Re: "Interesting" C behaviours
From: Christian Bau (christian.bau_at_cbau.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 11/27/04
- Next message: Christian Bau: "Re: Why in stdint.h have both least and fast integer types?"
- Previous message: Christian Bau: "Re: Correct type for array indices"
- In reply to: Rennie deGraaf: "Re: "Interesting" C behaviours"
- Next in thread: Chris Torek: "Re: "Interesting" C behaviours"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 12:31:23 +0000
In article <lJVpd.356735$nl.170987@pd7tw3no>,
Rennie deGraaf <ca.ucalgary.cpsc@degraaf> wrote:
> GCC, for instance, frequently doesn't even compile a%b to a single idiv
> instruction - it compiles it to a big mess of imul, shift, and leal
> instructions.
Because it is faster.
- Next message: Christian Bau: "Re: Why in stdint.h have both least and fast integer types?"
- Previous message: Christian Bau: "Re: Correct type for array indices"
- In reply to: Rennie deGraaf: "Re: "Interesting" C behaviours"
- Next in thread: Chris Torek: "Re: "Interesting" C behaviours"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|