Re: Can I write a recursive type definition ?
From: Timothy Madden (batman_at_rmv.spam.home.ro)
Date: 10/05/04
- Next message: Dave: "Re: goto to switch labels"
- Previous message: Mabden: "Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters"
- In reply to: Victor Bazarov: "Re: Can I write a recursive type definition ?"
- Next in thread: Michael Mair: "Re: Can I write a recursive type definition ?"
- Reply: Michael Mair: "Re: Can I write a recursive type definition ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:48:25 +0200
"Victor Bazarov" <v.Abazarov@comAcast.net> wrote in message
news:5ic8d.3926$Ae.1392@newsread1.dllstx09.us.to.verio.net...
> Timothy Madden wrote:
> > [...]
> > Does anyone think that there should be a special class of "void code
> > pointes" in C/C++ ?
> > A kind of pointer that could only be assigned function addresses,
without
> > the pointer being of a specific function type.
> >
>
> What problem would you solve with it that cannot otherwise be solved
> with what C++ already has?
>
Well ... It's like 'what problem would I solve with C++ that cannot
otherwise be solved with what C already has ?'
I think this could help making things clear in a good program
Timothy Madden
Romania
-----------------------------------------------------------
And I don't wanna miss a thing
- Next message: Dave: "Re: goto to switch labels"
- Previous message: Mabden: "Re: Trying to understand pointers for function paramaters"
- In reply to: Victor Bazarov: "Re: Can I write a recursive type definition ?"
- Next in thread: Michael Mair: "Re: Can I write a recursive type definition ?"
- Reply: Michael Mair: "Re: Can I write a recursive type definition ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
