comp.lang.c
By Author

3593 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 12/31/04
Ending: 01/31/05

• 'Lil Laurry
  • Java compiler (01/22/05)
• 42Bastian Schick
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/27/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/27/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/27/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/26/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/26/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/26/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
• __MMS__
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/02/05)
• A. Sinan Unur
  • Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities? (01/29/05)
• AA
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/04/05)
• Aaron Murray MacDonald
  • I want to write a Bit Torrent client in C (01/02/05)
• aaronfude_at_gmail.com
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
• Abhishek Jha
  • Why pointers can only be subtracted ? (01/31/05)
  • Convert numbers to words (01/05/05)
• Adam Warner
  • Re: Compiler behavior : Inlining external functions (01/10/05)
  • Re: Sensibly printed floats? (01/09/05)
  • Sensibly printed floats? (01/08/05)
  • Re: Handling unsigned overflow of size_t (01/07/05)
  • Handling unsigned overflow of size_t (01/07/05)
  • Re: Variable declaration syntax (01/03/05)
  • Re: Variable declaration syntax (01/03/05)
  • Variable declaration syntax (01/02/05)
• adbarnet
  • Re: Standard network method (12/31/04)
  • Re: Standard network method (12/31/04)
• addy.amu_at_gmail.com
  • Re: How to convert float to hex? (01/06/05)
  • Re: How to convert float to hex? (01/06/05)
• Adrianp
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/20/05)
• aegis
  • uniform random distribution (01/30/05)
  • Re: some help pls (01/28/05)
  • Re: is this intentional? (01/26/05)
  • is this intentional? (01/26/05)
  • Re: function call with arguments which takes no arguments (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/13/05)
  • getbits k&r2 (01/09/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/03/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/03/05)
• ajm
  • Re: snprintf vs strcat, (01/15/05)
  • snprintf vs strcat, (01/14/05)
• Al Bowers
  • Re: Finding the time taken by a function (01/25/05)
  • Re: Array of pointers to structs (01/21/05)
  • Re: Data importing BUS ERROR (01/18/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/15/05)
• Alan Balmer
  • Re: Watcom printf to stdout, I don't get it :-( (01/28/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/26/05)
  • Re: alignment revisited (01/19/05)
  • Re: Can function prototypes appear anywhere? (01/19/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Better Linked List Handling (01/07/05)
  • Re: compile C programs with UNIX system calls (= Unix Programs??) (01/04/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/04/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/04/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/04/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/04/05)
• Alan Krueger
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
• Albert van der Horst
  • Re: Coding standards (01/21/05)
  • Re: Result of Comparision (01/21/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/21/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/21/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/20/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/20/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/20/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (12/31/04)
  • Re: Coding standards (12/31/04)
• Alberto Giménez
  • Re: copying data to a structure member array (01/06/05)
• alex
  • Re: Does this make any sense? (01/09/05)
  • Re: does turbo C has be ran under windows 98/95 (01/08/05)
  • Re: freebsd (ufs) direct access to Hard drive using inode (01/06/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/05/05)
  • Re: I want to write a Bit Torrent client in C (01/04/05)
  • Re: online video conferencing (01/03/05)
  • Re: I want to write a Bit Torrent client in C (01/03/05)
  • Re: U make $50-$500 a week from your website Up>dH$N7 (01/03/05)
  • Re: memory alignment (01/03/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/03/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/03/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/03/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/03/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/02/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/02/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/02/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/02/05)
  • Re: [OT, links] vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/02/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/02/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/01/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/01/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/01/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/01/05)
• Alex Fraser
  • Re: integral promotion, arithmetic conversion, value preserving, unsigned preserving??? (01/31/05)
  • Re: integral promotion, arithmetic conversion, value preserving, unsigned preserving??? (01/30/05)
  • Re: What is the difference between signed and unsigned char? (01/27/05)
  • Re: its giving the different address !!!!!!!!!! (01/24/05)
  • Re: its giving the different address !!!!!!!!!! (01/24/05)
  • Re: Is declaring a pointer to an undefined struct legal? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Is declaring a pointer to an undefined struct legal? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Handling unsigned overflow of size_t (01/07/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/01/05)
• alex23
  • Re: how to write a tutorial (01/24/05)
• alexmdac_at_hotmail.com
  • Re: Some complex function prototypes like signal() (01/28/05)
  • Re: Initialize elements in an array (01/28/05)
  • Re: Is there anyway to iterate STL queue ? (01/28/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: is this intentional? (01/26/05)
  • Re: is this intentional? (01/26/05)
  • Re: is this intentional? (01/26/05)
  • Re: is this intentional? (01/26/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
• Alf P. Steinbach
  • Re: Problems initializing a dynamically allocated 2D array (01/30/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/25/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
• Allan Bruce
  • Re: implement atoi (01/21/05)
  • Re: implement atoi (01/20/05)
  • Re: implement atoi (01/20/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: position and number of 1's in an integer (01/19/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/14/05)
  • Re: Callback from a DLL (01/09/05)
• Allin Cottrell
  • Re: Message Mgmt Utility (01/08/05)
  • Re: How Free() works? (01/07/05)
  • Re: How Free() works? (01/05/05)
  • Re: compile C programs with UNIX system calls (= Unix Programs??) (01/05/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/05/05)
• Altova Announcements
  • ANNOUNCE: Altova DiffDog 2005 - the dedicated differencing utility for developers and power users (01/18/05)
• Amit
  • Calling subroutine in fortran module (01/30/05)
• Anders
  • courier-imap auth api (01/04/05)
• Anders Christensen
  • Re: char array not terminated with \0 (01/25/05)
  • Re: char array not terminated with \0 (01/16/05)
  • char array not terminated with \0 (01/16/05)
• Andreas Klimas
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/26/05)
  • ends_with() ? (01/26/05)
• Andrej Prsa
  • Re: Passing const int * to a function (01/04/05)
  • Passing const int * to a function (01/04/05)
• Andrew Koenig
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
• Andrew McDonagh
  • Re: Job Prospects for Software Engineers (01/03/05)
• Andrew Thompson
  • Re: Job Prospects for Software Engineers (01/03/05)
  • Re: Job Prospects for Software Engineers (01/03/05)
• Andrey Tarasevich
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/26/05)
  • Re: pointer to array of const objects (01/26/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/25/05)
  • Re: "Declaration" vs. "Definition" (01/22/05)
  • Re: interesting problem (01/21/05)
  • Re: "Declaration" vs. "Definition" (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/21/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/20/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: [OT] help with Koenig Lookup (01/19/05)
  • Re: Portable alloca() replacement? (01/19/05)
  • Re: Portable alloca() replacement? (01/18/05)
  • Re: Inside-Out Array-Indexing Syntax (01/17/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/08/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/07/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/07/05)
  • Re: scope resolution operator??????? (01/07/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/07/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/07/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/07/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/06/05)
  • Re: really confused with variable access (01/04/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/03/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/02/05)
• Angus Comber
  • How to resolve error LNK2005 - function already defined (01/08/05)
• Anil
  • Implementation of sizeof, malloc, new (01/20/05)
• Anitha Adusumilli
  • Re: problem with free. (01/09/05)
  • Re: problem with free. (01/07/05)
  • problem with free. (01/07/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/07/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/06/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/06/05)
  • Wide Characters and tchar (01/06/05)
• anonymous
  • Re: [OT] [Question]activities of stack pointer and frame pointer when function called (01/28/05)
  • [Question]activities of stack pointer and frame pointer when function called (01/20/05)
  • [Question]activities of stack pointer and frame pointer when function called (01/12/05)
  • Re: copying data to a structure member array (01/04/05)
  • Re: copying data to a structure member array (01/04/05)
  • Re: copying data to a structure member array (01/04/05)
  • copying data to a structure member array (01/04/05)
• Anthony J Bybell
  • Error log design... (01/04/05)
• arN
  • [Newbie] need help (01/20/05)
• Arthur J. O'Dwyer
  • Re: Coding standards (01/14/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/12/05)
  • [OT] Re: Coding standards (01/07/05)
  • Re: Thread-Safety in Functions: A Random String Generator (01/06/05)
• Artie Gold
  • Re: Ran across this cryptic code for C, I got blown away (01/23/05)
  • Re: char array not terminated with \0 (01/17/05)
  • Re: char array not terminated with \0 (01/16/05)
  • Re: char array not terminated with \0 (01/16/05)
  • Re: how to extern structure? (01/15/05)
  • Re: malloc error checking (01/01/05)
  • Re: malloc error checking (01/01/05)
• ashwin2mittal_at_gmail.com
  • Major project in C/C++ (01/14/05)
• askmore
  • Re: run a command in background in C (01/29/05)
  • Re: run a command in background in C (01/28/05)
  • run a command in background in C (01/28/05)
• axel_at_white-eagle.co.uk
  • Re: how to write a tutorial (01/28/05)
• bacadman
  • testing for the newline (01/24/05)
• bala
  • Re: position and number of 1's in an integer (01/20/05)
• Barry Schwarz
  • Re: array performance (01/31/05)
  • Re: Is my memory is not enough? (01/30/05)
  • Re: Is my memory is not enough? (01/30/05)
  • Re: passing structs in and out of functions (01/29/05)
  • Re: rand - is RAND_MAX how long before the same # will occur again? (01/29/05)
  • Re: Problem with integers (01/26/05)
  • Re: Rules for complex declarations (01/23/05)
  • Re: initializer element is not constant (01/18/05)
  • Re: Better Linked List Handling (01/07/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/06/05)
  • Re: Chnage the position of element! (01/06/05)
  • Re: Chnage the position of element! (01/06/05)
  • Re: array problem! (01/06/05)
  • Re: Newbie question (01/02/05)
• Bart C
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/27/05)
• Bart van Ingen Schenau
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/24/05)
• Bas Wassink
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/05/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/05/05)
  • Incrementing variables past limits (01/04/05)
• bd
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: accessing freed memory without error (01/17/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/17/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/17/05)
  • Re: how to extern structure? (01/17/05)
• beetle
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: passing pointer->struct->pointer->struct to function. .. ?? (01/25/05)
  • passing pointer->struct->pointer->struct to function. .. ?? (01/24/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/20/05)
  • should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/20/05)
• beginner10
  • Re: Showing problem (01/04/05)
  • Re: Showing problem (01/04/05)
  • Re: Showing problem (01/03/05)
  • Re: Showing problem (01/03/05)
  • Showing problem (01/03/05)
  • Re: Matrix problem (01/03/05)
  • Matrix problem (01/02/05)
• belial
  • Fresher starting programming with C (01/28/05)
• ben
  • Re: what is "variable-name-equivalence" in c? (01/27/05)
  • what is "variable-name-equivalence" in c? (01/26/05)
  • Use of the Volatile keyword for a pointer to a volatile memory block (01/10/05)
• Ben Midgley
  • Re: Error E2349 tester.c 29: Nonportable pointer conversion (01/16/05)
  • Re: Error E2349 tester.c 29: Nonportable pointer conversion (01/15/05)
  • Re: Error E2349 tester.c 29: Nonportable pointer conversion (01/15/05)
  • Error E2349 tester.c 29: Nonportable pointer conversion (01/14/05)
  • Re: Current languages are a mess, what would you choose C#, Java or C++? (01/13/05)
  • Re: Your Suggestion (01/12/05)
• Ben Pfaff
  • Re: function to count number of set bits (01/31/05)
  • Re: function to count number of set bits (01/30/05)
  • Re: Return to Start of Line? (01/29/05)
  • Re: rand - is RAND_MAX how long before the same # will occur again? (01/29/05)
  • Re: Input unknown number of integers in a line... (01/29/05)
  • Re: Input unknown number of integers in a line... (01/29/05)
  • Re: sqrt (01/28/05)
  • Re: Input unknown number of integers in a line... (01/28/05)
  • Re: Input unknown number of integers in a line... (01/28/05)
  • Re: reading a unformatted file (01/28/05)
  • Re: Input unknown number of integers in a line... (01/28/05)
  • Re: passing a (const void *) into memset() (01/28/05)
  • Re: feasibility of stdin stream to feel up directly. (01/27/05)
  • Re: [ IP validation math... ] (01/27/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/27/05)
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/26/05)
  • Re: strncpy and the knife (01/26/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: problem with round (01/26/05)
  • Re: strtok/strtok_r woes (01/25/05)
  • Re: Please help me crack this code... (01/23/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/22/05)
  • Re: interesting problem (01/21/05)
  • Re: Increment, decrement, overflow, and underflow (01/21/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/20/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/20/05)
  • Re: problem with round (01/20/05)
  • Re: problem with round (01/20/05)
  • Re: SAS/C INTEROPERABLE WITH IBM C/C++ (01/20/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: LL TO BST (01/19/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/19/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/19/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/19/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/18/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/18/05)
  • Re: How to read all files present in a directory in C ? (01/18/05)
  • Re: #if sizeof... (01/17/05)
  • Re: rounding (01/13/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: copying data to a structure member array (01/11/05)
  • Re: what is the scope of enum? (01/07/05)
  • Re: scope resolution operator??????? (01/07/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/05/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/05/05)
  • Re: Convert numbers to words (01/05/05)
  • Re: Convert numbers to words (01/05/05)
  • Re: Convert numbers to words (01/05/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/05/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/04/05)
  • Re: Question about C? (01/04/05)
  • Re: SendMessage() for saving text file (01/04/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/03/05)
  • Re: Newbie question (01/02/05)
• Berlin Brown
  • Re: GUI project, C, Win32, and lisp (01/04/05)
  • GUI project, C, Win32, and lisp (01/04/05)
  • GUI project, C, Win32, and lisp (01/04/05)
• Bertel Brander
  • Re: coloring a pixel (01/17/05)
• bhanu
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/18/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/18/05)
• Big K
  • Re: Is my memory is not enough? (01/30/05)
  • Re: what is happening in C when increment this way? (01/30/05)
• Bill Cunningham
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/25/05)
• Bill Pringlemeir
  • Re: Error log design... (01/04/05)
• Bill Reid
  • Re: To find the size of array using its pointer (01/22/05)
• Billy Patton
  • Re: Major project in C/C++ (01/27/05)
• bine
  • Watcom printf to stdout, I don't get it :-( (01/28/05)
• Bjørn Augestad
  • Re: Finished a "teach yourself" book, what next? (01/31/05)
  • Re: what is size_t (01/29/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: coins program, need some help with crashing (01/20/05)
  • Re: Datahiding in C (01/17/05)
  • Re: email program in c - help me solve one error,please... (01/02/05)
• BMarsh
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/15/05)
  • Re: OLD IDE C Compiler (01/14/05)
  • Re: Command terminated by signal 9 (01/14/05)
  • Re: Quandry with the following C code (Intermediate) (01/12/05)
  • Quandry with the following C code (Intermediate) (01/12/05)
• bob_jenkins_at_burtleburtle.net
  • Re: passing a (const void *) into memset() (01/28/05)
  • passing a (const void *) into memset() (01/28/05)
• Bonj
  • Re: Need for programming (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: Sockets programming (01/16/05)
  • Sockets programming (01/16/05)
  • Re: interview questions with answers (01/12/05)
  • About 64-bit portability (01/03/05)
  • Re: Standard network method (01/03/05)
  • Re: Standard network method (01/03/05)
• Bradley K. Sherman
  • Re: software types and programming languages (01/08/05)
• BRG
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/21/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/21/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/21/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
• Brian Inglis
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/27/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/27/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/27/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/24/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/13/05)
• Bruce Lee
  • Re: Handling binary data in C - questions (01/19/05)
  • Re: Handling binary data in C - questions (01/18/05)
  • Handling binary data in C - questions (01/18/05)
• Bryan Olson
  • Problems with Harbison & Steele (01/27/05)
• bstockwell_at_ucok.edu
  • Re: How to convert float to hex? (01/05/05)
• buda
  • Re: accessing freed memory without error (01/12/05)
• candy_init_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: what is size_t (01/29/05)
  • what is size_t (01/29/05)
  • Re: (",) .............. Good News Everyone! .............. (01/27/05)
  • Programming Challenge (01/04/05)
• Carlos
  • Re: Newbie Q: a C function like 'paste' ?? (01/17/05)
• Carramba
  • Re: compiling quistion (01/30/05)
  • compiling quistion (01/30/05)
  • %x question (01/30/05)
  • Re: UCHAR_MIN & UCHAR_MAX (01/30/05)
  • UCHAR_MIN & UCHAR_MAX (01/30/05)
• Carsten Hansen
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
  • Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
• CBFalconer
  • Re: string initilization WHY? (01/31/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/31/05)
  • Re: Input unknown number of integers in a line... (01/31/05)
  • Re: how to modify a txt file (01/31/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/31/05)
  • Re: Sign error in K&R 1 (01/31/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/31/05)
  • Re: uniform random distribution (01/31/05)
  • Re: sockets and connecting to other programs (01/30/05)
  • Re: UCHAR_MIN & UCHAR_MAX (01/30/05)
  • Re: Problems initializing a dynamically allocated 2D array (01/30/05)
  • Re: what is happening in C when increment this way? (01/30/05)
  • Re: what is happening in C when increment this way? (01/30/05)
  • Re: Calling subroutine in fortran module (01/30/05)
  • Re: Nested conditional expressions ---- good idea/bad idea? (01/30/05)
  • Re: Return to Start of Line? (01/29/05)
  • Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities? (01/29/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/29/05)
  • Re: Input unknown number of integers in a line... (01/29/05)
  • Re: Input unknown number of integers in a line... (01/29/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/29/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
  • Re: Fresher starting programming with C (01/28/05)
  • Re: run a command in background in C (01/28/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
  • Re: Input unknown number of integers in a line... (01/28/05)
  • Re: run a command in background in C (01/28/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
  • Re: What is the difference between signed and unsigned char? (01/28/05)
  • Re: passing arg char[X][Y] to function expecting (char**) (01/28/05)
  • Re: Sqrt precision ?! (01/27/05)
  • Re: Sqrt precision ?! (01/27/05)
  • Re: reading a unformatted file (01/27/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/27/05)
  • Re: use of do{...}while(0) (01/27/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/27/05)
  • Re: Using two different third party softwares ... function multiplpy-defined error (01/27/05)
  • Re: is this intentional? (01/27/05)
  • Re: is this intentional? (01/27/05)
  • Re: why use fprintf / size_t instead of printf/ int (01/26/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/26/05)
  • Re: simple question: namespace (01/26/05)
  • Re: is this intentional? (01/26/05)
  • Re: Problem with integers (01/26/05)
  • Re: why use fprintf / size_t instead of printf/ int (01/26/05)
  • Re: problem with round (01/26/05)
  • Re: Problem with integers (01/26/05)
  • Re: cast-as-lvalue (Thank You) (01/26/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/26/05)
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/26/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/26/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/25/05)
  • Re: Un plotter de fonctions mathematiques (01/25/05)
  • Where have they gone (was: strtok/strtok_r woes) (01/25/05)
  • Re: interesting problem (01/25/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: Please help me crack this code... (01/23/05)
  • Re: Multi-dimensional array initialization (01/23/05)
  • Re: how to write a tutorial (01/23/05)
  • Re: Rules for complex declarations (01/23/05)
  • Re: Multi-dimensional array initialization (01/23/05)
  • Re: The need for int to capture getchar()'s EOF (01/23/05)
  • Re: "streams" (01/22/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/22/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/21/05)
  • Re: interesting problem (01/21/05)
  • Re: float values can b rounded off? (01/21/05)
  • Re: how to write a tutorial (01/21/05)
  • Re: __atoi64 not working correctly (01/21/05)
  • Re: __atoi64 not working correctly (01/21/05)
  • Re: int func() v/s int func(void) (01/21/05)
  • Standard defined functions (was: implement atoi) (01/21/05)
  • Re: solution to Knr Exercise 1-9 (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/21/05)
  • Re: Increment, decrement, overflow, and underflow (01/21/05)
  • Re: Result of Comparision (01/21/05)
  • Re: implement atoi (01/21/05)
  • Re: Implementation of sizeof, malloc, new (01/21/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/20/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: Can function prototypes appear anywhere? (01/20/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/20/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/20/05)
  • Re: Creating a C application to be run on another machine (01/20/05)
  • Re: Macros with variable parameter list in MS VC Compiler (6.0) (01/20/05)
  • The Google Problem (was: How can i compare bit wise?) (01/20/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: Riddle (01/20/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/20/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/20/05)
  • Re: Need for programming (01/19/05)
  • Re: multidimensional array = pointer to pointer ? (01/19/05)
  • Re: alignment revisited (01/19/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/19/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/19/05)
  • Re: alignment revisited (01/19/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/19/05)
  • Re: Graphics in c (01/19/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/19/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/19/05)
  • Re: size of memory in C -- allocation (01/19/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/19/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/19/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/19/05)
  • Re: Mapping C code to assembly instructions (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Newbie Q: a C function like 'paste' ?? (01/18/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/18/05)
  • Re: Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/18/05)
  • Re: coloring a pixel (01/18/05)
  • Re: Inside-Out Array-Indexing Syntax (01/18/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/18/05)
  • Re: C call of a C# dll (01/17/05)
  • Re: Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/17/05)
  • Re: Datahiding in C (01/17/05)
  • Re: Datahiding in C (01/17/05)
  • Re: when to use strncpy() ? (01/17/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: Sockets programming (01/16/05)
  • Re: Trouble with scanf (01/16/05)
  • Re: Crazy (?) C problem (01/16/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/16/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/15/05)
  • Re: snprintf vs strcat, (01/14/05)
  • Re: indeed inneed to Good Editor C Compiler (01/14/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB ofInt, etc (01/14/05)
  • Re: Current languages are a mess, what would you choose C#, Java or C++? (01/14/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/13/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB ofInt, etc (01/13/05)
  • Re: rounding (01/13/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/13/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: slight rounding problem (01/12/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/12/05)
  • Re: Is declaring a pointer to an undefined struct legal? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/12/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/12/05)
  • Re: What does this do? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/12/05)
  • Re: Garbage data in float datatype - Mingw3.2 (gcc) (01/11/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: where variables are stored? (01/11/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: Garbage data in float datatype - Mingw3.2 (gcc) (01/10/05)
  • Re: How Free() works? (01/10/05)
  • Re: Handling unsigned overflow of size_t (01/10/05)
  • Re: Factoring Nested Loops (01/10/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/09/05)
  • Re: graph tutorial (01/09/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/09/05)
  • Re: Am I doing something wrong with printf() here? (01/09/05)
  • Re: VMDD Tech announces the availability of CS101 - Decimal/Hex/Binary calculator (01/09/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/09/05)
  • Re: Garbage data in float datatype - Mingw3.2 (gcc) (01/08/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/08/05)
  • Re: what is the scope of enum? (01/08/05)
  • Re: Garbage data in float datatype - Mingw3.2 (gcc) (01/08/05)
  • Re: Text editor data structures (01/08/05)
  • Re: Newbie question info (01/07/05)
  • Re: reverse a link list (01/07/05)
  • Re: scope resolution operator??????? (01/07/05)
  • Re: Better Linked List Handling (01/07/05)
  • Re: Better Linked List Handling (01/07/05)
  • Re: Text editor data structures (01/07/05)
  • Re: Linux rounding error??? (01/05/05)
  • Re: 0x400000*3/0x40000 undefined ? (01/05/05)
  • Re: How to convert float to hex? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/05/05)
  • Re: FAQ Related - why cast? (01/05/05)
  • Re: How can i call a function outside of the current project? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/05/05)
  • Re: How Free() works? (01/05/05)
  • Re: FAQ Related - why cast? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/05/05)
  • Re: reverse a link list (01/04/05)
  • Re: my wife dumped me and this is my suicide note (01/04/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/04/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/04/05)
• ccwork
  • tricky assignment statemenent (01/17/05)
  • tricky assignment statemenent (01/07/05)
• celsius
  • another method would be as follows (01/05/05)
  • another method is as follows (01/05/05)
  • formula used in calculating diffrence between dates (01/03/05)
• Cesar Rabak
  • Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities? (01/30/05)
• chaka
  • Re: testing for the newline (01/24/05)
• Charlton Wilbur
  • Re: how to write a tutorial (01/26/05)
• Chathu
  • File handling (01/31/05)
• chinabooter2003_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: Is my memory is not enough? (01/30/05)
  • Re: Is my memory is not enough? (01/30/05)
  • Is my memory is not enough? (01/30/05)
• chming
  • Is it possible to return an array from a function? (01/14/05)
  • Is it possible to return an array from a function? (01/14/05)
  • Re: reading stream up to next delimiter (01/06/05)
• chook
  • Pointer to Function (01/10/05)
• chris
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: Linked list (01/04/05)
• Chris Barts
  • Re: Is declaring a pointer to an undefined struct legal? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Is declaring a pointer to an undefined struct legal? (01/12/05)
  • Is declaring a pointer to an undefined struct legal? (01/12/05)
• Chris Croughton
  • Re: Finished a "teach yourself" book, what next? (01/31/05)
  • Re: Finished a "teach yourself" book, what next? (01/31/05)
  • Re: Local variables within looping constructs (01/29/05)
  • Re: using system("xxxxx") (01/29/05)
  • Re: Input unknown number of integers in a line... (01/29/05)
  • Re: groups.google.com indentation bugs [semi-OT] (01/28/05)
  • Re: What is the difference between signed and unsigned char? (01/28/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/28/05)
  • Re: some help pls (01/27/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/27/05)
  • Re: Sqrt precision ?! (01/27/05)
  • Re: enum... (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/26/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/26/05)
  • Re: Problem with integers (01/26/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/26/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/26/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/25/05)
  • Re: The need for int to capture getchar()'s EOF (01/23/05)
  • Re: Standard defined functions (was: implement atoi) (01/22/05)
  • Re: To find the size of array using its pointer (01/22/05)
  • Re: __atoi64 not working correctly (01/22/05)
  • Re: "Declaration" vs. "Definition" (01/21/05)
  • Re: __atoi64 not working correctly (01/21/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: __atoi64 not working correctly (01/21/05)
  • Re: __atoi64 not working correctly (01/21/05)
  • Re: implement atoi (01/21/05)
  • Re: Result of Comparision (01/21/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/21/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: To find the size of array using its pointer (01/20/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/19/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/19/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/19/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/19/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/18/05)
  • Re: size of memory in C -- allocation (01/18/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/18/05)
  • Re: Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/17/05)
  • Re: initializer element is not constant (01/17/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/17/05)
  • Re: when to use strncpy() ? (01/17/05)
  • Re: char array not terminated with \0 (01/17/05)
  • Re: when to use strncpy() ? (01/17/05)
  • Re: initializer element is not constant (01/17/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/14/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/13/05)
  • Re: Compiler code optimization: see code below (01/13/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/13/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/12/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/11/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/11/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/11/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/10/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/10/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/08/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/08/05)
  • Re: long double in C89? (01/08/05)
  • Re: Garbage data in float datatype - Mingw3.2 (gcc) (01/07/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/07/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/07/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/07/05)
  • Re: long double in C89? (01/07/05)
  • Re: long double in C89? (01/06/05)
  • Re: reading stream up to next delimiter (01/06/05)
  • long double in C89? (01/06/05)
  • Re: reading stream up to next delimiter (01/06/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/06/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/06/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/05/05)
  • Re: How to convert float to hex? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Underscore (01/05/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/05/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/05/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/04/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/04/05)
  • Re: compile C programs with UNIX system calls (= Unix Programs??) (01/04/05)
  • Re: Programming Challenge (01/04/05)
  • Re: reverse a link list (01/04/05)
  • Re: Programming Challenge (01/04/05)
  • Re: compile C programs with UNIX system calls (= Unix Programs??) (01/04/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/04/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/04/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/02/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/02/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/02/05)
  • Off-topic threads (01/02/05)
  • Re: malloc error checking (01/01/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/01/05)
  • Re: do{..}while(0) macro substitutions (01/01/05)
• Chris Dollin
  • Re: what is "variable-name-equivalence" in c? (01/28/05)
  • Re: what is "variable-name-equivalence" in c? (01/26/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/21/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/21/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/20/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/19/05)
  • Re: Can function prototypes appear anywhere? (01/19/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/19/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/19/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
• Chris Gordon-Smith
  • Re: Linked list (01/04/05)
• Chris Mattern
  • Re: how to write a tutorial (01/24/05)
• Chris McDonald
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/26/05)
  • Re: Variable declaration syntax (01/03/05)
• Chris Smith
  • Re: software types and programming languages (01/04/05)
• Chris Stephens
  • New and enhanced low cost C compilers (01/25/05)
• Chris Torek
  • Re: return statement at end of function (01/29/05)
  • Re: cast-as-lvalue (Thank You) (01/28/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/28/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/26/05)
  • Re: Q: recursive call to main, termination of program (01/26/05)
  • Re: Problem with integers (01/26/05)
  • Re: Problem with integers (01/26/05)
  • Re: Are constants and string literals considered "data objects" in c? (01/25/05)
  • Re: What does const char *s mean? is s a constant or *s? (01/24/05)
  • Re: To find the size of array using its pointer (01/22/05)
  • Re: int func() v/s int func(void) (01/21/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/21/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/21/05)
  • Re: Result of Comparision (01/21/05)
  • Re: function call with arguments which takes no arguments (01/20/05)
  • Re: multidimensional array = pointer to pointer ? (01/19/05)
  • Re: Do buffers always start with the lowest memory address being the first element? (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/19/05)
  • Re: Array assignment via cast (01/18/05)
  • Re: Mapping C code to assembly instructions (01/18/05)
  • Re: Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/17/05)
  • Re: initializer element is not constant (01/17/05)
  • Re: initializer element is not constant (01/17/05)
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/17/05)
  • Re: Is the name of a 2-dimensional array equal to address of [0][0] element? (01/17/05)
  • Re: char array not terminated with \0 (01/16/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/15/05)
  • Re: Do buffers always start with the lowest memory address being the first element? (01/15/05)
  • Re: Compiler code optimization: see code below (01/13/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/12/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/11/05)
  • Re: Address syntax (01/11/05)
  • Re: copying data to a structure member array (01/11/05)
  • Re: Use of the Volatile keyword for a pointer to a volatile memory block (01/11/05)
  • Re: Newbie question (01/11/05)
  • Re: Address syntax (01/10/05)
  • Re: Address syntax (01/10/05)
  • Re: why to use '&' in scanf( ) but not in printf( ) (01/10/05)
• Chris Williams
  • Re: File handling (01/31/05)
  • Re: compiling quistion (01/31/05)
  • Re: Finished a "teach yourself" book, what next? (01/31/05)
  • Re: compiling quistion (01/31/05)
  • Re: Local variables within looping constructs (01/29/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
• Christian Bau
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/30/05)
  • Re: Problem with integers (01/26/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/22/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/22/05)
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/18/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/13/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Am I doing something wrong with printf() here? (01/08/05)
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/08/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/07/05)
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/07/05)
  • Re: 0x400000*3/0x40000 undefined ? (01/05/05)
  • Re: software types and programming languages (01/04/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/04/05)
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/04/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/03/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/03/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/01/05)
• Christian Kandeler
  • Re: passing arg char[X][Y] to function expecting (char**) (01/28/05)
  • Re: passing arg char[X][Y] to function expecting (char**) (01/28/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/20/05)
  • Re: Portable alloca() replacement? (01/19/05)
• Christopher Benson-Manica
  • Re: simple question: namespace (01/24/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/12/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/11/05)
  • Re: does turbo C has be ran under windows 98/95 (01/08/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/07/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/07/05)
  • Re: im trying to finish a program just before the deadline (01/05/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/04/05)
  • Re: Passing const int * to a function (01/04/05)
  • Re: my wife dumped me and this is my suicide note (01/04/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/04/05)
• Clark S. Cox III
  • [OT] Re: utf-8 to ascii (01/27/05)
• Dan Espen
  • Re: compile C programs with UNIX system calls (= Unix Programs??) (01/04/05)
• Dan Perl
  • Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities? (01/29/05)
  • Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities? (01/29/05)
  • Re: how to write a tutorial (01/23/05)
• dandelion
  • Re: [OT] run a command in background in C (01/28/05)
  • Re: run a command in background in C (01/28/05)
  • Re: interesting problem (01/25/05)
  • Re: Why the Range of Int is less by one at positive side?......... (01/24/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/14/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/14/05)
  • Re: Is it possible to return an array from a function? (01/14/05)
  • Re: [OT} File I/O - Delete Record (01/13/05)
  • Re: rounding (01/13/05)
  • Re: accessing freed memory without error (01/13/05)
  • Re: Getting address of a function through some string (01/13/05)
  • Re: rounding (01/12/05)
  • Re: Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/12/05)
  • Re: How can I do sort program for unsorted setup file? (01/12/05)
  • Re: File I/O - Delete Record (01/12/05)
  • Re: accessing freed memory without error (01/12/05)
  • Re: [OT} File I/O - Delete Record (01/12/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: Beginner's question (01/11/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: where variables are stored? (01/11/05)
  • Re: Use of the Volatile keyword for a pointer to a volatile memory block (01/10/05)
  • Re: VMDD Tech announces the availability of CS101 - Decimal/Hex/Binary calculator (01/10/05)
  • Re: Pointer to Function (01/10/05)
  • Re: Pointer to Function (01/10/05)
  • Re: Newbie question stack implementation (01/07/05)
  • Re: Algorithms IN C (01/07/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/07/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/07/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/07/05)
  • Re: copying data to a structure member array (01/04/05)
  • Re: compile C programs with UNIX system calls (= Unix Programs??) (01/04/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/04/05)
  • Re: Programming Challenge (01/04/05)
  • Re: reverse a link list (01/04/05)
  • Re: Showing problem (01/03/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/03/05)
• Daniel Haude
  • Re: strtok/strtok_r woes (01/27/05)
  • Re: Java compiler (01/24/05)
• Darklight
  • Re: Newbie question (01/02/05)
• Dave Hansen
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/22/05)
• Dave Neary
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/20/05)
• Dave Thompson
  • Re: Array of pointers to structs (01/31/05)
  • Re: initializer element is not constant (01/24/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/24/05)
  • Re: Error E2349 tester.c 29: Nonportable pointer conversion (01/24/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/24/05)
  • Re: Is declaring a pointer to an undefined struct legal? (01/17/05)
  • Re: accessing freed memory without error (01/17/05)
  • Re: im trying to finish a program just before the deadline (01/10/05)
  • Re: Passing const int * to a function (01/10/05)
  • Re: compile C programs with UNIX system calls (= Unix Programs??) (01/10/05)
  • Re: memcpy() Behaviour (01/10/05)
• Dave Vandervies
  • Re: Please help me crack this code... (01/27/05)
• dave windsor
  • Re: Implementation of sizeof, malloc, new (01/21/05)
  • Re: Implementation of sizeof, malloc, new (01/20/05)
  • Re: Implementation of sizeof, malloc, new (01/20/05)
  • Re: Sockets programming (01/18/05)
  • Re: Sockets programming (01/16/05)
• DaveLessnau
  • Re: Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/11/05)
  • Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/11/05)
• David
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
• David Hilsee
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
• David Rasmussen
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/01/05)
  • Structs and Alignment (01/01/05)
• David Resnick
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/25/05)
  • Re: interesting problem (01/21/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/20/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/13/05)
• David White
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/26/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/25/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
• David. E. Goble
  • help broke prog up into functions now not working (01/30/05)
• davidrubin_at_warpmail.net
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/25/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/25/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/25/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/25/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
• dbtid
  • Re: recursive function (01/16/05)
• Debian User
  • Re: c program (01/19/05)
  • Re: c program (01/19/05)
• Deepak
  • algorithm for Modified Distribution Method / Transportation Simplex Method/Transport Problem (01/11/05)
• Default User
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: The Google Problem (was: How can i compare bit wise?) (01/20/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: alignment revisited (01/19/05)
  • Re: Sockets programming (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/08/05)
• Derrick Coetzee
  • Re: Does this make any sense? (01/09/05)
  • Re: graph tutorial (01/09/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/09/05)
  • Re: what is the scope of enum? (01/08/05)
  • Re: scope resolution operator??????? (01/07/05)
  • Re: Text editor data structures (01/07/05)
  • Re: Better Linked List Handling (01/07/05)
  • Re: [OT] Off-topic threads (01/07/05)
  • Re: Text editor data structures (01/07/05)
  • Re: scope resolution operator??????? (01/07/05)
  • Re: Better Linked List Handling (01/07/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/07/05)
  • Re: Wide Characters and tchar (01/06/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/06/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/06/05)
  • Re: FAQ Related - why cast? (01/06/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/05/05)
  • Re: FAQ Related - why cast? (01/05/05)
  • Re: compile C programs with UNIX system calls (= Unix Programs??) (01/05/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/05/05)
  • Re: Convert numbers to words (01/05/05)
  • Re: [OT] Missing initializer (01/05/05)
  • Re: How Free() works? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Passing const int * to a function (01/05/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/05/05)
  • Re: reverse a link list (01/05/05)
• developer
  • does turbo C has be ran under windows 98/95 (01/08/05)
• Dietmar Schindler
  • Re: Confusion on output (01/05/05)
  • Re: FAQ Related - why cast? (01/05/05)
  • Re: decimal to hexadecimal (01/05/05)
  • Re: Confusion on output (01/04/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/03/05)
  • Re: Address syntax (01/03/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/03/05)
• Diez B. Roggisch
  • Re: how to write a tutorial (01/21/05)
• Dik T. Winter
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: Whats the difference between the yahoo group and this google groups? (01/10/05)
  • Re: Whats the difference between the yahoo group and this google groups? (01/01/05)
  • Re: Whats the difference between the yahoo group and this google groups? (01/01/05)
  • Re: Whats the difference between the yahoo group and this google (01/01/05)
• Dirk Feytons
  • Re: sqrt (01/28/05)
• Douglas A. Gwyn
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/28/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/27/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/24/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/24/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/21/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/15/05)
• Dr. Laurence Leff
  • Follow up on Producing Windows API program at Command Line (01/22/05)
• drewc
  • Re: how to write a tutorial (01/21/05)
• Drummmachine
  • Anyone want one? (01/21/05)
• dyu9999_at_gmail.com
  • Re: how to extern structure? (01/15/05)
  • how to extern structure? (01/15/05)
  • how to extern structure? (01/15/05)
  • how to extern structure? (01/15/05)
• E. Robert Tisdale
  • Re: Calling subroutine in fortran module (01/31/05)
  • Re: Is my memory is not enough? (01/30/05)
  • Re: Return to Start of Line? (01/29/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/28/05)
  • Re: passing arg char[X][Y] to function expecting (char**) (01/28/05)
  • Re: passing arg char[X][Y] to function expecting (char**) (01/28/05)
  • Re: passing arg char[X][Y] to function expecting (char**) (01/28/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: why use fprintf / size_t instead of printf/ int (01/27/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/26/05)
  • Re: why use fprintf / size_t instead of printf/ int (01/26/05)
  • Re: pointer to array of const objects (01/26/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: initializer element is not constant (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: "Declaration" vs. "Definition" (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: multidimensional array = pointer to pointer ? (01/19/05)
  • Re: Portable alloca() replacement? (01/18/05)
  • Re: splitting functions into files (01/18/05)
  • Re: Datahiding in C (01/18/05)
  • Re: how to extern structure? (01/15/05)
  • Re: how to extern structure? (01/15/05)
  • Re: Compiler code optimization: see code below (01/13/05)
  • Re: Compiler code optimization: see code below (01/13/05)
  • Re: Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/12/05)
  • Re: where variables are stored? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/12/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/11/05)
  • Re: Using assembly in C (01/11/05)
  • Re: where variables are stored? (01/11/05)
  • Re: Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/11/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/08/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/07/05)
  • Re: Turing machine (01/07/05)
  • Re: How Free() works? (01/07/05)
  • Re: Thread-Safety in Functions: A Random String Generator (01/06/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/06/05)
  • Re: Where Can I download Cfront from ? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Passing const int * to a function (01/04/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/04/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/04/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/04/05)
  • Re: do{..}while(0) macro substitutions (01/01/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/01/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/01/05)
  • Re: do{..}while(0) macro substitutions (12/31/04)
  • Re: Coding standards (12/31/04)
• ed_davis2
  • Re: Text editor data structures (01/06/05)
  • Re: Text editor data structures (01/06/05)
• Efrat Regev
  • Re: What makes a good E. Robert Tisdale? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good E. Robert Tisdale? (01/24/05)
  • What makes a good E. Robert Tisdale? (01/24/05)
• ELAATIFI Sidi Mohamed
  • Un plotter de fonctions mathematiques (01/25/05)
• Eltee
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/31/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/31/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/29/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/28/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/26/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/26/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/25/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/25/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/24/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/21/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/19/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/12/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
• Emerson
  • How can i call a function outside of the current project? (01/05/05)
• Emmanuel Delahaye
  • Re: help broke prog up into functions now not working (01/31/05)
  • Re: UCHAR_MIN & UCHAR_MAX (01/31/05)
  • Re: string initilization WHY? (01/30/05)
  • Re: UCHAR_MIN & UCHAR_MAX (01/30/05)
  • Re: #if sizeof... (01/15/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/07/05)
  • Re: really confused with variable access (01/03/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/02/05)
  • Re: Newbie question (01/02/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/01/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/01/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/01/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/01/05)
  • Re: malloc error checking (01/01/05)
• engartte
  • Chnage the position of element! (01/05/05)
  • Re: Confusion on output (01/05/05)
  • array problem! (01/04/05)
  • Re: Confusion on output (01/04/05)
  • Re: Confusion on output (01/04/05)
  • Confusion on output (01/03/05)
• Eric A. Johnson
  • Re: Trouble with scanf (01/17/05)
  • Re: Trouble with scanf (01/16/05)
  • Re: Trouble with scanf (01/16/05)
  • Trouble with scanf (01/16/05)
• Eric Amick
  • Re: %x question (01/30/05)
• Eric Lilja
  • Re: Am I doing something wrong with printf() here? (01/08/05)
  • Re: Am I doing something wrong with printf() here? (01/08/05)
  • Am I doing something wrong with printf() here? (01/08/05)
• Eric Schmidt
  • Re: passing a (const void *) into memset() (01/28/05)
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/12/05)
• Eric Sosman
  • Re: function to count number of set bits (01/29/05)
  • Re: rand - is RAND_MAX how long before the same # will occur again? (01/29/05)
  • Re: what is size_t (01/29/05)
  • Re: Local variables within looping constructs (01/29/05)
  • Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities? (01/29/05)
  • Re: Multi-dimensional array initialization (01/23/05)
  • Re: Multi-dimensional array initialization (01/23/05)
  • Re: The need for int to capture getchar()'s EOF (01/23/05)
  • Re: int func() v/s int func(void) (01/21/05)
  • Re: int func() v/s int func(void) (01/21/05)
  • Re: implement atoi (01/21/05)
  • Re: implement atoi (01/21/05)
  • Re: int func() v/s int func(void) (01/21/05)
  • Re: implement atoi (01/20/05)
  • Re: implement atoi (01/20/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/19/05)
  • Re: regarding bit field structures (01/19/05)
  • Re: position and number of 1's in an integer (01/19/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/19/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/18/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/17/05)
  • Re: accessing freed memory without error (01/17/05)
  • Re: Trouble with scanf (01/16/05)
  • Re: Error E2349 tester.c 29: Nonportable pointer conversion (01/16/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/16/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/16/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/15/05)
  • Re: Do buffers always start with the lowest memory address being the first element? (01/15/05)
  • Re: Error E2349 tester.c 29: Nonportable pointer conversion (01/14/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/14/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/14/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/13/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/13/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/13/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/12/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Using assembly in C (01/11/05)
  • Re: Sensibly printed floats? (01/08/05)
  • Re: Function pointers, variable argument functions calling other variable-argument functions (sort of) (01/07/05)
  • Re: Garbage data in float datatype - Mingw3.2 (gcc) (01/07/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/07/05)
  • Re: long double in C89? (01/06/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/06/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/05/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/05/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/05/05)
  • Re: FAQ Related - why cast? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/05/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/04/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/04/05)
  • Re: Passing const int * to a function (01/04/05)
  • Re: Help with Constant Define--Compiler Issue with ANSI or my compiler or me? (01/03/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/02/05)
• Erik de Castro Lopo
  • Re: why use fprintf / size_t instead of printf/ int (01/26/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/25/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/25/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: Java compiler (01/22/05)
  • Re: interesting problem (01/21/05)
  • Re: Current languages are a mess, what would you choose C#, Java or C++? (01/13/05)
  • Re: scope resolution operator??????? (01/07/05)
  • Re: scope resolution operator??????? (01/07/05)
• Erik Trulsson
  • Re: Inside-Out Array-Indexing Syntax (01/17/05)
• EventHelix.com
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/03/05)
• FalkoG
  • Re: How to convert float to hex? (01/05/05)
  • How to convert float to hex? (01/05/05)
• Felix Kater
  • substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: simple question: namespace (01/24/05)
  • simple question: namespace (01/24/05)
• Flash Gordon
  • Re: Array assignment via cast (01/25/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/21/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/21/05)
  • Re: Graphics in c (01/19/05)
  • Re: Is declaring a pointer to an undefined struct legal? (01/17/05)
  • Re: accessing freed memory without error (01/17/05)
  • Re: Beginner's question (01/11/05)
  • Re: Linked list (01/06/05)
  • Re: software types and programming languages (01/06/05)
  • Re: email program in c - help me solve one error,please... (01/02/05)
  • Re: Matrix problem (01/02/05)
  • Re: Newbie question (01/02/05)
• flure
  • Re: Un plotter de fonctions mathematiques (01/25/05)
• foaud167
  • Underscore (01/05/05)
• fr3shman_at_gmail.com
  • recursive function (01/16/05)
• francescomoi_at_europe.com
  • Creating a C application to be run on another machine (01/20/05)
• Francis Glassborow
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/28/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/22/05)
• Francois Grieu
  • Re: Quandry with the following C code (Intermediate) (01/14/05)
  • Re: 0x400000*3/0x40000 undefined ? (01/06/05)
  • 0x400000*3/0x40000 undefined ? (01/05/05)
• Frank Buss
  • Re: how to write a tutorial (01/21/05)
• Frank M.
  • Re: Array of pointers to structs (01/21/05)
  • Array of pointers to structs (01/20/05)
• Frank Pool
  • array performance (01/30/05)
• Frank Schmied
  • Re: what is the scope of enum? (01/08/05)
  • Re: Garbage data in float datatype - Mingw3.2 (gcc) (01/08/05)
• Frank Way
  • Re: Newbie Q: a C function like 'paste' ?? (01/20/05)
• freeday
  • a c project for help! (01/05/05)
• Freejack
  • Re: Portable alloca() replacement? (01/18/05)
  • Portable alloca() replacement? (01/18/05)
• Friedhelm Usenet Waitzmann
  • [command shell] how to pass special characters as arguments? (was: using system("xxxxx")) (01/29/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/22/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/21/05)
• G Patel
  • Re: function to count number of set bits (01/31/05)
  • Re: function to count number of set bits (01/30/05)
  • function to count number of set bits (01/29/05)
  • why use fprintf / size_t instead of printf/ int (01/26/05)
  • What does const char *s mean? is s a constant or *s? (01/24/05)
  • Ran across this cryptic code for C, I got blown away (01/23/05)
• Gabriel Dos Reis
  • Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities? (01/29/05)
• Gary Labowitz
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: Linked list (01/06/05)
• Gene Wirchenko
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/16/05)
• gentlelover
  • Re: [Question]activities of stack pointer and frame pointer when function called (01/20/05)
• Gerald Bonnstetter
  • Re: Error log design... (01/05/05)
• Gerald Lafreniere
  • Re: Garbage data in float datatype - Mingw3.2 (gcc) (01/11/05)
  • Re: Garbage data in float datatype - Mingw3.2 (gcc) (01/11/05)
  • Re: Garbage data in float datatype - Mingw3.2 (gcc) (01/10/05)
  • Re: Garbage data in float datatype - Mingw3.2 (gcc) (01/10/05)
  • Re: Garbage data in float datatype - Mingw3.2 (gcc) (01/07/05)
  • Garbage data in float datatype - Mingw3.2 (gcc) (01/07/05)
• Gernot Frisch
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: Standard network method (01/03/05)
• giambi
  • Re: Confusion on output (01/04/05)
  • im trying to finish a program just before the deadline (01/04/05)
• Gianni Mariani
  • Re: Problems initializing a dynamically allocated 2D array (01/30/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: Programming Contest: Create a Crossword (01/20/05)
  • Re: Sockets programming (01/16/05)
• Gianni Mariani
  • Re: About 64-bit portability (01/04/05)
• Gibby Koldenhof
  • Re: oh oh it's OO - calling encapsulated functions - question for the experts (01/10/05)
  • Re: oh oh it's OO - calling encapsulated functions - question for the experts (01/10/05)
  • oh oh it's OO - calling encapsulated functions - question for the experts (01/10/05)
• Giesor
  • Re: Reading the data from keyboard! (01/21/05)
• Giorgos Keramidas
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/16/05)
  • Re: #if sizeof... (01/16/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/16/05)
  • Re: Address syntax (01/08/05)
• Giovanni
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/02/05)
• GMM50
  • Re: does turbo C has be ran under windows 98/95 (01/09/05)
• gooch
  • Re: Sqrt precision ?! (01/27/05)
  • Re: coins program, need some help with crashing (01/20/05)
  • Re: To find the size of array using its pointer (01/20/05)
  • Re: To find the size of array using its pointer (01/20/05)
  • Re: array problem! (01/04/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/03/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/03/05)
  • Re: linklist (01/03/05)
• Gordon Burditt
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/28/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/24/05)
• Gordon Sande
  • Re: software types and programming languages (01/11/05)
• Graeme Downes
  • Regular Expression for fnmatch function (01/14/05)
• GrandElf
  • Re: string initilization WHY? (01/31/05)
  • Re: Handling binary data in C - questions (01/19/05)
• Grant Edwards
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/26/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
• Greg Comeau
  • Re: what is size_t (01/29/05)
  • Re: How can #define printf like function? (01/28/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/28/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/28/05)
  • Re: How can #define printf like function? (01/28/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/26/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/26/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/26/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/26/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/26/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/26/05)
  • Re: Where Can I download Cfront from ? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Where Can I download Cfront from ? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Where Can I download Cfront from ? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Where Can I download Cfront from ? (01/05/05)
• Gregory Dean
  • Re: What is the difference between signed and unsigned char? (01/28/05)
  • Re: What is the difference between signed and unsigned char? (01/27/05)
• Gregory K Johnson
  • Re: where variables are stored? (01/11/05)
• Gregory Toomey
  • Re: function to count number of set bits (01/30/05)
  • Re: sqrt (01/29/05)
  • Re: Sqrt precision ?! (01/28/05)
  • Re: Sqrt precision ?! (01/27/05)
  • Re: [ IP validation math... ] (01/27/05)
  • Re: Please help me crack this code... (01/24/05)
  • Re: Please help me crack this code... (01/23/05)
  • Re: Linux rounding error??? (01/06/05)
  • Re: freebsd (ufs) direct access to Hard drive using inode (01/06/05)
• Grumble
  • Re: Can function prototypes appear anywhere? (01/20/05)
  • Re: Can function prototypes appear anywhere? (01/19/05)
  • Can function prototypes appear anywhere? (01/19/05)
  • Pointer to array of unspecified size (01/11/05)
  • Re: which is the appropriate news group (01/05/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/04/05)
  • Re: my wife dumped me and this is my suicide note (01/04/05)
  • Re: Programming Challenge (01/04/05)
• Guillaume
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/21/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/13/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/13/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/12/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/12/05)
  • Re: copying data to a structure member array (01/04/05)
• Guy Eschemann
  • Re: "Implicitly only" splint warnings (01/13/05)
  • "Implicitly only" splint warnings (01/12/05)
• Gyro
  • Building gnu cross-compiler targeted for sparc (01/11/05)
• Hans-Bernhard Broeker
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/15/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/03/05)
• Harald Hanche-Olsen
  • Re: perl-python a-day (01/21/05)
• Hariprasad Govardhanam
  • Re: run a command in background in C (01/28/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/27/05)
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/25/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/25/05)
• Harshan
  • Re: Why the Range of Int is less by one at positive side?......... (01/24/05)
  • Why the Range of Int is less by one at positive side?......... (01/24/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/22/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
• Herbert Rosenau
  • Re: Recommended style (01/02/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/02/05)
• hotadvice
  • Re: malloc size (01/07/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/07/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/07/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/07/05)
• Howard
  • Re: Linked list (01/06/05)
  • Re: Where Can I download Cfront from ? (01/04/05)
  • Re: About 64-bit portability (01/03/05)
• Howard Hinnant
  • Re: malloc size (01/09/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/09/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/08/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/07/05)
• HP
  • Re: problem with round (01/26/05)
• http://vmdd.tech.mylinuxisp.com/catalog/
  • VMDD Tech announces the availability of CS101 - Decimal/Hex/Binary calculator (01/08/05)
• Ian Pilcher
  • Re: Increment, decrement, overflow, and underflow (01/21/05)
  • Increment, decrement, overflow, and underflow (01/21/05)
• Ignacio G. T.
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
• Ike Naar
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/02/05)
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/02/05)
• imanpreet_at_gmail.com
  • Re: Do buffers always start with the lowest memory address being the first element? (01/17/05)
  • Re: What does this do? (01/12/05)
• infobahn
  • Re: Why pointers can only be subtracted ? (01/31/05)
  • Re: File handling (01/31/05)
  • Re: string initilization WHY? (01/30/05)
  • Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities? (01/29/05)
  • Re: Initialize elements in an array (01/28/05)
  • Re: Urgent !!!!! Please if possible give the explain about the program. (01/28/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/26/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: Are constants and string literals considered "data objects" in c? (01/25/05)
  • Re: Handling binary data in C - questions (01/19/05)
  • Re: reading a double var byte per byte (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: c program (01/18/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/18/05)
  • Re: why define size_t ssize_t ? (01/17/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: Crazy (?) C problem (01/16/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/16/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/15/05)
  • Re: CreatemotionsT seeks beta testers for a strong Q&A session (01/15/05)
  • Re: CreatemotionsT seeks beta testers for a strong Q&A session (01/14/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/14/05)
  • Re: Quandry with the following C code (Intermediate) (01/14/05)
  • Re: Quandry with the following C code (Intermediate) (01/13/05)
  • Re: Getting address of a function through some string (01/13/05)
  • Re: Getting address of a function through some string (01/13/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/12/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/12/05)
  • Re: CreatemotionsT seeks beta testers for a strong Q&A session (01/11/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/11/05)
  • Re: Garbage data in float datatype - Mingw3.2 (gcc) (01/11/05)
  • Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c! (01/10/05)
  • Re: Handling unsigned overflow of size_t (01/10/05)
  • Re: Pointer to Function (01/10/05)
  • Re: getbits k&r2 (01/10/05)
  • Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c! (01/10/05)
  • Re: Does this make any sense? (01/09/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/08/05)
  • Re: VMDD Tech announces the availability of CS101 - Decimal/Hex/Binary calculator (01/08/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/08/05)
  • Re: Algorithms IN C (01/08/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/07/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/07/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/07/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/07/05)
  • Re: scope resolution operator??????? (01/07/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/07/05)
  • Re: CreatemotionsT seeks beta testers for a strong Q&A session (01/07/05)
  • Re: CreatemotionsT seeks beta testers for a strong Q&A session (01/06/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/06/05)
  • Re: Linked list (01/06/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/06/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/06/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/06/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/06/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/06/05)
  • Re: How does this work? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Linux rounding error??? (01/05/05)
  • Re: How to convert float to hex? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/05/05)
  • Re: How can i call a function outside of the current project? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/05/05)
  • Re: Beginning ANSI - Standard C (01/05/05)
  • Re: How Free() works? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/05/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/05/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/03/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/03/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/03/05)
  • Re: Standard network method (01/03/05)
  • Re: Standard network method (01/03/05)
  • Re: memory alignment (01/03/05)
  • Re: memory alignment (01/03/05)
  • Re: email program in c - help me solve one error,please... (01/02/05)
• Ioannis Vranos
  • Re: Major project in C/C++ (01/16/05)
  • Re: Where Can I download Cfront from ? (01/04/05)
• Ira Baxter
  • Re: splitting functions into files (01/22/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/12/05)
• Ishtiyaq
  • Re: Sign error in K&R 1 (01/31/05)
• italy
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/25/05)
  • Re: Are constants and string literals considered "data objects" in c? (01/25/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
• Ivan Vecerina
  • Re: why define size_t ssize_t ? (01/17/05)
• J. F. Cornwall
  • Re: software types and programming languages (01/04/05)
  • Re: compile C programs with UNIX system calls (= Unix Programs??) (01/04/05)
• Jack
  • rand - is RAND_MAX how long before the same # will occur again? (01/29/05)
• Jack Klein
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/29/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/29/05)
  • Re: Urgent !!!!! Please if possible give the explain about the program. (01/29/05)
  • Re: error_message in cyrus imap server not working (01/27/05)
  • Re: why use fprintf / size_t instead of printf/ int (01/27/05)
  • Re: why use fprintf / size_t instead of printf/ int (01/26/05)
  • Re: Are constants and string literals considered "data objects" in c? (01/26/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/26/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/26/05)
  • Re: strtok/strtok_r woes (01/25/05)
  • Re: Java compiler (01/22/05)
  • Re: type conversion float and long (01/22/05)
  • Re: __atoi64 not working correctly (01/22/05)
  • Re: __atoi64 not working correctly (01/22/05)
  • Re: __atoi64 not working correctly (01/22/05)
  • Re: How can i compare bit wise? (01/20/05)
  • Re: alignment revisited (01/20/05)
  • Re: alignment revisited (01/20/05)
  • Re: function call with arguments which takes no arguments (01/20/05)
  • Re: size of memory in C -- allocation (01/19/05)
  • Re: What does "Standard C", "K&R C" , "ANSI C" mean? (01/19/05)
  • Re: What does "Standard C", "K&R C" , "ANSI C" mean? (01/18/05)
  • Re: Mapping C code to assembly instructions (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/16/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/16/05)
  • Re: Compiler code optimization: see code below (01/13/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/13/05)
  • Re: Does this make any sense? (01/10/05)
  • Re: Turing machine (01/07/05)
  • Re: 0x400000*3/0x40000 undefined ? (01/06/05)
  • Re: Question on Linux Device Driver ? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Question on Unix ? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Convert numbers to words (01/05/05)
  • Re: FAQ Related - why cast? (01/05/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/04/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/03/05)
  • Re: Confusion with stdarg (01/03/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/03/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/03/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/03/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/01/05)
• jacob navia
  • Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities? (01/29/05)
  • Re: Sqrt precision ?! (01/28/05)
  • Re: Sqrt precision ?! (01/27/05)
  • Re: What makes a good E. Robert Tisdale? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good E. Robert Tisdale? (01/24/05)
  • IDE for C (01/23/05)
  • Re: __atoi64 not working correctly (01/21/05)
  • Re: __atoi64 not working correctly (01/21/05)
  • Re: __atoi64 not working correctly (01/21/05)
  • Re: Current languages are a mess, what would you choose C#, Java or C++? (01/13/05)
  • Re: Current languages are a mess, what would you choose C#, Java or C++? (01/13/05)
  • Re: Compiler behavior : Inlining external functions (01/10/05)
  • Re: scope resolution operator??????? (01/07/05)
  • Re: Confusion with stdarg (01/03/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/02/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/02/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/02/05)
• Jacob Oost
  • Re: how to modify a txt file (01/31/05)
  • Re: Finished a "teach yourself" book, what next? (01/31/05)
  • Re: Finished a "teach yourself" book, what next? (01/31/05)
  • Re: compiling quistion (01/31/05)
  • Re: Finished a "teach yourself" book, what next? (01/30/05)
  • Finished a "teach yourself" book, what next? (01/30/05)
  • Re: compiling quistion (01/30/05)
• jake1138
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/21/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/20/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/20/05)
• James Hu
  • Welcome to comp.lang.c! (01/24/05)
  • Welcome to comp.lang.c! (01/09/05)
• James Kuyper
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
• James Mcguire
  • Array assignment via cast (01/18/05)
• James McIninch
  • Re: The need for int to capture getchar()'s EOF (01/23/05)
  • Re: "streams" (01/22/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/21/05)
  • Re: Implementation of sizeof, malloc, new (01/21/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/19/05)
  • Re: char array not terminated with \0 (01/17/05)
  • Re: Using assembly in C (01/12/05)
  • Re: whats the use of third argument to main( ) (01/11/05)
  • Re: where variables are stored? (01/11/05)
• Jarno A Wuolijoki
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/27/05)
• Jason Curl
  • Re: Datahiding in C (01/17/05)
  • Datahiding in C (01/17/05)
• Jason Sewall
  • Re: coloring a pixel (01/18/05)
  • Re: Crazy (?) C problem (01/16/05)
  • Re: Crazy (?) C problem (01/16/05)
  • Crazy (?) C problem (01/16/05)
• Jason Wells
  • Re: Finished a "teach yourself" book, what next? (01/31/05)
• jaym1212
  • Re: Result of Comparision (01/21/05)
  • Result of Comparision (01/21/05)
• jdallen2000_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: Coding standards (01/07/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/03/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/03/05)
• Jeffrey Cunningham
  • Re: how to write a tutorial (01/22/05)
• jeko
  • Re: reading a double var byte per byte (01/18/05)
  • Re: reading a double var byte per byte (01/18/05)
  • Re: reading a double var byte per byte (01/18/05)
  • Re: reading a double var byte per byte (01/18/05)
  • reading a double var byte per byte (01/18/05)
• Jens
  • Re: How can #define printf like function? (01/28/05)
• Jens M Andreasen
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/27/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/22/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/22/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/22/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/22/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/21/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/16/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/16/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/13/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/13/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/10/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/10/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/09/05)
• Jens.Toerring_at_physik.fu-berlin.de
  • Re: File handling (01/31/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: simple question: namespace (01/24/05)
  • Re: passing pointer->struct->pointer->struct to function. .. ?? (01/24/05)
  • Re: testing for the newline (01/24/05)
  • Re: how to call foreign programs from c? (01/21/05)
  • Re: how to call foreign programs from c? (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: Good IDE for C/C++ (01/21/05)
  • Re: int func() v/s int func(void) (01/21/05)
  • Re: Array of pointers to structs (01/21/05)
  • Re: Good IDE for C/C++ (01/21/05)
  • Re: Newbie question (01/15/05)
  • Re: indeed inneed to Good Editor C Compiler (01/14/05)
  • Re: Your Suggestion (01/12/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/07/05)
  • Re: Newbie question stack implementation (01/07/05)
  • Re: copying data to a structure member array (01/06/05)
  • Re: Programming Challenge (01/05/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/04/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/03/05)
  • Re: Showing problem (01/03/05)
  • Re: Matrix problem (01/02/05)
  • Re: Newbie question (01/02/05)
• Jeremy Yallop
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/15/05)
• Jerry
  • Re: how to modify a txt file (01/31/05)
  • Re: how to modify a txt file (01/31/05)
  • how to modify a txt file (01/31/05)
  • the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/25/05)
  • Re: How can i compare bit wise? (01/20/05)
• Jerry Coffin
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/27/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/25/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/25/05)
• Jesse Meyer
  • Re: what is happening in C when increment this way? (01/30/05)
• jiggly
  • Re: Finished a "teach yourself" book, what next? (01/31/05)
• Jim
  • Re: DPMI and ISO C++ ?? (01/25/05)
• jmachine_at_gmail.com
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/20/05)
• JNY
  • rounding (01/12/05)
  • slight rounding problem (01/12/05)
  • rounding (01/12/05)
  • slight rounding problem (01/11/05)
• Joe Kelsey
  • Re: software types and programming languages (01/08/05)
  • Re: software types and programming languages (01/08/05)
• Joe Wright
  • Re: Why the Range of Int is less by one at positive side?......... (01/29/05)
  • Re: Why the Range of Int is less by one at positive side?......... (01/29/05)
  • Re: using system("xxxxx") (01/29/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/29/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/28/05)
  • Re: reading a unformatted file (01/28/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/26/05)
  • Re: "streams" (01/22/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/22/05)
  • Re: char array not terminated with \0 (01/17/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/16/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/16/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/15/05)
  • Re: how to extern structure? (01/15/05)
  • Re: slight rounding problem (01/12/05)
  • Re: Factoring Nested Loops (01/10/05)
  • Re: Newbie question stack implementation (01/08/05)
• Johann \
  • Re: Graphics in c (01/19/05)
• John
  • Reading the data from keyboard! (01/20/05)
  • Re: what is wrong! (01/08/05)
  • what is wrong! (01/08/05)
• John C. Bollinger
  • Re: software types and programming languages (01/10/05)
  • Re: software types and programming languages (01/05/05)
• John Carson
  • Re: Linked list (01/04/05)
• John P
  • sockets and connecting to other programs (01/30/05)
• John Valko
  • Re: what is happening in C when increment this way? (01/30/05)
  • Re: what is happening in C when increment this way? (01/30/05)
  • Re: using system("xxxxx") (01/29/05)
  • Re: using system("xxxxx") (01/29/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: solution to Knr Exercise 1-9 (01/21/05)
  • Re: Is it possible to return an array from a function? (01/14/05)
• john_bode_at_my-deja.com
  • Re: what does [ ] mean with an integer? (01/21/05)
  • Re: float values can b rounded off? (01/21/05)
  • Re: Variable declaration syntax (01/04/05)
  • Re: Variable declaration syntax (01/03/05)
• johnnyb_at_eskimo.com
  • Re: Better Linked List Handling (01/07/05)
• Jon Bryan
  • ttyname() problems (01/17/05)
• Jonathan Bartlett
  • Re: Some complex function prototypes like signal() (01/28/05)
  • Re: Good IDE for C/C++ (01/20/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/20/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/19/05)
  • Re: size of memory in C -- allocation (01/18/05)
  • Re: coloring a pixel (01/18/05)
  • Re: coloring a pixel (01/17/05)
  • Re: Sockets programming (01/17/05)
  • Re: Using assembly in C (01/13/05)
  • Re: Newbie question stack implementation (01/07/05)
  • Better Linked List Handling (01/06/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/03/05)
• Jonathan Burd
  • Re: Why pointers can only be subtracted ? (01/31/05)
  • Re: Finished a "teach yourself" book, what next? (01/31/05)
  • Re: Finished a "teach yourself" book, what next? (01/31/05)
  • Re: Pre-ANSI C functions and .NET browse information symbols (01/31/05)
  • Re: Pre-ANSI C functions and .NET browse information symbols (01/31/05)
  • Re: compiling quistion (01/31/05)
  • Re: %x question (01/30/05)
  • Re: What does this code mean??? (01/30/05)
  • Re: What does this code mean??? (01/30/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/29/05)
  • Re: What this means? ---> struct resource *r = v, *p; (01/29/05)
  • Re: Problems with Harbison & Steele (01/28/05)
  • Re: some help pls (01/28/05)
  • Re: feasibility of stdin stream to feel up directly. (01/27/05)
  • Re: feasibility of stdin stream to feel up directly. (01/27/05)
  • Re: feasibility of stdin stream to feel up directly. (01/27/05)
  • Re: feasibility of stdin stream to feel up directly. (01/27/05)
  • Re: some help pls (01/27/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: float values can b rounded off? (01/27/05)
  • Re: use of do{...}while(0) (01/27/05)
  • Re: use of do{...}while(0) (01/27/05)
  • Re: use of do{...}while(0) (01/26/05)
  • Re: use of do{...}while(0) (01/26/05)
  • Re: is this intentional? (01/26/05)
  • Re: Finding the time taken by a function (01/25/05)
  • Re: porting from Borland 4.0 to Visual C 6.0 (01/25/05)
  • Re: strtok/strtok_r woes (01/25/05)
  • Re: strtok/strtok_r woes (01/25/05)
  • Re: strtok/strtok_r woes (01/24/05)
  • Re: strtok/strtok_r woes (01/24/05)
  • Re: its giving the different address !!!!!!!!!! (01/24/05)
  • Re: how to write a tutorial (01/24/05)
  • Re: its giving the different address !!!!!!!!!! (01/24/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: What does const char *s mean? is s a constant or *s? (01/24/05)
  • Re: Please help me crack this code... (01/23/05)
  • Re: Rules for complex declarations (01/23/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/22/05)
  • Re: Implementation of sizeof, malloc, new (01/22/05)
  • Re: __atoi64 not working correctly (01/21/05)
  • Re: __atoi64 not working correctly (01/21/05)
  • Re: __atoi64 not working correctly (01/21/05)
  • Re: float values can b rounded off? (01/21/05)
  • Re: __atoi64 not working correctly (01/21/05)
  • Re: how to write a tutorial (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/21/05)
  • Re: __atoi64 not working correctly (01/21/05)
  • Re: int func() v/s int func(void) (01/21/05)
  • Re: Anyone want one? (01/21/05)
  • Re: "Declaration" vs. "Definition" (01/21/05)
  • __atoi64 not working correctly (01/21/05)
  • Re: Good IDE for C/C++ (01/21/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/19/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/19/05)
  • Re: Array assignment via cast (01/19/05)
  • Re: c program (01/19/05)
  • Re: c program (01/18/05)
  • Re: why define size_t ssize_t ? (01/18/05)
  • Re: Get rid of trailing newline for scanf (01/17/05)
  • Re: Inside-Out Array-Indexing Syntax (01/17/05)
  • Re: why define size_t ssize_t ? (01/17/05)
  • Re: Inside-Out Array-Indexing Syntax (01/17/05)
  • Inside-Out Array-Indexing Syntax (01/17/05)
  • Re: why to use '&' in scanf( ) but not in printf( ) (01/10/05)
  • Re: Pointer to Function (01/10/05)
  • Re: Am I doing something wrong with printf() here? (01/10/05)
  • Re: scope resolution operator??????? (01/07/05)
  • Re: Thread-Safety in Functions: A Random String Generator (01/06/05)
  • Thread-Safety in Functions: A Random String Generator (01/06/05)
  • Re: Newbie question (01/05/05)
  • Re: Using Assembly Procedures with C (01/02/05)
• Jonathan Kirwan
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/26/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
• Jonathan Turkanis
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: Where Can I download Cfront from ? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Where Can I download Cfront from ? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Where Can I download Cfront from ? (01/04/05)
• Joona I Palaste
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/31/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/29/05)
  • Re: sqrt (01/28/05)
  • Re: use of do{...}while(0) (01/28/05)
  • Re: Urgent !!!!! Please if possible give the explain about the program. (01/28/05)
  • Re: some help pls (01/27/05)
  • Re: feasibility of stdin stream to feel up directly. (01/27/05)
  • Re: use of do{...}while(0) (01/26/05)
  • Re: use of do{...}while(0) (01/26/05)
  • Re: use of do{...}while(0) (01/26/05)
  • Re: Macro or eval() for constants at runtime? (01/21/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/21/05)
  • Re: Implementation of sizeof, malloc, new (01/21/05)
  • Re: SAS/C INTEROPERABLE WITH IBM C/C++ (01/20/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/16/05)
  • Re: Sockets programming (01/16/05)
  • Re: Newbie Q: a C function like 'paste' ?? (01/16/05)
  • Re: CreatemotionsT seeks beta testers for a strong Q&A session (01/15/05)
  • Re: Factoring Nested Loops (01/10/05)
  • Re: Does this make any sense? (01/10/05)
  • Re: Factoring Nested Loops (01/09/05)
  • Re: Does this make any sense? (01/09/05)
  • Re: what is wrong! (01/09/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/07/05)
  • Re: Preprocessor define concatenation (01/07/05)
  • Re: problem with free. (01/07/05)
  • Re: Newbie question info (01/07/05)
  • Re: CreatemotionsT seeks beta testers for a strong Q&A session (01/06/05)
  • Re: compile C programs with UNIX system calls (= Unix Programs??) (01/04/05)
  • Re: SendMessage() for saving text file (01/04/05)
  • Re: really confused with variable access (01/03/05)
  • Re: really confused with variable access (01/03/05)
  • Re: Pointer initialization question... (01/03/05)
  • Re: Matrix problem (01/02/05)
  • Re: Matrix problem (01/02/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/01/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/01/05)
• Joseph Turian
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
• joshc
  • Re: Compiler code optimization: see code below (01/14/05)
  • Re: Compiler code optimization: see code below (01/14/05)
  • Re: Compiler code optimization: see code below (01/14/05)
  • Re: Compiler code optimization: see code below (01/13/05)
  • Compiler code optimization: see code below (01/13/05)
• juleigha27_at_gmail.com
  • Data importing BUS ERROR (01/18/05)
• Julian V. Noble
  • Re: interesting problem (01/21/05)
• Julie
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
• july_wedding2005
  • Re: Good IDE for C/C++ (01/20/05)
• Jun Woong
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/15/05)
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/12/05)
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/12/05)
• junky_fellow
  • position and number of 1's in an integer (01/19/05)
• junky_fellow_at_yahoo.co.in
  • Re: What this means? ---> struct resource *r = v, *p; (01/28/05)
  • Re: use of do{...}while(0) (01/28/05)
  • Re: use of do{...}while(0) (01/28/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/19/05)
• jvankay
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/12/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/12/05)
  • Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/11/05)
• jxh
  • Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c! (01/10/05)
• kan Pu
  • Re: Standard network method (01/01/05)
• Karl Heinz Buchegger
  • Re: how to handle name mangling in a shared C library (01/04/05)
  • Re: Linked list (01/04/05)
• Karthik Kumar
  • Re: What does const char *s mean? is s a constant or *s? (01/24/05)
  • Re: Finding the time taken by a function (01/24/05)
  • Re: Why the Range of Int is less by one at positive side?......... (01/24/05)
• Kaushal Mehta
  • error_message in cyrus imap server not working (01/26/05)
  • Re: Using two different third party softwares ... function multiplpy-defined error (01/26/05)
• kbhat_at_kaxy.com
  • Re: strtok/strtok_r woes (01/24/05)
  • Re: strtok/strtok_r woes (01/24/05)
  • strtok/strtok_r woes (01/24/05)
• Keith Thompson
  • Re: string initilization WHY? (01/30/05)
  • Re: Calling subroutine in fortran module (01/30/05)
  • Re: Is my memory is not enough? (01/30/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/30/05)
  • Re: rand - is RAND_MAX how long before the same # will occur again? (01/30/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/30/05)
  • Re: Why the Range of Int is less by one at positive side?......... (01/30/05)
  • Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities? (01/29/05)
  • Re: using system("xxxxx") (01/29/05)
  • Re: Local variables within looping constructs (01/29/05)
  • Re: using system("xxxxx") (01/29/05)
  • Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities? (01/29/05)
  • Re: return statement at end of function (01/28/05)
  • Re: Where have they gone (01/28/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/28/05)
  • Re: run a command in background in C (01/28/05)
  • Re: run a command in background in C (01/28/05)
  • Re: passing arg char[X][Y] to function expecting (char**) (01/28/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/28/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/28/05)
  • Re: groups.google.com indentation bugs [semi-OT] (01/28/05)
  • Re: passing arg char[X][Y] to function expecting (char**) (01/28/05)
  • Re: passing arg char[X][Y] to function expecting (char**) (01/28/05)
  • Re: [ IP validation math... ] (01/28/05)
  • Re: What is the difference between signed and unsigned char? (01/28/05)
  • Re: is this intentional? (01/27/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/26/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/26/05)
  • Re: strtok/strtok_r woes (01/26/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/26/05)
  • Re: is this intentional? (01/26/05)
  • Re: how to write a tutorial (01/26/05)
  • Re: Q: recursive call to main, termination of program (01/26/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/26/05)
  • Re: Problem with integers (01/26/05)
  • Re: problem with round (01/26/05)
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/25/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/25/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/25/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/24/05)
  • Re: The need for int to capture getchar()'s EOF (01/23/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/23/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/23/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/23/05)
  • Re: float values can b rounded off? (01/22/05)
  • Re: what does [ ] mean with an integer? (01/22/05)
  • Re: how to call foreign programs from c? (01/21/05)
  • Re: int func() v/s int func(void) (01/21/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/21/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/21/05)
  • Re: what does [ ] mean with an integer? (01/21/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/21/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/21/05)
  • Re: Implementation of sizeof, malloc, new (01/21/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/21/05)
  • Re: Anyone want one? (01/21/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/21/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/21/05)
  • Re: Result of Comparision (01/21/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: To find the size of array using its pointer (01/20/05)
  • Re: is the definition of declaration is contradictory????????? (01/20/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: alignment revisited (01/20/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: Graphics in c (01/19/05)
  • Re: alignment revisited (01/19/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/19/05)
  • Re: How can i compare bit wise? (01/19/05)
  • Re: How can i compare bit wise? (01/19/05)
  • Re: Handling binary data in C - questions (01/19/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/19/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/19/05)
  • Re: alignment revisited (01/19/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/19/05)
  • Re: function call with arguments which takes no arguments (01/19/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/19/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/19/05)
  • Re: Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/19/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/19/05)
  • Re: splitting functions into files (01/19/05)
  • Re: size of memory in C -- allocation (01/19/05)
  • Re: size of memory in C -- allocation (01/19/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/19/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/19/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/19/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/19/05)
  • Re: Array assignment via cast (01/19/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/18/05)
  • Re: reading a double var byte per byte (01/18/05)
  • Re: splitting functions into files (01/18/05)
  • Re: Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: #if sizeof... (01/18/05)
  • Re: Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/18/05)
  • Re: Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/18/05)
  • Re: coloring a pixel (01/18/05)
  • Re: char array not terminated with \0 (01/18/05)
  • Re: Inside-Out Array-Indexing Syntax (01/18/05)
  • Re: why define size_t ssize_t ? (01/18/05)
  • Re: Crazy (?) C problem (01/17/05)
  • Re: char array not terminated with \0 (01/17/05)
  • Re: ttyname() problems (01/17/05)
  • Re: char array not terminated with \0 (01/17/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: Crazy (?) C problem (01/16/05)
  • Re: Crazy (?) C problem (01/16/05)
  • Re: Do buffers always start with the lowest memory address being the first element? (01/15/05)
  • Re: #if sizeof... (01/15/05)
  • Re: #if sizeof... (01/15/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/15/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/15/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/14/05)
  • Re: Regular Expression for fnmatch function (01/14/05)
  • Re: Compiler code optimization: see code below (01/14/05)
  • Re: rounding (01/13/05)
  • Re: rounding (01/13/05)
  • Re: rounding (01/13/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/13/05)
  • Re: rounding (01/13/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/13/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/13/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/13/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/13/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/13/05)
  • Re: slight rounding problem (01/13/05)
  • Re: rounding (01/13/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/13/05)
  • Re: How can I do sort program for unsorted setup file? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/12/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: where variables are stored? (01/12/05)
  • Re: perl-python a-day (01/12/05)
  • Re: Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/11/05)
  • Re: copying data to a structure member array (01/11/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/11/05)
  • Re: Garbage data in float datatype - Mingw3.2 (gcc) (01/11/05)
  • Re: copying data to a structure member array (01/11/05)
  • Re: Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/11/05)
  • Re: whats the use of third argument to main( ) (01/11/05)
  • Re: what is wrong! (01/11/05)
  • Re: what is wrong! (01/10/05)
  • Re: Garbage data in float datatype - Mingw3.2 (gcc) (01/10/05)
  • Re: Compiler behavior : Inlining external functions (01/10/05)
  • Re: Pointer to Function (01/10/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/10/05)
  • Re: problem with free. (01/10/05)
  • Re: groups.google.com indentation bugs [semi-OT] (01/10/05)
  • Re: Pointer to Function (01/10/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/09/05)
  • groups.google.com indentation bugs [semi-OT] (01/09/05)
  • Re: what is wrong! (01/08/05)
  • Re: Am I doing something wrong with printf() here? (01/08/05)
  • Re: what is wrong! (01/08/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/08/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/08/05)
  • Re: Preprocessor define concatenation (01/08/05)
  • Re: problem with free. (01/07/05)
  • Re: Newbie question stack implementation (01/07/05)
  • Re: long double in C89? (01/07/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/07/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/07/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/07/05)
  • Re: problem with free. (01/07/05)
  • Re: scope resolution operator??????? (01/07/05)
  • Re: Better Linked List Handling (01/07/05)
  • Re: Better Linked List Handling (01/07/05)
  • Re: scope resolution operator??????? (01/07/05)
  • Re: Newbie question info (01/07/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/07/05)
  • Re: Linked list (01/07/05)
  • Re: long double in C89? (01/07/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/06/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/06/05)
  • Re: freebsd (ufs) direct access to Hard drive using inode (01/05/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/05/05)
  • Re: 0x400000*3/0x40000 undefined ? (01/05/05)
  • Re: How to convert float to hex? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Coding [style] standards (01/05/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/05/05)
  • Re: Confusion on output (01/05/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/05/05)
  • Re: compile C programs with UNIX system calls (= Unix Programs??) (01/04/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/04/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/04/05)
  • Re: Question about C? (01/04/05)
  • Re: Variable declaration syntax (01/04/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/03/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/03/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/03/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/03/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/03/05)
  • Re: I want to write a Bit Torrent client in C (01/03/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/03/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/03/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/03/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/03/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/03/05)
  • Re: memory alignment (01/03/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/03/05)
  • Re: memory alignment (01/03/05)
  • Re: U make $50-$500 a week from your website Up>dH$N7 (01/03/05)
  • Re: Whats the difference between the yahoo group and this google groups? (01/03/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/03/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/03/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/03/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/03/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/02/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/02/05)
  • Re: email program in c - help me solve one error,please... (01/02/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/02/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/02/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/02/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/02/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/02/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/02/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/01/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/01/05)
  • Re: do{..}while(0) macro substitutions (01/01/05)
  • Re: do{..}while(0) macro substitutions (01/01/05)
  • Re: do{..}while(0) macro substitutions (12/31/04)
• Kelly Mah
  • Linux rounding error??? (01/05/05)
• Kelly Goode
  • Problem with integers (01/26/05)
• Kelsey Bjarnason
  • Re: malloc size (01/08/05)
• Kelvin Moss
  • strncat functionality (01/25/05)
• Kenneth Brody
  • Re: Array of pointers to structs (01/20/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: #if sizeof... (01/18/05)
  • Re: #if sizeof... (01/15/05)
  • Re: #if sizeof... (01/15/05)
  • #if sizeof... (01/14/05)
• Kenny McCormack
  • Re: compiling quistion (01/30/05)
  • Re: compile C programs with UNIX system calls (= Unix Programs??) (01/04/05)
  • Re: compile C programs with UNIX system calls (= Unix Programs??) (01/04/05)
• Kenny Tilton
  • Re: perl-python a-day (01/19/05)
  • Re: perl-python a-day (01/12/05)
  • Re: perl-python a-day (01/11/05)
• kerb
  • Re: freebsd (ufs) direct access to Hard drive using inode (01/06/05)
  • freebsd (ufs) direct access to Hard drive using inode (01/05/05)
• Kevin
  • How can #define printf like function? (01/28/05)
• Kevin Bracey
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/31/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/31/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
• Kevin D. Quitt
  • Re: Problem with integers (01/26/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/05/05)
  • Re: reverse a link list (01/04/05)
• KiLVaiDeN
  • Re: Linked list (01/04/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/03/05)
• kiru.sengal_at_gmail.com
  • Re: Nested conditional expressions ---- good idea/bad idea? (01/30/05)
  • Re: Is my memory is not enough? (01/30/05)
  • Re: integral promotion, arithmetic conversion, value preserving, unsigned preserving??? (01/29/05)
  • Re: Multi-dimensional array initialization (01/23/05)
  • Do buffers always start with the lowest memory address being the first element? (01/15/05)
• Kishore
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
• kk
  • SAS/C INTEROPERABLE WITH IBM C/C++ (01/20/05)
• Kleenex
  • Re: Pointer to Function (01/11/05)
• Kobu
  • Re: string initilization WHY? (01/30/05)
  • Re: integral promotion, arithmetic conversion, value preserving, unsigned preserving??? (01/29/05)
  • Re: What is the difference between signed and unsigned char? (01/27/05)
  • "streams" (01/22/05)
  • "Declaration" vs. "Definition" (01/21/05)
  • How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: multidimensional array = pointer to pointer ? (01/19/05)
  • multidimensional array = pointer to pointer ? (01/19/05)
• kobu.selva_at_gmail.com
  • Are constants and string literals considered "data objects" in c? (01/25/05)
• Koollman
  • Re: Q: recursive call to main, termination of program (01/27/05)
• Krishanu Debnath
  • Re: accessing freed memory without error (01/13/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/13/05)
• kuyper_at_wizard.net
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/29/05)
• Kvele
  • Re: Turing machine (01/07/05)
  • Turing machine (01/07/05)
• Larry
  • Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities? (01/30/05)
• Larry Brasfield
  • Re: Regarding left shift operator (01/05/05)
• Larry__Weiss
  • Re: use of do{...}while(0) (01/26/05)
  • Re: Where have they gone (01/25/05)
• Lawrence
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/02/05)
  • vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/01/05)
• Lawrence Kirby
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/31/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/31/05)
  • Re: integral promotion, arithmetic conversion, value preserving, unsigned preserving??? (01/31/05)
  • Re: integral promotion, arithmetic conversion, value preserving, unsigned preserving??? (01/31/05)
  • Re: what is size_t (01/31/05)
  • Re: string initilization WHY? (01/31/05)
  • Re: uniform random distribution (01/31/05)
  • Re: help broke prog up into functions now not working (01/31/05)
  • Re: cast-as-lvalue (Thank You) (01/28/05)
  • Re: Input unknown number of integers in a line... (01/28/05)
  • Re: passing a (const void *) into memset() (01/28/05)
  • Re: [OT] help with Koenig Lookup (01/27/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/27/05)
  • Re: Good IDE for C/C++ (01/27/05)
  • Re: reading a unformatted file (01/27/05)
  • Re: strtok/strtok_r woes (01/27/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: The need for int to capture getchar()'s EOF (01/26/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: simple question: namespace (01/26/05)
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/26/05)
  • Re: use of do{...}while(0) (01/26/05)
  • Re: what is "variable-name-equivalence" in c? (01/26/05)
  • Re: Computer time -> Developer time -> User time? (01/26/05)
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/26/05)
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/26/05)
  • Re: Q: recursive call to main, termination of program (01/26/05)
  • Re: is this intentional? (01/26/05)
  • Re: interesting problem (01/24/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/24/05)
  • Re: Can function prototypes appear anywhere? (01/24/05)
  • Re: Ran across this cryptic code for C, I got blown away (01/24/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: Finding the time taken by a function (01/24/05)
  • Re: Why the Range of Int is less by one at positive side?......... (01/24/05)
  • Re: problem with round (01/21/05)
  • Re: To find the size of array using its pointer (01/20/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/20/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/20/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/20/05)
  • Re: Is the name of a 2-dimensional array equal to address of [0][0] element? (01/20/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/20/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/20/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/20/05)
  • Re: Can function prototypes appear anywhere? (01/20/05)
  • Re: is the definition of declaration is contradictory????????? (01/20/05)
  • Re: Implementation of sizeof, malloc, new (01/20/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/19/05)
  • Re: size of memory in C -- allocation (01/19/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/19/05)
  • Re: Array assignment via cast (01/18/05)
  • Re: reading a double var byte per byte (01/18/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/18/05)
  • Re: #if sizeof... (01/18/05)
  • Re: Error E2349 tester.c 29: Nonportable pointer conversion (01/18/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Is the name of a 2-dimensional array equal to address of [0][0] element? (01/18/05)
  • Re: initializer element is not constant (01/18/05)
  • Re: Inside-Out Array-Indexing Syntax (01/18/05)
  • Re: Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/18/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/17/05)
  • Re: Crazy (?) C problem (01/17/05)
  • Re: Inside-Out Array-Indexing Syntax (01/17/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: #if sizeof... (01/14/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/14/05)
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/14/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/14/05)
  • Re: [nitpick] Where do pointers point to? (01/14/05)
  • Re: accessing freed memory without error (01/14/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/14/05)
  • Re: Is it possible to return an array from a function? (01/14/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/13/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/13/05)
  • Re: [nitpick] Where do pointers point to? (01/13/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/13/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/13/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/13/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/13/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/13/05)
  • Re: [OT} File I/O - Delete Record (01/13/05)
  • Re: accessing freed memory without error (01/13/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/13/05)
  • Re: Compiler code optimization: see code below (01/13/05)
  • Re: Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/12/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Address syntax (01/11/05)
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/11/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/11/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/11/05)
  • Re: Factoring Nested Loops (was: Re: which loop is faster) (01/11/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/11/05)
  • Re: Compiler behavior : Inlining external functions (01/11/05)
  • Re: Use of the Volatile keyword for a pointer to a volatile memory block (01/11/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/10/05)
  • Re: scope resolution operator??????? (01/10/05)
  • Re: Handling unsigned overflow of size_t (01/10/05)
  • Re: Does this make any sense? (01/10/05)
  • Re: Compiler behavior : Inlining external functions (01/10/05)
  • Re: copying data to a structure member array (01/04/05)
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/04/05)
  • Re: Confusion with stdarg (01/04/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/04/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/04/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/04/05)
• lawrence.jones_at_ugs.com
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/23/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/21/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/20/05)
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/08/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/08/05)
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/07/05)
  • Re: long double in C89? (01/06/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/06/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/05/05)
• Leny
  • Re: Tools to help to understand code written by another person (01/10/05)
  • Tools to help to understand code written by another person (01/10/05)
• Lew Pitcher
  • Re: feasibilty of the memset operation on the FILE streams (01/28/05)
  • Re: some help pls (01/27/05)
  • Re: testing for the newline (01/24/05)
  • Re: Why the Range of Int is less by one at positive side?......... (01/24/05)
  • Re: interesting problem (01/21/05)
  • Re: what does [ ] mean with an integer? (01/21/05)
  • Re: coins program, need some help with crashing (01/20/05)
  • Re: Implementation of sizeof, malloc, new (01/20/05)
  • Re: implement atoi (01/20/05)
  • Re: Implementation of sizeof, malloc, new (01/20/05)
  • Re: Implementation of sizeof, malloc, new (01/20/05)
  • Re: alignment revisited (01/20/05)
  • Re: alignment revisited (01/19/05)
  • Re: alignment revisited (01/19/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/19/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/15/05)
  • Re: Linked list (01/06/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/03/05)
• linux.lover
  • Mapping C code to assembly instructions (01/18/05)
  • C structure question (01/16/05)
• lovecreatesbeauty
  • Re: How to understand function prototype signal() (01/29/05)
  • Some complex function prototypes like signal() (01/28/05)
• Luke Wu
  • Re: integral promotion, arithmetic conversion, value preserving, unsigned preserving??? (01/30/05)
  • Re: Nested conditional expressions ---- good idea/bad idea? (01/30/05)
  • Re: integral promotion, arithmetic conversion, value preserving, unsigned preserving??? (01/30/05)
  • Re: integral promotion, arithmetic conversion, value preserving, unsigned preserving??? (01/29/05)
  • getline- to limit input (where do the unused characters in stdin go?) (01/26/05)
  • The need for int to capture getchar()'s EOF (01/23/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Books / online material on C COMPILER DESIGN (01/20/05)
  • Re: Is the name of a 2-dimensional array equal to address of [0][0] element? (01/18/05)
  • What does "Standard C", "K&R C" , "ANSI C" mean? (01/18/05)
  • Re: Is the name of a 2-dimensional array equal to address of [0][0] element? (01/18/05)
  • Re: Is the name of a 2-dimensional array equal to address of [0][0] element? (01/17/05)
  • Is the name of a 2-dimensional array equal to address of [0][0] element? (01/17/05)
• m
  • Re: problem with round (01/26/05)
  • Re: problem with round (01/26/05)
  • Re: problem with round (01/26/05)
  • Re: problem with round (01/26/05)
  • Re: problem with round (01/20/05)
  • Re: problem with round (01/20/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • problem with round (01/20/05)
• M Jared Finder
  • Re: how to write a tutorial (01/21/05)
• Mabden
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/31/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/31/05)
  • Re: Where have they gone (01/28/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/28/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/28/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: Finding the time taken by a function (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: interview questions with answers (01/23/05)
  • Re: interesting problem (01/23/05)
  • Re: float values can b rounded off? (01/23/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/23/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/23/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/23/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/23/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/20/05)
  • Re: Coding [style] standards (01/19/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/01/05)
• Mac
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: I want to write a Bit Torrent client in C (01/04/05)
• Mac A. Cody
  • Re: Confusion with stdarg (01/04/05)
  • Re: Confusion with stdarg (01/04/05)
  • Re: Confusion with stdarg (01/04/05)
  • Re: Confusion with stdarg (01/03/05)
  • Confusion with stdarg (01/03/05)
• MackS
  • Re: passing arg char[X][Y] to function expecting (char**) (01/28/05)
  • passing arg char[X][Y] to function expecting (char**) (01/27/05)
• madireddy_at_HotPop.com
  • malloc size (01/06/05)
• Mads Jensen
  • Re: IDE C Compiler (01/14/05)
• Magix
  • File I/O - Delete Record (01/12/05)
• mail2atulmehta_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: utf-8 to ascii (01/27/05)
  • utf-8 to ascii (01/26/05)
• mailto.anand.hariharan_at_gmail.com
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/25/05)
• makko
  • Re: interesting problem (01/25/05)
  • interesting problem (01/21/05)
• Malcolm
  • Re: what is size_t (01/30/05)
  • Re: Finished a "teach yourself" book, what next? (01/30/05)
  • Re: array performance (01/30/05)
  • Re: what is size_t (01/30/05)
  • Re: what is size_t (01/30/05)
  • Re: what is size_t (01/29/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/20/05)
  • Re: Newbie Q: a C function like 'paste' ?? (01/16/05)
  • Re: Do buffers always start with the lowest memory address being the first element? (01/15/05)
  • Re: Major project in C/C++ (01/15/05)
  • Re: Callback from a DLL (01/09/05)
  • Re: graph tutorial (01/09/05)
  • Re: How Free() works? (01/09/05)
  • Re: Sensibly printed floats? (01/08/05)
• Manuel Petit
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/25/05)
• Marcin
  • sqrt (01/28/05)
  • Sqrt precision ?! (01/28/05)
  • Sqrt precision ?! (01/27/05)
• Mario Rosario
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
• Mark A. Odell
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
• Mark L Pappin
  • Re: Error E2349 tester.c 29: Nonportable pointer conversion (01/16/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/12/05)
• Mark McIntyre
  • Re: [ IP validation math... ] (01/27/05)
  • Re: Finding the time taken by a function (01/24/05)
  • Re: IDE for C (01/24/05)
  • Re: Rules for complex declarations (01/23/05)
  • Re: alignment revisited (01/20/05)
  • Re: Getting address of a function through some string (01/13/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/08/05)
  • Re: C interface to kermit or minicom or seyon (01/08/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/08/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/05/05)
  • Re: Variable declaration syntax (01/03/05)
  • Re: Showing problem (01/03/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/03/05)
  • Re: Whats the difference between the yahoo group and this google groups? (01/03/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/03/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/03/05)
  • Re: Standard network method (01/03/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/03/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/03/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/03/05)
  • Re: I want to write a Bit Torrent client in C (01/03/05)
  • Re: Whats the difference between the yahoo group and this google groups? (01/03/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/03/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/03/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/03/05)
  • Re: online video conferencing (01/03/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/03/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/03/05)
  • Re: [OT, links] vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/03/05)
• Mark Piffer
  • Re: Datahiding in C (01/18/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/14/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/13/05)
• Mark Richards
  • Re: Macro or eval() for constants at runtime? (01/22/05)
  • Macro or eval() for constants at runtime? (01/21/05)
• Marlene Stebbins
  • return statement at end of function (01/28/05)
• Mars
  • new line character : scanf and getchar (01/31/05)
  • Re: What does this code mean??? (01/30/05)
  • Re: What does this code mean??? (01/30/05)
  • What does this code mean??? (01/30/05)
  • Re: Initialize elements in an array (01/27/05)
  • Initialize elements in an array (01/27/05)
• Martin
  • Re: FAQ Related - why cast? (01/05/05)
  • Re: FAQ Related - why cast? (01/05/05)
  • FAQ Related - why cast? (01/04/05)
• Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: uniform random distribution (01/31/05)
  • Re: string initilization WHY? (01/30/05)
  • Re: what is happening in C when increment this way? (01/30/05)
  • Re: what is happening in C when increment this way? (01/30/05)
  • Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities? (01/29/05)
  • Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities? (01/29/05)
  • Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities? (01/29/05)
  • Re: Is there anyway to iterate STL queue ? (01/28/05)
  • Re: Urgent !!!!! Please if possible give the explain about the program. (01/28/05)
  • Re: Sqrt precision ?! (01/27/05)
  • Re: reading a unformatted file (01/27/05)
  • Re: enum... (01/27/05)
  • Re: Problem with integers (01/26/05)
  • Re: simple question: namespace (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: interesting problem (01/21/05)
  • Re: float values can b rounded off? (01/21/05)
  • Re: C structure question (01/17/05)
  • Re: Trouble with scanf (01/16/05)
  • Re: char array not terminated with \0 (01/16/05)
  • Re: C structure question (01/16/05)
  • Re: recursive function (01/16/05)
  • Re: Trouble with scanf (01/16/05)
  • Re: Crazy (?) C problem (01/16/05)
  • Re: accessing freed memory without error (01/12/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/11/05)
  • Re: slight rounding problem (01/11/05)
  • Re: Sensibly printed floats? (01/08/05)
  • Re: Am I doing something wrong with printf() here? (01/08/05)
  • Re: How to resolve error LNK2005 - function already defined (01/08/05)
  • Re: Algorithms IN C (01/07/05)
  • Re: CreatemotionsT seeks beta testers for a strong Q&A session (01/06/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/06/05)
  • Re: Linux rounding error??? (01/05/05)
  • Re: How to convert float to hex? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Newbie question (01/02/05)
• masood.iqbal_at_lycos.com
  • Problems initializing a dynamically allocated 2D array (01/30/05)
  • Local variables within looping constructs (01/29/05)
  • Re: Multi-dimensional array initialization (01/23/05)
  • Multi-dimensional array initialization (01/23/05)
  • Rules for complex declarations (01/23/05)
  • Rules for complex declarations (01/23/05)
  • Rules for complex declarations (01/23/05)
  • Rules for complex declarations (01/23/05)
  • Rules for complex declarations (01/23/05)
  • Multi-dimensional array initialization (01/23/05)
  • Multi-dimensional array initialization (01/23/05)
• Massimo Mannelli
  • porting from Borland 4.0 to Visual C 6.0 (01/25/05)
• Mathew Hendry
  • Re: Is the name of a 2-dimensional array equal to address of [0][0] element? (01/17/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/15/05)
  • Re: do{..}while(0) macro substitutions (01/01/05)
• Matt
  • Re: About 64-bit portability (01/04/05)
• matthias_k
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
• Max T. Woodbury
  • Re: is this intentional? (01/27/05)
• mfhaigh_at_sbcglobal.net
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/07/05)
• Micah Cowan
  • [OT] Typography [was Re: Coding standards] (01/12/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/06/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/06/05)
  • Re: FAQ Related - why cast? (01/06/05)
  • Re: Missing initializer (01/05/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/05/05)
  • Re: FAQ Related - why cast? (01/05/05)
  • Re: compile C programs with UNIX system calls (= Unix Programs??) (01/04/05)
  • Re: Help with Constant Define--Compiler Issue with ANSI or my compiler or me? (01/04/05)
  • Re: Help with Constant Define--Compiler Issue with ANSI or my compiler or me? (01/03/05)
• michael
  • What this means? ---> struct resource *r = v, *p; (01/28/05)
  • How to terminate a telnet session from within your C/C++ program (01/27/05)
• Michael Coyne
  • Re: interesting problem (01/21/05)
  • Re: array problem! (01/04/05)
• Michael Mair
  • Re: help broke prog up into functions now not working (01/30/05)
  • Re: uniform random distribution (01/30/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/30/05)
  • Re: what is size_t (01/30/05)
  • Re: %x question (01/30/05)
  • Re: %x question (01/30/05)
  • memsize() for the poor (code review request, was: substitute for string 0 termination) (01/30/05)
  • Re: Return to Start of Line? (01/29/05)
  • Re: some help pls (01/27/05)
  • Re: some help pls (01/27/05)
  • Re: some help pls (01/27/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: reading a unformatted file (01/27/05)
  • Re: Sqrt precision ?! (01/27/05)
  • Re: Sqrt precision ?! (01/27/05)
  • Re: reading a unformatted file (01/27/05)
  • Re: enum... (01/27/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/27/05)
  • Re: float values can b rounded off? (01/27/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: use of do{...}while(0) (01/26/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/26/05)
  • Re: is this intentional? (01/26/05)
  • Re: is this intentional? (01/26/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/26/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/26/05)
  • Re: Are constants and string literals considered "data objects" in c? (01/26/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: DPMI and ISO C++ ?? (01/24/05)
  • Re: What does const char *s mean? is s a constant or *s? (01/24/05)
  • Re: "Implicitly only" splint warnings (01/12/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: How can I do sort program for unsorted setup file? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Tools to help to understand code written by another person (01/11/05)
  • Re: oh oh it's OO - calling encapsulated functions - question for the experts (01/10/05)
  • Re: oh oh it's OO - calling encapsulated functions - question for the experts (01/10/05)
  • Re: Does this make any sense? (01/10/05)
  • Re: Confusion with stdarg (01/03/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/03/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/03/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/02/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/02/05)
  • Re: Variable declaration syntax (01/02/05)
  • Re: Newbie question (01/02/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/02/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/01/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/01/05)
• Michael Wojcik
  • Re: what is "variable-name-equivalence" in c? (01/28/05)
  • Re: what is "variable-name-equivalence" in c? (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/27/05)
  • Re: pointer to array of const objects (01/26/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/26/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/26/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/26/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/25/05)
  • Re: Why the Range of Int is less by one at positive side?......... (01/24/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/21/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/20/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/20/05)
  • Re: Can function prototypes appear anywhere? (01/19/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/19/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/19/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/17/05)
  • Re: snprintf vs strcat, (01/14/05)
  • Re: Current languages are a mess, what would you choose C#, Java or C++? (01/14/05)
  • [OT] typesetting [was Re: Coding standards] (01/14/05)
  • Re: Current languages are a mess, what would you choose C#, Java or C++? (01/13/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/13/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/12/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/10/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/10/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/10/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/07/05)
  • Re: Text editor data structures (01/07/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/07/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/05/05)
  • Re: Language efficiency of C versus FORTRAN et al (01/04/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/04/05)
• Michael Zeile
  • Macros with variable parameter list in MS VC Compiler (6.0) (01/20/05)
• michael.martin_at_asahq.com
  • Preprocessor define concatenation (01/07/05)
• Mike Smith
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
• Mike Wahler
  • Re: Finished a "teach yourself" book, what next? (01/31/05)
  • Re: string initilization WHY? (01/31/05)
  • Re: sockets and connecting to other programs (01/30/05)
  • Re: string initilization WHY? (01/30/05)
  • Re: %x question (01/30/05)
  • Re: Why the Range of Int is less by one at positive side?......... (01/29/05)
  • Re: what is size_t (01/29/05)
  • Re: Why the Range of Int is less by one at positive side?......... (01/29/05)
  • Re: what is size_t (01/29/05)
  • Re: Why the Range of Int is less by one at positive side?......... (01/29/05)
  • Re: Fresher starting programming with C (01/28/05)
  • Re: string length limitation of printf (01/28/05)
  • Re: string length limitation of printf (01/28/05)
  • Re: passing a (const void *) into memset() (01/28/05)
  • Re: float values can b rounded off? (01/27/05)
  • Re: pointer to array of const objects (01/26/05)
  • Re: pointer to array of const objects (01/26/05)
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/26/05)
  • Re: pointer to array of const objects (01/26/05)
  • Re: [FAQ, link] Problem with integers (01/26/05)
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/25/05)
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/25/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/25/05)
  • Re: strtok/strtok_r woes (01/24/05)
  • Re: its giving the different address !!!!!!!!!! (01/24/05)
  • Re: its giving the different address !!!!!!!!!! (01/24/05)
  • Re: strtok/strtok_r woes (01/24/05)
  • Re: testing for the newline (01/24/05)
  • Re: What does const char *s mean? is s a constant or *s? (01/24/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/23/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/23/05)
  • Re: [OT] Java compiler (01/23/05)
  • Re: "streams" (01/22/05)
  • Re: "streams" (01/22/05)
  • Re: "streams" (01/22/05)
  • Re: "streams" (01/22/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: float values can b rounded off? (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: "Declaration" vs. "Definition" (01/21/05)
  • Re: type conversion float and long (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: "Declaration" vs. "Definition" (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: array initialization standard (01/21/05)
  • Re: int func() v/s int func(void) (01/21/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: [corr] Array of pointers to structs (01/20/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/20/05)
  • Re: Array of pointers to structs (01/20/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/20/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/20/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: implement atoi (01/20/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/20/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/20/05)
  • Re: function call with arguments which takes no arguments (01/20/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/20/05)
  • Re: function call with arguments which takes no arguments (01/20/05)
  • Re: alignment revisited (01/19/05)
  • Re: Graphics in c (01/19/05)
  • Re: How can i compare bit wise? (01/19/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/19/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/19/05)
  • Re: How to read all files present in a directory in C ? (01/18/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/18/05)
  • Re: size of memory in C -- allocation (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: splitting functions into files (01/18/05)
  • Re: What does "Standard C", "K&R C" , "ANSI C" mean? (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: char array not terminated with \0 (01/17/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: Inside-Out Array-Indexing Syntax (01/17/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: Crazy (?) C problem (01/17/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/16/05)
  • Re: Trouble with scanf (01/16/05)
  • Re: Crazy (?) C problem (01/16/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/16/05)
  • Re: Error E2349 tester.c 29: Nonportable pointer conversion (01/15/05)
  • Re: Error E2349 tester.c 29: Nonportable pointer conversion (01/14/05)
  • Re: [OT] Linker error creating dll (01/14/05)
  • Re: rounding (01/13/05)
  • Re: rounding (01/13/05)
  • Re: accessing freed memory without error (01/13/05)
  • Re: Using assembly in C (01/13/05)
  • Re: Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/12/05)
  • Re: [corr] Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/12/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/12/05)
  • Re: accessing freed memory without error (01/12/05)
  • Re: Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/12/05)
  • Re: where variables are stored? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/12/05)
  • Re: Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/12/05)
  • Re: where variables are stored? (01/12/05)
  • Re: interview questions with answers (01/12/05)
  • Re: [OT, welcome msg, redir] algorithm for Modified Distribution Method / Transportation Simplex Method/Transport Problem (01/11/05)
  • Re: whats the use of third argument to main( ) (01/11/05)
  • Re: Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/11/05)
  • Re: Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/11/05)
  • Re: Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/11/05)
  • Re: [corr] why to use '&' in scanf( ) but not in printf( ) (01/10/05)
  • Re: why to use '&' in scanf( ) but not in printf( ) (01/10/05)
  • Re: Pointer to Function (01/09/05)
  • Re: what is wrong! (01/08/05)
  • Re: Am I doing something wrong with printf() here? (01/08/05)
  • Re: what is wrong! (01/08/05)
  • Re: Am I doing something wrong with printf() here? (01/08/05)
  • Re: problem with free. (01/07/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/06/05)
  • Re: [FAQ] Beginning ANSI - Standard C (01/05/05)
  • Re: [FAQ] How Free() works? (01/05/05)
  • Re: difference between assignement and initialisation (01/05/05)
  • Re: Missing initializer (01/05/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/05/05)
  • Re: Confusion on output (01/04/05)
  • Re: Confusion on output (01/04/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/04/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/04/05)
  • Re: Programming Challenge (01/04/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/04/05)
  • Re: Question about C? (01/04/05)
  • Re: [OT, redir] SendMessage() for saving text file (01/04/05)
  • Re: really confused with variable access (01/04/05)
  • Re: Showing problem (01/03/05)
  • Re: [OT] Avionics (01/03/05)
  • Re: linklist (01/03/05)
  • Re: [OT, links] vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/03/05)
  • Re: Variable declaration syntax (01/02/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/02/05)
  • Re: [OT] vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/02/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/02/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/02/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/02/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/01/05)
  • Re: [OT, welcome msg] vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/01/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/01/05)
  • Re: [OT, links] vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/01/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/01/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/01/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/01/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/01/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/01/05)
  • Re: Standard network method (12/31/04)
• milkyway
  • C interface to kermit or minicom or seyon (01/08/05)
• moi
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/20/05)
• mojozoox
  • Re: malloc size (01/08/05)
• moumou
  • splitting functions into files (01/18/05)
• Mr. Olsen
  • How does this work? (01/05/05)
  • Beginning ANSI - Standard C (01/05/05)
• Mr. X
  • Need for programming (01/18/05)
• msalters
  • Re: Linked list (01/04/05)
• myhotline_at_gmail.com
  • Re: Convert numbers to words (01/05/05)
• Mysidia
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/16/05)
  • Re: groups.google.com indentation bugs [semi-OT] (01/09/05)
  • Re: variadic arithmetic, boolean operators (01/02/05)
• nanolucifer
  • Re: [ IP validation math... ] (01/27/05)
  • Re: reading a unformatted file (01/27/05)
• Natt Serrasalmus
  • Re: Coding standards (01/03/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/03/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/03/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/03/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/03/05)
• Nebula
  • Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/17/05)
• Neil Kurzman
  • Re: Mapping C code to assembly instructions (01/18/05)
  • Re: Handling binary data in C - questions (01/18/05)
  • Re: OLD IDE C Compiler (01/15/05)
  • Re: #if sizeof... (01/15/05)
  • Re: Major project in C/C++ (01/15/05)
  • Re: Compiler code optimization: see code below (01/13/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Newbie question info (01/07/05)
• Nejat AYDIN
  • Re: int func() v/s int func(void) (01/21/05)
• Neo
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: "Declaration" vs. "Definition" (01/21/05)
  • Re: "Declaration" vs. "Definition" (01/21/05)
  • Re: function call with arguments which takes no arguments (01/20/05)
  • Re: function call with arguments which takes no arguments (01/20/05)
  • function call with arguments which takes no arguments (01/19/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/19/05)
  • Re: whats the use of third argument to main( ) (01/11/05)
  • where variables are stored? (01/11/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/06/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/05/05)
  • Re: reverse a link list (01/05/05)
  • Re: reverse a link list (01/04/05)
  • reverse a link list (01/04/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/04/05)
  • Re: Error log design... (01/04/05)
  • Re: really confused with variable access (01/04/05)
  • Re: Confusion on output (01/04/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/04/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/03/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/03/05)
  • Re: Showing problem (01/03/05)
  • [OT] Avionics (01/03/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/03/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/03/05)
  • pointer to an int array (01/03/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/03/05)
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/03/05)
• Newcomer
  • Re: How to read all files present in a directory in C ? (01/19/05)
• Nick Austin
  • Re: %x question (01/30/05)
  • Re: What does this code mean??? (01/30/05)
  • Re: pointer to array of const objects (01/26/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: what is wrong! (01/08/05)
• Nick Keighley
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/04/05)
  • Re: reverse a link list (01/04/05)
  • Re: email program in c - help me solve one error,please... (01/03/05)
  • Re: Matrix problem (01/03/05)
  • Re: email program in c - help me solve one error,please... (01/02/05)
  • Re: Matrix problem (01/02/05)
• Nicolao
  • Re: Newbie Q: a C function like 'paste' ?? (01/20/05)
  • Re: Newbie Q: a C function like 'paste' ?? (01/20/05)
  • Re: Newbie Q: a C function like 'paste' ?? (01/19/05)
  • Re: Newbie Q: a C function like 'paste' ?? (01/18/05)
  • Re: Newbie Q: a C function like 'paste' ?? (01/18/05)
  • Re: Newbie Q: a C function like 'paste' ?? (01/17/05)
  • Re: Newbie Q: a C function like 'paste' ?? (01/16/05)
  • Newbie Q: a C function like 'paste' ?? (01/16/05)
• Nicolas Pavlidis
  • Re: Why the Range of Int is less by one at positive side?......... (01/29/05)
  • Re: Regarding left shift operator (01/05/05)
• Nigel Kukard
  • Opensource developers? (01/22/05)
• Niko Schwarz
  • how to call foreign programs from c? (01/21/05)
• Nils Weller
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/15/05)
• nimmi_srivastav_at_yahoo.com
  • Nested conditional expressions ---- good idea/bad idea? (01/30/05)
  • Re: strtok/strtok_r woes (01/25/05)
• no spam
  • Re: [corr] Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/12/05)
  • Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/12/05)
• None
  • How to understand function prototype signal() (01/28/05)
  • Re: Input unknown number of integers in a line... (01/27/05)
  • Re: Input unknown number of integers in a line... (01/27/05)
  • Input unknown number of integers in a line... (01/27/05)
• olbircli_at_sk.com
  • LOL..... I Just Found A Gwenyth Paltrow Sex Video Online. Take A Look....... J5P2 (01/01/05)
• Old Wolf
  • Sign error in K&R 1 (01/31/05)
  • Re: cast-as-lvalue (Thank You) (01/27/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/25/05)
  • Re: cast-as-lvalue (Thank You) (01/25/05)
  • Re: The Google Problem (was: How can i compare bit wise?) (01/20/05)
  • Re: How can i compare bit wise? (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/18/05)
  • Re: Data importing BUS ERROR (01/18/05)
  • Re: Error E2349 tester.c 29: Nonportable pointer conversion (01/17/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/17/05)
  • Re: why define size_t ssize_t ? (01/17/05)
  • Re: #if sizeof... (01/17/05)
  • Re: initializer element is not constant (01/17/05)
  • Re: Crazy (?) C problem (01/16/05)
  • Re: Crazy (?) C problem (01/16/05)
  • Re: groups.google.com indentation bugs [semi-OT] (01/10/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/05/05)
  • Re: 0x400000*3/0x40000 undefined ? (01/05/05)
  • Re: Beginning ANSI - Standard C (01/05/05)
  • Missing initializer (01/05/05)
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/04/05)
• Owen McShane
  • Re: Programming Contest: Create a Crossword (01/21/05)
• Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities? (01/30/05)
• patrick courant
  • Re: Certification in C (01/08/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/05/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/05/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/05/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/05/05)
  • Certification in C (01/04/05)
• paudirac
  • Re: Command terminated by signal 9 (01/14/05)
  • Command terminated by signal 9 (01/14/05)
• Paul Black
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
• Perceptron
  • Re: Chnage the position of element! (01/06/05)
• pete
  • Re: Sqrt precision ?! (01/27/05)
  • Re: why use fprintf / size_t instead of printf/ int (01/27/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/27/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/27/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/26/05)
  • Re: why use fprintf / size_t instead of printf/ int (01/26/05)
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/26/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: is this intentional? (01/26/05)
  • Re: why use fprintf / size_t instead of printf/ int (01/26/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/26/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: Computer time -> Developer time -> User time? (01/25/05)
  • Re: strncat functionality (01/25/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: Are constants and string literals considered "data objects" in c? (01/25/05)
  • Re: What does const char *s mean? is s a constant or *s? (01/24/05)
  • Re: "streams" (01/23/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/23/05)
  • Re: Rules for complex declarations (01/23/05)
  • Re: Multi-dimensional array initialization (01/23/05)
  • Re: "streams" (01/22/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/22/05)
  • Re: "streams" (01/22/05)
  • Re: "streams" (01/22/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: array initialization standard (01/20/05)
  • Re: array initialization standard (01/20/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/20/05)
  • Re: How can i compare bit wise? (01/20/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/19/05)
  • Re: How to read all files present in a directory in C ? (01/19/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: Portable alloca() replacement? (01/19/05)
  • Re: size of memory in C -- allocation (01/18/05)
  • Re: reading a double var byte per byte (01/18/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/18/05)
  • Re: reading a double var byte per byte (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Is the name of a 2-dimensional array equal to address of [0][0] element? (01/18/05)
  • Re: Better Linked List Handling (01/18/05)
  • Re: char array not terminated with \0 (01/17/05)
  • Re: [nitpick] Where do pointers point to? (01/15/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/15/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/14/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/14/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/13/05)
  • Re: [nitpick] Where do pointers point to? (01/13/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/12/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: Address syntax (01/11/05)
  • Re: Newbie question info (01/07/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/07/05)
  • Re: Handling unsigned overflow of size_t (01/07/05)
  • Re: reverse a link list (01/07/05)
  • Re: reverse a link list (01/07/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/07/05)
  • Re: Thread-Safety in Functions: A Random String Generator (01/07/05)
  • Re: Better Linked List Handling (01/07/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/07/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/07/05)
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/06/05)
• Peter
  • Re: string initilization WHY? (01/31/05)
  • Re: Is my memory is not enough? (01/31/05)
  • Re: Parse "Card * const wDeck" (01/11/05)
  • Re: problem with free. (01/10/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/10/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/03/05)
• Peter Butler
  • Re: cast-as-lvalue (Thank You) (01/24/05)
• Peter Koch Larsen
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
• Peter Nilsson
  • Re: integral promotion, arithmetic conversion, value preserving, unsigned preserving??? (01/29/05)
  • Re: What is the difference between signed and unsigned char? (01/28/05)
  • Re: What is the difference between signed and unsigned char? (01/28/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: strncat functionality (01/25/05)
  • Re: strncat functionality (01/25/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/22/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: Increment, decrement, overflow, and underflow (01/21/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/21/05)
  • Re: Increment, decrement, overflow, and underflow (01/21/05)
  • Re: function call with arguments which takes no arguments (01/20/05)
  • Re: Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/19/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/19/05)
  • Re: Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/18/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/18/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/18/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/18/05)
  • Re: Data importing BUS ERROR (01/18/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/18/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/17/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/17/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: Is the name of a 2-dimensional array equal to address of [0][0] element? (01/17/05)
  • Re: char array not terminated with \0 (01/17/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: Crazy (?) C problem (01/16/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/14/05)
  • Re: FAQ Related - why cast? (01/06/05)
  • Re: 0x400000*3/0x40000 undefined ? (01/06/05)
  • Re: Convert numbers to words (01/05/05)
  • Re: Incrementing variables past limits (01/05/05)
• petermcmillan_uk_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/04/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/04/05)
  • Re: Programming Challenge (01/04/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/04/05)
  • Re: Linked list (01/04/05)
• Phil Carmody
  • Re: Computer time -> Developer time -> User time? (01/25/05)
• Phlip
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: software types and programming languages (01/04/05)
  • Re: Job Prospects for Software Engineers (01/03/05)
• Pierre
  • Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/15/05)
• Pierre Maurette
  • Re: Good IDE for C/C++ (01/20/05)
  • Re: reading a double var byte per byte (01/18/05)
  • Re: reading a double var byte per byte (01/18/05)
  • Re: reading a double var byte per byte (01/18/05)
  • Re: reading a double var byte per byte (01/18/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/01/05)
• pjp_at_plauger.com
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/25/05)
• potm_at_dinsights.com
  • Programming Contest: Create a Crossword (01/20/05)
• prabhat143_at_gmail.com
  • Re: %x question (01/30/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/24/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/19/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/18/05)
  • convert a list to tree (01/18/05)
• Prasad
  • Re: Initialize elements in an array (01/28/05)
• Prashanth Badabagni
  • Re: Getting address of a function through some string (01/17/05)
  • Getting address of a function through some string (01/13/05)
• Pravin Shetty
  • Urgent !!!!! Please if possible give the explain about the program. (01/28/05)
  • c program (01/18/05)
  • Question on Linux Device Driver ? (01/05/05)
  • Question on Unix ? (01/05/05)
  • Question about C? (01/04/05)
• Przemek Drochomirecki
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
• purifier
  • Re: How can i compare bit wise? (01/19/05)
  • Re: How can i compare bit wise? (01/19/05)
  • How can i compare bit wise? (01/19/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/17/05)
  • Comparing two numbers (01/16/05)
• puzzlecracker
  • Re: string initilization WHY? (01/30/05)
  • string initilization WHY? (01/30/05)
  • string initilization WHY? (01/30/05)
  • Re: what is happening in C when increment this way? (01/30/05)
  • Re: what is happening in C when increment this way? (01/30/05)
  • Re: what is happening in C when increment this way? (01/30/05)
  • what is happening in C when increment this way? (01/30/05)
  • implement atoi (01/20/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • LL TO BST (01/19/05)
  • Re: position and number of 1's in an integer (01/19/05)
  • Re: alignment revisited (01/19/05)
  • alignment revisited (01/19/05)
  • malloc vs new (01/19/05)
  • Re: size of memory in C -- allocation (01/19/05)
  • Re: size of memory in C -- allocation (01/19/05)
  • Re: size of memory in C -- allocation (01/19/05)
  • Re: size of memory in C -- allocation (01/19/05)
  • Re: size of memory in C -- allocation (01/18/05)
  • size of memory in C -- allocation (01/18/05)
• PZ
  • Call for Panels - OSS 2005 (01/11/05)
• QNils_O=2E_Sel=E5sdal=22?=
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/27/05)
• R. Mattes
  • Re: perl-python a-day (01/12/05)
• raj
  • Re: Pointer to array of unspecified size (01/12/05)
  • Re: Does this make any sense? (01/10/05)
  • Re: Does this make any sense? (01/10/05)
  • Re: Matrix problem (01/02/05)
• Ralmin
  • Re: initializer element is not constant (01/17/05)
  • Re: initializer element is not constant (01/17/05)
  • Re: initializer element is not constant (01/17/05)
  • Re: initializer element is not constant (01/17/05)
• Randy Howard
  • Re: Pre-ANSI C functions and .NET browse information symbols (01/31/05)
  • Re: what is size_t (01/31/05)
  • Re: Input unknown number of integers in a line... (01/31/05)
  • Re: Urgent !!!!! Please if possible give the explain about the program. (01/28/05)
  • Re: Where have they gone (01/28/05)
  • Re: DPMI and ISO C++ ?? (01/28/05)
  • Re: some help pls (01/28/05)
  • Re: some help pls (01/28/05)
  • Re: Where have they gone (01/28/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/28/05)
  • Re: strtok/strtok_r woes (01/28/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/26/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/25/05)
  • Re: implement atoi (01/23/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: OLD IDE C Compiler (01/14/05)
  • Re: [OT] Avionics (01/05/05)
  • Re: do{..}while(0) macro substitutions (01/01/05)
  • Re: Whats the difference between the yahoo group and this google (01/01/05)
• Randy Yates
  • Re: how to handle name mangling in a shared C library (01/04/05)
  • how to handle name mangling in a shared C library (01/04/05)
  • Re: Unix programmer definition (01/04/05)
• ranjeet
  • Your Suggestion (01/12/05)
• Raphael
  • Compiler behavior : Inlining external functions (01/10/05)
• Rav
  • interview questions with answers (01/12/05)
• Ravi Uday
  • Re: strncat functionality (01/25/05)
  • Re: its giving the different address !!!!!!!!!! (01/24/05)
  • Re: its giving the different address !!!!!!!!!! (01/24/05)
  • Re: Getting address of a function through some string (01/13/05)
  • Re: scope resolution operator??????? (01/07/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/06/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/05/05)
  • Re: Beginning ANSI - Standard C (01/05/05)
• Raymond Martineau
  • Re: accessing msaccess by using c language (01/20/05)
  • Re: Get rid of trailing newline for scanf (01/16/05)
  • Re: [Question]activities of stack pointer and frame pointer when function called (01/12/05)
  • Re: groups.google.com indentation bugs [semi-OT] (01/09/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/02/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/01/05)
• REH
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: [OT] help with Koenig Lookup (01/19/05)
  • Re: Portable alloca() replacement? (01/19/05)
  • Re: Portable alloca() replacement? (01/18/05)
• Rich Teer
  • Re: compile C programs with UNIX system calls (= Unix Programs??) (01/04/05)
  • Re: compile C programs with UNIX system calls (= Unix Programs??) (01/04/05)
• Richard B. Gilbert
  • Re: Unix programmer definition (01/04/05)
• Richard Bos
  • Re: Finished a "teach yourself" book, what next? (01/31/05)
  • Re: What does this code mean??? (01/31/05)
  • Re: using system("xxxxx") (01/31/05)
  • Re: passing arg char[X][Y] to function expecting (char**) (01/31/05)
  • Re: What this means? ---> struct resource *r = v, *p; (01/28/05)
  • Re: integral promotion, arithmetic conversion, value preserving, unsigned preserving??? (01/28/05)
  • Re: Urgent !!!!! Please if possible give the explain about the program. (01/28/05)
  • Re: How can #define printf like function? (01/28/05)
  • Re: Initialize elements in an array (01/28/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/28/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/28/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/28/05)
  • Re: [ IP validation math... ] (01/27/05)
  • Re: How to terminate a telnet session from within your C/C++ program (01/27/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: should I free mem in function after alloc and returning pointer... ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/27/05)
  • Re: strtok/strtok_r woes (01/27/05)
  • Re: float values can b rounded off? (01/27/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/27/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/27/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
  • Re: strtok/strtok_r woes (01/26/05)
  • Re: utf-8 to ascii (01/26/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/26/05)
  • Re: Q: recursive call to main, termination of program (01/26/05)
  • Re: float values can b rounded off? (01/25/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/25/05)
  • Re: float values can b rounded off? (01/21/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/21/05)
  • Re: How do the experts here quickly come up with references to standards? (01/20/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/20/05)
  • Re: position and number of 1's in an integer (01/20/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/20/05)
  • Re: is the definition of declaration is contradictory????????? (01/20/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/20/05)
  • Re: alignment revisited (01/19/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/19/05)
  • Re: Handling binary data in C - questions (01/19/05)
  • Re: Special C Preprocessing Tool Needed for Pruning of #ifdefs in code (01/19/05)
  • Re: problem with Data Files (01/19/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/19/05)
  • Re: Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/19/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/19/05)
  • Re: Newbie Q: a C function like 'paste' ?? (01/19/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/19/05)
  • Re: regarding bit field structures (01/19/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/19/05)
  • Re: reading a double var byte per byte (01/18/05)
  • Re: Comparing two numbers (01/18/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/18/05)
  • Re: reading a double var byte per byte (01/18/05)
  • Re: Array assignment via cast (01/18/05)
  • Re: Newbie Q: a C function like 'paste' ?? (01/18/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/18/05)
  • Re: What does "Standard C", "K&R C" , "ANSI C" mean? (01/18/05)
  • Re: Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/17/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/17/05)
  • Re: Newbie Q: a C function like 'paste' ?? (01/17/05)
  • Re: CreatemotionsT seeks beta testers for a strong Q&A session (01/14/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/14/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/14/05)
  • Re: Quandry with the following C code (Intermediate) (01/14/05)
  • Re: Quandry with the following C code (Intermediate) (01/13/05)
  • Re: [Question]activities of stack pointer and frame pointer when function called (01/13/05)
  • Re: rounding (01/13/05)
  • Re: Is declaring a pointer to an undefined struct legal? (01/12/05)
  • Re: File I/O - Delete Record (01/12/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/12/05)
  • Re: Beginner's question (01/11/05)
  • Re: Pointer to array of unspecified size (01/11/05)
  • Re: CreatemotionsT seeks beta testers for a strong Q&A session (01/11/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/11/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/11/05)
  • Re: VMDD Tech announces the availability of CS101 - Decimal/Hex/Binary calculator (01/10/05)
  • Re: How Free() works? (01/10/05)
  • Re: Text editor data structures (01/10/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/05/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/05/05)
  • Re: compile C programs with UNIX system calls (= Unix Programs??) (01/04/05)
  • Re: Showing problem (01/04/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/04/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/04/05)
  • Re: vesa mode 105h or 117h (01/04/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/03/05)
  • Re: Confusion with stdarg (01/03/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/03/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/03/05)
  • Re: Off-topic threads (01/03/05)
• Richard E Maine
  • Re: software types and programming languages (01/07/05)
• Richard H.
  • Re: Error log design... (01/04/05)
  • Re: Error log design... (01/04/05)
• Richard Harter
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/25/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/22/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/22/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/20/05)
• Richard Tobin
  • Re: Is my memory is not enough? (01/30/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/27/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/22/05)
  • Re: interesting problem (01/21/05)
  • Re: malloc vs new (01/19/05)
  • Re: #if sizeof... (01/14/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/13/05)
  • Re: where variables are stored? (01/12/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/12/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: Better Linked List Handling (01/07/05)
• Richards Noah \(IFR LIT MET\)
  • Re: what is wrong! (01/10/05)
• RK
  • Pre-ANSI C functions and .NET browse information symbols (01/31/05)
• Ro
  • Re: Computer time -> Developer time -> User time? (01/25/05)
• Rob van der Leek
  • Re: Quandry with the following C code (Intermediate) (01/12/05)
• Robert B. Clark
  • Re: Getting address of a function through some string (01/17/05)
  • Re: How can I do sort program for unsorted setup file? (01/12/05)
  • Re: reading stream up to next delimiter (01/06/05)
  • Re: Linked list (01/04/05)
  • Re: Showing problem (01/04/05)
  • Re: Showing problem (01/03/05)
• Robert Gamble
  • Re: Using assembly in C (01/11/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
• Roberto Della Pasqua
  • CreatemotionsT seeks beta testers for a strong Q&A session (01/06/05)
• Roberto Waltman
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
• Rohit Upadhyay HCST
  • Where Can I download Cfront from ? (01/04/05)
• Ron Natalie
  • Re: software types and programming languages (01/08/05)
• Ron Peterson
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/07/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/07/05)
  • /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/07/05)
• RoSsIaCrIiLoIA
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/30/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/30/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/30/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/29/05)
  • Re: ends_with() ? (01/29/05)
  • Re: Result of Comparision (01/29/05)
• Rouben Rostamian
  • Re: uniform random distribution (01/30/05)
  • Re: what is the scope of enum? (01/08/05)
  • what is the scope of enum? (01/07/05)
• rss
  • Re: Array assignment via cast (01/18/05)
• Rudolf
  • Re: alignment revisited (01/20/05)
• Rufus V. Smith
  • Re: Urgent !!!!! Please if possible give the explain about the program. (01/28/05)
  • Re: What this means? ---> struct resource *r = v, *p; (01/28/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/27/05)
  • Re: Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/21/05)
  • Re: Good IDE for C/C++ (01/21/05)
  • Re: recursive function (01/20/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: OLD IDE C Compiler (01/14/05)
• Russell Shaw
  • Re: Integer promotion and overflow (01/03/05)
  • Integer promotion and overflow (01/02/05)
• s.subbarayan
  • Error log design... (01/04/05)
• S.Tobias
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/31/05)
  • Re: UCHAR_MIN & UCHAR_MAX (01/31/05)
  • Re: UCHAR_MIN & UCHAR_MAX (01/31/05)
  • Re: what is size_t (01/30/05)
  • Re: UCHAR_MIN & UCHAR_MAX (01/30/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/29/05)
  • Re: integral promotion, arithmetic conversion, value preserving, unsigned preserving??? (01/29/05)
  • Re: integral promotion, arithmetic conversion, value preserving, unsigned preserving??? (01/29/05)
  • Re: return statement at end of function (01/28/05)
  • Re: How to understand function prototype signal() (01/28/05)
  • Re: [OT] [Question]activities of stack pointer and frame pointer when function called (01/28/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/28/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: why use fprintf / size_t instead of printf/ int (01/27/05)
  • Re: c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/27/05)
  • Re: getline- to limit input (where do the unused characters in stdin go?) (01/27/05)
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/27/05)
  • Re: [OT] [Question]activities of stack pointer and frame pointer when function called (01/27/05)
  • Re: Finding the time taken by a function (01/24/05)
  • Re: "Declaration" vs. "Definition" (01/22/05)
  • Re: Reading the data from keyboard! (01/20/05)
  • Re: function call with arguments which takes no arguments (01/19/05)
  • Re: C structure question (01/17/05)
  • Re: C structure question (01/16/05)
  • Re: Get rid of trailing newline for scanf (01/16/05)
  • Re: Get rid of trailing newline for scanf (01/16/05)
  • Re: Manipulation of strings: upper/lower case (01/16/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/16/05)
  • Re: #if sizeof... (01/15/05)
  • Re: [nitpick] Where do pointers point to? (01/15/05)
  • Re: #if sizeof... (01/14/05)
  • Re: [Question]activities of stack pointer and frame pointer when function called (01/14/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/13/05)
  • Re: [nitpick] Where do pointers point to? (01/13/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/13/05)
  • Re: [nitpick] Where do pointers point to? (01/13/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/13/05)
  • Re: [corr] Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/12/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/12/05)
  • Re: [OT] tricky assignment statemenent (01/07/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/07/05)
• S?ren Gammelmark
  • Function pointers, variable argument functions calling other variable-argument functions (sort of) (01/07/05)
• sachin_mzn_at_yahoo.com
  • accessing freed memory without error (01/12/05)
  • which is the appropriate news group (01/05/05)
  • Re: memory alignment (01/04/05)
  • memory alignment (01/03/05)
• Sanda
  • Re: Finding the time taken by a function (01/25/05)
  • Graphics in c (01/19/05)
• Sandie C
  • Newbie question stack implementation (01/07/05)
  • Re: Newbie question info (01/07/05)
  • Newbie question info (01/07/05)
• sara
  • Re: decimal to hexadecimal (01/04/05)
• Sathish Athreya
  • Re: Major project in C/C++ (01/14/05)
• sathyashrayan
  • Re: what is "variable-name-equivalence" in c? (01/27/05)
  • Re: use of do{...}while(0) (01/27/05)
  • Re: use of do{...}while(0) (01/26/05)
  • use of do{...}while(0) (01/26/05)
  • solution to Knr Exercise 1-9 (01/21/05)
• Schizoid Man
  • Good IDE for C/C++ (01/20/05)
• Scott
  • Re: initializer element is not constant (01/17/05)
  • initializer element is not constant (01/17/05)
• Scott J. McCaughrin
  • Re: help with va_list etc (01/02/05)
• sean
  • [ IP validation math... ] (01/27/05)
• seema_coma_at_yahoo.co.in
  • reading stream up to next delimiter (01/06/05)
• seller
  • Re: Programming Contest: Create a Crossword (01/20/05)
• sensible
  • Re: Please help me crack this code... (01/26/05)
  • Re: Please help me crack this code... (01/23/05)
  • Please help me crack this code... (01/23/05)
• Seong-Kook Shin
  • string length limitation of printf (01/28/05)
  • Q: recursive call to main, termination of program (01/26/05)
• Serge Paccalin
  • Re: c program (01/18/05)
• Servé La
  • Re: What does this code mean??? (01/31/05)
  • Re: Pre-ANSI C functions and .NET browse information symbols (01/31/05)
  • Re: string initilization WHY? (01/30/05)
  • Re: substitute for string 0 termination (01/26/05)
• Sethalicious
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/24/05)
• Severian
  • Re: malloc size (01/08/05)
• sgerchick_at_bloomberg.net
  • Re: what does [ ] mean with an integer? (01/21/05)
• Shagy
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/13/05)
  • c equivilant to "copy" (01/13/05)
• Shan
  • Re: problem with free. (01/07/05)
  • Re: difference between assignement and initialisation (01/04/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/03/05)
  • Re: Showing problem (01/03/05)
  • Re: memory alignment (01/03/05)
  • Re: memory alignment (01/03/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/01/05)
• Shark1
  • coins program, need some help with crashing (01/20/05)
• Shawn
  • Re: How can #define printf like function? (01/31/05)
• shez
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/25/05)
  • Re: Superbasic efficiency question (01/25/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
• SM Ryan
  • Re: utf-8 to ascii (01/27/05)
• Sn
  • SendMessage() for saving text file (01/04/05)
• SnaiL
  • Re: Tools to help to understand code written by another person (01/11/05)
  • Re: Tools to help to understand code written by another person (01/10/05)
  • Re: Question about C? (01/04/05)
• Song Yun Zhao
  • Re: Major project in C/C++ (01/20/05)
• Sontu
  • Re: To find the size of array using its pointer (01/22/05)
  • Re: To find the size of array using its pointer (01/22/05)
  • Re: To find the size of array using its pointer (01/20/05)
  • To find the size of array using its pointer (01/20/05)
• sorryonly4spam_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: #if sizeof... (01/17/05)
  • Re: #if sizeof... (01/17/05)
• spingoogL
  • Re: Garbage data in float datatype - Mingw3.2 (gcc) (01/12/05)
• spleen
  • passing structs in and out of functions (01/29/05)
• sriamar
  • type conversion float and long (01/21/05)
• srkkreddy_at_gmail.com
  • Finding the time taken by a function (01/24/05)
• Stan Milam
  • Re: Handling binary data in C - questions (01/18/05)
  • Re: c equivilant to "copy" (01/15/05)
  • Re: formula used in calculating diffrence between dates (01/05/05)
  • Re: Unix programmer definition (01/04/05)
  • Re: pointer to an int array (01/04/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/04/05)
• Stephen Maudsley
  • Re: Error log design... (01/04/05)
• Stephen Mayes
  • Re: array initialization standard (01/20/05)
  • array initialization standard (01/20/05)
• Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/21/05)
  • Re: is NULL-checking redundant in accessor-functions? (01/21/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/02/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/02/05)
  • Re: do{..}while(0) macro substitutions (01/01/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/01/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/01/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (12/31/04)
  • Re: do{..}while(0) macro substitutions (12/31/04)
• Steve
  • Re: enum... (01/27/05)
  • enum... (01/27/05)
• Steve Summit
  • comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) (01/15/05)
  • comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) (01/01/05)
  • comp.lang.c FAQ list Table of Contents (01/01/05)
• SteveC
  • Re: DPMI and ISO C++ ?? (01/24/05)
  • DPMI and ISO C++ ?? (01/24/05)
• Stian Stryni
  • Re: some help pls (01/27/05)
• Subhash
  • Re: Finding the time taken by a function (01/24/05)
• sudha
  • accessing msaccess by using c language (01/20/05)
• Sundar
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/03/05)
• surender
  • Linked list (01/04/05)
• sushant
  • Re: Can function prototypes appear anywhere? (01/28/05)
  • Re: its giving the different address !!!!!!!!!! (01/24/05)
  • Re: its giving the different address !!!!!!!!!! (01/24/05)
  • Re: its giving the different address !!!!!!!!!! (01/24/05)
  • Re: its giving the different address !!!!!!!!!! (01/24/05)
  • Re: its giving the different address !!!!!!!!!! (01/24/05)
  • Re: Why the Range of Int is less by one at positive side?......... (01/24/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: its giving the different address !!!!!!!!!! (01/24/05)
  • its giving the different address !!!!!!!!!! (01/24/05)
  • float values can b rounded off? (01/21/05)
  • Re: int func() v/s int func(void) (01/21/05)
  • Re: is the definition of declaration is contradictory????????? (01/20/05)
  • is the definition of declaration is contradictory????????? (01/20/05)
  • Re: How can i compare bit wise? (01/20/05)
  • Re: How can i compare bit wise? (01/20/05)
  • Re: function call with arguments which takes no arguments (01/20/05)
  • regarding bit field structures (01/19/05)
  • Re: Showing problem (01/10/05)
  • why to use '&' in scanf( ) but not in printf( ) (01/10/05)
  • scope resolution operator??????? (01/07/05)
  • difference between assignement and initialisation (01/04/05)
  • which loop is faster (01/03/05)
• T O
  • Re: using system("xxxxx") (01/29/05)
  • Re: using system("xxxxx") (01/29/05)
  • using system("xxxxx") (01/29/05)
• Taladan
  • Re: groups.google.com indentation bugs [semi-OT] (01/28/05)
• TanKC
  • Re: Sockets programming (01/16/05)
• Taran
  • Re: solution to Knr Exercise 1-9 (01/24/05)
  • Re: Result of Comparision (01/21/05)
  • Re: recursive function (01/17/05)
  • Re: Compiler code optimization: see code below (01/13/05)
  • Re: Compiler code optimization: see code below (01/13/05)
  • Re: accessing freed memory without error (01/12/05)
  • Re: Newbie question stack implementation (01/10/05)
  • Re: scope resolution operator??????? (01/07/05)
  • Re: difference between assignement and initialisation (01/05/05)
  • Re: Passing const int * to a function (01/05/05)
  • Re: Linked list (01/04/05)
• TaxicabNumber_at_yahoo.com
  • Re: really confused with variable access (01/04/05)
  • really confused with variable access (01/03/05)
• Tennis
  • Message Mgmt Utility (01/07/05)
• Thad Smith
  • Re: Message Mgmt Utility (01/08/05)
• The Dragon
  • Re: linklist (01/03/05)
  • Re: help with va_list etc (01/01/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/01/05)
• thesushant_at_rediffmail.com
  • Re: char array not terminated with \0 (01/17/05)
  • Re: whats the use of third argument to main( ) (01/11/05)
  • whats the use of third argument to main( ) (01/11/05)
  • re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: Variable declaration syntax (01/10/05)
  • Re: malloc size (01/08/05)
  • Re: scope resolution operator??????? (01/07/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/07/05)
• Thomas Matthews
  • Re: reading a unformatted file (01/27/05)
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
  • Re: interesting problem (01/21/05)
  • Re: what does [ ] mean with an integer? (01/21/05)
  • Re: [Newbie] need help (01/20/05)
  • Re: SAS/C INTEROPERABLE WITH IBM C/C++ (01/20/05)
  • Re: implement atoi (01/20/05)
  • Re: How to read all files present in a directory in C ? (01/18/05)
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/18/05)
  • Re: size of memory in C -- allocation (01/18/05)
  • Re: coloring a pixel (01/17/05)
  • Re: Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/17/05)
  • Re: where variables are stored? (01/11/05)
  • Re: Using assembly in C (01/11/05)
  • Re: [OT] Avionics (01/09/05)
  • Factoring Nested Loops (was: Re: which loop is faster) (01/09/05)
  • Re: Certification in C (01/09/05)
  • Re: variadic arithmetic, boolean operators (01/01/05)
• Thomas Stegen
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/19/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
• those who know me have no need of my name
  • Re: strncpy and the knife (01/27/05)
  • strncpy and the knife (01/26/05)
  • Re: cast-as-lvalue (Thank You) (01/26/05)
  • Re: cast-as-lvalue (Thank You) (01/25/05)
  • Re: the maximum memory size allowed in malloc (01/25/05)
• Till Crueger
  • Re: convert a list to tree (01/22/05)
  • Get rid of trailing newline for scanf (01/16/05)
• Tim Prince
  • Re: Calling subroutine in fortran module (01/30/05)
  • Re: About 64-bit portability (01/04/05)
  • Re: About 64-bit portability (01/04/05)
• Tim Rentsch
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/07/05)
  • Re: tricky assignment statemenent (01/06/05)
  • Re: Help with function-like macros (01/05/05)
  • Re: Coding [style] standards (01/05/05)
• tinesan_at_gmail.com
  • What is the difference between signed and unsigned char? (01/27/05)
• tings
  • Does this make any sense? (01/09/05)
• toby
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/27/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/27/05)
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/25/05)
• Todd Shillam
  • Re: What makes a good C/C++ programmer? (01/24/05)
• Tom Dyess
  • Re: software types and programming languages (01/08/05)
  • Re: software types and programming languages (01/05/05)
• Tomi Häsä
  • Re: groups.google.com indentation bugs [semi-OT] (01/22/05)
  • Re: groups.google.com indentation bugs [semi-OT] (01/22/05)
  • Re: Whats the difference between the yahoo group and this google groups? (01/22/05)
• Torsten
  • Callback from a DLL (01/09/05)
• Trent Buck
  • Re: whats the use of third argument to main( ) (01/11/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: variadic arithmetic, boolean operators (01/01/05)
  • Re: Coding standards (01/01/05)
  • variadic arithmetic, boolean operators (01/01/05)
• TTroy
  • Re: integral promotion, arithmetic conversion, value preserving, unsigned preserving??? (01/30/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
  • integral promotion, arithmetic conversion, value preserving, unsigned preserving??? (01/28/05)
• Turner, GS \(Geoff\)
  • RE: its giving the different address !!!!!!!!!! (01/24/05)
• tyler_durden
  • Re: email program in c - help me solve one error,please... (01/02/05)
  • email program in c - help me solve one error,please... (01/02/05)
  • Re: What I have until now (01/02/05)
• uekstrom_at_gmail.com
  • Re: position and number of 1's in an integer (01/20/05)
• Ulrich Achleitner
  • Re: Linked list (01/04/05)
• Ulrich Eckhardt
  • Re: What does this code mean??? (01/30/05)
  • Re: Building gnu cross-compiler targeted for sparc (01/11/05)
  • Re: Use of the Volatile keyword for a pointer to a volatile memory block (01/11/05)
  • Re: Use of the Volatile keyword for a pointer to a volatile memory block (01/10/05)
• unknown
  • Re: coloring a pixel (01/17/05)
  • Re: coloring a pixel (01/17/05)
  • coloring a pixel (01/17/05)
• user
  • What does this do? (01/12/05)
• vadud3
  • Re: Newbie question (01/02/05)
  • Newbie question (01/02/05)
• Vajira
  • Re: Is there anyway to iterate STL queue ? (01/28/05)
  • Is there anyway to iterate STL queue ? (01/28/05)
• Victor Bazarov
  • Re: What does this do? (01/12/05)
• Victor Nazarov
  • Re: Coding standards (01/03/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/01/05)
• Vig
  • Re: c program (01/18/05)
  • Re: Need for programming (01/18/05)
  • Linker error creating dll (01/14/05)
• Vijay
  • reading a unformatted file (01/28/05)
  • reading a unformatted file (01/27/05)
  • Re: Good IDE for C/C++ (01/20/05)
• Villy Kruse
  • Re: utf-8 to ascii (01/27/05)
  • Re: int func() v/s int func(void) (01/24/05)
  • Re: int func() v/s int func(void) (01/21/05)
  • Re: Portable alloca() replacement? (01/19/05)
  • Re: /dev/urandom vs. /dev/random (01/13/05)
  • Re: Underscore (01/05/05)
  • Re: const function() !!?? (01/05/05)
• Vimal Aravindashan
  • Re: use of do{...}while(0) (01/27/05)
• vin pane
  • feasibilty of the memset operation on the FILE streams (01/28/05)
  • feasibility of stdin stream to feel up directly. (01/27/05)
• Vinko Vrsalovic
  • Re: Abstraction layer between C and CPU (01/21/05)
  • Re: int func() v/s int func(void) (01/21/05)
  • int func() v/s int func(void) (01/21/05)
• vir
  • Re: Recommended style (01/05/05)
  • Re: Recommended style (01/02/05)
• vjay
  • Re: How Free() works? (01/09/05)
  • How Free() works? (01/05/05)
• vsk
  • Re: Comparing two numbers | What about this solution ?. (01/18/05)
  • How to read all files present in a directory in C ? (01/18/05)
• W. Wat son
  • Re: Return to Start of Line? (01/30/05)
  • Return to Start of Line? (01/29/05)
• Wayne Farmer
  • Re: Beginning ANSI - Standard C (01/07/05)
• websnarf_at_gmail.com
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/22/05)
• William Gabler
  • Re: formula used in calculating diffrence between dates (01/05/05)
• William R.
  • Re: Algorithms IN C (01/07/05)
  • Algorithms IN C (01/07/05)
• William Xuuu
  • Re: why define size_t ssize_t ? (01/23/05)
  • Re: when to use strncpy() ? (01/18/05)
  • why define size_t ssize_t ? (01/17/05)
  • when to use strncpy() ? (01/17/05)
• wintaki
  • what does [ ] mean with an integer? (01/21/05)
• Wojtek Lerch
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/30/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/29/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/29/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
• Wong
  • Beginner's question (01/11/05)
• x-pander
  • Re: pointer to array of const objects (01/27/05)
  • Re: pointer to array of const objects (01/26/05)
  • Re: pointer to array of const objects (01/26/05)
  • Re: Problem with integers (01/26/05)
  • pointer to array of const objects (01/26/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Re: Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
  • Where do pointers point to? (01/12/05)
• Xah Lee
  • what's OOP's jargons and complexities? (01/29/05)
  • Re: how to write a tutorial (01/26/05)
  • Re: how to write a tutorial (01/23/05)
  • how to write a tutorial (01/21/05)
  • Re: perl-python a-day (01/19/05)
  • Re: perl-python a-day (01/11/05)
• xarax
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/31/05)
  • Re: Why the Range of Int is less by one at positive side?......... (01/29/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/29/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
  • Re: Bit-fields and integral promotion (01/28/05)
  • Re: a[i] = x[a[i]]++ (01/21/05)
  • Re: SAS/C INTEROPERABLE WITH IBM C/C++ (01/21/05)
  • Re: array riddle in c (01/20/05)
  • Re: Need for programming (01/19/05)
  • Re: Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/18/05)
  • Re: Why no/limited checking on enum values ? (01/17/05)
  • Re: initializer element is not constant (01/17/05)
  • Re: Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB ofInt, etc (01/13/05)
  • Re: [corr] Implemenation Indepdent Way to Move LSByte of Char to MSB of Int, etc (01/12/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/05/05)
  • Re: Coding [style] standards (01/05/05)
  • Re: which loop is faster (01/03/05)
• Xenos
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/12/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/12/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: Factoring Nested Loops (01/10/05)
• xpyttl
  • Re: software types and programming languages (01/07/05)
  • Re: software types and programming languages (01/04/05)
• xuanbai98_at_gmail.com
  • c99 on Microsoft Visual Studio (01/19/05)
• Yan
  • Re: re-entrant function???????? (01/11/05)
  • Re: Preprocessor define concatenation (01/08/05)
  • Re: I want to write a Bit Torrent client in C (01/02/05)
  • Re: Structs and Alignment (01/01/05)
• Yaniv Oliver
  • Re: Finding the time taken by a function (01/24/05)
  • Re: Finding the time taken by a function (01/24/05)
• Yousuf Khan
  • Re: About 64-bit portability (01/03/05)
• Zilla
  • Re: size of a byte and int? (01/27/05)
  • Re: use of do{...}while(0) (01/27/05)

Last message date: 01/31/05
Archived on: 01/31/05 CET

---

3593 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]