Re: Is "scope" different from "visibility" ?
From: Peter (phaywood_at_alphalink.com.au.NO.SPAM)
Date: 02/12/05
- Next message: Luke Wu: "Re: What is a sequence point?"
- Previous message: evolnet.regular_at_gmail.com: "Re: Why C Is Not My Favourite Programming Language"
- In reply to: Jack Klein: "Re: Is "scope" different from "visibility" ?"
- Next in thread: Dave Thompson: "Re: Is "scope" different from "visibility" ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:04:17 GMT
Groovy hepcat Jack Klein was jivin' on Wed, 09 Feb 2005 23:07:43 -0600
in comp.lang.c.
Re: Is "scope" different from "visibility" ?'s a cool scene! Dig it!
>On 9 Feb 2005 20:04:04 -0800, "TTroy" <tinesan@gmail.com> wrote in
>comp.lang.c:
>
>Scope is independent of linkage. Definitions or declarations inside a
>block have scope that lasts to the end of that block, but block scope
>declarations have no linkage. A file scope definition with the static
>keyword also has no linkage.
Uh..., internal linkage, I think, Jack.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
6.2.2 Linkages of identifiers
...
3 If the declaration of a file scope identifier for an object or a
function contains the storageclass specifier static, the identifier
has internal linkage.20)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Dig the even newer still, yet more improved, sig! http://alphalink.com.au/~phaywood/ "Ain't I'm a dog?" - Ronny Self, Ain't I'm a Dog, written by G. Sherry & W. Walker. I know it's not "technically correct" English; but since when was rock & roll "technically correct"?
- Next message: Luke Wu: "Re: What is a sequence point?"
- Previous message: evolnet.regular_at_gmail.com: "Re: Why C Is Not My Favourite Programming Language"
- In reply to: Jack Klein: "Re: Is "scope" different from "visibility" ?"
- Next in thread: Dave Thompson: "Re: Is "scope" different from "visibility" ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|