Re: What Defins the "C" Language?
From: Xenos (dont.spam.me_at_spamhate.com)
Date: 12/03/04
- Next message: Martin Ambuhl: "Re: [Q] superfluous ids in self-referential typedef struct"
- Previous message: Eric Sosman: "Re: [Q] superfluous ids in self-referential typedef struct"
- In reply to: Chris Croughton: "Re: What Defins the "C" Language?"
- Next in thread: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: What Defins the "C" Language?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:32:30 -0500
"Chris Croughton" <chris@keristor.net> wrote in message
news:slrncr1anm.5fg.chris@ccserver.keris.net...
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:03:48 -0500, Xenos
> <dont.spam.me@spamhate.com> wrote:
> That is, however, what you did imply.
Not that I disagree with anything you said, but this is kind of a pet peeve
of mine: I did not imply anything, as you and others have stated. When you
interpret what I say a certain way, it is not that I am implying, it is that
you are inferring. That may lead you to make assumptions about what--if
any--implication I was making, but it is still your inference. Again,
though, I will attempt to be more clear in the future.
Regards.
- Next message: Martin Ambuhl: "Re: [Q] superfluous ids in self-referential typedef struct"
- Previous message: Eric Sosman: "Re: [Q] superfluous ids in self-referential typedef struct"
- In reply to: Chris Croughton: "Re: What Defins the "C" Language?"
- Next in thread: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: What Defins the "C" Language?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
