumar Reddy Sandireddy
  • Re: Different outputs in different environments. (09/01/04)
  • Different outputs in different environments. (09/01/04)
• Rajeev
  • Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis (09/20/04)
  • Re: Loop Optimization, Array Alignment (09/18/04)
  • Loop Optimization, Array Alignment (09/16/04)
• Ramanathan
  • Puzzle (09/04/04)
• Ramesh
  • #include optimization (09/28/04)
• Ramesh Natarajan
  • Re: #include optimization (09/29/04)
• Randy Howard
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/20/04)
  • Re: compilers & stack machines (09/19/04)
  • Re: K and R & Fuehrerschaft (09/17/04)
  • Re: variable changed, but i didn't change is. (09/16/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/15/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/15/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/13/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/12/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/12/04)
  • Re: Performance Programming (09/12/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/05/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/04/04)
  • Re: comp.lang.c Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ List) (09/02/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (I WAS WRONG) (09/02/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/02/04)
  • Re: Colon (:) syntax in defining fields in a struct (09/02/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/01/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
  • Re: bitwise subnetscanning? (09/01/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
• ranjeet
  • Re: Problem with DO-WHILE Loop (09/30/04)
  • Re: Problem with DO-WHILE Loop (09/22/04)
  • Re: Problem with DO-WHILE Loop (09/21/04)
  • Re: Problem with DO-WHILE Loop (09/21/04)
• Ravi Uday
  • Re: sscanf parsing doubt (09/28/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/02/04)
• RCollins
  • Re: malloc and free (09/14/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/14/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/14/04)
  • Re: How to know the memory pointed by a ptr is freed? (09/14/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/14/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/14/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/12/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/09/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/09/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/09/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/08/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/07/04)
  • <OT> Re: How does free() knows? (09/07/04)
  • Re: Determining EOF using fseek()? (09/05/04)
• red floyd
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/09/04)
  • Re: [OT]Re: Different outputs in different environments. (09/09/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/09/04)
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/09/04)
  • Re: string length questions related to fseek (09/03/04)
  • Re: [OT] Printing source code (09/02/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/01/04)
• Redduck
  • Problem with DO-WHILE Loop (09/21/04)
• RedLion
  • SMBus find devices (09/29/04)
• Rich Grise
  • Re: webpage bookmark program in C (09/07/04)
  • Re: qsort(...) in <stdlib.h> (09/05/04)
  • Re: critique: conversion to binary (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
• Richard
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/19/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
• Richard Bos
  • Re: Compound statements in expressions (09/30/04)
  • Re: OO in C (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/30/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/29/04)
  • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy" (09/29/04)
  • Re: how to efficiently find line number k (09/29/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/29/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/28/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/28/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/28/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/27/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/27/04)
  • Re: elementary construction +2 (09/27/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/27/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/24/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/23/04)
  • Re: Daylight saving (09/23/04)
  • Re: union access (09/23/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/23/04)
  • Re: Viewing the *.I file of my C source code in MS Visual C++ 6.0 (09/22/04)
  • Re: Pop's Device, was Re: Some Newb Problem with "int", please help. (09/22/04)
  • Re: Exception handling (09/22/04)
  • Re: Daylight saving (09/22/04)
  • Re: union access (09/22/04)
  • Re: c-book (09/22/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/22/04)
  • Re: Problem with DO-WHILE Loop (09/21/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/21/04)
  • Re: Dynamically assigning data type (09/21/04)
  • Re: Daylight saving (09/20/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/20/04)
  • Re: Newbie-question: scanf alternatives? (09/20/04)
  • Re: problem adding into a tree (09/20/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/19/04)
  • Re: Need help on bit operations define (09/19/04)
  • Re: C library VS (Unix) System calls ? (09/16/04)
  • Re: array a[(foo)()] (help) (09/16/04)
  • Re: b = 2 / a[2] (09/16/04)
  • Re: string & bytes (09/16/04)
  • Re: array a[(foo)()] (help) (09/16/04)
  • Re: free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/15/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/15/04)
  • Re: Timer in a C Program [OT] Answer (09/15/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/14/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/14/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/13/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/13/04)
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/10/04)
  • Re: Please find out what is wrong (09/10/04)
  • Re: Coding statements before declaration-a doubt on standard!!! (09/10/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/08/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/08/04)
  • Re: Bloodshed Dev. Compiler will only not show me my RUN execuable. Help! (09/07/04)
  • Re: Accessing result of assignment (09/07/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/07/04)
• Richard Hengeveld
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/29/04)
• Richard Pennington
  • Re: compilers & stack machines (09/19/04)
  • Re: compilers & stack machines (09/19/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/18/04)
• Richard Tobin
  • Re: Why is this allowed in C? (09/27/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/27/04)
  • Re: no lcm in standard library? (09/15/04)
  • Re: no lcm in standard library? (09/14/04)
  • Re: Endianess: why does this code not change value on BE machine? (09/12/04)
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/09/04)
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/09/04)
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/09/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/08/04)
  • Re: switch and if..else same at assemby code ? (09/07/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/06/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/06/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/04/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/02/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/02/04)
  • Re: Max Size of argv[1] ??? (09/02/04)
• rickyt
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/16/04)
  • Re: [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/15/04)
  • [OT?] What is (a) "plunger"? (09/14/04)
• Robert
  • Re: returning an array of integers (09/01/04)
  • Re: returning an array of integers (09/01/04)
  • returning an array of integers (09/01/04)
• Robert Ngo
  • Re: connect to ftp (09/22/04)
  • Re: connect to ftp (09/22/04)
  • connect to ftp (09/21/04)
• Robert Rodriguez
  • nested function support (09/05/04)
• Robert Smith
  • How to make the text stand out (09/06/04)
  • how flushing standard io (09/06/04)
  • linux socket help (09/05/04)
• romi
  • type VARIANT and array - conversion to CString (09/02/04)
• Rookie
  • EFAULT error in accept socket call (09/27/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/25/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/24/04)
  • Max Path [Newbie] (09/24/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/23/04)
  • Re: envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/23/04)
  • envp[i]!=(char *)0 (09/23/04)
• RoSsIaCrIiLoIA
  • Re: align to double or to long double? (09/28/04)
  • Re: memory (09/27/04)
  • Re: memory (09/26/04)
  • Re: memory (09/26/04)
  • align to double or to long double? (09/26/04)
  • Re: Out-of-bounds access and UB (09/22/04)
  • memory (09/22/04)
  • Re: free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/18/04)
  • Re: free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/16/04)
  • Re: Endianess: why does this code not change value on BE machine? (09/16/04)
  • Re: Endianess: why does this code not change value on BE machine? (09/13/04)
  • Re: Endianess: why does this code not change value on BE machine? (09/13/04)
  • Re: Endianess: why does this code not change value on BE machine? (09/13/04)
  • Re: Endianess: why does this code not change value on BE machine? (09/13/04)
  • Re: Dynamic loop nesting (09/04/04)
• Rowland
  • [OT] Performance Programming (09/15/04)
  • Re: Mail bomber (09/07/04)
  • Re: Mail bomber (09/07/04)
• Ruben
  • Re: two dimensional arrays passed to functions (09/10/04)
  • Re: two dimensional arrays passed to functions (09/09/04)
  • Re: two dimensional arrays passed to functions (09/09/04)
  • two dimensional arrays passed to functions (09/09/04)
• Rufus V. Smith
  • Re: how to convert very large number to hex string (09/14/04)
• Ryan Reich
  • Re: question (09/19/04)
• s.subbarayan
  • Is this valid C statement? (09/27/04)
  • Need help for optimising nested ifs-help me plz panic situation!!! (09/11/04)
  • Coding statements before declaration-a doubt on standard!!! (09/10/04)
• S.Tobias
  • Re: Endless loop question (09/30/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: unsigned long long + int (09/29/04)
  • Re: [OT] struct and union alignment (09/28/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/28/04)
  • Re: # inside a macro body (09/28/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/28/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: [OT] struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: How do I pass the & instead of a ptr? (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: # inside a macro body (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/27/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/26/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/26/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/26/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/25/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] struct and union alignment (09/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] struct and union alignment (09/25/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/25/04)
  • Re: [OT] struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • struct and union alignment (09/23/04)
• s_t_o_r_a_g_e
  • Re: newbie-question: comments (09/21/04)
• Sachin
  • Structure Query.... (09/08/04)
• Saket
  • Open a file in C (09/08/04)
• sangeetha
  • Developing chat application (09/19/04)
• sathya_me
  • Re: Postfix / Prefix Operators on array / pointer, search key word wanted [OT] (09/10/04)
  • Postfix / Prefix Operators on array / pointer, search key word wanted [OT] (09/10/04)
  • Re: I don't understand a past thread (help) (09/02/04)
  • I don't understand a past thread (help) (09/02/04)
  • Re: C Book from comp.lang.c !!! (09/01/04)
• Sathyaish
  • Viewing the *.I file of my C source code in MS Visual C++ 6.0 (09/22/04)
• Saurabh Jain
  • Detecting multiple keypress(es) in C (09/02/04)
• Scott Robert Ladd
  • Re: Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis (09/18/04)
  • Comparing Linux C and C++ Compilers: Benchmarks and Analysis (09/18/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/05/04)
• Sean Dolan
  • Re: union access (09/14/04)
  • union access (09/14/04)
• Seebs
  • 17th IOCCC winners announced (09/02/04)
• senapathy
  • Re: LINKER/LOADER DOUBT (09/15/04)
• Senturon
  • syntax for e (natural logs) (09/27/04)
• shailashri_sk_at_sify.com
  • integer array (09/01/04)
• Shalini
  • Embedded systems and C programming (09/17/04)
• Shanmuhanathan T
  • Re: array of functions (09/03/04)
  • Re: Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (09/01/04)
• shiling zhang
  • C compling Error on IBM 390 (09/21/04)
• sieg1974
  • Re: Pointer question [ Newbie ] (09/24/04)
  • Pointer question [ Newbie ] (09/23/04)
  • Re: string length questions related to fseek (09/03/04)
  • string length questions related to fseek (09/02/04)
• Simon Stienen
  • Re: Rectangle intersection (09/25/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/25/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/25/04)
  • Re: ++i vs i++ (09/24/04)
  • Re: [OT] struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
• Simone Mehta
  • Re: sscanf parsing doubt (09/27/04)
  • sscanf parsing doubt (09/27/04)
  • sscanf parsing doubt (09/26/04)
• SIP3261
  • From where i can download C9X compiler for both linux and windows (09/04/04)
• SM Ryan
  • Re: Rectangle intersection (09/25/04)
  • Re: context switching with setjmp (09/22/04)
  • Re: C Program Portability (09/22/04)
  • Re: Malloc/Free - freeing memory allocated by malloc (09/20/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
  • Re: Doubt-Efficiecy of 3D arrays (09/20/04)
  • Re: #ifdef (09/16/04)
  • Re: C external execution - trap stdout + stderr (09/16/04)
  • Re: string & bytes (09/15/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/11/04)
  • Re: Reading Simple Flatfiles with a COBOL Mindset (09/10/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/09/04)
  • Re: switch and if..else same at assemby code ? (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: how flushing standard io (09/06/04)
  • Re: nested function support (09/05/04)
  • Re: nested function support (09/05/04)
  • Re: exit() (09/03/04)
  • Re: Dynamic loop nesting (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: Colon (:) syntax in defining fields in a struct (09/01/04)
  • Re: webpage bookmark program in C (09/01/04)
  • Re: How to create folder at fopen? (09/01/04)
• Songling
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/09/04)
  • is this code safe? (09/09/04)
  • Usage of VxWorks setsockopt() (09/02/04)
• soumen
  • calling fopen using function (09/23/04)
• Spacen Jasset
  • Re: Could VC6 be integrated with gcc, and if so,how to do it? (09/30/04)
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/27/04)
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/26/04)
  • Re: integer to char table problems (09/26/04)
• Spoofed Existence (astalavista.net)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/11/04)
  • Re: Pointer arithmetic involving NULL pointers (09/10/04)
• sreelal
  • Timer in a C Program (09/14/04)
• Sriram
  • Multi Lang support C functions ? (09/05/04)
• Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters (09/30/04)
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/29/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/14/04)
  • Re: malloc and free (09/14/04)
  • Re: Problems implementing Rijndael (09/08/04)
• Steve Kobes
  • contiguity of arrays (09/25/04)
  • Re: scanf pushes back two chars? (09/06/04)
  • scanf pushes back two chars? (09/06/04)
• Steve Lambert
  • declaring array of pointers (09/19/04)
  • Re: Typedef structs (09/05/04)
  • Re: generalised linked list routines - opinion appreciated (09/03/04)
  • generalised linked list routines - opinion appreciated (09/03/04)
• Steve Summit
  • comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) (09/15/04)
  • comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) (09/01/04)
  • comp.lang.c FAQ list Table of Contents (09/01/04)
• Stewart Brodie
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/11/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/10/04)
• sudi
  • 6 byte integer to string (09/24/04)
• Suyog_Linux
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/03/04)
  • How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
• Suzie
  • Re: #include optimization (09/29/04)
• Swami Tota Ram Shankar
  • JAMES LEHRER AND AL JEROME HAVE RUINED THE PUBLIC TV STANDARDS OF JOURNALISM (09/11/04)
• Tabrez Iqbal
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/15/04)
• Targeur fou
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/09/04)
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/09/04)
  • Re: is this code safe? (09/09/04)
  • Re: parsing time string, getting timezone (09/09/04)
  • Re: parsing time string, getting timezone (09/09/04)
• Tatu Portin
  • Re: Isn't C Programming In DOS, A Part Of This Newsgroup? (09/28/04)
• Ted
  • Runge kutta Cash Karp Matlab Code (08/31/04)
• Theo Harlauch
  • Re: porting curses driven to gui application (09/12/04)
  • porting curses driven to gui application (09/12/04)
• Thes
  • Re: Daylight saving (09/17/04)
  • Re: Daylight saving (09/17/04)
• Thomas Jollans
  • glibc: socket and fdopen (09/03/04)
• Thomas L.
  • Re: free() dumps core with a segfault. (09/15/04)
• Thomas Matthews
  • Re: #include optimization (09/28/04)
  • Re: Screen Handling (09/22/04)
  • Re: removing Spaces (09/09/04)
  • Re: mmap queestion (09/08/04)
  • Re: MARKING STRUCTS PROCESSED (09/08/04)
  • Re: switch and if..else same at assemby code ? (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: Removing white spaces and tab characters - we can avoid tab characters (09/07/04)
  • Re: console library (09/07/04)
  • Re: Entering a binary string (09/07/04)
  • Re: +++i (09/07/04)
  • Re: Removing white spaces and tab characters (09/03/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
• Thomas Pornin
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/09/04)
  • Re: C 99 compiler access (09/02/04)
• Thomas Rogg
  • Re: malloc->free->damage: after normal block (09/03/04)
• Thomas Stegen
  • Re: Clearly, it is too late to fix c99 - C is dead (09/30/04)
• Tim Hagan
  • Re: need help with input and output files ASAP (09/17/04)
  • Re: Question about declaring Floating Point Variable in a Structure (09/15/04)
• Tim Prince
  • Re: align to double or to long double? (09/29/04)
  • Re: syntax for e (natural logs) (09/27/04)
  • Re: align to double or to long double? (09/26/04)
  • Re: Doubt-Efficiecy of 3D arrays (09/20/04)
  • Re: Link compatibility among C compilers? (09/14/04)
  • Re: Calling fortran subroutine from c (09/02/04)
• Tim Rentsch
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/29/04)
  • Re: opinions on logical OR variation (09/29/04)
  • Re: How do I pass the & instead of a ptr? (09/28/04)
  • Re: managing global variables (09/25/04)
  • Re: removing a loop from a linked list? (09/21/04)
  • Re: declaring array of pointers (09/19/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/17/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/17/04)
  • Re: Warnings when using % operator (09/16/04)
  • Re: how to convert very large number to hex string (09/15/04)
  • Re: Geting info (09/14/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/12/04)
  • Re: volatile expression (09/10/04)
  • Re: volatile expression (09/10/04)
• Timothy Madden
  • Can I write a recursive type definition ? (09/30/04)
• Tom Gerhard
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/25/04)
• Tom Widmer
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/08/04)
• tom_usenet
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/07/04)
• Toni Uusitalo
  • Re: MARKING STRUCTS PROCESSED (09/08/04)
• Tony Adams
  • Re: init of multdim array of structs... (09/20/04)
  • init of multdim array of structs... (09/20/04)
• tristan
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/07/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/02/04)
• tschi-p
  • Re: How to create folder at fopen? (09/02/04)
  • How to create folder at fopen? (09/01/04)
• Turner, GS (Geoff)
  • Re: removing Spaces (09/09/04)
  • Re: removing Spaces (09/09/04)
  • Re: Entering a binary string (09/07/04)
  • Re: critique: conversion to binary (09/03/04)
• Ulrich Eckhardt
  • Re: Entering a binary string (09/07/04)
• Vaddina Prakash Rao
  • Re: system() doesnt give me the control back .. (09/17/04)
  • system() doesnt give me the control back .. (09/16/04)
• Vasu
  • Re: Difference between Structure & Union (09/16/04)
• vertigo
  • string & bytes (09/15/04)
  • pwd (09/12/04)
  • read files in dir (09/12/04)
• Victor Nazarov
  • Re: Segfault question. (09/05/04)
• Vinay
  • Re: [OT} Function Call Tree Command in UNIX. (09/11/04)
  • Re: Function Call Tree Command in UNIX. (09/08/04)
  • Function Call Tree Command in UNIX. (09/07/04)
• Vincenzo Conti
  • mmap queestion (09/08/04)
• Vinod Patel
  • Re: Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/17/04)
  • Re: Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/15/04)
  • Does typecasting consume cpu cycles (09/14/04)
• VJ
  • C program to flowchart (09/08/04)
• vkreddy_in_at_hotmail.com
  • Re: Exception handling (09/22/04)
  • Exception handling (09/18/04)
• Vyom
  • Re: How to convert a double **ptr in a double const ** const ptr? (09/13/04)
• Walter
  • Re: Floating point number to binary (09/19/04)
• wana
  • ping source code (09/16/04)
  • Re: speed of int vs bool for large matrix (09/14/04)
• webposter
  • Short-Circuit Evaluation of Boolean Expressions (09/13/04)
• Wei Li
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
  • Re: Small C "Puzzle" (09/01/04)
  • Re: Array size limits (09/01/04)
• Willem
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/19/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/18/04)
  • Re: Tips on gaining proficiency in C (09/15/04)
• William Clodius
  • Re: C or Fortran obsolete? (was Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy") (09/02/04)
• William L. Bahn
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/03/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/03/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/03/04)
  • Local Heap? (09/02/04)
  • Re: How does free() knows? (09/02/04)
  • Re: free() is useless... (09/02/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: Bit Pattern Problem (09/02/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/02/04)
  • Re: Some bit manipulation (09/02/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/02/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/02/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/02/04)
  • Re: small C puzzles (09/01/04)
• Wojtek Lerch
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/30/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/30/04)
  • Re: contiguity of arrays (09/29/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
  • Re: addresses and integers (09/01/04)
• Wong
  • Please help beginner (09/17/04)
• xarax
  • Re: Obtain sizeof struct element using offsetof()? (09/28/04)
  • Re: Is this valid C statement? (09/27/04)
  • Re: Rectangle intersection (09/26/04)
  • Re: struct and union alignment (09/24/04)
  • Re: How to find out if an int has no value (09/18/04)
  • Re: declaring a function only if it isn't already declared (09/18/04)
  • Re: union access (09/14/04)
  • Re: Anonymous Union Member Access (09/03/04)
• Xenos
  • Re: Can I write a recursive type definition ? (09/30/04)
  • Re: SET ADT (09/30/04)
• Xiangliang Meng
  • A way to maintain a global set in many files by using preprocessing directives . Could we find a better method? (09/10/04)
• Yevgen Muntyan
  • Re: Disadvantage of using 'inline' (09/26/04)
  • Re: union access (09/24/04)
• yogi
  • Re: Dynamically assigning data type (09/22/04)
  • Dynamically assigning data type (09/20/04)
• ZER0K3WL
  • Using mysqlclient library -- odd crash (09/30/04)
• Zhou Wei
  • Re: string & bytes (09/16/04)
• Zian Smith
  • Re: malloc and pointer hell (09/21/04)
  • Re: How to determine available system calls on a Unix/Linux system (09/20/04)
• ~neil~
  • Re: Invoking A DOS Program Through A "C" Program (09/26/04)
  • Isn't C Programming In DOS, A Part Of This Newsgroup? (09/26/04)
  • Re: Invoking A DOS Program Through A "C" Program (09/26/04)
  • Invoking A DOS Program Through A "C" Program (09/23/04)

Last message date: 09/30/04
Archived on: 09/30/04 CEST

---

3171 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]