Re: C to Java Byte Code

From: Alfred Z. Newmane (a.newmane.remove_at_eastcoastcz.com)
Date: 10/29/04 

Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:42:29 -0700

Willem wrote:
> Paul wrote:
> ) The claim made by Mr. Abdullah is that unions are supported by his
> product. ) Since unions are already supported in C, this can only
> mean his claim ) refers to Java.
>
> That's a very odd thing to say. His product is a C compiler.
>
>
> Let me ask you a question:
>
> Does GCC support unions ?

2.9.5 and 3.2 seem to.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: C to Java Byte Code
    ... )> Paul wrote: ... Since unions are already supported in C, ... what it means for a compiler to 'support unions'. ... SaSW, Willem ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: C to Java Byte Code
    ... )> Paul wrote: ... Since unions are already supported in C, ... what it means for a compiler to 'support unions'. ... SaSW, Willem ...
    (comp.programming)
  • Re: C to Java Byte Code
    ... )> Paul wrote: ... Since unions are already supported in C, ... what it means for a compiler to 'support unions'. ... SaSW, Willem ...
    (comp.lang.cpp)
  • Re: C to Java Byte Code
    ... )> Paul wrote: ... Since unions are already supported in C, ... what it means for a compiler to 'support unions'. ... SaSW, Willem ...
    (comp.unix.programmer)
  • Re: C to Java Byte Code
    ... >> that compiler and run on that plartform. ... > demonstrates that unions are not supported. ... Java does not support the mapping of one variable type onto another. ... The basic issue is that the disparate data types that can be mapped using ...
    (comp.programming)